852
853

SOCJUS[socjus] SJWs now want to ban art. A Monet exhibition of Japanese-inspired art at an MFA gallery is "racist cultural appropriation." One commenter writes: "Just toss out the Monet. Burn it, shred it, whatever. Problem solved." (self.KotakuInAction)

plaidjester が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]md1957 44ポイント45ポイント  (8子コメント)

Given their tendencies, I wouldn't be surprised if these sods wind up calling for "pure, ideologically correct" art.

[–]Urishima 19ポイント20ポイント  (7子コメント)

I was wondering where Hitler went after WW2...

[–]AngryArmour 17ポイント18ポイント  (5子コメント)

Apparently just into hiding, together with his concept of "Entartete Kunst"...

Godwin's law is one thing, but people are actually arguing for bringing back Nazi policies on censorship of art, I think we've passed the point where Godwin's law is a problem.

[–]Bwhitty23 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

No no no man godwins law is the ultimate argument stopper. If someone mentions the Nazis then they lost argument as they had to go to the extreme even if it is applicable to the situation at hand./s

[–]AngryArmour 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because as we all know, there is no difference between "I don't agree with you, therefore you are a nazi" and "Oh, so your idea of "No bad tactics, only bad targets" also apply to the Nazies methods for maintaining societal purity?"

[–]Urishima 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Apparently just into hiding, together with his concept of "Entartete Kunst"...

So Walter Moers was right! He was hiding in the sewers all along!

[–]GeltonZ 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Are you implying we have to worry about a Teenage Mutant Ninja Hitler now?!

[–]Urishima 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Naw, he'll probably just end up having sex with a post sex-change Herbert Goering and get addicted to crack.

[–]niczar 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just try to guess where the Nazis got their idea of "degenerate art" ... It's quite surprising.