Tim Hunt Didn’t Matter. The Narrative Did
Candice Holdsworth | On 30, Jun 2015
How is it that a distinguished Nobel Laureate was completely undone by fourth-hand gossip? Silly tittle-tattle, spread by people who have not achieved one iota of what he has.
It is because Tim Hunt, as an individual, doesn’t really matter; it is “the narrative” which must be preserved at all costs: the narrative that the STEM industry is rife with anti-woman bigotry and it is men like Hunt, which spitefully perpetuate it.
To that end, what a juicy prospect he must have seemed.
This narrative will inform you, with a straight face, that a major scientific figure like Tim Hunt is so filled with misogyny and resentment at having to work alongside female scientists that he willingly risked his entire career just to spew hatred at them. The man is simply bursting with bigotry, apparently.
A similar narrative was at work recently when a fraternity at the University of Virginia was falsely accused of committing a crime of extreme depravity. This story, the invention of a young female fantasist, was gleefully repeated by Rolling Stone magazine and the world’s media, until it was eventually completely discredited and retracted.
The innocent members of that fraternity, however, were just sacrificial lambs to the ignoble narrative: there is a rape epidemic on college campuses.
In my last piece on Tim Hunt I said, “the lessons that can be drawn from this are that the institutions we trust to protect free speech and individual liberty have shown themselves to be pusillanimous in the face of brute force by fanatics, but ordinary people are starting to push back now. Truth will out, eventually.”
Another lesson is that there is endemic political partisanship in the media, which we have to be very aware of (GamerGate originally criticised this in games journalism). We’re not always dealing with honest brokers who report the truth objectively. These are ideologues playing a power game.
Sign up for our newsletter and receive a free copy of Athena eBook Psyche in the City:
Featured Image Credit: The Remorse of Orestes, where he is surrounded by the Erinyes, William-Adolphe Bouguereau, 1862 Source: WikiCommons
-
Not to get all meta, but there’s now a whole cottage industry of posting about narratives – narratives about narratives, of which this is a piece. Instead of taking a single item and examining it (Hunt made sexist comments and resigned/was removed from a couple honorary positions over it), let’s rope in UVA and gamer gate and God knows what else and send the whole thing down the rabbit hole. Which then makes dialogue basically impossible, because it could be about anything and everything.
Should Hunt have suffered consequences, and if so what? I’d say yes, and the consequences (again, resigning a couple honorary posts – he’s retired and lost no paying positions) are appropriate.
People who defend him have been saying it was just a joke, but many a truth was said in jest. I think he said it in a kidding way, but he actually believes the things he says – which sends a terrible message. I think it’s also indicative of a not-insignificant mindset in the scientific community. Events like this may prompt those who hold those views to reexamine them. At a minimum they’ll think twice about sharing similar, um, insights in the future. Either way that’s progress.
I try to take this stuff on a case by case basis. In November I posted about shirtstorm, basically in defense of the scientist:
So I think the left has at times been unreasonable. But I don’t think this is one of those times.
-
Enjoyed this! I find the reaction to his comments so ironic, because those crying foul are essentially proving his point.
-
Enjoyed this! I find the reaction to the emotional comment so ironic.
-
This is very true, many “gaming journalists” even generally outright stated that they have a problem with the concept of “objectivity” or as other people would describe it “telling the truth” because it wouldn’t let them peddle their horseshit as easily, see for instance: http://i.imgur.com/n5ZUEZC.png
https://storify.com/jasonschreier/gamergate
https://twitter.com/patrickklepek/status/507319477865025536 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BxNR1agCUAAPLn_.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/dyqhR95.png
It’s much harder building a narrative on pesky things like “facts”.
-
It is very accurate what you are saying about narrative, its very similar to the which hunt trials in Salem. Its the same idea, controlling the discussion and not allowing those effected a fair chance at defending themselves. I have in the past wondered what would happen if someone was to survive a witch trial, confirming they are in fact a witch, what would happen? Would people become more determined to hunt them and put a stop to their evil ways? To scared to lose control of the narrative? On the other hand it took many years for people to fight back against the “judges” of these trials, but eventually they did. Its just history repeating, hopefully we will eventually learn from it.
Comments