/
    Skip to main content
    Advertisement

    Hold the applause for Facebook's rainbow-colored profiles, activists say

    The Radical Faeries argue ban on adopted names is unfair to LGBT people who want to avoid homophobia or to express their true identity
    Storm Arcana
    ‘I don’t like anybody telling me who I am or have to be,’ said Storm Arcana, left, seated on a rug in the Faerie Freedom Village, a colourful camp near city hall. Photograph: Rory
    Rory Carroll in San Francisco and Amanda Holpuch in Ann Arbor, Michigan
    Within hours of the supreme court’s Friday decision on same-sex marriage, people with a certain number of progressively minded friends found their Facebook news feeds dominated by rainbow-colored profile pictures created by a special link on the website.
    The gambit successfully put Facebook’s equality credentials in the spotlight. But it was challenged on Saturday at San Francisco Pride, an event the company sponsored.
    The Radical Faeries, one of the more idiosyncratic groups at San Francisco’s Pride, said the festival should dump Facebook as a sponsor because of the company’s ban on adopted names.
    The policy was unfair to LGBT people who use adopted names to avoid homophobia or to express their true identity, they said.
    “I don’t like anybody telling me who I am or have to be,” said Storm Arcana, 42, seated on a rug in the Faerie Freedom Village, a colourful camp near city hall.
    “That’s anathema to my essence. I’m self-defined and self-described and that is my right.” He objected to Facebook sponsoring Pride. “There’s too much of a contrast between what they represent and what we represent.”
    In response, a Facebook spokesperson told the Guardian on Sunday: “Facebook is proud of our commitment to diversity and our support of the LGBTQ community as a company and an employer.
    “We have been strong supporters of the San Francisco parade for many years. Last year more than 1,500 people associated with Facebook marched in the San Francisco parade, and this year we are participating in 12 celebrations around the world.”
    The #MyNameIs organization has been fighting for Facebook to change its name policy. At San Francisco pride, it demonstrated against the policy.
    The group is led by San Francisco-based drag queens but also includes domestic abuse survivors, Native Americans and other people who feel that they should be allowed to use names different from those that appear on their birth certificate. Facebook, which has met members of the group, has slightly amended its policy but insists that it distinguishes itself from other social networks by refusing to let people be anonymous.
    Advertisement
    “This policy directly harms LGBTQ people, especially transgender and queer people around the world who face daily discrimination, and use social media like Facebook to find support, build community, and express their authentic selves,” said organizer and drag queen Lil Miss Hot Mess in a statement.
    “Facebook may seem like a trivial waste of time, but for trans people and LGBTQ youth who face disproportionate rates of violence and suicide, it can literally be a lifeline.”
    The #MyNameIs group tried to ban Facebook from the parade with an online petition that collected more than 2,500 signatures. Facebook did not respond to requests for comment.
    But the company remained as a sponsor, to the dismay of the #MyNameIs organizers and the Radical Faeries, a group which blends counter-cultural values, queer consciousness and spirituality.
    Many members said they had been expelled from Facebook because they could not supply documentation to prove their adopted names were real.
    Lovely Day, a 48-year-old woman who adopted that name six years ago, said Facebook suspended her account on Christmas Day, saying she needed to prove its authenticity. The suspension came soon after she posted videos of controversial police shootings, prompting her suspicion that trolls who disliked her viewpoint alerted Facebook.
    She lamented that the company was a festival sponsor.
    “I’m not really into it but I can’t change what corporate dollars do,” she said.
    Day had a consolation: she is still able to use a Facebook account registered as Bobbi Terri, the names of two plastic trans dolls she takes on trips.
    “I can’t have an account,” she said, “but the dolls, sure.”
    Other Faeries accused the tech giant of wanting to use only names that appeared on credit cards in order to monetize data.
    Stellara Solanum, 31, bristled that he must use his birth name, Kevin Faulkner, on Facebook even though friends know him as Stellara, which he considers more meaningful.
    “My housemate spent a lot more getting to know me before naming me than my parents did,” he said.
    Solanum said he now struggled to recognise friends on Facebook because they were obliged to use birth names which he did not recognise.
    “Now it’s, who the hell is John Stone? It’s disconnecting me.”
    The problem was gravest for queer people facing homophobic threats, and Native Americans, he said, adding: “They’re the ones I feel sorry for.”
    On Saturday, a former Facebook employee wrote on Medium that her profile was suspended because she goes by a name different from the one she was born with. She said the ban happened while she was at trans pride on Friday, the day the supreme court announced that same-sex marriage is legal in every US state.
    “If you’re a marginalised person, such as a trans person, you may be left with no way to get back on,” she wrote.
    “Facebook have handed an enormous hammer to those who would like to silence us, and time after time I see that hammer coming down on trans women who have just stepped out of line by suggesting that perhaps we’re being mistreated.”

    comments (491)

    Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
    This discussion is closed for comments.
    We’re doing some maintenance right now. You can still read comments, but please come back later to add your own.
    Commenting has been disabled for this account (why?)
    1 2 3 4 6 next
    Loading comments… Trouble loading?
    • 2 3
      I don't understand this discussion, I have a nick name although it's a part of my name, in facebook. never had a problem with that...
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      Being groomed to be taken over by another tech giant perhaps?
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      I am posting from a friend's account to briefly share my story and also to tell all of you who have been harmed by this how sad I am for you, and that you're not alone.
      I have used a different name on Facebook for many years, it was the only way to communicate with friends and stay safe from an abusive ex. I knew I wasn't alone but failed (for which I'm so sorry, most of my closest, dearest friends are also gay men. I'm female and straight, can't give out much more info)
      I signed on last week and suddenly was faced with the "we here at Facebook are real, etc etc), and if I didn't use my real name, well actually I had a panic moment and don't remember what it said but do remember clicking something they said about sending them TWO pieces of ID to prove who I am.
      Facebook has often felt like Big Brother, for me it hasn't been fun, but a necessary evil. So I guess I quit, as I would rather be alive and not use this stupid thing than use my real name and be quickly found. I wish they would think about why some of us truly cannot just publicly share information. What's next??
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      It is hard to underestimate the importance of this issue.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      I dont know about you. But I quite like on FB how when people post it comes from 'Steve Smith' and not 'Lil Miss Hot Mess' or 'NuckingFuts' or J@s0n$' or etc.
      If you want nicknames then go back to Bebo.
      That being said if somebodies legal name is Kevin Smith, but they are now known as Cindy Smith, then FB should allow that, as long as they are not taking the mickey and havign some ridiculous nickname.
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      I'm happy to see now they are officially recognised as complete and equal human beings they are using their new and powerful voice to highlight such minor things. It's a sign of progress imo.
      PS: LGBTQ - surely the Q is covered by the G?
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      Why is there an actual entire article on something so insignificant and trivial?
      Reply |
    • 5 6
      What is it about FB that people don't get??? Do you think it's free?? THEY WANT AS MUCH INFO ON YOU AS POSSIBLE FOR MARKETING PURPOSES. They sell advertising. That is their revenue. They want your legal name, if you don't like it, don't use it. It's their site and they can do what they like. Please people, go away, grow up and come back when you have real problems.
      Reply |
      • 1 2
        Yep - I feel a right idiot for letting my then gf convince me to use my real name when signing up to FB. I knew better but let it slide rather than get into a row over my personal right to privacy vs her need to see me 'connect' with her social group. Total f'ing disaster of course, principally due to the weird phantom 'emotions' and 'conflicts' FB (apparently) threw up between me and people I'd never met before. All I could do was lock the account down and let it wither away - good riddance.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        Read my first post, then tell me this applies to me
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        It does apply to you. Facebook is a company and not a right. Do you get that? You don't require it and it isn't like water and food. Just get over yourself and get over facebook and that you think you own everything you lay your damn fingers on.
        Reply |
    • This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.
    • 1 2
      Perfect opportunity to quit using that trashy website and get a life then.
      Reply |
      • 1 2
        There is nothing wrong with Facebook, it's probably the people you had as friends and their posts that annoyed you.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        Nothing wrong with it, apart from data-mining continuously and annoying the crap out of you by trying to make you 'friend' some complete wanker from school 20-odd years ago, then flogging your friend demographic and an outline of your financial status. Perfectly nice site if you enjoy being the human equivalent of a sock puppet...
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        "There is nothing wrong with Facebook" - other than the fact that it is replacing the true intimacy of friendship with personal brand marketing?
        Reply |
    • 2 3
      Solanum said he now struggled to recognise friends on Facebook because they were obliged to use birth names which he did not recognise.
      “Now it’s, who the hell is John Stone? It’s disconnecting me.”

      And I thought I was under-employed. Get over yourself and find some real problems in the world to sort out; there are plenty of them.
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      Really? That was your point? Cos what you actually said was "I thought this [real name policy] would be welcomed. A policy like this on Twitter would be a step towards dissuading people from making online threats."
      You were totally advocating the real-name policy; implying that if Twitter insisted on it, then trolling might subside. But why should we all forsake our privacy, for the trolls? There are other, smarter, ways to hinder trolls, frankly. And having them all use their real name wouldn't even be one of them - it wd only be partially successful in reducing it, and the rest of us wd be paying the price.

      Google: Block Together
      Reply |
    • 3 4
      “That’s anathema to my essence. I’m self-defined and self-described and that is my right.”
      Quite an ego talking there, mate.
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        Soooooo...you don't feel you (and anyone else) have the right to self-define? As for self-describing, unless your parents were very creative, you seem to have done so. This person just stated what most people do. That's not ego, it's observation.
        Reply |
    • 1 2
      The name im using here is the name fb took away....its the only name ive used since sitting in front of a computer.....im sure my posts were too much for them too, but my profile has never been a fake profile just a nic name in the middle if my real name....but i had to make a seperate page for Queenagitator and i dont want another page i want my page and I want my name back! BrendaQueenagitator Dolan.
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        I have no problem with you. I do have a problem with my "Christian" neighbor who, after becoming obsessed with me and getting blocked on FB, began paying people to spy on me. She then verbally assaulted me and my elderly mother. She threatened to send her foster children to vandalize our house. Another neighbor was going to send her young daughter to blast an airhorn at us, hoping to harm my father, who is terminally ill with cancer.
        When I threatened to call the police, she indicated our local police are her "friends." After reading me complain I ought to paint my fence in rainbow colors (through a paid spy), she got her police "friend" to come to our home and question if I am "mentally ill." After we shared the death threats from the "good Christians," he forgot all about it.
        You see, FB has no issues with these kinds of people. FB has issues with people like me, people who are still being followed by obsessives and are cagey about sharing lots and lots of personal info. FB would love to report everything I do to a woman who believes she's on a mission from God.
        Gotta love the US and its theocracy.
        Stick to Twitter.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        While I sympathise with you, FB is not the culprit, it is your lunatic neighbour. It is not FB's responsibility to police the world, that fall under the remit of the government and the actual police. FB are a BUSINESS. They are NOT there to give you a free outlet to express yourself or to influence opinion. If your neighbour verbally abused you over the phone would you blame the telephone company and insist that they weren't allowed a telephone?
        FB is a business, they need your information for marketing purposes. They have no personal issue with you whatsover, their agenda is to make a profit by selling advertising AND THAT IS ALL.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        Actually, it's more than advertising. FB is also good for intelligence and surveillance.
        Reply |
    • 0 1
      I think Facebook might have a point if this was specifically about people using fake names to deliberately deceive people, or to use for stalking and trolling, but if that's not the case, I can't see what harm it does. I have several friends who use fake names for various reasons but none of them are doing it for nefarious purposes or trying particularly hard to hide who they really are.
      Reply |
      • 1 2
        It's easy for the authorities to trace someone whether they are using a fake name online or not, so this is really a fallacy. Facebook is only seeking to monetise and interlink information.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        ...and why should they not seek to do this? They are a business after all.
        Many services that are offered to the pubic require the presentation of legal identification. if that is how FB makes their cash what's the issue?
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        Maybe they should stop pretending to be two things then:
        1. Social
        2. Free
        It's the hypocrisy that gets people - by all means require people to use their real names but don't try to pontificate about how it's all about protecting people from trolls etc. FB doesn't give a rats arse about trolling and bullying unless it affects the bottom line i.e. people start leaving in numbers - unlikely given that FB make the permanent delete option difficult to use. Their protests that they're doing something about anti-social behaviour are just a diluted and cynical form of CSR.
        Reply |
    • 0 1
      Golly, Face book should get over itself - The only reason to get 'legal' names is to link data, not operate friendship groups. Linking data means making money. I'm fairly cynical about all this.
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        It's incredibly naive to think you'd be anonymous if your real name wasn't used on Facebook. It's sadly a common misconception all over Germany, but then, my country is one of the biggest alternative medicine consumers on the planet, so no huge surprise...
        Here's the thing: You can register and post on Facebook as "Spukhafte Fernwirkungen", but thanks to your IP, your provider's obligation to hand over your data, your mailing address if you've ever ordered anything at all, your browsing history etc. you are an open book no matter what, and the truly scary powers that be will know you are actually Fester J. Eagleburger in a flash.
        Using ghostery etc. will net you less targeted marketing. Good.
        Using a fake name on facebook will make it harder for "journalists" to trawl your FB profile for pictures in case you decide to be killed or kill in a press-baiting way. Also good.
        But if you wanted total privacy and anonymity, your chance to protest was in the late 80s and early 90s. That chance has been blown for a while now. Your data is linked already, the best you can do is to at least keep your online life marketing free.
        Reply |
    • 1 2
      I personally think it's a great policy that you use your birth name because, many people post pictures and videos abusing animals, children and elderly and having their real name makes it's somewhat easier to finding these people. Don't cave in FB stand your grand.
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        Naive. You can be traced whatever name you use. Facebook does it for own selfish reasons.
        Reply |
      • 1 2
        this is true but it does tend to act as a slight deterrent for those who would use FB as bullying tool.
        The knowledge that all your actions are public and attached to your name (and don't require any investigation) can limit the actions of certain bullies.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        You know what would be an even better deterrent? The bullying reporting tool. Which, incidentally, appropriately penalizes people for their behavior, not their names.
        Reply |
    • 1 2
      Why do they require facebook? Does anyone else still use it?
      Reply |
      • 1 2
        Probably for the same reason people require, or choose, to use telephones - to stay in contact with family, friends, etc.
        Reply |
      • 1 2
        Well, if those people are worth staying in touch with, given and surnames should suffice.
        Reply |
      • 1 2
        Yes, but I'll be the judge of that - not Facebook. And "given" name is arbitrary. Mayve if they contacted Facebook and explained their story, they might restore their deleted profiles. Or do I have too much of an optimistic expectation of a highly profitable company that would want to avoid appearing to be discriminatory at all costs. I'm sure they don't just deliberately target names like "Lovely Day" because they hate drag queens.
        Reply |
    • 5 6
      Lovely Day, a 48-year-old woman who adopted that name six years ago
      Wouldn't this get confusing?
      "Hi, I'm Will."
      "Hello Will. Lovely Day."
      "Yes... I suppose it is..." (Looking out the window at the torrential rain.)
      Reply |
    • 3 4
      I love how this article wastes peoples time but articles on sport are just sooooooo meaningful, significant and culturally invaluable right?
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        I suppose you know what you're getting into with a sports article, whereas this headline is quite ambiguous.
        Reply |
      • 1 2
        The headline has nothing to do with it. The article could be called 'Facebook naming policy hurts drag queens, drag queens say' and people would still be in here whinging that it's a 'waste of their time' and implying that things like this don't matter.
        It's ultimately not about the article at all, it's about the continued desire of ignorants to keep certain minorities silenced at all costs. I'm absolutely sick of it. The world doesn't revolve around their idea of 'normal'.
        Some people are just born different and they deserve to be heard too.
        Reply |
    • 3 4
      This article wasted my time.
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      "one of the more idiosyncratic groups at San Francisco’s Pride" -- oh and what exactly does THIS mean?
      Reply |
    • 6 7
      Oh FFS - this isn't a civil rights issue, it's a learn to use the tools provided issue. Privacy settings, sensible friending and blocking. Use them. FB is not a public service and doesn't owe anyone anything. If you want to adopt a ridiculous name, change it by deed poll and FB is obliged to accept it.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      Starting the subtitle "The Radical Faeries argue..." makes it sound as if we are an organized group with an official leadership hierarchy and policy positions. We have no leaders. Individual Faeries can argue things, but there is no opinion about which it can be said "the Radical Faeries argue." Even though I personally do dislike this and many other Facebook policies (to the point where I have chosen to avoid using Facebook).
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      It all has come to a laughing matter to me. Be whomever you want to be, it is time to get over ourselves. Be it straight or other there is so much more to life than the constant battle of social media. I am living with half an arm and 33 internal injuries due to a drunken drivers stupidity to put his key in the ignition of his 3,000 pound weapon of choice. This is my first time expressing my experience on social media. Be thankful to find yourself not pushing up daisies tomorrow. Just get over yourselves once and for all, everyone.
      Reply |
    1 2 3 4 6 next
    SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
    SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
    desktop
    0%
    10%
    20%
    30%
    40%
    50%
    60%
    70%
    80%
    90%
    100%