全 11 件のコメント

[–]plajjer 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

I really wish you didn't step down here. You post the best content, especially to comments in threads that aren't picked up by r/moderationlog that we'd miss otherwise. You'd be fine moderating r/politic (if you get it) and this sub because as you say, it will be bot moderated and transparent. I kind of doubt r/politics will add this sureddit to their sidebar no matter what you do. Thanks for all your work though. I think it's really having an effect. I do hope more people will start posting content from what r/moderationlog picks up on.

[–]go1dfish[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

I don't plan to stop posting, but I won't be making reference to any specific moderators, or actions only general theory.

I kind of doubt r/politics will add this sureddit to their sidebar no matter what you do.

So do I, but I'm willing to give them the benefit of a doubt on this.

If the moderators are unwilling to unban me despite my concessions I will very likely return to personally pointing out any and every removal that is the least bit questionable.

This is not meant to be an offer to silence critics of the moderation of /r/politics and /r/worldnews it's meant to be an opportunity for the moderators to show that the criticisms are unfounded.

[–]platypuspracticus 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

I really wish this place would be modded a bit more. There's some times where it's obvious the person posting here is having an overreaction to the mods and throw a tantrum that not only includes assaulting the mods online but also posting it here. I came here because I was concerned about tone of discussion being controlled but I wind up finding more and more people who simply just cannot discuss things in a civil tone and have to play the martyr at every turn.

[–]go1dfish[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

I think this is a necessary trade off for a subreddit of this nature.

Who am I to deem a user crazy or misguided for you in an absolute way?

I have no problem down voting to help suggest to others that maybe some post/person isn't worth listening to, but to decide as a moderator to remove a post is to assume correctness. It says I'm right and the poster (maybe even the community) is wrong.

On the topic of moderation, there is no right or wrong answer, there are merely competing opinions.

Can you come up with objective guidelines for what you think should be removed?

[–]platypuspracticus -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

That's fair.

[–]redblender 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

Give em hell, go1dfish.

[–]cojoco 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

Go1dfish' resignation message is here, and I've been added as a mod of /r/PoliticalModeration

[–]alllie -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

People who post comments on /r/ModerationLog are now being confronted.

[–]go1dfish[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

Confronted how?

[–]alllie -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

[–]go1dfish[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

That looks like a conversation, not a confrontation.

I tapped cojoco as a mod to help foster a more neutral atmosphere than I was able to create; and so far he seems to be doing a good job.

He isn't a mod of any other political sub-reddit so please don't direct your frustration at him, he's here to help.