Social Justice Alert: Wikipedia Is Transphobic

Wikipedia is transphobic. There. I’ve said it. Wikipedia is a vile, transmisogynistic cissexist propaganda site masquerading as an encyclopedia. The people who write articles for Wikipedia are supposed to edit in good faith. What I saw today made me cringe at their lack of sensitivity. The Wikipedia article on “female” for starters.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female

Female (♀) is the sex of an organism, or a part of an organism, which produces non-mobile ova (egg cells). Most female mammals, including female humans, have two X chromosomes.

Seriously? Not all females produce eggs. It gets worse.

Genetic determination

The sex of most mammals, including humans, is genetically determined by the XY sex-determination system where males have X and Y (as opposed to X and X) sex chromosomes.

Ah excuse me. This is only part of the story. Transwomen usually have XY chromosomes yes, but we all knew we were female from our earliest memories. You can’t assume we are male from our chromosomes. Basic trans theory 101 stuff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman

The term woman is usually reserved for an adult, with the term girl being the usual term for a female child or adolescent. Women are typically capable of giving birth from puberty onwards, though older women who have gone through menopause and some intersex women cannot…Womanhood is the period in a female’s life after she has passed through childhood and adolescence, generally around the age 18.

(*trigger warning biology*)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_penis

The human penis is an external male sexual organ

luthorwrong

Staggering cisnormativity here. A transwoman who keeps her penis has a female sexual organ. Penises are female because transwomen with penises are female. #biologyfail

Also, circumcision just became a transfeminist issue. Parents, please do not circumcise babies born with penises. The foreskin can be used for raw materials for sex reassignment surgery. Without one, there is less for the surgeon to work with.

Please, if you love your bepenised children, understand they may come to realize they are female one day, and they might have a better SRS result with an intact penis.

Alternately, they may choose to keep their female penis after transition and they might appreciate the extra stimulation that I hear comes from being uncircumcised.

What a ridiculous and outdated piece this is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_differentiation

For what one is is simply a matter of what they perceive they are. 

I have to say as an infertile woman, all the Wiki articles on female biology like childbirth, the cervix, and menstruation that I’ve read are both triggering and alienating for me.

The people who edit these articles need to educate themselves. Please feel free to link or reblog or tweet this up. Fifty percent of trans* attempt suicide because of institutional transphobia like this:

Good job Wikipedia for propagating this harmful cisnormativity

About plasticgirl

Just another Six
This entry was posted in gender politics and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Social Justice Alert: Wikipedia Is Transphobic

  1. Gaius says:

    If I may – the main reason that circumcision is unethical is that it’s a human rights violation, full stop. There are over a billion survivors (and that word is apropos because of the hundreds of deaths and amputations yearly) whose relationship with their own bodies has been altered to fixate them on women. This violation doesn’t have to be committed against women (genetic or trans) in order to be wrong.

    It’s also an issue where trans women and radfems might find common ground. Maybe there’s something to the idea that you should be able to live however you want and still enjoy the parts you were born with. At this point in our development, everything that happens when knife meets genitals is the attempt of a self-replicating machine to make itself a more efficient replicator. Natural selection, leveraging our collective intelligence, decided that girls shouldn’t have anything external and boys shouldn’t have anything internal. This is a machine’s thinking. That’s why it’s called a binary. 1s and 0s. No 1.3s or 0.4s.

    • plasticgirl says:

      Interesting comment. Care to elaborate on this a bit?

      whose relationship with their own bodies has been altered to fixate them on women.

      Not sure how I feel about your last part, but I for one am very grateful to have had SRS. I wouldn’t want to go back to preop state. My only wish there is that I could have had the full system installed at the time, ovaries on down.

      Thanks for reading and commenting.

    • plasticgirl says:

      so Gaius, are you ever coming back? i keep a socket available just for you.

  2. ANEES KHAN says:

    yuuk….

  3. ANEES KHAN says:

    too good

come have your say

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s