411
412

Planned Parenthood director caught on tape selling aborted 'baby parts' (liveactionnews.org)

KnightGalahad が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]gtfooh1011 30ポイント31ポイント  (8子コメント)

She's the shining pride of Democrats everywhere, especially reddit.

[–]BobTheNinjaPanda 27ポイント28ポイント  (7子コメント)

The top rated comment on there was pointing out how over 60% of women refused to answer the survey, which most likely severely skewed the results as people who really regretted it probably wouldn't want to talk about it. It's since been deleted, along with a bunch of other comments. Was it deleted because of any specific rules on /r/science or is this just an attempt at keeping a certain narrative going?

[–]ultimisConstitutionalist 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

/r/science is rabid liberal on every issue. If for instance you post anything remotely skeptical of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change, you will find yourself banned from the subreddit or at the very least your comment deleted. They let poor articles that are essentially spam through if it agrees with a liberal issue.

[–]3mpir3 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (5子コメント)

Part time mod of /r/Science here. Stop posting shit articles from shit websites & we'll stop removing 'em.

Without fail, skeptical articles removed:

  • Include every subject; including left-wing skepticism.
  • Are not peer-reviewed.
  • Are from a very biased source.
  • Are NOT peer-reviewed.

[–]ultimisConstitutionalist 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

I wasn't talking about articles. I was talking about comments.

Speaking of garbage spam; pnwell who is a self professed paid climate propagandist posts sensationalized articles with no science at all on that subreddit. Yet they are never deleted. The guy is an obvious spammer based on the number of articles submitted to reddit each day yet he has not been banned from r/science.

I'm perfectly fine with garbage skeptical blog spam being removed. What I'm not fine with is the clear ideological hypocrisy of the mods there. Back when I used to visit the subreddit I reported those pnwell crap articles thinking the mods actually cared about science and being professional. Instead the articles persisted and rational posts calling out the garbage article we're deleted from the comments. Essentially you were fine with crap submissions as long as it fit the political narrative you agreed with.

[–]3mpir3 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

PM me a few of his links/posts. I'm on my phone atm, but I'll look into it when I get a break

[–]ultimisConstitutionalist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I haven't visited r/science in about a year. I'm also on my phone. I'll go find a few articles for you tomorrow.

[–]Bookwormy13Libertarian Conservative 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

So basically whatever you deem is appropriate or right, right?

[–]chabanaisThe Bird's the Word 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

What a tool.