Could you please try another argument for its usefulness? So far the proposal to host some foreign legal document looks like a bid to get a tattoo in an unknown language.
ok
GETs are disabled to prevent the crawlers (such as Googlebot) from making submits.
yes, old archives are not altered.
Ironicaly, the JS part is the most useless one and not portable, it requires PhantomJS with many patches applied.
Thank you!
There is no way.
I do not know how to arrange it.
Accepting credit cards would require the incorporation and the accounting (this is costly, perhaps more costly than the expected amount of the donations).
May be Bitcoin is a solution?
Also you can support WebCite here: https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/aQMp7
ok, done.
if you have an idea how to design it better (I do not like the present solution), please, let me know.
The codebase is far from the point where the open/close-source difference may even have sense; it is not in the form of a re-deployable product; besides the html standards (and big list of exceptions) the code reflects specific hardware and network, which pages are popular, the behaviour of the SEO-bots and the users (in order to tune the caching strategies), etc.
It would be a big work to create an alienable archiver (whether open or closed source) which anyone could set up on their own premises.