341
342

We apologize (self.modnews)

ekjp[A] が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]weffey[A] 7ポイント8ポイント  (12子コメント)

We have not removed anything in this thread: http://i.imgur.com/1AT0pN0.png

gah, I know... public mod log... it's on my list!

[–]DEATH-BY-CIRCLEJERK 2ポイント3ポイント  (10子コメント)

Will the public mod log be optional to moderators or forced public? As a user (not a mod) this might be the biggest news I've seen come out of this debacle today.

[–]weffey 6ポイント7ポイント  (9子コメント)

Ok so... This is, total idea in my head, I have no idea how feasible, implications anything, there's a scratch pad with more but off the top of my head, things I want to see out of it:

  • opt in -- not forced on anyone
  • pseudo anonymous -- So there's no "u/weffey is out to get me claims", kinda like how Google does "fancy fox" or "curious cat" when you share a document
  • show reports -- so if something is removed it says reports(54) beside it
  • remove links -- if something is spam, and it's removed there's no reason to
  • no OP -- witchhunts. I just can't deal with them.
  • removal reasons -- I can't in good faith let people open up their mod logs without an option to say "removing as spam" or "doesn't belong in this subreddit."

There's more. It's not fully thought out. When it comes closer to spec-ing it out fully, I'll be sure to get full fledged feedback.

Annnnnnnnnd I fully admit this comment will come back to bite my in the butt at some point.

[–]Umdlye 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Annnnnnnnnd I fully admit this comment will come back to bite my in the butt at some point.

No way! This seems pretty reasonable.

[–]NinjaDiscoJesus 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fuck em least you are offering new ideas.

[–]zardeh [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

kinda like how Google does "fancy fox" or "curious cat" when you share a document

as in each mod is anonymized?

This is probably good, but for a large subreddit any sufficiently interested user will be able to figure that out based on timezones and kind of activity. Right, like figuring out who automod is is trivial, and figuring out that the mod who lives in australia is active in that timezone is easy, and then you can do that (although I guess you can kinda do that anyway).

Would an opt-in thing be better, for example for a "controversial" mod action, be able to hide your name and say "banned by /r/subreddit" or "moderator: private"

[–]weffey [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Like I said, not really thought out ;)

[–]zardeh [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

well now its slightly more thought out :P

[–]porpoiseoflife [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If it does, then bite back. You're just sitting here brainstorming and giving us the exact kind of feedback that we want to see. And not only that, you're being straight-forward about the brainstorming part of it. To paraphrase an old saying: No action plan survives contact with the code.

We're all nerds here. Even those of us that don't code know that there are times when you can't get a certain piece of code to work right, regardless of how often you bang your head on the desk and threaten the servers with a frag grenade.

[–]CedarWolf [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Well, that's great and all, and I'm sure I'll get along just fine because I'm traditionally a heavy-hitter on most of my subs... but there's still no mechanism to remove inactive or detrimental head mods.

I know of head mods who use their own subs to spam their personal blogs, their YouTube channels, or for profit content; I know of head mods who don't freaking do anything but do pop up every once in a while to wreck their mod team; I know of head mods who are actively and openly bigoted against the communities they lead; I know of head mods who hold their subreddits hostage against the will of their communities because they find it funny...

Please institute some sort of system to deal with that.

[–]weffey [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This is definitely on our radar, and it's not an easier problem to solve. I'm sure that we will talk more about it when we are ready to actively address it.

[–]brainburger [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think it would be interesting to have elections for mods. I suppose this would have to be optional, or... maybe it could be a requirement for subreddits over a certain size?

Full of complication, I know..

[–]TotesMessenger -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)