全 17 件のコメント

[–]Jamesshrugged[S] [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

http://imgur.com/a/OU4Zz

I posted the Playboy Interview with Ayn Rand over at /r/philosophy and was soon notified that it had been removed for violating rule 2: philosophical topics only.

I asked for clarification and I was told that Ayn Rand was an author, not a philosopher. I also asked if Ayn Rand posts were not allowed despite her lengthy article describing her as such in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and mod /u/Really Nicole replied

Did I studder?

Edit: Another moderator has also replied, again arguing for banning Ayn Rand from /r/philosophy http://imgur.com/hxWt7aO

[–]brokedown [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Studder?

Is that like a cow with a lisp?

[–]Western_World [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Typical of /r/philosophy. I made similar experiences there. It's full of people who are opposed to Rand in a very irrational way.

[–]PluviusReddit [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

mod /u/Really Nicole replied Did I studder?

What a coward.

[–]max225 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Next they'll be banning Nietzche because his work is too "artistic".

[–]DopeAnon [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Is there a specific reason Rynd isn't considered a philosopher? I'm pretty ignorant, but I would think we are all philosophers, and somedo it as a profession, calling, or way of life. It seems very close-minded to strip her of that title, based on being an author, when everything I found on a Google search says otherwise. Sounds like there's an agenda.

[–]phuckHipsters [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Sounds like there's an agenda

There is very much an agenda. It's why I quit my philosophy program 3/4's of the way through and switched to a STEM degree.

Among philosophers in academia, she is not only not considered a philosopher, she is vilified. Admitting that you are an Objectivist is akin to admitting that you are in the Klan as far as most modern academics are concerned.

I was once told that my infatuation with her would fade as I grew up.

That infatuation has not faded as I've since gone to work in the real world and I am not an academic in some philosophy department somewhere.

[–]Jamesshrugged[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That's what I thought when I gave them the link to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the mod said "did I studder?"

[–]Jamesshrugged[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I really have no idea... especially given the degree to which her ideas are taught in colleges.

[–]TotesMessenger [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]chiguy [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Seems pretty clear that they consider her an author and not a philosopher. Makes sense.

[–]doguhnew [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

How many philosophers that you know of never wrote anything?

[–]chiguy [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I'm not sure your point and how it relates to Ayn. It is possible to be both. I don't find Ayn to be both, however.

[–]TheAethereal [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If philosophy wasn't the subject of her writing, what was?

[–]max225 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

She has a few books that are just essays outlining objectivism. The fact that the moderators did not know this or just disregarded it is indicative of complete and total failure in philosophical education.

[–]Jamesshrugged[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I did post a link to the quite lengthy Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Rand.

The mod replied "did I studder?"

It's all there in the screedshots.