全 21 件のコメント

[–]Abe_Drinkin[S] 7ポイント8ポイント  (8子コメント)

At 7:30 a.m., the British launch a massive offensive against German forces in the Somme River region of France. During the preceding week, 250,000 Allied shells had pounded German positions near the Somme, and 100,000 British soldiers poured out of their trenches and into no-man’s-land on July 1, expecting to find the way cleared for them. However, scores of heavy German machine guns had survived the artillery onslaught, and the infantry were massacred. By the end of the day, 20,000 British soldiers were dead and 40,000 wounded. It was the single heaviest day of casualties in British military history. The disastrous Battle of the Somme stretched on for more than four months, with the Allies advancing a total of just five miles.

When World War I broke out in August 1914, great throngs of British men lined up to enlist in the war effort. At the time, it was generally thought that the war would be over within six months. However, by the end of 1914 well over a million soldiers of various nationalities had been killed on the battlefields of Europe, and a final victory was not in sight for either the Allies or the Central Powers. On the Western Front–the battle line that stretched across northern France and Belgium–the combatants had settled down in the trenches for a terrible war of attrition. Maimed and shell-shocked troops returning to Britain with tales of machine guns, artillery barrages, and poison gas seriously dampened the enthusiasm of potential new volunteers.

With the aim of raising enough men to launch a decisive offensive against Germany, Britain replaced voluntary service with conscription in January 1916, when it passed an act calling for the enlistment of all unmarried men between the ages of 18 and 41. After Germany launched a massive offensive of its own against Verdun in February, Britain expanded the Military Service Act, calling for the conscription of all men, married and unmarried, between the ages of 18 and 41. Near the end of June, with the Battle of Verdun still raging, Britain prepared for its major offensive along a 21-mile stretch of the Western Front north of the Somme River.

For a week, the British bombarded the German trenches as a prelude to the attack. British Field Marshal Douglas Haig, commander of the British Expeditionary Force, thought the artillery would decimate the German defenses and allow a British breakthrough; in fact, it served primarily to remove the element of surprise. When the bombardment died down on the morning of July 1, the German machine crews emerged from their fortified trenches and set up their weapons. At 7:30 a.m., 11 British divisions attacked at once, and the majority of them were gunned down. The soldiers optimistically carried heavy supplies for a long march, but few made it more than a couple of hundred yards. Five French divisions that attacked south of the Somme at the same time fared a little better, but without British success little could be done to exploit their gains.

After the initial disaster, Haig resigned himself to smaller but equally ineffectual advances, and more than 1,000 Allied lives were extinguished for every 100 yards gained on the Germans. Even Britain’s September 15 introduction of tanks into warfare for the first time in history failed to break the deadlock in the Battle of the Somme. In October, heavy rains turned the battlefield into a sea of mud, and on November 18 Haig called off the Somme offensive after more than four months of mass slaughter.

Except for its effect of diverting German troops from the Battle of Verdun, the offensive was a miserable disaster. It amounted to a total gain of just 125 square miles for the Allies, with more than 600,000 British and French soldiers killed, wounded, or missing in the action. German casualties were more than 650,000. Although Haig was severely criticized for the costly battle, his willingness to commit massive amounts of men and resources to the stalemate along the Western Front did eventually contribute to the collapse of an exhausted Germany in 1918.

[–]DuxBelisariusarchaeologist of new, week 12 11ポイント12ポイント  (7子コメント)

When World War I broke out in August 1914, great throngs of British men lined up to enlist in the war effort. At the time, it was generally thought that the war would be over within six months.

There is no evidence that the 'War would be over by Christmas' was ever held in wide belied in 1914. Kitchener called up the new armies with the knowledge that they wouldn't be ready until 1915 at the very least, and he didn't expect the British Army to be making any major effort until at most 1916, more likely 1917.

On the Western Front–the battle line that stretched across northern France and Belgium–the combatants had settled down in the trenches for a terrible war of attrition.

Attrition did not become the aim of Allied strategy until the Inter-Allied Conference at Chantilly in November, 1915. The stated goal of the General Allied Offensive next year would be the 'destruction of the enemy's armies', specifically those of the German and Austro-Hungarian Empires.

With the aim of raising enough men to launch a decisive offensive against Germany, Britain replaced voluntary service with conscription in January 1916, when it passed an act calling for the enlistment of all unmarried men between the ages of 18 and 41.

This had more to do with the fact that compulsion under the Derby Plan wasn't working, and Britain needed to institute a more organized system of providing the Army with manpower. Conscription, which was already utilized by all the major combatants, would weed out those men that were needed for vital war work, and thus ensure that industrial and military demands could be met efficiently. As Richard Holmes points out in Tommy, many conscripts would argue that they would have volunteered sooner or later, but conscription made that choice for them.

Near the end of June, with the Battle of Verdun still raging, Britain prepared for its major offensive along a 21-mile stretch of the Western Front north of the Somme River.

It was not a solely British offensive; British 4th Army under Henry Rawlinson would attack along a 20 km front north of the Somme, but south of the Somme Emile Fayolle's French 6th Army would attack along a 10 km front. It was a joint offensive, coordinated by Ferdinand Foch, aimed at inflicting heavy losses on the German Army, and driving it from it's positions in Picardy, centered on the Thiepval-Combles Massif, Lassigny and the Flaucourt Plateau. It would also have the immediate effect of forcing the Germans to disengage from their offensive at Verdun, and give the French Army time to recuperate and counter-attack.

For a week, the British bombarded the German trenches as a prelude to the attack. British Field Marshal Douglas Haig, commander of the British Expeditionary Force, thought the artillery would decimate the German defenses and allow a British breakthrough; in fact, it served primarily to remove the element of surprise.

Haig was C-in-C British Armies in France and Flanders; General Sir Henry Rawlinson was GOC 4th Army. Rawlinson was the one who decided on a methodical bombardment, and it made sense. Haig, for his part, wanted a short, hurricane barrage, but with the state and quantity of British shells and artillery, in tandem with the length of front and depth of enemy defences, this was unfeasible. Moreover, there was really no point in operational surprise on the Western Front: allied papers tracked the build-up, the Somme sector was where Franco-British lines met and thus the only place a joint offensive could be launched; the build-up requires for an offensive was obvious to the enemy; a methodical bombardment would ensure that the enemy's positions were thoroughly shelled, and would spare the British guns from excessive wear in a short time, which a hurricane bombardment would have entailed. There were plenty of officers and soldiers sceptical of the bombardment, and even it had worked, there still would have been bloody fighting ahead.

When the bombardment died down on the morning of July 1, the German machine crews emerged from their fortified trenches and set up their weapons. At 7:30 a.m., 11 British divisions attacked at once, and the majority of them were gunned down.

Except for, y'know, XIII & XV Corps south of the Albert-Bapaume road, that reached basically all of their first day objectives; or 36th Ulster Division, which captured the Schwaben redoubt, and was only driven out by nightfall; and the Leipzig redoubt, where the British gained a foothold in the German lines.

The soldiers optimistically carried heavy supplies for a long march, but few made it more than a couple of hundred yards.

They were carrying the supplies that would have been needed to consolidate positions, and hold out against enemy counter-attacks. What should they have left behind? The extra ammo, the extra rations and water? The spare barrels and mags for the Lewis Gun, their spade? The sand bags and barbed wire coils?

Five French divisions that attacked south of the Somme at the same time fared a little better, but without British success little could be done to exploit their gains.

Without British success? Certainly, north of the road the situation was abysmal, but south of the road the entire German defensive line had been unhinged; soon after the Germans would abandon Fricourt, and the commander of XIV Reserve Corps would order a retreat to the second position, completely unhinging the Somme defenses west of Peronne.

After the initial disaster, Haig resigned himself to smaller but equally ineffectual advances, and more than 1,000 Allied lives were extinguished for every 100 yards gained on the Germans.

What's the source on those 1000 allied lives per hundred yards? Allied dead and missing was 131 000 total, French and British. Moreover, they claim that 'Haig' resigned himself to smaller advances ignores a) Rawlinson was the commander on the ground, joins by Gough and the Reserve Army; and b) the attack on Bazentin Ridge, the broad front attacks attempted in August, and the successful broad front assaults in September at Flers-Courcelettes and Thiepval. Moreover, Haig pressured Gough and Rawlinson to attempt more broad front attacks, but the commanders of the armies and corps did have to face their own inexperience and other pressing factors. A) The British guns and shells were poor quality and often defective; B) The BEF received only 50% of the shells it was expending on the Somme, and the British had to carefully husband their resources; C) broadfront attacks could take as much as a week to coordinate and prepare, and were still no guarantee of easy success; and D) the time spent planning a broad front assault was time given to the Germans their prepare their defences and plan counterattacks, with one such attack involving wan entire division being launched in August, with bloody results.

Continued

[–]DuxBelisariusarchaeologist of new, week 12 14ポイント15ポイント  (6子コメント)

Even Britain’s September 15 introduction of tanks into warfare for the first time in history failed to break the deadlock in the Battle of the Somme.

Actually, the Battle of Flers-Courcelettes was a great success for the British. Although most of the tanks were immobilized, those that did support the attack did quite well in supporting the infantry. Most of the German second position fell to Franco-British assault, and 135 000 casualties were inflicted on the Germans that month. Moreover, British infantry, artillery and aircraft cooperated together in an effective, combined arms system, something that even the Germans took note of!

Except for its effect of diverting German troops from the Battle of Verdun, the offensive was a miserable disaster.

Aside from not breaking through the Germans lines, but that was always more of a contingency than an actual plan, the Offensive achieved all of it's aims. The Bapaume-Peronne road was severed by French forces around Morval, Bouchavesnes, and Sailly-Saillisel. German lateral communications were thus cut off, and Bapaume and Peronne were within range of future allied advances. The offensive put an end to German hopes at Verdun, and facilitated a French recovery, the fruits of which were born by Robert Nivelle's autumn offensives there. It inflicted c. 500 000 casualties on the German Army of which c. 140-150 000 were killed & missing and c. 73 000 taken prisoner, triggering a manpower crisis that would afflict the Army till the war's end. Beginning in September, the Germans began planning a withdrawal to the under-construction Siegfried Stellung, recognizing that it would be madness to face another Somme offensive in their position. In the words of Generalleutnant von Fuchs:

Enemy superiority is so great that we are not in a position either to fix their forces in position or to prevent them from launching an offensive elsewhere. We just do not have the troops.... We cannot prevail in a second battle of the Somme with our men; they cannot achieve that any more. (20 January 1917)

Finally:

Although Haig was severely criticized for the costly battle, his willingness to commit massive amounts of men and resources to the stalemate along the Western Front did eventually contribute to the collapse of an exhausted Germany in 1918.

It had more to it than just a willingness to expend resources. The BEF and the French Army emerged from the Somme and Verdun stronger, smarter, more technological entities than when they had gone in. Infantry tactics continued to develop, emphasizing fire and movement, artillery became more deadly, aircraft were combined with ground forces to create an effective all arms system, and the appearance of the Tank merely added a new piece to the puzzle. I'd argue that the roots of Allied victory in WWI, at least on the Western Front, lay in the mud of the Somme.

Here are some answers I've given concerning the Somme on r/AskHistorians, for anyone that's interested:

Sources:

  • The Somme: the Day-by-Day Account by Chris McCarthy
  • The Great War: A Combat History of the First World War by Peter Hart
  • Bloody Victory: The Sacrifice on the Somme and the Making of the Twentieth Century by William Phillpott
  • War of Attrition: Fighting the First World War by William Phillpott
  • The Deluge: The Great War, America and the re-making of the Global Order, 1916-1931 by Adam Tooze
  • The First World War, 1914-1918: Germany and Austria-Hungary by Holger Herwig
  • The German Army on the Somme 1914-16 by Jack Sheldon
  • Mud, Blood and Poppycock by Gordon Corrigan
  • Through German Eyes: the British and the Somme by Christopher Duffy
  • 1914-1918 by David Stevenson
  • Tommy: the British Soldier on the Western Front, 1914-1918 by Richard Holmes
  • Pyrrhic Victory by Robert Doughty
  • Battle Story: Somme 1916 by Andrew Robertshaw
  • The Last Great War: British Society and the First World War by Adrian Gregory

[–]HockeyGoalie1 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

A lot of people forget the number of germans killed.

Also, this is a /r/badhistory worthy post.

[–]DuxBelisariusarchaeologist of new, week 12 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you!

[–]elos_archaeologist of new, week 19 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Thank you for saving me the effort :p

Man a damn shame you're at -1 though, come on /r/history...just because it counters your view doesn't mean it isn't a well cited, well reasoned refutation

[–]DuxBelisariusarchaeologist of new, week 12 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

No problem! Happy Canada Day, eh!

[–]chavz25 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I was just there two months ago and I saw the thiepval memorial there to the missing at the Somme. It is chilling the amount of lives lost that never had a proper burial. Really brings it into perspective how brutal the first world war was.

[–]inversedwnvte 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

And also today, England scored on itself to lose against Japan, poor girl :(

[–]DuxBelisariusarchaeologist of new, week 12 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Alan Seeger, an American war poet serving in the French Foreign Legion, died on July 4th, 1916, during the Battle of the Somme. Incidentally, he died on the date of the 140th Anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. He wrote one of the best poems of the war, I have A Rendezvous with Death:

I have a rendezvous with Death At some disputed barricade, When Spring comes back with rustling shade And apple-blossoms fill the air— I have a rendezvous with Death When Springs brings back blue days and fair.

It may be he shall take my hand And lead me into his dark land And close my eyes and quench my breath— It may be I shall pass him still. I have a rendezvous with Death On some scarred slope of battered hill, When Spring comes round again this year And the first meadow-flowers appear.

God knows 'twere better to be deep Pillowed in silk and scented down, Where Love throbs out in blissful sleep Pulse nigh to pulse, and breath to breath, Where hushed awakenings are dear . . . But I've a rendezvous with Death At midnight in some flaming town, When Spring trips north again this year, And I to my pledged word am true. I shall not fail that rendezvous.

[–]elos_archaeologist of new, week 19 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

...why is this at -2? Piss someone off or something? Lol

[–]Ionicfold -3ポイント-2ポイント  (5子コメント)

It's unfortunate how this is getting buried beneath everything else.

This is one of the bloodiest battles in history, and there are more people bothered about the battle of Gettysburg than they are about about a battle in one of history's turning points. WWI.i

I suppose Americans aren't taught important history like this though, which is why it's getting buried.

[–]elos_archaeologist of new, week 19 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Look I literally study WW1 academically. It's not a surprise that people are interested in one of the bloodiest battles in the bloodiest war in their history compared to a battle in a war that they hadn't even joined yet half a world away. Don't take it personally.

[–]pimparo02 -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yes how dare Americans be more interested in a battle that occurred on their soil in their own civil war, which also happens to be the bloodiest battle on the entire continent.

Also this is an American site, it would make sense for a majority of people to be American.

[–]elos_archaeologist of new, week 19 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Just because it was made in America doesn't mean it's an American only site lol. It has a massive European population. It isn't "owned" by any nationality.

[–]pimparo02 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know, Im just pointing out that a lot of posts being about american history, especially when such a significant and bloody battle took place is not unexpected and does not mean that Americans are not taught important history, just that our own countries history is important to us.

[–]jimmywutangclan -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

And 18 years ago today, the British also lost Hong Kong :D

[–]Ionicfold 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Something a lot of people in Hong Kong regret.

[–]Ungface 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

We didnt lose Hong Kong, essentially our lease was up.

The chinese gave it to us for 100 years and theyve given hong kong its "independance" for 100 years.