あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]pie-oh -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

Allegations? Ethically corrupt?

"Chairman Pao"

How about this image too, http://d35brb9zkkbdsd.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ellen_pao_reddit_attack_1024.jpg

THAT is ethically corrupt. THIS lacks ethics: https://np.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/3cbo4m/we_apologize/csu7ybw

Edit: Wait a fucking second. Who on earth are you to talk about ethics. You run a sub literally titled /r/SocialMediaSluts/ - I'm done with this conversation. Obviously a troll.

[–]frankenmine 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

So you have no evidence of denial of equal rights on the basis of race or sex. At all.

Concession accepted.

[–]pie-oh -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

racism is literally defined in the dictionary as:

prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

So yes, this is antagonism, and are racist insults.

Seriously. I don't know why I have to explain to anyone calling someone who is Asian "Chairman Pao" isn't acceptable, and is racist.

[–]frankenmine -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The only objective definition of racism or sexism is denial of equal rights on the basis of race or sex. You have not shown this.

You call certain expressions antagonism. I call it criticism. You can't objectively prove that this is racism or sexism. Therefore it isn't. It's just that simple.

Get back to me when you can objectively prove your point, and if you can't, don't bother.