全 29 件のコメント

[–]urnbabyurnNeoPanglossian[S] 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also, badeconomics will be scabs during the strike in hopes of finally reaching front page of /all

[–]SoyElGoddamnBatmanI don't really know anything, honestly 3ポイント4ポイント  (7子コメント)

I'm just waiting for something to come out where she actually did fuck something up and should have been let go. That would be hilarious and apt, given that everyone is freaking out on incomplete information.

As with the harrassment subs, no big for me.

[–]irondeepbicycleI got 99 problems but technological unemployment ain't one 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

A warrant for Victoria's arrest is going to become public tomorrow. Turns out Victoria has been in league with ISIS.

[–]AssaultedCracker 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

I think you're missing the point of the protests. Yes, the general reddit population is upset because they liked Victoria, and that's not a valid cause for protest because we don't know what she did to warrant a firing. The protest, on the other hand, is being done by mods, because the mods were not given any notice, or any assistance in dealing with her absence.

Generally when you fire somebody for fucking up, you find somebody from among your remaining employees to fill their shoes until a new employee can be hired. You also let your clients know about the situation and assure them about how you will be meeting their needs going forward. In this case, the mods are reddit's clients. They bring in the revenue. They were not shown this standard level of consideration, and they find it to be in keeping with the general lack of support and respect they receive from admins over the long term.

In short, it's nothing at all like the harassment subs protest.

[–]a_s_h_e_nA stable currency, like bitcoin 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

what's really cool is that mainstream reddit has been forced to care about this issue

[–]AssaultedCracker 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I legitimately can't tell if you're being sarcastic.

[–]a_s_h_e_nA stable currency, like bitcoin 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

no sarcasm. Realized that as I hit submit haha.

[–]IntegraldsI am the rep agent AMA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The protest, on the other hand, is being done by mods, because the mods were not given any notice, or any assistance in dealing with her absence.

As a minor mod (/r/asksocialscience, my little /r/dsge, a few of the subs in the reddit-econosphere) it is extremely disconcerting that the admins fired a person key to the functioning of /r/iama without informing the /r/iama mods.

[–]SoyElGoddamnBatmanI don't really know anything, honestly 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I didn't mean to suggest it was like the harassment subs business; I've just seen it referenced a few times in the threads I've looked at, so there must be some shared antipathy.

[–]IntegraldsI am the rep agent AMA 2ポイント3ポイント  (12子コメント)

So I'm slightly confused. Here's what I understand is going on:

  1. There's this person named Victoria who coordinates and assists with high-profile AMAs.
  2. She seems pretty darn useful to have around.
  3. She worked for reddit? Either as an employee or a contractor of some sort?
  4. In either case, she has been let go.
  5. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.

I can't find any information as to why she was terminated. It's confusing. She seems to have been bringing in enormous amounts of benefit to Reddit -- in pageviews, clicks, popular awareness, advertising, logistics -- and I'm sure she was being paid W<MPL. There is no rational business motive for terminating her. I happen to think firms are (roughly) profit maximizers. Hence my confusion! What gives?

[–]abetadist 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Maybe for whatever reason, her MPL dropped below her W?

[–]IntegraldsI am the rep agent AMA 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

She must have been caught with a dead girl or a live boy or somethin'.

This is one of them there Bayesian things. Like, what is the distribution of (whatever Victoria did | Reddit fired her)?

[–]urnbabyurnNeoPanglossian[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

All I know if Pr(fired|what she did)=1 but Pr(fired) is probably pretty low. So it's very likely that she did it.

[–]urnbabyurnNeoPanglossian[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

They should have been paying her an efficiency wage.

[–]qgyh2 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not just her firing.

I think the point is that reddit admins have generally ignored users/mods as a policy. And of these admins /u/chooter did respond a bit / was helpful.

The fact that admins calmly fired her without informing anyone or taking into account pending AMA's etc is also bad.

[–]ThisIsNotHim 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The information why she was let go is unlikely to be made public.

The initial reason people were upset was that she was helping coordinate a lot of upcoming AMAs. Moderators in subs like /r/books are now left without a way to contact the AMAees they have scheduled.

The admins are allegedly going to step in and help, but they only made this announcement in a thread, after everyone had found out in a super roundabout way that she's gone. This I guess was during an AMA she was supposed to be helping run today. So, yeah.

People are also still upset about not being able to harass the imgur employees.

[–]irwin08Memes are always and everywhere dank 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Well lets prax it out.

  1. Humans Act

  2. Humans are horses.

  3. Horses were replaced by machines.

  4. Therefore Victoria is being replaced by a machine.

[–]Fellownerd 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

We need 5. Victoria is a human. Otherwise we aren't even our prax is bad

[–]Oediumpareto efficiency is possible if we just kill the right people 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I can't find any information as to why she was terminated. It's confusing.

Reddit isn't known for its sound administrative decisions. They basically stumbled into their current position on the Internet by virtue of structuring subreddits as they are, every call since has been a questionable one. Arguably the single mind behind their biggest traffic driver is let go? I know all sites have a shelf life, but you could at least milk it to a certain point if you didn't make it blatantly frictous

[–]a_s_h_e_nA stable currency, like bitcoin 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.

Specifically because there was no warning to the mods of /r/iama etc so many AMAs are now in unknown waters, they have no contingency plan, and the mods are in general sick of not getting the respect they feel they deserve from the admins.

[–]Locnil 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I happen to think firms are (roughly) profit maximizers.

Firms, as a whole, are generally that, to the best of their capabilities. Individual firms, on the other hand...

[–]BUTWHYNOTZOIDBERGTranscedential Virgo Trotskyist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Maybe it was a bit unfair for her to be fired in the manner that she was - but christ almighty I go to this website for content, not for drama or subreddit protests... Silly stuff.

I just want my dank memes, man.

[–]a_s_h_e_nA stable currency, like bitcoin 1ポイント2ポイント  (6子コメント)

just saw that /u/qgyh2 might be closing all subs, which would include /r/economics...

http://gyazo.com/93df03c62bd798e134b86efba9f09389

[–]qgyh2 5ポイント6ポイント  (4子コメント)

I'm fine with closing anything/everything if other mods and users agree.

[–]a_s_h_e_nA stable currency, like bitcoin 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

fair enough!

[–]IntegraldsI am the rep agent AMA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's after Jobs Day, so I don't even care. I did my thing.

Tagging /u/besttrousers; whenever he wakes up, he seems like the guy to ask.

[–]abetadist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why are we doing this on so little information?

Have a look at this submission on /r/economics. How strong do you think your theory of Victoria's firing is? 60%? 70%?

[–]urnbabyurnNeoPanglossian[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cool. Hopefully this traffic booms.

I should have just asked if Victoria is bad economics since /r/wumbotarian seems ok with those posts.

/u/besttrousers should know what's going on in economics. I assume ASS is open /u/integralds