(cache) This sub is a distraction : conspiracy

Injustices	Information
911 truth	Wikileaks
Endless War	World Politics
Collapse	Politics Uncensored
Post Collapse	Conspiracy Fact
Social Engineering	PermaCulture
Propaganda	Documentaries
Descent Into Tyranny	Documented Truth
Military Conspiracy	United We Stand
Bad Cop No Donut	NSA Leaks
Palestine	altnewz


Intelligence	Other
Intelligence	UFOs
BlackOPs	Paranormal
False Flag Watch	The Survival Guide
Privacy	UAP
Subliminals	Perma Culture
Activism	Conspiracy Memes
Agenda 21	Conspiracy Best of
Limited Hangouts	High Strangeness

This sub is a distraction (self.conspiracy)

Boines が 2時間前投稿

Y'all are too wrapped up in bitching about reddit, and making wild, unprovable accusations under the guise of "speculating" with no evidence to show. Nothing but assumptions and massive jumps with little logic.

You claim that every large media event that happens is an intentional distraction (as if news wasnt a business that cares about money and will feed sheep whatever stupid celebrity bullshit they want... a little different then intentional distraction), but this subreddit as a whole is a distraction in itself.

The majority of posts ive seen for the past while have just been idiotic, about something going on internslly at reddit, factually wrong but upvoted by all the ignorant people filling this sub, or just some random article about something a jewish person did.

Your actions in this subreddit make it very easy for all of reddit to all you nuts.

Your "open mind" is just as closed as anyones just looking from a different perspective.

You take any disagreement with your narrative as an idiot buying into the media's narrative, not an opportunity for honest logical discussion which BOTH sides may learn from

You exist here on reddit for two reasonsm To distract, and froth into this stew of ignorance, and assumption.

For all the wild accusations people throw around, maybe they need to take a look in the mirror and see what part theyre playing.

You don't have to know you're a pawn to be one.

全 29 件のコメント

トップ新着論争中古い順 Q&A

[–]swim32 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2時間前 (11子コメント)

[+]Boines[S] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント 2時間前 (10子コメント)

It happened 14 years ago and as far as i know no major new evidence has really come out since. I think given that it was 14 years ago people need to drop it as the go to conspiracy. was jfk the go to until 9/11? Wonder how long thisll last.

I find it hard to believe that the us governement did not know it would happen.

Im not sure about their ability to prevent such an attack.

I am sure that they exploited the events that occurred, whoever committed these acts, to use them for political means and gonto war in countries they should not be in, and that since then they have gotten ballsier going into more countres they REALLY shouldn't be in like yemen.

Im not sure who committed the attacks.

I think that people need to realize there is a massive difference between committing an attack on you own population, and exploiting a tradgedy for political means.

[–]IanPhlegming 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2時間前 (5子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 2時間前 (4子コメント)

Your passion is evident, but you need to dig deeper. When you write "I'm not sure who committed the attacks," it makes me think: What are you doing here then? Don't you want to find out? It is the SINGLE MORE IMPORTANT SUBJECT TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE COUNTRY.

Not "the" country. not my country. Dont assume the world is USA. I would like to find out, i doubt that even if that information was made public that it would have massive implications. Things will keep on keeping on. The world wont riot.

the reason i say im not sure who committed the attacks is because the only people who currently are sure are the ones who planned and committed them. Until i see substantial evidence one way or the other i will not be sure.

If 9/11 was an inside job -- and it sure looks like a rogue element of the government was behind it, yes, in tandem with other countries -- it means we are under occupation, the corporate media is complicit, and we need to question EVERY other story that comes down the river. How do you not see that? How can you not want the answer to that?

It does not mean the media is complicit. It does not necessarily mean that we are under occupation. Those are massive assumptions with zero evidence, the exact thing i made this post about. Who is to say that the media is not as blind as us, and just pushing whatever sells? If were going to go with baseless speculation that seems a lot more probable then every single western media outlet being owned/bought out. Occupation? How are you defining occupation? Is the usa under occupation by lobbygroups, individual protestors, or anyone who seeks to push the direction of the country along? Isn't that an essential part of democracy that all have the potential to influence the countries outcome? Why is a group attempting to influence your countries path mean your country is "occupied"?

The questioning story thingshould apply regardess of whether or not it is corporate media. I question the ATM when it dispenses the bills.

It's hard, coming to the realization of how dark our timeline has actually become. But we will be unlikely to change it if we do not.

And being fully disconnected from reality will not help anything. If we want to make a change we NEED evidence. Not speculation.

We should be striving to uncover conspiracies. Not write fantasy conspiracy theories, then pat eachother on the back and tell eachother how right we all must be because the fiction that we have created conforms to our world view.

[–]IanPhlegming 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間前 (3子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)

[–]Ambiguously_Ironic 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]swim32 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2時間前 (3子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)

allowing an attack to happen i the same as committing it when we're talking about this scale.

Being unable to react and stop an attack is not allowing it to happen. Do not assume anything. I have no idea exactly what happened and do not claim to know but have an open mind.

-check out the physics of the WTC 1 and 2 collapses...also WTC 7 came down for what reason?? https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-physics-quiz/ -No video of a plane hitting the pentagon The fact that there is not an available video of the pentagon being hit is a HUGE reason for suspicion.

Are you a building engineer? Im not. I agree tower 7 is extremely sketchy. But like i said i am not educated enough to see a video that was widely published (why only selectively hide film?) And say "aha! These intelligent supersecretive clandestine organizations fucked up! And i caught them!". Sketchiness does not indicate guilt.

Lack of video isnt really that sketchy considering the amount of other videos that were broadcast worldwide. Why would you selectively hide one video? It doesnt make sense.

Again, suspicion does not mean guilt. I never said that things werent kinda fishy. I just am saying that there is no strong evidence. Just suspicions and speculations. Ask any black man in the 60s how it felt to be convicted on evidence consisting of solely "suspsicion".

[–]swim32 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)

lol to your last sentence. great reply, i appreciate you taking the time.

i'm not an engineer of any sort. However, the guys at http://www.ae911truth.org/ are-over 2,000 of them

"Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of architects, engineers, and affiliates dedicated to researching and disseminating scientific information about the complete destruction of all three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, with the ultimate goal of obtaining a truly independent investigation and supporting the victims in their pursuit of justice."

Please take the 9/11 physics quiz and give ae911truth.org 10 minutes of your time.

My point about the pentagon video is that the pentagon has more surveillance than any other building in the world, and you're telling me they can't release a video that shows the plane hitting the building??? It's just ludicrous

[–]Boines[S] 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)

lol to your last sentence. great reply, i appreciate you taking the time.

i'm not an engineer of any sort. However, the guys at http://www.ae911truth.org/ are-over 2,000 of them

"Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of architects, engineers, and affiliates dedicated to researching and disseminating scientific information about the complete destruction of all three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, with the ultimate goal of obtaining a truly independent investigation and supporting the victims in their pursuit of justice."

and i support a truly independent investigation from people who are properly educayed. You do realize that this needs to begin with an unbiased view however right? No matter what structural evidence is found that solely points to how the towers came down. not who took them down.

My point about the pentagon video is that the pentagon has more surveillance than any other building in the world, and you're telling me they can't release a video that shows the plane hitting the building??? It's just ludicrous

And allowing so much other video and information to be released while hiding one small clip is equally ridiculous. Either way, it is not evidence towards anyones guilt.

What do we want EVIDENCE! when do we want it? apparently never over here.

[–]s70n3834r 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]sudo-tleilaxu 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]TwinkPanther[🍰] 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]Lo0seR 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)

[–][削除されました] 2時間前 (2子コメント)

[deleted]

[–]Terex80 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]heykenziewannafrack 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (5子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 2時間前 (4子コメント)

[–]The_Free_Marketeer 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2時間前 (3子コメント)

This sub just like this life is filled with different people with different perspectives and opinions. It is your responsibility as an individual to discern what you believe are facts from what you perceive as insanity.

You ignored the fact that this sub became one of the go to places for the frustrated redditors who lost subs and is also a nesting ground for assholes who actively try to make everyone here seem crazy.

You can't see that Forrest for the trees...

You post this here painting everyone with a broad brush and fail to realize you got paint on yourself while doing so.

So please add to this sub, show evidence of inaccurate information on this sub or contribute in some constructive way.

If you can't or won't do that then who cares about what you have to say and why you say it?

[–]Boines[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)

This sub just like this life is filled with different people with different perspectives and opinions. It is your responsibility as an individual to discern what you believe are facts from what you perceive as insanity.

It is the subs responsibility to upvote or downvote things that are actually important/factual vs. Mindless speculations.

You ignored the fact that this sub became one of the go to places for the frustrated redditors who lost subs and is also a nesting ground for assholes who actively try to make everyone here seem crazy.

Giving reasons for why the sub is shitty does not make it any better.

You post this here painting everyone with a broad brush and fail to realize you got paint on yourself while doing so.

Right. Because speaking generally means that i dont believe that there are exceptions? Because saying the sub as a whole is a shitpile means that there is no intelligent individuals who frequent it?

So please add to this sub, show evidence of inaccurate information on this sub or contribute in some constructive way.

Every time i comment pointing out someones complete lack of evidence i get downvoted by the circlejerk. I don't contribute much to reddit as a whole aside from comments. This sub is no different. You can't expect everyone who has an interest in conspiracy to be frequent posters or be devoting their lives to uncovering something.

If you can't or won't do that then who cares about what you have to say and why you say it?

This is the worst logic ever.

Do you need to be able to sing to comment on whether or not rebecca black had talent when recording friday?

Do you need to ge a stripper to be able to say whether or not it was a good lap dance?

Do you need to be a drywaller to mention that the guys left a big bump in your wall?

Doing an act is not a prerequisite for having and voicing an opinion on it.

[–]The_Free_Marketeer 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]DelusionAndIllusions 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)

[–]Boines[S] 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]DelusionAndIllusions 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)

π Rendered by PID 10830 on app-365 at 2015-07-16 01:06:28.373979+00:00 running 3812e17 country code: JP.

conspiracy

Rules of Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/rules

Rules of r/Conspiracy:

Related subreddits:

Conspiracy AMAs

Non-reddit resources

調停者