全 117 件のコメント

[–]cyph3rpunk 50ポイント51ポイント  (3子コメント)

Yea... Tards and paid shills all day here

[–]Viking1488 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

The paid (Israeli) shills increase their activity when bad news about Israel surfaces. This week more surfaced about their involvement in shooting down the MH17:

http://www.rt.com/news/310039-mh17-israeli-missile-version/

[–]cyph3rpunk 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's like clockwork

[–]InkMercenary 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I almost read that as "tardis" that would explain why they came out of nowhere.

[–]ChangeThroughTruth 21ポイント22ポイント  (69子コメント)

Yes, this place is heavily manipulated as is to be expected. Any place that has a large enough user base will be a target of programs like JTRIG. Research the methods of programs like JTRIG so you can understand their techniques. Use this as a place to get ideas to research yourself, but don't put too much weight into comments and voting. Always view by /new. Observe the topics in the /new queue that are hammered with downvotes quickly. Those are probably topics worth looking in to.

Identify for yourself the commenting users who participate in this behavior. FortHouston is a pretty obvious example, as is BillionaireBob.

Navigating through this mess is a lot of work, but it is probably worth it.

[–]polkadotgirl 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

FortHouston and BillionaireBob suck.

[–]YoStephen [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How do we know that they aren't correct and that you're not a shill.

[–]Don117 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I second this observation. They have both exceeded their maximum allotment of douchiness.

[–]iamagod_____ 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

E're day. Call them out and move on. Don't waste your time with worthless, low IQ disruptors.

[–]know_comment 0ポイント1ポイント  (52子コメント)

Aren't you one of the guys that is always posting about how the earth is flat?

[–]Lose__Not__Loose[S] 14ポイント15ポイント  (33子コメント)

Even if he's a flat earther, which I disagree with along with many of the views in this sub, it's something that should be discussed, not just downvoted and called crazy. If you disagree, then disagree. Insults are not productive and the downvote button isn't a disagree button.

[–]know_comment 3ポイント4ポイント  (7子コメント)

not every theory is worthy of discussion. i'm not saying it should be censored, but i do think it detracts from the sub.

He's claiming that shills are downvoting "important topics", while he spends his time here talking about a theory that was literally invented by satirists as a method of mocking "science deniers".

[–]Findout246 2ポイント3ポイント  (6子コメント)

Labelling a theory "not worthy of a discussion" is called pre-censorship. Same reason why 9/11 is a taboo subject in the MSM.

Free-thinking means ANYTHING is on the table, no matter how silly it may seem.

[–]know_comment [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Ok, I think the moon is made of cheese. Anyone who downvotes me is a shill.

We have to be discerning. remember when you were in kindergarden and your teacher told you there was no such thing as a stupid question? Your teacher was wrong. Don't waste the class's time with stupid questions.

[–]Findout246 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

And who decides what is/isn't a stupid question? Is this something that is universally understood on all levels (not just moon cheese)?

[–]know_comment [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

People are responsible for their own logic. Flat earthers are going to get downvoted by community members who think their "theory" detracts from the sub content. That doesn't make me a "shill", that means that I don't think their posts contribute any value.

[–]d4rthdonut [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Haha, wrong. Somethings are so mind blowingly stupid that they are not worthy of discussion. Flat earth falls firmly in that camp, it's been proven wrong for the past 500 years and you can see the curvature from the tops of mountians or on the ocean. You literally have to be living underground to miss the proof. Which probably isn't too far of a stretch, parents basement = underground.

[–]Findout246 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Wrong/right is not the point. It's about being open and discussing anything despite how silly it sounds to you (subjective).

Even Plato, Copernicus, etc. were met with extreme opposition in their time by people like you. Yet today, you accept their findings as fact.

[–]d4rthdonut [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Haha, and they proved that the earth was round and that the earth orbited the sun with mathematics and observation, they provided the proof required to overturn the established theory. Flat earthers have shit tons of math (every part of physics works because the world is round) and observable phenomenon to debunk before they can even begin to discuss whether the earth is round or flat. But we get no proof, just a bunch of conjecture and misunderstandings, The people pushing this theory today are not a copernacus or plato. To be considered a thinker like those men, they have to provide evidence, instead, just spew unbacked or easily debunked claims and want everyone to trust them. I'm sorry, I can fly around the world, thus the world is round that alone debunks the entire hypothesis. It takes a serious lack of understanding of the pysical world to even consider such a stupid hypothesis.

[–]Independentthought0 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Did you notice the immediately start talking about the most way out thing on the sub. It's what they do along with the Bozos who claim we don't post proof when we do the just reject it but offer no proof on their side. You're post is apparently the mating call of the North American Shill, they're out this time of season.

[–]magic3383 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I personally enjoy watching flat earth videos. I enjoy any conspiracy that is instantly dismissed, but also has passionate believers who are at least attempting to put their evidence forward.

[–]vezokpiraka 2ポイント3ポイント  (17子コメント)

Look. There are some things you can have a sensible discussion about and there are things that make no sense.

Believing the Earth is flat just shows how ignorant you can become.

There is one thing to say the Moon Landing never happened and quite another to say that the Moon doesn't exist.

[–]ChangeThroughTruth 0ポイント1ポイント  (16子コメント)

I understand where you are coming from. The scope of the lie required for the official version of the earth to be untrue is so huge. It is too far off of your world view to be even valid for consideration.

But, do you hold any current opinions that in the past you would have dismissed without investigation? A couple of years ago I would have had the same reaction to many, many topics, not just the shape of the earth. Psychology is a strange thing.

[–]sci-op 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

the people who claim they 'question everything' including the earth being round and the existence of nukes and so on always fail to question their own intelligence and maturity.

some things are just absolutely pointless to question. like if water is truly wet, or if ice is really cold. the lies are everywhere! dun dun dun! given all the other silly 'skepticism' for other topics i'm surprised IF these haven't been brought to the table of 'serious discussion' by 'well meaning' free thinkers. In the end, all it does is make people who question events of significance get lumped in the same camp according to the rest of the public.

[–]ChangeThroughTruth -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Who gets to decide what topics are valid for consideration? What is the appropriate methodology for making these decisions? To allow this to be dictated by some authority or punishment by the herd is problematic.

[–]sci-op [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

people get to decide. it's common sense. the methodology is logical reasoning, which people who want to stick to flat earth this and no nukes that never bother to use, indistinguishable from troll behavior.

You're actually going to argue it's worth discussing whether water is wet? it is only problematic for people who want to split such hairs and pick flyshit out of pepper over such trivial bullshit that has been settled for hundreds of years. when it comes to major events that don't add up and a lot of sweeping policy changes, that's when it matters. duh.

[–]ChangeThroughTruth [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You're actually going to argue it's worth discussing whether water is wet?

The wetness of water or thinking proves the thinker are completely different types of topics.

For the shape of the earth I am talking about physical, measurable properties. It's not a philosophical debate.

[–]vezokpiraka 2ポイント3ポイント  (11子コメント)

I have flown around in planes. I've seen the Earth from up above. There is 0% chance that the Earth is flat. I've also been at sea where you see the horizon. I've changed my mind about stuff, but some things are just true because they are true.

For example, water boils at 100 degrees Celsius. There is absolutely nothing that will change my mind on this. (I know physics and I know boiling point depends on a lot of factors. I'm using this as an example. )

[–]Findout246 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Constants in science are only absolute until they are disproven, which history shows happens often. Just saying..

[–]vezokpiraka [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.

[–]Findout246 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Think about history. We use to believe the Earth was flat. That was 100% fact at the time. It was an absolute constant. Then Aristotle and the like came along and said nah it's actually round. They were at the time met with extreme ridicule from people just like you; who said things like, "this is dangerous thinking, blah blah" and as such the truth was suppressed for hundreds of years.

Who's to say we got it right now?

[–]vezokpiraka [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This never happened. Nobody believed the Earth was flat. Check your sources better.

Also how does flat Earth explain the Coriolis effect? Also how do they explain that if you look at a Sunrise over the sea while being on a hill and then running down that the hill and you see the Sunrise again?

[–]ChangeThroughTruth -4ポイント-3ポイント  (5子コメント)

I have flown around in planes. I've seen the Earth from up above. There is 0% chance that the Earth is flat. I've also been at sea where you see the horizon.

Yes, I have done these things too. There are some observations you should make the next time you are in a plane or have the opportunity to see a ship sail away from you.

but some things are just true because they are true

There is an enormous amount of evidence to consider on this topic. By saying something is true because it is true you deny yourself the opportunity to think through it yourself.

Think of it as an exercise in logic and reasoning. You don't have to go into it looking to have your mind changed. Many thinking people go into the topic looking to debunk it, but end up realizing there is something to it.

This is an intro written by another user if you are interested:

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3cowhi/intro_to_flat_earth_a_basic_primer_v20/

A caution on this topic, there is a huge amount of disinfo on it. The Flat Earth Society is clearly freemason run controlled opposition. They exist to dead end people on the topic and forget about it by making silly arguments such as the earth is rising at 9.8 m/s2 in order to create the effect of gravity. Many debunk videos on the subject then refute these straw man arguments (ex https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNqNnUJVcVs). It is easy to win a debate when you get to attribute whatever statements you like to your opponent.

[–]vezokpiraka [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

This discussion is hopeless.

You can't have an opinion on anything if you don't have at least some things that are true because they are true.

Are you going to tell me now that "Cogito, ergo sum." is not actually true?

[–]ChangeThroughTruth [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Why should the shape of the earth be a base, unquestionable truth? Who gets to decide that? There is a wealth of evidence on this topic, why not look at that instead?

[–]vezokpiraka [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Because nobody gives a flying fuck if we live on a round Earth or a flat Earth. Everybody cares about living. I want to live in a world where my government tries to help me and not try to kill me.

[–]KikiCVIII 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

No, there is no reason to waste our time talking about how the Earth is flat. That is not a theory that is a mental delusion.

[–]Lose__Not__Loose[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

If it's something that they believe, it's worth discussing to them. If it's not worth discussing to you, don't click the thread. There's plenty of things I find not worth discussing so I don't discuss them. Flat earth is probably one of them but I'm always curious to learn about new things, even if they don't make any sense.

[–]KikiCVIII 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm always curious to learn about new things, even if they don't make any sense

If it doesn't make sense then what new things are you learning?

[–]Findout246 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." -Aristotle

[–]ChangeThroughTruth 3ポイント4ポイント  (17子コメント)

I would call myself an earth shape agnostic. After having spent a good deal of time on the subject I can't say that I know of a complete working model. Both the official spinning globe model and the standard flat earth model have problems. But all it takes to make it an important topic of conversation is to show that the official version is incorrect. I would call this similar to 9/11 in that way. I don't absolutely know what occurred there, but I do know that the official version cannot be true so it is an important thing to discuss.

Feel free to check out my post history if you are interested in the things I've said.

[–]sci-op 1ポイント2ポイント  (10子コメント)

it is not at all similar to 9/11.

[–]ChangeThroughTruth -3ポイント-2ポイント  (9子コメント)

What I am trying to say is that it is not necessary to have a complete alternate explanation for 9/11 in order to make it an important topic of conversation. All you have to do is show that the official story cannot be correct.

Similarly for the shape of the earth it is not necessary to present a complete alternate model. All that is required is to show that the official spinning globe model has unresolvable contradictions.

[–]d4rthdonut 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

I just want a flat earther to provide an accurate explaination of the pysical world using math, physics does that based on the assumption that the world is round. Where is the flat earth rebuttle? If you cannot provide logical math related arguments that disprove physics or prove a new way of thinking about the physical world then what proof do you have?

[–]ChangeThroughTruth [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

As I have stated several times, I don't know of a full working model that I can endorse. But that is not required to make this a valid topic of conversation. All that is necessary is to show that the official spinning globe model cannot work. For example, showing that water does not curve. For a globe of circumference 25000 miles there should be drop from the tangent of 8 inches * distance in miles2, but this doesn't happen.

I encourage you to look into the topic for yourself, there is a huge amount of information there. But I don't have any vested interest in convincing you of anything.

[–]sci-op [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Water doesn't curve? wtf? it's liquid. It has currents that go all sorts of directions. Each drop of water is held onto the earth at it's location by gravity, which is at the center of the earth, so wherever the water is on the surface, it will fall towards the center, making it very easy for water to stay on the surface no matter where it is at on a sphere. Gravity is not below the earth. Learn some basic physics. Or is all of physics a conspiracy too?

"I encourage you to look into the topic for yourself, there is a huge amount of information there" again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YzeGRFDIms

[–]d4rthdonut [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

But water does curve... you just refuse to beleive that it does, watch a ship sailing away into the horizon. What is the last part that you can see? Oh right, the masts or highest point. The rest of the ship hasn't sunk, it has just dropped below our line of sight. That's how I can tell that the world is round. All this masturbating about an 8in drop is just disrupting you from seeing the world as it is, round...

[–]ChangeThroughTruth [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

But water does curve... you just refuse to beleive that it does

That really isn't the case. It's not about a 'belief'. People associate beliefs with their identity and so are resistant to changing them when presentated with evidence to the contrary. I try as much as possible to hold "opinions based on the evidence that I have seen" so that I am able to constantly reconsider what I "know".

I don't really want to get deep into this topic in this thread, it's rehashing things I have been through many times before, ie the ship going down over the horizon is one of the first things that gets discussed. If you are interested, look into the topic for yourself. I have no need to convince you of anything.

[–]d4rthdonut [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Wait, can you tell me what happens to the bottom of a ship once it disappears over the horizon? Seems pretty simple to me. If the world was flat, the bottom of the ship would have to sink, is that not what happens?

I really don't care if you answer the question, I just think it funny watching you dance around all the observable phenomenon that shows that the earth is round with no explainations. Heck, explain gravity, the coriolous effect, night and day cycles, or eclipses these are all things that have an explanation in the spherical world theory that can be used to successfully calculate when and where these phenomenon will occur. Can flat earth say the same? As others have pointed out, flat earth theory has been around for far longer than the spherical earth and yet, Noone can provide me with an explanation for how any of these thing happen in accordance with the planar earth.

[–]sci-op [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Falsifying the 9/11 official story is fine. because it's loaded with bullshit. Falsifying the globe theory is also fine, but it has never been falsified. The 'unresolvable contradictions' of which you speak of have already been explained, thousands of times over. Your misunderstandings and inability to understand the explanations is not the problem with the theory, that is your problem.

[–]ChangeThroughTruth [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I think we should just end the discussion at this point. You are clearly assuming that all contradictions must have been resolved because you know the earth is a globe. You don't even know what contradictions I am speaking of. This isn't the topic of the thread, so I don't really want to dive into it. If you are interested, you should look for yourself. Just know what it means if you dismiss without looking.

[–]sci-op [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I already have looked for myself. The flat earth theory doesn't rely upon anything besides complete misunderstandings and silly questions that have been debunked and answered over and over and over. Or do you have some secret stash of contradictions I have never seen before? You don't even know what i've looked at. But that's ok, you can save both of us time by bailing on the point you brought up.

[–]youfuckingslaves 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

This should help with conceptualizing the flat earth. This model works perfectly.

https://youtu.be/lPuedDwAeKc https://youtu.be/wqKTLzUKqDc https://youtu.be/d6BY15hwVzo

The earth is flat, I have spent an inordinate amount of the last 4 months on this and it is flat, I would bet my life on it.

Not to toot my own horn but I am not a moron that doesn't understand science etc. , I have been IQ tested and am borderline genius, and was in honors classes throughout my schooling.

[–]ahmrbond 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just starting to get into this one myself... I can't believe I'm entertaining the theory, but the more I try and argue it the harder it gets.

I do have a couple of questions about it though - certain things that stop me from entirely buying into it... Let me know if you have any thoughts...

One is the sun. I get how perspective will make it seem like it is "setting" as it rotates off into the distance, but it just seems like there would be some kind of residual glow from the sun after it has "set".

Then there is the matter of gravity. Because of centrifugal force (or centripetal force if you prefer), and also because of varying altitudes in various parts of the planet, the net effect of gravity on solid objects is not constant, so objects weigh different amounts on different parts of the globe. I know this is the theory, but it would not be hard to verify this with experiments, so I would imagine that someone has done so (I haven't found an experiment yet, but I need to look harder). If the results are as expected, this would kinda debunk the flat earth model... although the opposite is also true.

The other thing is that amateur astronomers have apparently taken pictures of satellites... a quick google search can confirm this. They could be lying. Or could there be another explanation?

[–]dehehn 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

People who boast about their I.Q. are losers.

Stephen Hawking

[–]sci-op 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

it works perfectly, sure, except for all of these basic problems: https://youtu.be/_YzeGRFDIms

if you'll bet your life on it then lets see you go find the edge of this flat earth and report back. no? oh that's right, didn't think so.

[–]ChangeThroughTruth 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks, I will check out those videos. I have spent a lot of time on it in the last few months as well.

I think it is important to distinguish between disproving the official spinning globe model and proving any other model complete. A single proof by contradiction can get rid of the globe, but proving another model completely correct means addressing contradictions raised with the new model.

For example, in the standard flat earth model, how do long summer days work in the Southern 'hemisphere'?

Not to toot my own horn but I am not a moron that doesn't understand science etc. , I have been IQ tested and am borderline genius, and was in honors classes throughout my schooling.

That part really wasn't necessary. I'm sure you know statements like that can't be verified and border on appeal to authority.

[–]FuckyouOPintheass 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd be interested in how you came to your conclusion. I haven't taken a full stance on any conspiracy yet presented to me, because both sides have way too much conflicting ideas. I do take a full stance on the fact conspiracies are being played against us all, at almost all times.

[–]IanPhlegming 21ポイント22ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's a sign of success; the more we are infiltrated, the more concerned they show themselves to be. As others have noted, always go to r/new, and look for the stuff being voted down fast. Recognized the trolls and shills by name.

They are afraid. They are cowards. The time of change may well be near. I suspect they will do all they can to get Reddit offline when it happens, whatever "it," is.

[–]ograskal 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Exactly I'd rather have shills then it being a ghost town here, I mean look at the subscribers this is a nice sized group of free thinkers

[–]ucanthandletheturth 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

once you learn to spot them they actually help to detect important topics or posts.

[–]Findout246 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's a positive sign only if we adapt and move on from this already infiltrated outlet. Otherwise the joke is on us.

[–]ucanthandletheturth 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

yes i often ask myself why i dont spent all day in /r/christianity calling them all whack job delusional crazys and encouraging them to seek help. also why i dont educate /r/cats on why dogs are so much better.

[–]Lose__Not__Loose[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Exactly. I have similar feelings on religion and cats but, oddly, I've never been to either sub.

As far as I can tell, even the people at /r/atheism don't troll the religious subs.

[–]burningempires 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good.

Hopefully, it indicates a growing awareness that Youtube videos are not "proof", and that non-mainstream sources are every bit as biased and inaccurate as mainstream ones.

The more we question EVERYTHING - and that includes the claims made here with little or no evidence - the closer we can get to the truth.

[–]madmaxsin 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

I think the mods are slipping. Some are modding this sub and conspiracy on voat. I am seeing alot of rule breaking not addressed.

[–]yellowsnow2 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Rule breaking needs to be reported to be addressed. I reported some rule breaking a couple weeks ago and the mods were quick to take action. You can't expect them to read every comment of every post. Use the report button.

[–]madmaxsin 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's good but they are not consistent. To be honest, I don't know how to judge rule 10, the rule is not clear. I rarely get anything back from mods after reporting so how do I know if it is or not.

[–]itsjeremyson 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Said it before.

  1. We have trolls.

  2. People post nonsense now.

  3. People are accused of being a shill if they don't agree with you.

  4. People don't do their own research.

This sub is not anything like it used to be. Which is why I frequent less and less.

[–]phidel_kashflow 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm also confused and intrigued on a weekly basis by this sub. These are muddy waters. On one hand, people here "believe" A LOT OF SHIT on the word of "experts" outside the "mainstream" they blast. On the other hand, "proof" is needed for them to make a perceived leap to believing that extraterrestrials exist AT ALL because of things like Project Blue Beam.

There are a lot of closed minds in this sub wearing the masks of critical thinkers, rationalizing their own disbelief as skepticism. Don't hate them for it. Disinfo campaigns are successful nearly all the time.

[–]Peanutbuttabrew 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Most are moving on. Start in that direction too.

[–]Bovolt 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's a discussion forum, not an echo chamber. Not everybody supports every conspiracy.

For example, the only conspiracies that I believe/am interested in are cryptids and cryptid coverups. Of course nobody talks about that here. We have jews, police brutality, 9/11, and occasional circlejerking. None of which I care to discuss or believe all that much. (Well, police brutality I guess, but that's hardly a conspiracy.)

[–]Yserbius [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Oh cryptids. I used to be a big fan of cryptids. The more I read though, the more disheartened I get. It doesn't help that all the mainstream TV "documentaries" that seem to have the best evidence and experts are 99% fictional.

[–]Bovolt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah, the Learning Channel and Discovery Channel really ruined the scene. It's a shame.

90% of crypids have about a 0% chance of actually existing, but it's still fun to discuss. That other 10% is what keeps me geniunely interested in it all. There's plenty of mysteries left in the world.

[–]Lose__Not__Loose[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Then why do you come here?

I don't like or agree with Islam so I avoid the sub.

[–]Bovolt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

For the off chance that a cryptid thread might show up. Plus I'll hop into a discussion once in awhile anyways.

Also there's always tons of arguing in here and it's fun to read.

[–]peterson2004 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's a cockroach hotel. Just standard mind manipulation stuff.

[–]Brendancs0 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Conspirtard secret is that they love us so they spend all their time here to make us think other wise

[–]tamrix 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's the real conspiracy.

[–]yellowsnow2 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've been here at least 3 years. This is not bad. It has been way worse. We will always have some shills and trolls.

[–]ucanthandletheturth 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

mods needs a bigger ban hammer, or start dual-wielding.

[–]eunderscore 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I dunno, but I bet it's something fishy!

[–]Findout246 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think we need to all do our part and spread the love. If there's a comment you read that you like or strongly agree with, upvote it. Don't just click through someone's hard work and forget to give it credit. Your upvote helps the information spread to other people.

Same goes for downvoting, but I think we are all pro at that lol.

[–]Expectationslowered [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I know what you mean. Instead of having discussion with others i find myself arguing with trolls :-[ anit seems like they are getting worse and worse everytime. All the interesting posts that should be on top are being downvoted by people who don't even want anything ro do with this subreddit in the first place.

[–]yeetskeet88 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's not going to be too long before us legit users are going to have to find a new place to spread the truth. That being said, never give up.

[–]an_outstanding_user [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You are all crazy, go get help! /s

Seriously, shills follow some kind of manual, you can detect them by the tactics. This is maybe the most clear one, so call out and don't feed them

[–]TheCocaineFairy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Whenever its nightime in Tel Aviv it feels like there are less shills on the prowl.

[–]Dysnomi [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Reddit administrators sent a bunch of shitlords here. We capped 300k subscriptions only recently and we've gained 20k since then.

[–]TheCocaineFairy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

r/conspiracy comrads, its time time we go on the offense. Full on Blitzkreig against shills, no holds barred!

[–]YoStephen [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This subreddit is plagued by the inexperience of its user base. While certain people are willing to carry out due dilligence to facts, it seems many of the vocal participants (dare i say the majority) approach the serious topics in the sub from a limited world view and lack of perspective that is probably creditable to the fact the so much of reddit is 20 something year old white men to begin with and the subject matter of the community tends to draw that type.

I, being the uncle Tom I am, am not unwilling to say that I am a member of the 20-something white man group and have experienced the realization that I don't have all the answers first hand. That said, I am still unwilling to accept that the official story is always true. However, I am also not willing to accept the concept that everything is lies and the product of collusion.

The reason I bring this up, is that when people on the sub react critically of a post it does not necessarily indicate that the rebuke is being made by someone from /r/conspiratard. It could well be that one of the 300000 free thinkers thinks your theory is crap. If you're noticing a lot of criticism in the comments, maybe it has something to do with a post being crap. Maybe everything doesn't have to be a conspiracy by those that would persecute us.

tl;dr: A lot of newfags in this bitch making shit posts and getting called out for it by oldfags.

[–]IDF_WEB_PATROL [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Gimme a break guys. I'm just trying make a few shekels here.

[–]videinfra666 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

A conversation here on an controversial matter is worse than anything politics-wise on 9gag. Pure bullshit

[–]Yserbius -3ポイント-2ポイント  (3子コメント)

I find just the opposite. There is a mainline viewpoint on /r/conspiracy and on major threads if you go against it you will be very heavily downvoted. Even simply innocuous statements that would generally be ignored or upvoted on the major subs. Examples of things that will be downvoted include (but are in no way limited to) the following:

  • The cause of the Twin Towers falling was because two hijacked jet airlines flew into them
  • Adam Lanza was a mentally disturbed individual who murdered 26 people in Sandy Hook Elementary School
  • If there are paid shills on this sub, they are highly ineffective
  • Around 11 million people were purposely murdered by the Nazis during WWII in an event known as the Holocaust. 6 million of them were Jews.
  • ISIS is a loosely connected series of individual groups that came out of hard-liner civilians who opposed various Mid-East regimes and have little to no outside support other than what they take or get as ransom
  • Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his brother Tamerlyn set off bombs in Boston that killed three people and injured many more. Their purpose was classic terrorism: to terrify a civilian population.
  • /r/worldnews is heavily moderated and many things on many different topics get deleted from there on a daily basis. There's no inherent political bias to what stays and what goes.

And on and on and on.

EDIT: I believe I've just confirmed my own point. Here is a comment listing the things that get downvoted here, getting downvoted. As usual, instead of people discussing the points they simply downvote. If they do comment, they latch on to one specific thing and simply call it "wrong" as if no discussion is necessary, it's a simple solved matter.

[–]Thothx3 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

/r/worldnews is heavily moderated and many things on many different topics get deleted from there on a daily basis. There's no inherent political bias to what stays and what goes.

COMPLETE BULLSHIT ALERT ....

/r/worldnews is one of the most rabidly pro-Israel subs on reddit.com. The moderators in that sub will delete any/all posts critical of Israel/Zionism/Jews without exception. If your comment manages to survive moderators deleting it, then it is instantly downvoted into -40+ within minutes.

It should be noted that /u/Yserbuis is also a moderator of /r/Israel

[–]Yserbius 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

These are the top posts on /r/worldnews from the past seven days. Out of the top ten, only three can be seen as "pro-Israel" while several are very anti-Israel. Perhaps you can explain to me how this fits with your narrative. Preferably soon, as I see your accounts a month old which is near your personal expiration date.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

While not required, you are requested to use the NP domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by prefacing your reddit link with np.reddit.com.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]DiarrheaMonkey- 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have never said anything like "get help". I've been a commenter here for years, but when people post shit about pyramid magic and reptilian shapeshifters, I tend to (when I bother and have an hour to waste) point out why that stuff is factually disprovable.

A lot of that crap comes from people trying to make us look like nutcases. Did you notice there was a recent and kind of brief uptick in posts by "flat earthers" and just as quick it's gone? Don't get me started on the racists who are actually just honestly stupid bigots, trying find new recruits.

I've been here a looong time (don't believe me? take the - off the end of my username; I didn't say I remembered my original password). This sub has gone from Ron Paul dislikes the Fed", "Here's something interesting about a Secret Society", etc. to "Israel did something shitty!", "Here's some easily disprovable bullshit about ancient civilization alien pyramid blah blah."

There are disinfo agents. Most likely in this sub, trying to make us look like idiots. But remember, there are a lot more actual idiots, some taken in by their lies.

[–]beatlejuicex [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Those conspiritards are needed to be put in concentration camps then all gassed in giant chamber n buried in mass graves

[–]VancouverSucks [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

That would be the first instance in history of gas chambers being used...

[–]beatlejuicex [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

No california using em to get rid of poor unwanted people