Wow, I think a lot of people may not realize the intent of this post. I'm sure I, as the apologist to OP will also get downvoted (and now for sure downvoted, because for some reasons pointing out that I think this post will be downvoted is viewed as begging or something, and also met with downvotes.), but allow me to explain what I think OP's intent was with this post.

I think he saw all the announcements and such about Ellen Pao this week, and noticed a central theme that we should remember the person behind the internet (this is good advice, especially in response to the amount of vile hate and discontent that was aimed at Ellen herself.) and how a lot of those posts are making Ellen out to be some sort of champion of women's rights and she was bold for the things she did while CEO of reddit even though reddit hated the policies put in place during her tenure. He saw that, and immediately saw the hypocritical nature of it, because if we remeber (pun intended) Ellen, we should automatically assume she was well aware of the circumstances of the people her husband directly affect (and by proxy, she indirectly affected because of her knowledge of his actions. Again, all based on assumption of his guilt [I have no knowledge of his situation, so he may have been found guilty but I have no idea], and the assumption that she knew about his actions.) and therefore if we remember Ellen that way, we see that she is a shitty person. But that's if you make those assumptions.