Playing devil's advocate here, what if you reach this level of Red Pill Zen Master where you legitimately do not give a fuck but continue to subconsciously employ red pill philosophy into your daily life?

Yes, you still have a game if this describes you. Everyone has a game (Machiavellian ability, charm etc,) whether they have to work their ass off to deploy it, or not.

IMO, red pill simply streamlines guy game via internalisation. Just because it's natural to you and you're not pouring over blueprints like these new guys, doesn't mean you don't have a game plan.

You're distinguishing between a guy with game that's so great he's reached unconscious competence, and a guy whose game is so bad that he's somewhere between unconscious incompetence, and conscious incompetence.

But every guy strives for good guy game, just as RPWs strive for good girl game. And hence, everyone is playing a game - and refining it. We're all players (of the game.) If you're not, you're a loser, the game doesn't stop playing because you don't know how to play or won't play it. Robert says in the 48 that people who think they can transcend the game by not playing are fools. We are all in this.

Relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_stages_of_competence

---

Also realise when I speak about "game" it is not one thing, eg: seduction, Machiavellianism or survival. Think of Russian dolls. Life is a game. That's the most outer doll. We're all smaller dolls inside that doll, playing the game of life, running our own game alongside the game of life to maximise our own ends. Then we run games inside of games, eg: we show one person the side of ourselves we think will benefit us most, and another person an image that may run entirely counter to that.

So you end up having all these micro games (one on one manipulations - not necessarily negative, but just practical in nature) running inside a game with a bigger goal (to fit an agenda) - which is an agenda that can be constrained by the agenda of others (that's politics) which are constrained by the rules of the greatest game - survival and navigating human psychology.

I know this may sound obtuse and a little difficult to follow, but I hope you follow. It's not easy to explain "the different levels that game operates at." So you have the different scale of game, that's one way of measuring game. Then you have the level of competence that one operates at in executing their game, another metric of game. Both measure "the level of game" but in different ways - one is competence, the other is scale.

When you realise this is how things are, you will realise people who say they don't play games are either very manipulative, are simply UNAWARE of the nature of reality, or both (as is typical in the case of women who are dissociative in nature.) They play games but think they don't and have no greater understanding of the abstract reality around us. Solipsism kind of has that effect on a person. People who flat out reject reality are beyond help IMO. They usually end up being losers.