あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]IanPhlegming 6ポイント7ポイント  (5子コメント)

Your passion is evident, but you need to dig deeper. When you write "I'm not sure who committed the attacks," it makes me think: What are you doing here then? Don't you want to find out? It is the SINGLE MORE IMPORTANT SUBJECT TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE COUNTRY.

If 9/11 was an inside job -- and it sure looks like a rogue element of the government was behind it, yes, in tandem with other countries -- it means we are under occupation, the corporate media is complicit, and we need to question EVERY other story that comes down the river. How do you not see that? How can you not want the answer to that?

It's hard, coming to the realization of how dark our timeline has actually become. But we will be unlikely to change it if we do not.

[–]Boines[S] -4ポイント-3ポイント  (4子コメント)

Your passion is evident, but you need to dig deeper. When you write "I'm not sure who committed the attacks," it makes me think: What are you doing here then? Don't you want to find out? It is the SINGLE MORE IMPORTANT SUBJECT TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE COUNTRY.

Not "the" country. not my country. Dont assume the world is USA. I would like to find out, i doubt that even if that information was made public that it would have massive implications. Things will keep on keeping on. The world wont riot.

the reason i say im not sure who committed the attacks is because the only people who currently are sure are the ones who planned and committed them. Until i see substantial evidence one way or the other i will not be sure.

If 9/11 was an inside job -- and it sure looks like a rogue element of the government was behind it, yes, in tandem with other countries -- it means we are under occupation, the corporate media is complicit, and we need to question EVERY other story that comes down the river. How do you not see that? How can you not want the answer to that?

It does not mean the media is complicit. It does not necessarily mean that we are under occupation. Those are massive assumptions with zero evidence, the exact thing i made this post about. Who is to say that the media is not as blind as us, and just pushing whatever sells? If were going to go with baseless speculation that seems a lot more probable then every single western media outlet being owned/bought out. Occupation? How are you defining occupation? Is the usa under occupation by lobbygroups, individual protestors, or anyone who seeks to push the direction of the country along? Isn't that an essential part of democracy that all have the potential to influence the countries outcome? Why is a group attempting to influence your countries path mean your country is "occupied"?

The questioning story thingshould apply regardess of whether or not it is corporate media. I question the ATM when it dispenses the bills.

It's hard, coming to the realization of how dark our timeline has actually become. But we will be unlikely to change it if we do not.

And being fully disconnected from reality will not help anything. If we want to make a change we NEED evidence. Not speculation.

We should be striving to uncover conspiracies. Not write fantasy conspiracy theories, then pat eachother on the back and tell eachother how right we all must be because the fiction that we have created conforms to our world view.

[–]IanPhlegming 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Man, so much excellent digging has been done on 9/11, it's clear you just really haven't been doing much digging yourself.

Have you seen "Anatomy of a Great Deception"? "9/11: A New Pearl Harbor"? Really, check out those two films and get back to me.

[–]Boines[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Send me some sources that arent movies.

[–]Ambiguously_Ironic 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

You sound like you aren't really interested in investigating at all, you'd rather dismiss the subject out of hand. If you are actually interested in learning something though, Crossing the Rubicon would be a good place to start. Or The Big Bamboozle.

And since we're on the conspiracy sub I should also mention that both of the authors have died in the years since.

[–]Boines[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well check into them as well as the credibility of the authors as well. Thanks for the titles.