Out of interest, how realistic is it for MAKR to be able to isolate out the sending of the message and the reposting of the post (I would assume that would be easy, but maybe not?), as well as be able to tell the difference between basically pure spammers (i.e. not constructive posters), legitimate users who submitted spam in good faith (i.e. constructive posters, but who are, perhaps, new to a subreddit or accidentally clicked a button too many times), and those who were "actually censored" and not simply removed as spam (which itself, is kinda a vague adjective at times)?

I mean, I'm assuming the second and third group are your targets, but if you could identify all 3 groups and separate out commenting and reposting, you could allow mods to have at least a moderate degree of control over what your specific actions are in their subreddit with, say, spammers never being given a message or getting reposted, with or without request, good-faith spam posters perhaps being messaged with default no repost but still allow that to be turned on, and actual censorship always getting messaged (with or without approval from moderators of a specific subreddit) and defaulting to reposting.

I could be wrong, but such a compromise would seem to be acceptable, at least, for what I'm guessing the admins want (i.e. no warning spammers), but also acting as a dissenting voice towards the whole "mods are gods" thing, which is something I know that I, personally, would definitely support.