1605
1606

Niiiiice (i.imgur.com)

odlawodlaw が 投稿

全 113 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]ON3i11 206ポイント207ポイント  (17子コメント)

Yeah that news headline looks super professional and totally legit.

[–]Yatta79 68ポイント69ポイント  (1子コメント)

It was supposed to be "Hot chick taken by po-po for giving lucky fucker the time of his life. HIGH FIVE BRAH!" but they had to the proffesional route so banging sounded better.

[–]ON3i11 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

YEAH BRAH, HIGH FIVE!

[–]KingPickle 16ポイント17ポイント  (12子コメント)

Looks like it is:

http://www.inquisitr.com/2241228/fatima-grupico-catholic-school-teacher-had-sex-with-teen-student-charges-say-held-without-bail/

[–]azz808 24ポイント25ポイント  (1子コメント)

Fatima Grupico was a teacher at a Catholic school in New Jersey, a school that has since had its doors shuttered by the local diocese because declining enrollments had rendered running the high school no longer cost effective.

Maybe she was just trying to get enrollment up?

[–]relevant84 19ポイント20ポイント  (0子コメント)

She got something up, anyway.

[–]the-cat-killa 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

"took advantage of at least one member of the shrinking student body"

[–]TelMegiddo 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Now that. That right there is something special.

[–]THE_DROG 8ポイント9ポイント  (5子コメント)

Last week, 30-year-old Florida high school teacher Jennifer Fichter was sentenced to 22 years in prison for engaging in sexual acts with not one, not two, but three male students, all of whom were age 17. One of the illicit relationships even resulted in Fichter becoming pregnant.

22 years in prison seems like a bit much for having sex with 17 year olds, doesn't it?

[–]Dcajunpimp 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Jennifer Fichter

Admitted to 37 counts, each with a maximum penalty of 15 years.

I don't know what the minimum penalty is per count.

[–]intiraymi 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I thought the exact same when reading the article. IMO, those boys were old enough to know what they were doing, yet are treated as victims.

[–]buckeyelaw -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

While the 17-year-old boys may understand what they are doing, sexual relationships between students and teachers is grossly inappropriate. These teachers should have the moral resolve to not abuse the relationships that they have with students. Pursuing a sexual relationship with someone that you have authority over is not okay. A sexual relationship between a student and teacher is an unprofessional exploitation of power.

[–]JACdMufasa 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not one, not two, not three, not four....

[–]Zaloon 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

It is, but she got caught and the papers got wind of it. Tough luck for her.

[–]ON3i11 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm not saying it's fake news. I'm saying the headline is unprofessional, and that whatever news/website is came from is sub-buzzfeed.

[–]IMMA_WIZARD 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

The website is dudecomedy.com, which suggests BBC level journalism.

[–]Agent_McMuffin 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

The source is "dudecomedy.com". What did you expect?

[–]kp305 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Banging is the scientific term I believe.

[–]Casemods 80ポイント81ポイント  (37子コメント)

I bet she wont even have to register as a sex offender

[–]J-Unleashed 21ポイント22ポイント  (0子コメント)

This would not surprise me.

[–]coltar10 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why should she? The guy was 17. He can consent.

[–]UnluckyLuke 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Besides age, it's considered statutory rape because they had a student/teacher relationship (ie: an authority figure)

[–]fericyde 30ポイント31ポイント  (1子コメント)

Quick, someone get this kid his "luckiest kid in America" award right away.

[–]satanicpriest13 43ポイント44ポイント  (16子コメント)

So wait, what, what's the crime?

[–]R0ot2U 111ポイント112ポイント  (0子コメント)

That she's not doing it with me.

[–]Fifaa 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

The kid bragged too much

[–]Bookkeep 40ポイント41ポイント  (10子コメント)

I know there's a double standard but it's hard to feel sorry for a "victim" when I would trade places with them.

I wouldn't want to trade places with someone who got mugged in the street.

[–]gymger 24ポイント25ポイント  (7子コメント)

I get where you're coming from, but there are plenty if handsome male rapists too. In this type of situation is was most likely just statutory rape, possibly a bit of grooming, but nonetheless it is definitely possible for attractive, desirable men to be rapists, and people who would love to "trade places" with their victims.

[–]berriesthatburn 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

The thing is this was statutory rape, not like violent or date rape, and that he likely consented to it. Well, "consented" in the sense that he probably wanted it but he's a minor.

[–]JamesLiptonIcedTea 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Reminds me of Twitter back when Chris Brown was in the news after beating Rihanna. "I'd let him beat me anytime he wanted <3" and other nonsense.

[–]TelMegiddo 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Grooming. Such an overused term. When you are dating someone for the first time and turning on the charm you are technically "grooming" them too.

[–]xereeto 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know there's a double standard but it's hard to feel sorry for a "victim" when I would trade places with them.

I hope you're not a masochist

[–]rib-bit -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not about the victim. It's about the predator

And fat chicks might want to take the place of a rape victim but that doesn't make it right....

[–]Dissidence802 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

NICCCE!

[–]BigWill2k 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Facebook strikes again. :D

[–]RemcoBluB 4ポイント5ポイント  (13子コメント)

Serious question:

Why do they have to go to jail for so many years? The student wasnt raped or something, He was probably not sad about fucking her. She should pay some money because she did it at work, but i dont think that she should go to prison because of this...

[–]Loojay 24ポイント25ポイント  (2子コメント)

Paedophilia is a crime, which is half the sentence.

Also we put a lot of trust in teachers and they have a lot of responsibility - breaking that trust should deservedly warrant a long sentence. You don't leave your kids with many other institutions like you do with school, and especially not for anywhere near as long. It should be completely inexcusable to break that trust and have relations with a student.

[–]ChronaMewX 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, it is a crime. However, no one in their right mind would consider someone who sleeps with a 17 year old to be a pedophile. Apart from a couple of backwards states, that's legal just about everywhere

[–]andy_hoffman 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, the student was 17 so it was by definition not pedophilia, but even if it was, is pedophilia really a crime in the US? I mean, is it a crime to be a pedophile? As long as you don't act on it I can't see any reason why it would be criminal.

Breaking the student/teacher trust is however a different thing, and should warrant a high sentence. Very unprofessional.

[–]0b3r0n 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's the whole "position of authority" thing. It could, depending on how the student viewed the teacher, really mess up their sex life. It's one thing to fantasize about having your teacher seduce you; it's another thing altogether to have that happen.

Consider the opposite: many women, according to recent surveys, fantasize about being raped. Far fewer, if any, women actually want that to happen.

[–]MashMango 5ポイント6ポイント  (7子コメント)

A student is too young to consent, and so it is rape. Simple as that.

Also as others have said, it's paedophilia, and she's in a position of authority.

[–]ChronaMewX 4ポイント5ポイント  (6子コメント)

He's not too young to consent though. Apart from a couple of ass-backwards states, the vast majority of the developed world has their age of consent at 16, at worst 17

[–]MashMango 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

Apparently this was in New Jersey where yes, the age of consent is 16. However as she is a teacher, in a position of responsibility and authority, it makes it manipulative and coercive. In the UK this is still illegal, and according to Wikipedia, the same is true in NJ:

There is an exception. If the victim is less than 18 and the partner is a parent, guardian, sibling or any other person closer than a fourth cousin or has any type of authority over the victim (for example, a teacher) then the assailant may be charged with a crime. For instance, it's criminal for a manager of any age to have sex with a 17-year-old subordinate, even if the sex was consensual.

[–]ChronaMewX 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

Honestly my biggest problem with that is that it's still called rape despite it being consentual. I think if we just changed the terminology, people wouldn't make light of it as much as they do. "Statutory Rape" should be renamed to "Statutory Intercourse" or something, because it's not rape.

[–]MashMango 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

No consent = rape. Rape is rape. No ifs, no buts.

Someone underage may willingly have sex with someone older which later, once they've matured and are of age, they could regret. They've been taken advantage of. That is rape.

I think if we just changed the terminology, people wouldn't make light of it as much as they do. "Statutory Rape" should be renamed to "Statutory Intercourse" or something, because it's not rape.

you think trivialising it with a less serious and inaccurate name would make people make light of it less?

[–]ChronaMewX 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

But both parties did consent, and both parties were of the age of consent. Consent isn't the issue here, the whole teacher/student thing was. I don't see how that makes it rape. A crime, sure, but if we consider this rape then we're devaluing...well, actual rape.

[–]MashMango 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

No, sexual consent is a little more complicated than a 'willingness' to have sex at the time. Having said that, it's still straightforward. If one party has authority over the other, then they are not in a position to consent, and it's rape. The key is that they're been taken advantage of.

Consent isn't the issue here, the whole teacher/student thing was

because of the issue of consent.

A crime, sure, but if we consider this rape then we're devaluing...well, actual rape.

A fair point, but I think mainly serves to give statutory rape the recognition it deserves as a serious crime.

[–]MY_GOOCH_HURTS 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This wasn't even statutory. He's 17 in a state where the age of consent is 16.

[–]alsatianbro 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice

[–]irwinner 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nice

[–]Solidkrycha 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice

[–]LOOK_AT_ME_BITCH 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lucky son of a bitch

[–]Moonwlkr50 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Wow this girl is obsessed with taking pictures of herself. She's posted so many selfies at work lol. Search Fatima Grupico

[–]vcc0m 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good for us. Everytime there's one of these news you can only find one or two pictures

[–]Dcajunpimp 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

So your saying theres a 90% shes under the age of 50 and female?

[–]Moonwlkr50 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Haha I don't know many 40 or 50 year olds who take a lot of selfies, but I'm assuminy you do. So in this case I guess that's who I'm talking about.

[–]lil_phyfe 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

But.. she's a girl.

[–]vcc0m 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fucking nice

[–]gamernamer69 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not even okay how jealous I am

[–]russmartin 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

NIIIIIIIIIIIICE

[–]russmartin 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

whos subs to the south park reddit to down vote comments? what a sick sob.

[–]ShinyCubone -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Middlesex county prosecutors. 6th grade self laughs hysterically

[–]MashMango 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Comes from Middlesex, England - which is now basically London. It means 'Middle saxons'. Same as Essex, Wessex and Sussex - ie. East, West, South saxons.

The more you know

[–]MY_GOOCH_HURTS -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Can we stop posting this shit?