use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
14,315 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Official announcements from the reddit admins.
See also:
Let's talk content. AMA. (self.announcements)
spez[A] が 4時間 前 * 投稿x5
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]OlympicHockey 138ポイント139ポイント140ポイント 4時間 前 (31子コメント)
I don't agree with anything you said, however, if I set aside my disagreement and play by the type of rules you're advocating for I demand that a subreddit you're a moderator of be removed as it offends me. r/BestofOutrageCulture is subreddit that links to and provides a forum where individuals post a users comments and proceed to harass, make fun of and completely dismiss what that person has to say. Furthermore, most of the user quotes submitted overlap on various topics. You're a moderator of a sub dedicated to pointing out and bullying users into silence as any user can be pushed into silence for fear of being mocked and harrassed on a subreddit you moderate.
Merely creating a subreddit dedicated to making fun of users with "wrong" POVs definitely contributes to what spez is saying is directly against the rules.
Anything that harasses, bullies, or abuses an individual or group of people (these behaviors intimidate others into silence)
You're effectively using a (subreddit) watch list as a threat to users that you don't agree with. Users have and will continue to be publicly shamed and humiliated in an echo chamber.
There are dozens of these type of subreddits including r/shitredditsays and r/subredditdrama. Under your and Spez rules these subreddits should be banned without a second thought. Silencing/Publicly shaming users is a cut and dry rule and it's constantly violated.
It's clear to me that you want to stifle conversation and bully those that you disagree as you're an active participant in doing so. You want your bully pulpit protected because you believe you're doing the right thing and all other views or opinions need to be silenced.
[–]endingonagoodnote 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 48分 前 (0子コメント)
Best post in this whole thread.
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-80ポイント-79ポイント-78ポイント 3時間 前 (28子コメント)
Those subreddits don't target a marginalized group of people, or directly harass individuals.
[–]OlympicHockey 43ポイント44ポイント45ポイント 3時間 前 (6子コメント)
Creating a list of comments for people to flock to and mock, ridicule and deride is unquestionably bullying and harassment. There is no stipulation of such as "harassment/bullying is welcome in subreddits a user may not find." It is a clear cut anti bullying and anti harassment policy that is violated by a large portion of the very same people that want to remove subreddits wherein people bully them. It's the same fucking thing.
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-28ポイント-27ポイント-26ポイント 3時間 前 (5子コメント)
Creating conversations about comments and bullying are two totally different things
[–]OlympicHockey 31ポイント32ポイント33ポイント 3時間 前 (4子コメント)
The time and place to discuss the comment has always been in the comment chain. That's why a reply system is put in place.
Pulling someones comment to specifically show like minded individuals so that you can collectively point at and deride is bullying. The consequence of which are that person must now fear their comments will be catalogued and held up for mockery, derision and and harassment by whichever group doesn't like what was said. This silences the user for fear of anyone being offended and taking that users comments to people that will knowingly bully this person for their idea. There is no other reason for these subreddits to exist. It is specifically to harass individuals and their viewpoints.
[+]GeneralSedgwick スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14ポイント-13ポイント-12ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
it's almost like you can see u/OlympicHockey's face start to flush in these last few comments. The grammer and logic start to fade, but lo and behold, the upvoats bear his point out, for better or worse.
[–]sock2828 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 11分 前 (0子コメント)
Dear god you're a condescending ass who can't think of anything to refute a very solid argument.
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-33ポイント-32ポイント-31ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
The reason I subscribe to those subs is to see the racist, misogynist, dark underbelly of reddit and talk about it with people who agree with me (aka go outside sometimes).
[–]OlympicHockey 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
aka go outside sometimes
Yup, I'm done with you. You can't discuss the topic at hand without resulting to attempted insults that were made famous by 10 year olds in 2003. They're just as effective and grounded in your delusional reality as they were a decade ago.
[–]model_railroad_alt 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 2時間 前 (2子コメント)
Those subreddits don't target a marginalized group of people,
I think that this sort of reasoning is ridiculous. Sure, I get that under your particular political views, going after white men is different than going after black women, and hell, I tend to agree, but I don't think that reddit should be incorporating particular leftwing political views into its policy if it wants to continue being a place where ideas can be debated openly.
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
Racism and sexism aren't right-wing views. Coontown is not right-wing, and neither is rapingwomen. There are so many places on reddit that are full of absolute shit that does not create meaningful discussion, but only gives a safe haven to the worst people in the world.
[–]sock2828 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 9分 前 (0子コメント)
That's not what people are talking about. They're talking about things like r/shitredditsays and /r/subreddit drama.
They don't just target racists and the like.
[–]SoupTyrant 76ポイント77ポイント78ポイント 3時間 前 (8子コメント)
Those subreddits don't target a marginalized group of people
So it's ok because the groups they target totally deserve it? That's the same justification used by every hate group.
[–]bannedAgainHuh 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
Yup, standard SJW behavior and belief. If you're not the speshulist of snowflakes from your 8-way trans-otherkin intersectionality you deserve to be silenced and abused.
[+]Noven-sides スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
Are you just using Anti-Tumblr buzzwords? The "i'm literally a fox" crowd are different to your SJW buddies.
[–]sock2828 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 11分 前 (0子コメント)
You're part of the problem.
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-46ポイント-45ポイント-44ポイント 3時間 前 (4子コメント)
Well, yeah, the comments linked are always 100% Reddit-verified racist/misogynist
[–]SoupTyrant 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント 3時間 前 (3子コメント)
the comments linked are always 100% Reddit-verified racist/misogynist
And then the SRS comments are also full of racism/misandry, so how does that make them better than the people they mock? They're just the other side of the same coin.
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-29ポイント-28ポイント-27ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
No they're not, that's just straight up not true.
[–]poptart2nd 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 22分 前 (0子コメント)
Anyone who supports MRAs is a misogynist
~~~~
"Especially considering that most MRA's are racists as well." (bonus racism in the parent comment)
Rules are different for white people
that's just in a cursory browsing of a few posts.
[–]SoupTyrant 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
that's just straight up not true.
Why?
[–]Razzal 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
I mean look at what they are wearing, they totally deserved it. A white male in a polo, harass them all you want. Love me some of this equality.
[–]IsSendEmailsWasYes 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Would you say he was...asking for it?
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-26ポイント-25ポイント-24ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
What are you talking about?
[–]OlympicHockey 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 3時間 前 (4子コメント)
Indirect harassment is totally cool guys.
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-23ポイント-22ポイント-21ポイント 3時間 前 (3子コメント)
Talking about something someone said is harassment?
[–]OlympicHockey 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
That's what a comment chain is for. Purposefully grouping comments in a subreddit to mock, ridicule and point a giant finger at are different.
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21ポイント-20ポイント-19ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
No, this is different. SRD, SRS, and similar communities like to show their users comments/threads that are particularly disparaging. Most of the users won't interact with those threads, but instead come back and talk about them in SRD/SRS.
[–]OlympicHockey 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
Again, you can bully and harass someone even if it's not directly to their face. It would be no different than constantly posting quotes of someone in a public setting knowing that they may or may not see it. Users can usually find it when the linked from other areas of Reddit in subreddits that use this bot. The bot is literally leading users to a subreddit that harasses them.
[–]sock2828 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7分 前 (0子コメント)
"Those subreddits don't target a marginalized group of people"
So?
[+]torsocannon スコアが基準値未満のコメント-83ポイント-82ポイント-81ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
Well you clearly know a thing or two about bullying. Just go to voat already.
π Rendered by PID 29348 on app-115 at 2015-07-17 00:37:17.212179+00:00 running 66eaa1a country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]OlympicHockey 138ポイント139ポイント140ポイント (31子コメント)
[–]endingonagoodnote 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-80ポイント-79ポイント-78ポイント (28子コメント)
[–]OlympicHockey 43ポイント44ポイント45ポイント (6子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-28ポイント-27ポイント-26ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]OlympicHockey 31ポイント32ポイント33ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]GeneralSedgwick スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14ポイント-13ポイント-12ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sock2828 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-33ポイント-32ポイント-31ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]OlympicHockey 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]model_railroad_alt 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sock2828 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SoupTyrant 76ポイント77ポイント78ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]bannedAgainHuh 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]Noven-sides スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sock2828 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-46ポイント-45ポイント-44ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]SoupTyrant 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント (3子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-29ポイント-28ポイント-27ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]poptart2nd 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SoupTyrant 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Razzal 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]IsSendEmailsWasYes 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-26ポイント-25ポイント-24ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]OlympicHockey 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-23ポイント-22ポイント-21ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]OlympicHockey 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]tankguy33 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21ポイント-20ポイント-19ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]OlympicHockey 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sock2828 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]torsocannon スコアが基準値未満のコメント-83ポイント-82ポイント-81ポイント (0子コメント)