225
226

kn0thingConversation between the /r/science mods and /u/kn0thing over amas (imgur.com)

Br00ce が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]CressCrowbits -9ポイント-8ポイント  (15子コメント)

I'm still bemused about how everyone hates Pao, when she appears not to have actually done anything, bar the announcement of FPH's ban.

[–]Firecracker048 9ポイント10ポイント  (11子コメント)

She did fire an employee for having cancer

[–]HiiiPowerd -4ポイント-3ポイント  (10子コメント)

allegedly. there's absolutely no evidence to back that up, and him deleting the ama hints he realized that what he was saying was libel if he can't back it up (if it's true, he could have sued reddit in the first place)

[–]cojoco 3ポイント4ポイント  (9子コメント)

there's absolutely no evidence to back that up

Except the employee in question strongly implying it.

How much evidence do you need?

[–]HiiiPowerd 3ポイント4ポイント  (8子コメント)

Right, he alleged that he was fired for being sick. What I need, is for that to be verified. He hasn't provided a shred of proof, and that's a major allegation. I'm not gonna take some random guy's word for it without a second source to back it up, and I think the only reason so many people are quick to believe is because it supports their narrative. An unverified allegation isn't evidence, it's an allegation.

Do we not remember the last time a reddit employee was fired? He was fired for "no reason", or so he said.

[–]cojoco -1ポイント0ポイント  (7子コメント)

it supports their narrative.

God forbid anybody post evidence that supports their narrative.

What would the New York Times do if this was ever regarded as slimey?

You're forgetting about all the stuff in the background of these firings which is mere supposition but is also the likeliest explanation, and that also supports the narrative.

Sometimes one has to act without knowing all of the facts, but just knowing the ways of the world.

[–]HiiiPowerd 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

God forbid anybody post evidence that supports their narrative.

An allegation isn't evidence. It's an allegation. It needs to be supported with evidence, not mere conjecture.

What would the New York Times do if this was ever regarded as slimey?

What does the NYT have to do with this?

You're forgetting about all the stuff in the background of these firings which is mere supposition but is also the likeliest explanation, and that also supports the narrative.

No I'm not...Victoria was fired. That has nothing to do with this guy supposedly being fired for being sick. These are separate incidents.

Sometimes one has to act without knowing all of the facts, but just knowing the ways of the world.

Wow, the dramatics. You don't know all the facts, nor do you even have any power here to do anything about it anyway. What you are describing is called being a conspiracy theorist. "knowing the ways of the world", looooooool.

[–]cojoco -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

So it's come to this, a lame little thought-terminating cliché?

That didn't take long.

[–]HiiiPowerd 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Sometimes one has to act without knowing all of the facts, but just knowing the ways of the world.

I'm gonna remember this one man, made my day

[–]cojoco -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

You're denying that personal experience informs one's actions and beliefs?

I've been involved in a successful start-up and I've seen the sackings that occur between growth and eventual financial success.

[–]antiproton 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

She is, ostensibly, steering the ship.

Plus given her personal history and the recent commentary on "safe spaces", it doesn't take too much of a logical leap to come to the conclusion that she's turning the screws to make the site look more like how she wants it to look.

That may or may not be true, but, as Truman said, "The buck stops here". Even if she is not the one responsible for all the bullshit going on, she should be the one knocking heads together to get it sorted.

[–]cojoco 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

she's turning the screws to make the site look more like how she wants it to look.

A place she can sue when she inevitably gets terminated, you mean?

[–]HiiiPowerd 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

that's not logic, it's conspiracy.