全 18 件のコメント

[–]smewchies 3ポイント4ポイント  (13子コメント)

Clearly you have been good mods, but all of this sounds like personal issues between you guys and not really user based.

Edited to add: all of your responses have been helpful and clarifying.

[–]IronTitsMcGuintyOn-fire pants are a dead giveaway 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I can see where you're coming from, really. I know I had and other mods had worked really hard to keep it away from the users. But in the end, instituting sexist policies may not be visible but they do damage and ring of hypocrisy. Its hard to stand by that, and it would certainly affect the users eventually.

[–]smewchies 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for adding context.

[–]Jollysaur[M] 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nose has been holding off on getting us more mods for a long time. We have been drowning in modwork with no extra hands to get on deck for any reason.

And he has been constantly undermining the decisions of half the the mod team.

Not to mention the whole sexism problem of him insisting that using gendered slurs directed at men weren't something we were allowed to remove under our rules. The dick issue.

These are just a few of the complaints we have been trying to bring up with him over the last 6 months, but he has refused to listen and has now decided to demod us all.

We can't work under someone who constantly treats us badly and makes it more difficult for us to do our job.

The only reason the users haven't noticed this mess is because we have spent stupid amounts of energy trying our hardest to save our sub and work around the difficulties /u/Nosefetish kept giving us.

[–]smewchies 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for responding. All of this sounds more like reasons a user may want to follow you to another sub.

[–]PaganBacon 1ポイント2ポイント  (6子コメント)

While it doesn't seem like it has affected the user base, then, if true, it is really worrying that the head moderator blankly exclude white cis males as being potential moderators, and do not treat trans and non-binary moderators equally.

In particular, considering that female moderators are supposedly being treated favourably, one might worry that the sub could turn into a den of "whiteknighting". A place that brands itself on being free from prejudice and a safe place for all, but in actually is prejudicial itself and not a safe place for everyone. In fact, a lot of users outside the subreddit already see the /r/creepypms in that way (Though, I personally think that is a matter of people being prejudicial. Still, it is worth mentioning.)

All this said, I am not sure this has been handled in the right way (by any party in the drama). Though, of course, this is speaking as someone who doesn't know the details, or even have an inkling of knowledge as what actually occurred behind the scenes.

[–]IronTitsMcGuintyOn-fire pants are a dead giveaway 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yeah, this was handled awkwardly at best. For months we've been trying to get answers and solutions and we got frustrated. Hell, I quit when the Nose told me he micromanages the men who mod and wouldn't be adding more men as mods because we were supposed to be a space for women. It was rash and out of shock, I guess.

In the end, Nose doubled down and blatantly said our input is appreciated but unnecessary and he would continue to run the sub with prejudice. I guess we all got really frustrated by the fact that his disrespect for trans people and for men were going to continue.

I know this is rocky and sudden and clearly we were not prepared, but please stick with us. We're gonna do good things here. :)

[–]PaganBacon 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Eurgh, that sounds really bad :x It sounds like he really bought into the idea of "the minority can't be prejudicial".

As for how to handle his issue, I don't know what is best for you to do. My gut reaction is to urge you to collect actual examples of Nose acting in the ways you complain about - so it isn't just a matter of "he said - they said". Whether that is actually a good idea, I don't know, it might make the issue explode in an unforseen way, but I guess without it, the user base as a whole won't know what has actually happened. An alternative tactic would be to stand back, and if your allegations are true simply let /r/creepypms destroy itself with poor (one-sided) moderation. I really don't know.

[–]IronTitsMcGuintyOn-fire pants are a dead giveaway 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Please stand by for examples. I'm just editting out first names and usernames of uninvolved users now :D

[–]UpsidedownTreetrunkʘ‿ʘ how about no[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

The problem is we don't want them destroyed. We love the community, we love the sub. That's why we're upset- it's fallen into this shitty state that all of us have tried to keep it from becoming. We want it how it was 18 months ago. We want the discussion (behind the scenes), we want our opinions taken seriously. We want the safe space it used to be.

[–]PaganBacon 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sorry, poor choice of words, I guess a better way to phrase it would be to say something along the lines of 'let /r/creepypms alienate its userbase'. That said, I think being open about the specific issues (with concrete examples) is the better option. I simply listed the passive approach as the direct approach might also turn really ugly.

[–]UpsidedownTreetrunkʘ‿ʘ how about no[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not gonna lie. That happened a few times.

We tried to handle this more peacefully. We've been trying to discuss issues like these for months. We were ignored, the head mod would go quiet for ages at a time. Our requests and nominations for more mods were completely ignored. We've tried, we've tried, we've tried. The horse has been beaten as much as it can. This was our final option. None of us wanted it handled this way. We were silenced within an hour, making it clear our request was denied. So, here we are.

[–]UpsidedownTreetrunkʘ‿ʘ how about no[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

The head mod blatantly disregarding their own rules doesn't impact the users?

He's shown he has no regard for calling people by their preferred pronouns, and with trans* users, that creates a problem. When he says he refuses to add male mods, displaying sexism, that creates a problem. Women are placed on a pedestal, and even though he may say "men can be creeped on/women can be creepers", his actions speak that he doesn't care. Body shaming isn't a priority unless it's directed at women, same with gendered slurs. The environment that creates is toxic, and does indeed affect users.

[–]smewchies 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The average user? No, it doesn't affect me. I see the posts in my feed, and I see the mod team works hard to keep stuff in line. Then I move on to the next shiny thing that will interest me.

You, as mods, spend a lot more time in this subreddit, watching for infractions and keeping things calm. You see the little things that I don't, because you are doing your job well. If I don't know these things are happening, it is not affecting me.

[–]smewchies 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

I just can't blindly get behind someone who says this other person is a meanie poo poo head without some proof, I guess.

If he is doing these things, then sure I agree he is indeed the doodoo head. Otherwise, this is gossip. Probably true, but still gossip.

I agree that this wasn't presented well, but it's early yet and I've had a couple of good responses.

Edit: this was meant to be a reply to u/PaganBacon, not a separate comment.

[–]UpsidedownTreetrunkʘ‿ʘ how about no[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

We tried. We were silenced. We've been trying for months and months and have been totally ignored. This was our last resort. It wasn't handled in the way any of us would like, but our only option.

[–]IronTitsMcGuintyOn-fire pants are a dead giveaway 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Give me a bit to edit first names out of the screencaps and I'll share something with you. :)

[–]PaganBacon 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I definitely agree with you on proof being important. Otherwise it might just be a smear campaign based on personal issues. That's why I phrased myself conditionally on 'if these claims are true'. It's definitely worth remembering that, as you say, one shouldn't blindly follow this complaint. Sadly, I think we're somewhat prone to do so, as generally the underdog "whistleblowers" are more likable than "the established system".