•
•

Wednesday Sticky - 7/15/15. (self.badeconomics)

wumbotarianI want to be the Walrasian Auctioneer when I grow up[M] が 投稿 - stickied post

New sticky for wednesdays. I don't know how to program the automod to do M/W/F stickies. I'll figure that out eventually.

全 33 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]HealthcareEconomist3Krugman Triggers Me 5ポイント6ポイント  (17子コメント)

You are visited by an alien race who demand you must kill an entire occupational classification otherwise they will destroy the planet. Which one do you choose and why?

[–]haalidoodiOn second thought, let's not go to r/econ. It is a silly place. 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

Just let them destroy the planet. The stimulative effect from having to rebuild literally everything should just about fix our economy forever.

[–]commentsrusBring maymayday back! 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

http://i.imgur.com/lXgCzwd.jpg

[–]basilect40% of economics is dental hygiene 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

☐ not praxd

☑ praxd

[–]UltSomnia 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Obviously healthcare economists.

[–]Fallline048 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

53-6031 Gas Pump Attendants. Specifically in full-service states. I can pump my own gas and don't need my time wasted while you try to fill 3 cars at once and yell at me when I try to exit my vehicle, then expect a tip for the inconvenience.

[–]haalidoodiOn second thought, let's not go to r/econ. It is a silly place. 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've spent most of my life in Michigan. Is this still a think in some places? I can't say I've ever seen gas pump attendants outside of 40's noir films and possibly some Keaton comedies.

[–]wyman856People are horses 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

As far as I know, New Jersey and Oregon are the only two states in the U.S. that continue full-service, mainly because their attendants unionized and successfully lobbied for making/keeping self service illegal back in the day.

[–]commentsrusBring maymayday back! 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You'll set yourself on fire, kid.

[–]alexhoyerhoard plywood now for our ANCAP overlords 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Art critics. Fuck them, if it's so easy they should do it.

[–]haalidoodiOn second thought, let's not go to r/econ. It is a silly place. 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I went with a friend to the DIA recently and they were loudly complaining about the quality of some colonial-era furniture on display in the American art section. Do they count?

[–]deathpigeonxPart of the 1% (who have actually read Piketty) 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

People who's job is to kill an entire occupational classification.

[–]Meta-Cognition"Neoclassical Bernankean shill" 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Modern artists.

Fuck off. Friedrich's Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog and Raphael's School of Athens are all you need.

[–]Babahoyo 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

fucking neoclassicist.

[–]Meta-Cognition"Neoclassical Bernankean shill" 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It all went downhill with Van Gogh and his shitty impressionism.

[–]k4rter 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

car dealers, let Tesla sell those cars directly.

[–]irondeepbicycleI got 99 problems but technological unemployment ain't one 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Bail bondsmen? Maybe it forces changes to our bail system?

[–]k4rter 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

will Krugman be happy?

[–]deathpigeonxPart of the 1% (who have actually read Piketty) 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I leave Krugman at the foot of the mountain. One always finds one's burden again. But Krugman teaches the higher fidelity that negates the gods and raises rocks. He too concludes that all is well. This universe henceforth without a master seems to him neither sterile nor futile. Each atom of that stone, each mineral flake of that night-filled mountain, in itself, forms a world. The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Krugman happy.

[–]commentsrusBring maymayday back! 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Prediction: 120 comments in 6 hours

[–]IntegraldsI am the rep agent AMA 3ポイント4ポイント  (5子コメント)

We've done taxes and subsidies, what about expenditures?

  • An expenditure category or program that should receive more funding.
  • An expenditure category or program that should receive less funding.
  • An expenditure category or program that is receiving about the right amount of funding.
  • A new expenditure category or program.
  • An expenditure category or program that should be eliminated.

I'm using "expenditure category or program" to be as broad as possible. "NASA" counts. "Defense" counts, as do subsets like "CIA" or "the F-35" or "$3,000 screwdrivers." "Health spending" counts, as do subsets of health like "Medicare" or "Medicare Part D" or "Medicare prescription drugs."

You may not answer "waste, fraud, and abuse," because that's lame.

[–]commentsrusBring maymayday back! 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

An expenditure category or program that should be eliminated.

The government. QED.

[–]Meta-Cognition"Neoclassical Bernankean shill" 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

More funding: R&D. (I'm not sure about the budget for the likes of the NSA, but from what I hear there's quite a significant technological lag in the intelligence services at the moment, so I wouldn't mind increased funding their either to be honest. . . Will Wumbo kill me for that, being a libertarian and all?).

Less funding: The prison system.

Right amount of funding: Defence (although you could allocate the existing budget a bit better).

New expenditure: NGDP futures market ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Eliminated: Social security.

Of course, all of these come with caveats of complimentary policies.

[–]Babahoyo 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

funding prisons less will probably just make prison conditions worse, rather than make our country sentence fewer people for shorter sentences like we should.

[–]Meta-Cognition"Neoclassical Bernankean shill" 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd rather see drugs legalised/regulated and more effort placed into rehabilitation before we begin to cut prison funding. Prisons really ought to be holding pens for the ~50pc of violent criminals who can't be rehabilitated.

And maybe as a deterrent/punishment for shit like white collar crime, because I have no idea how you'd even begin to rehabilitate those people.

[–]MildlyEoghanDon't Prax Me, Bro! 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

  1. Third level education
  2. Unemployment activation programs (excluding education)
  3. No idea, probably a lot of them
  4. Social welfare reform and monitoring program
  5. Child benefit, in its current form, various pension entitlements

[–]wyman856People are horses 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I found this piece via Tyler Cowen on the relationship between Milton Friedman and Paul Samuelson, "The Rivals."

It has a great deal of meta-economics history and is a really well-done piece overall.

[–]IntegraldsI am the rep agent AMA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I read that too quickly, as "I found this place via Tyler Cowen," and thought we'd hit the big leagues with a link from MR.

[–]wumbotarianI want to be the Walrasian Auctioneer when I grow up[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Someone reported a comment of mine because I broke Rule III.

I kek'd

[–]basilect40% of economics is dental hygiene 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

kekxico

[–]Babahoyo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

[http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/14/what-economics-can-and-cant-do/?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=opinion-c-col-right-region&region=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region](What Economics Can -and Can’t- Do)

This article is pretty interesting, it'll probably end up on this sub some point in the next few hours. I would do an R1 but idk what i would say. Overall I think its a good piece, but would obviously have liked them interview an economist instead of a philosopher of economics.

[–]SoyElGoddamnBatmanI don't really know anything, honestly 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What do you guys think are the best subs for learning about other topics? BE is my spot, but sometimes I want to learn about other stuff too.