1300
1301

No articles about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) show up on the /r/news feed for the last 16 days.[META] (archive.is)

Stand_Alone_Complex が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]CarrollQuigley 115ポイント116ポイント  (17子コメント)

Hilariously, I've been banned from /r/news for exposing their censorship.

http://imgur.com/G2AoVT9

[–]CarrollQuigley 41ポイント42ポイント  (3子コメント)

Note: it looks like they let one submission that didn't say either "TPP" or "Trans-Pacific" in the title through yesterday, and maybe that's the "justification" for banning me from /r/news? My search didn't catch it because the title was: "Trade Authority Bill Wins Final Approval in Senate"

https://archive.is/dFSeU

/u/Kylde --I'd be happy to edit the comments of mine that your team has removed from /r/news and clarify that you've let exactly one TPP-related article through--albeit one without the terms "TPP" or "Trans-Pacific" in the title--if you'll unban me.

And let's be honest--banning me on the grounds that one low-visibility submission that didn't even have either of those terms in it was let through in the last two weeks is specious at best.

[–]Josheru 39ポイント40ポイント  (2子コメント)

My search didn't catch it because the title was: "Trade Authority Bill Wins Final Approval in Senate"

The funny part is that it probably slipped through their auto-removal process for the same reason you didn't catch it in your search.

[–]CarrollQuigley 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

What's especially frustrating is that if they'd noticed the issue and messaged me about it, I'd have edited the comment to reflect that they have, in fact, allowed exactly one TPP post through in the last two weeks.

/u/Kylde --I've edited all of the comments I made in /r/news yesterday to reflect the fact that you have let one TPP-related post through in the last two weeks. Are you ready to re-approve the comments that your team has removed and to unban me?

Also, I noticed while I was hovering over your account with RES activated that your link is to a comment of mine. How flattering. Although I can't say I understand why you thought it was worth linking to from your RES pop-up profile:

http://www.reddit.com/r/undelete/comments/3107h1/bloomberg_article_removed_from_rnews_in_less_than/cpxgr77

[–]sidewalkchalked 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also isn't the title deceptive? It makes it sound like it was approved whereas in fact it was only fast track...right?

[–]creq 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, they're full of shit. They're censoring it.

[–]Flatscreens 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

What did you post?

[–]CarrollQuigley 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Look at my comment history. I made a bunch of comments in an /r/news post yesterday about their censoring of this subject, all of which have since been removed.

I'd link you to them directly, but they'd appear blank to you because of the removals.

[–]Halfwayhome22 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

I was banned too, due to this post a few days ago. My reply. Ha. Everyone here should go and try out Voat.

[–]CarrollQuigley 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yep, I'm already there too.

[–]crashdemon -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I created an app that links to Voat if anyone is interested. It's called UPVoat on the google play store.

[–]NotFromKentucky 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

The pressure being applied against 'political' topics across reddit have many parallels with what lead to the Free Speech Movement in the 1960's. May be some lessons to be learned from that experience.

[–]autowikibot 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Free Speech Movement:

The Free Speech Movement (FSM) was a student protest which took place during the 1964–65 academic year on the campus of the University of California, Berkeley under the informal leadership of students Mario Savio, Jack Weinberg, Michael Rossman, Brian Turner, Bettina Aptheker, Steve Weissman, Art Goldberg, Jackie Goldberg, and others. In protests unprecedented in scope, students insisted that the university administration lift the ban of on-campus political activities and acknowledge the students' right to free speech and academic freedom. The group's primary goals were to promote the ideas of the Cuban Revolution and weaken the Cold War consensus.

Image i - Memorial to the Free Speech Movement at the University of California, Berkeley

Relevant: Moffitt Library | 1960s Berkeley protests | Edward Strong | Mario Savio

Parent commenter can toggle NSFW or delete. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Call Me

[–]bokono 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

"for spreading misinformation"? You need to message them and have them clarify exactly what they mean by this? If "spreading misinformation" was against the rukes and actually enforceable, there wouldn't be a reddit. Take screenshots if you do talk to them.

[–]CarrollQuigley 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Here are the messages I sent after the ban. Still no reply.

http://imgur.com/p4VS6uF

[–]bokono 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

They probably won't respond. If I were you I'd post this stuff on as many subs as you can find that'll allow it. Then link to them from here.

[–]jshanthonymayne 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

How ironic