Okay, then in that case -- Keynesianism, what Keynes actually advocated, doesn't have much of a problem. Keynes simply said that when national economies are threatened by outside forces (such as world wars, for instance), governments should manipulate currencies in order to promote economic stability. Basically, when your factories are getting blown up, you should probably promote some capital accumulation so that they can be re-built. And when your population suffers a massive decline, you should promote consumption and create some artificial prosperity in order to offset that. And this artificial consumption should be offset by future savings in order to help the economy return to a steady state once the threat has passed.

The problem only appears now that his ideas have been co-opted by privately owned central banks and their bought-and-paid-for academic spokespersons -- people who (ironically) profit from international conflict and who create wars in order to manipulate and parasitically feed off of national economies. Keynesianism has now morphed into perma-Keynesianism, or permanent money-printing that promotes unsustainable resource consumption and unsustainable population growth, that sows the seeds of future conflicts, and whose benefits accrue only to the parasitical globalist financial classes who are protected from the effects of the monetary inflation they promote.