上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]untumulted 499ポイント500ポイント  (332子コメント)

From link:

"Other sayings deemed unacceptable include:

● “Everyone can succeed in this society, if they work hard enough.”

● “Where are you from or where were you born?”

● “Affirmative action is racist.”

● “When I look at you, I don’t see color.”"

[–]Not_Pictured 529ポイント530ポイント  (131子コメント)

This is clearly thought policing.

[–]Rogue_Shitposting_AI 293ポイント294ポイント  (22子コメント)

I'd say it's totalitarian. It's schizophrenic, sure, but it's chaotic and sort of lawless by design. The idea being there's nothing set in stone, the rules are constantly changing, and everyone is policing everyone else all the time. You can be betrayed and turned in at any moment. That's a totalitarian system.

This sorta reminds me of reading about western communist groups in the 1930s, weirdly enough. It was a lot different and those were top-down organizations, for one. But this constant sniffing out of minor differences and drumming people out for byzantine ideological reasons reads exactly like how those groups operated. And the way it worked, any party member who happened to be targeted (usually for personal reasons) could be conceivably found guilty of a transgression. Like one example would be a party member who wrote propaganda leaflets being singled out and put on a show trial because being literate enough to write propaganda showed an insufficiently proletarian spirit. This wasn't even in Stalinist Russia but the CPUSA meeting halls in Chicago! Now just replace "bourgeois" with "privilege" and you get the same vibe.

[–]sammysfw 33ポイント34ポイント  (1子コメント)

It doesn't take a genius to see that this stuff has more to do with pushing other people around than any genuine concern for people's well being. All the more reason people should start standing up to it and telling these SJWs to just get lost.

[–]theaviationhistorian 34ポイント35ポイント  (11子コメント)

And the problem is that this unstable system creates its own demise. These short term movements do much harm in the advancement of our society and the only ones that win are the greedy or narcissists that proliferated all of this for their own benefit.

[–]Rogue_Shitposting_AI 41ポイント42ポイント  (10子コメント)

It's hilarious seeing so many horseshoe around into open sexism and racism.

There's a bikeshop near Evergreen University in Olympia, WA which has a 'safe space' night where they're still operating as a bike shop, but it's NO MEN and NO WHITES (although you'll probably get a pass if you're a woman; they're more sexist than racist).

[–]Fat_Pony 18ポイント19ポイント  (5子コメント)

There's a bikeshop near Evergreen University

I just found the problem.

[–]gibonez 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Is that the same school with the commercials where an angry black guy screams at you insisting you to attend?

[–]LtGayBoobMan 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

That seems insane. It's also segregationist, but in addition, it implies that their shop only caters to white men at all other times.

[–]theaviationhistorian 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I heard about that, where you could get in if you stated you were transgendered or 'non-binary' (I don't know what that is or why that is legitimately relevant to social issues). If I knew that this would fizzle out into a Dolores Umbridge collapse like in the last attempts in the 19th century (the worst being alcoholic prohibition), then I would be laughing my ass off at the rodents trying to hijack the household.

[–]ITMANAGER_KILLME_PLS 43ポイント44ポイント  (4子コメント)

A movement focused on centralized control will naturally attract control freaks.

[–]AnEndgamePawn 189ポイント190ポイント  (47子コメント)

Ironic how social justice claims to advocate for freedom and diversity for all races and genders, while it simultaneously denounces freedom of thought and diversity of opinion.

[–]maiqthetrue 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

When I'm weak, I ask for my freedom because it's according to your principles, when I am strong, I take your freedom because it's according to my principles.

I forget the exact quote, it's from Dune. But I think that's sjw in a nutshell.

[–]murrypurryfurryfury 105ポイント106ポイント  (34子コメント)

Fight it now

[–]NomadicHomeBody 68ポイント69ポイント  (27子コメント)

This comment thread is heart warming for me. More need to start standing up to the nonsense. There is no reason for blacks and white to fight, or police and civilians. Instead it's time for us to look to the manipulators, rise up, grab them by their ears, and cut off their heads.

[–]Gh0stw0lf 100ポイント101ポイント  (19子コメント)

I'll say this time and time again, the far left and the far right are becoming more and more blurred together.

Both sides want to limit what you can and can't say, change how history is taught to make it more acceptable with their views. It's scary because this mindset in universities has been succeeding because it's been labelled as "progressive". Anybody opposed is a bigot and opposed to change.

I remember last semester I was having casual conversation in class about Mexican culture (I'm Mexican, yes with nationality and all) and what is "offensive" and I told some girl (white) that the topic in general was not offensive.

She then told me "It's disgusting to see you side with the oppressors, the white man, they're keeping you down".

Wat

[–]imSwain 28ポイント29ポイント  (5子コメント)

Yes! Someone else who sees how BOTH political parties are getting so radical and any kind of rational debate or even discussion results in you being labelled as racist, sexist, etc.

[–]murrypurryfurryfury 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

this is a big part of the reason why no one wants to even discuss politics.

[–]zzorga 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Horseshoe theory, the further right or left you travel, the closer the two paths become.

[–]red_hot_magma 18ポイント19ポイント  (5子コメント)

Just throw a tortilla at her, and start talking really fast in staccato spanish, with lots of hand gestures.

[–]Gh0stw0lf 60ポイント61ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm not gonna waste a perfectly good tortilla on her.

[–]surlylemur 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agreed with throwing the tortilla until your far superior argument made me realize the error of my ways! Bravo to you

[–]rockidol 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

People should realize that progressive doesn't mean a good idea. Banning alcohol in the U.S. was pushed by the progressive movement.

[–]tight_lips_tony 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

Look at all the race articles at the top of this sub.

There is a divisive agenda being pushed.

[–]Imapopulistnow 18ポイント19ポイント  (5子コメント)

We all, most of us that is, leave college with a complete sense of ideals regarding, not how things necessarily are, but how we wish for them to be. Then over time, our ideals are tempered by the realities of life and practical considerations.

But then again, there are others who never leave college...

[–]GHGCottage 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

It goes beyond freedom of speech. Hiring committees would not be able to discuss ending affirmative action, or hiring based on merit.
So permanently entrenched sex and race discrimination. Is that good? I don't think it is.

[–]sammysfw 23ポイント24ポイント  (6子コメント)

They claim that, but what they want is supremacy, not freedom or equality. The good news is that the moment you step off the college campus and into the adult world no one knows or cares about any of this SJW crap. I think these schools are doing a real disservice to kids by indulging them in it. College is supposed to prepare you for the real world, and these kids are going to be completely helpless and maladapted when they try to transition into that.

[–]nabilus13 26ポイント27ポイント  (3子コメント)

100% thought policing. These schools aren't challenging and educating anymore, they're squashing the ability to look at issues from multiple angles to get an objective view.

[–]JubeltheBear 27ポイント28ポイント  (17子コメント)

To be fair "When I look at you, I don't see color." is never said to someone of the same race. It's one of the stupidest things a person can say. We all see "color". Microaggression might be bullshit, I'm not qualified to say, but that phrase is just ridiculous.

[–]johndoe555 14ポイント15ポイント  (12子コメント)

Perhaps it's a clumsy thing to say, but the intent is to convey that one is not judging or treating the other differently on the basis of race. It's meant to be conciliatory, but some people strive to find ways to be offended...

[–]JubeltheBear 9ポイント10ポイント  (5子コメント)

If people don't see race: then why are they mentioning race? I'm White: because I don't see race so it doesn't matter which race I am classified as. Does economics work the same way? Can you just apply arbitrary labels to the paradigm under which your society is built?

"I understand the social construction that is organizing people into class or social heirarchies by the color of their skin and cultural heritage. I acknowledge that it exists and people see it, but I'm not obligated to adhere to it or approve of it."

[edit] the "I'm White: because I don't see race so it doesn't matter which race I am classified as. " was written as an example that if race doesn't matter then it doesn't matter which race I identify as. It was not written as an indicment of White people or a statement of fact: I am not White.

[–]ItsMeCaptainMurphy 13ポイント14ポイント  (4子コメント)

The only time I could see someone saying that without sounding like a complete jackass is to a person who brought up race in the first place.

[–]ch1584 68ポイント69ポイント  (6子コメント)

Other unacceptable micro aggressive phrases include: "U-cal is a legitimate school" "The university president has his/her/it's head screwed on properly" "Everyone is entitled to their opinion"

[–]thrilldigger 13ポイント14ポイント  (5子コメント)

it's

That's a microaggression right there. Using "it's" when it should be "its"... what will you do next, micro-Hitler?

[–]Morrigi_ 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

As Hitler-kin, I am extremely offended by that insinuation and demand an apology!

[–]CHNLLOS_BIG_BOY 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I did not know that. God now I'm so triggered.

[–]IkLms 91ポイント92ポイント  (4子コメント)

So you can't state what affirmative action is by it's very definition?

[–]epicwinguy101 89ポイント90ポイント  (0子コメント)

Questioning the rules is now against the rules.

[–]Schlagv 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

First rule of fight club, don't talk about fight club.

[–]negotiationtable 57ポイント58ポイント  (101子コメント)

● “When I look at you, I don’t see color.”"

I was confused as to what was bad about this and had a look in the article, and evidently the reason is:

Others are said to be color blind, apparently a bad thing that indicates “that a white person does not want to or need to acknowledge race,”

Surely we'd be much better off if no-one needed to acknowledge race? Isn't that the endgame? To not give a fig what race someone is from and treat them on their merits?

If someone says 'when I look at you, I don't see color.' they are surely the ones not causing problems due to racism?

[–]DasKapitalist 58ポイント59ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's because SJWs dont care about racism. They're just using alleged racism as a lever to control you.

[–]avidiax 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, the whole point of this is to be able to call non-racist people saying non-racist things as "hidden racists".

The goal is not for things to be fair. It's for them to be "affirmative".

[–]pyrespirit 27ポイント28ポイント  (17子コメント)

There are cultural differences between different ethnicities.

Pretending they don't exist is ludicrous and insulting.

Colourblindness pretends that cultural differences don't exist.

The goal should be not to treat people different based upon ethnicity, not to claim that ethnicity doesn't exist.

The cultural differences are a source of strength - with different viewpoints for analyzing situations it makes a much more complete and much more strong whole.

[–]SamusSaysDie 43ポイント44ポイント  (12子コメント)

No it doesnt. Homogeneous is the most successful system. It works better than diversity and especially in modern times. Look at all the time and energy that is wasted catering to moving society to a diverse society. Homogeneous communities can skip all of that and be more innovative.

[–]Gylth 25ポイント26ポイント  (2子コメント)

People are downvoting you, but it's true. I understand we should celebrate differences and all that, but homogeneous populations are definitely more efficient than mixed. This isn't because of racism or anything, it's literally because like minded people act relatively similar, so there's never a clash between cultures or laws. It doesn't mean it's right or even works all the time, especially when it is forced or when the like-mindedness is one of violence.

[–]SamusSaysDie 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree thank you for your post yours shined more light on what I was trying to say.

[–]evilquesadilla 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

I have to somewhat disagree. I believe homogeneous society can be better at being productive, once a goal has been set. Simply because there is less friction and disagreement.

But innovation benefits from thinking outside the box, and drawing inspiration from different sources. So I believe multi-cultural society is better at innovation.

IMHO.

[–]SamusSaysDie 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

You all are correct. I'm just glad to start a little extra dialogue. Thank y'all for responding.

[–]evilquesadilla 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

You all are correct.

How dare you? That's a microaggression statement.

...just kidding.

[–]PJNifty 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, homogenous groups have the lowest levels of conflict while simultaneously having lower levels of innovation and adaptability.

[–]InfamousBLT 16ポイント17ポイント  (25子コメント)

The problem with ignoring race is that race is often tied to culture, and ignoring someone's culture is often ignoring a large part of that person.

People have races. People have cultures. It's OK and even a good thing to recognize that, and to try to share and understand their differences and your own. It's when you use someone's race or culture against them that it becomes a problem.

So ultimately ignoring someone's race or culture isn't helpful to anyone, which is why being "colorblind" is definitely not the right answer.

[–]bande2 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

People on Reddit hate when you say that stuff too.

[–]infinity_QE 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

You know why those are called microaggressions? Because its' shorter than micro-establishment-authoritarian-loose-headed-jingoism.

[–]jcaseys34 319ポイント320ポイント  (13子コメント)

"I believe the most qualified person should get the job"? I would imagine it's because somewhere in the chain of command at U-Cal it obviously isn't true.

[–]T1mac 32ポイント33ポイント  (0子コメント)

The Peter Principle is clearly in full effect in the UCal administration.

[–]Qinella 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

For example, whoever put together this training curriculum.

[–]ExplodoJones 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is the one that really bothers me the most.

[–]di11deux 116ポイント117ポイント  (3子コメント)

“These seminars are not an attempt to curb open dialogue, debate or classroom discussions.”

Then stop telling people what they can and cannot say.

[–]cooltest2 22ポイント23ポイント  (2子コメント)

Then stop telling people what they can and cannot say.

You can say whatever you want as long as it is the right thing. Wonder if the most qualified doctor will be doing surgery on these people when they are ill.

The only place this bullshit is even talked about is worthless liberal colleges. Unqualified people are toxic to a work environment.

You only need to be the 2nd fastest gazelle to not get eaten.

[–]BoomGoesMoriarty 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think you mean second slowest. And after the slowest gazelle is eaten you will be next because you are now the slowest.

[–]Sorryaboutthat1time 111ポイント112ポイント  (3子コメント)

Napo should work on macro-aggressions, like jacking up tuition and UC police beating up passive protestors. Start there, then work on hurt feeling language.

[–]debrady 186ポイント187ポイント  (6子コメント)

crimespeak doubleplusungood.

[–]sexpressed 65ポイント66ポイント  (3子コメント)

Seriously, what would Orwell think about the term "microaggression"? I bet he could write a whole book just on that. RIP George.

[–]TheWastelandWizard 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's another George I'm sure would have loved to comment on this idiocy as well, however, he's currently stuck on the roof.

[–]desertman1979 129ポイント130ポイント  (10子コメント)

The real world is gonna kick the shit out of these kids.

[–]Loughla 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nope. They'll get their way in the working world, too.

[–]MaxSarcasm2 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

That offends me. Ban life.

[–]Big_Test_Icicle 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

That offends me. Ban yourself.

[–]Jimonalimb 546ポイント547ポイント  (68子コメント)

"Microagressions"= Anything I disagree with or offends me. How about Fuck You?

[–]AdmiralAngry 114ポイント115ポイント  (14子コメント)

These people are in for a rude awakening once they leave college.

[–]JegnomeSimpson 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

indeed. Could you imagine hiring someone knowing at their entry level position they would looking for any opportunity to criticize the company, find flaws in policy, and lobby to waste funds on SJ-type events for the firm? The reality is it's a headache employee that no one wants.

[–]Nyx_Goddess 123ポイント124ポイント  (4子コメント)

"Why won't you hire me as a doctor??! I'm so triggered right now!"

"Sir, your hold a bachelors in psychology. This is an ER."

[–]Eurynom0s 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

These are the people who will sue their employer at the drop of a hat over imagined slights.

[–]ITMANAGER_KILLME_PLS 39ポイント40ポイント  (2子コメント)

Why would they leave college? They're future adjunct professors.

[–]nabilus13 19ポイント20ポイント  (1子コメント)

And really, that's a big problem. They'll see this as normal and pass this along to the next generation of students.

[–]Sneaky_Gopher 34ポイント35ポイント  (2子コメント)

I think "Fuck You" counts as a regular aggression.

[–]Gishin 24ポイント25ポイント  (1子コメント)

Microaggressions should = Saying things like "oh, you're so articulate!".

[–]PantsJihad 153ポイント154ポイント  (17子コメント)

I am so fucking triggered you shitlord!!!

/s

[–]maul_walker 82ポイント83ポイント  (9子コメント)

As a shitlord, you need to check your trigger privilege.

[–]jsct 51ポイント52ポイント  (8子コメント)

As a shytlord, please don't say shitlord. It triggers me.

[–]scarecrowslostbrain 30ポイント31ポイント  (3子コメント)

Don't say the word lord, it triggers me back when my ancestors were ruled by lords. I'm going to go cry in the bathroom now.

[–]OMGSPACERUSSIA 39ポイント40ポイント  (2子コメント)

As a baron, I find this post offensive. I treat my peasants with only the utmost respect and provide an excellent health plan.

We barons get so much shit because of stereotypes like that and the Hollywood portrayal of lower nobility as evil. Just because I have a torture chamber doesn't mean I torture people. I have a man for that and he's very conscientious and an excellent husband.

Check your peasant privilege, pleb.

[–]usernameson 31ポイント32ポイント  (1子コメント)

These new instructions are triggering my memories of reading "1984".

[–]barrett51bmg 19ポイント20ポイント  (0子コメント)

That is exactly what it is. Control of your mind through fear, intimidation, and doublespeak.

[–]jovietjoe 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm going to focus more on being macroaggressive

[–]Mochashaft 270ポイント271ポイント  (41子コメント)

"microaggressions?" Seriously? I love the fact that freedom of speech has been bastardized into "Freedom of speech as long as it doesnt hurt mine or anyone elses feelings."

This shit is seriously getting out of control.

[–]edvek 35ポイント36ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not just "mine and anyone else's feelings" but "mine and anyone that I feel offended for's feelings." It seems like groups that are so hurt by words (essentially nothing) have to feel offended for other groups in order to control speech even more.

[–]SnatchTease 53ポイント54ポイント  (2子コメント)

we have the right to freedom of speech, but we do not have the right to be free from being offended. just as it should be.

[–]akai_ferret 27ポイント28ポイント  (1子コメント)

Someone should print up a Bill of SJW's Imaginary Rights.

Let's see,

There's the right to not be offended.

The right to feel "Safe", no mater how paranoid and delusional I am.

The right to self diagnosis.

Freedom from disagreement.

...

This could be a long list.

[–]CompletePlague 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

and, don't forget, the right to be an abusive little shit to anybody I dislike, because they're not oppressed, and so don't need a safe space.

[–]motheranimal 103ポイント104ポイント  (12子コメント)

What's next? Book burning?

[–]flyingburritoman 45ポイント46ポイント  (1子コメント)

Well I mean they've already begun censoring books so......

[–]Borigrad 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

They already burn books. Ask Christina Hoff Sommers, whether you agree with his politics or not, they were burning her books as a form of symbolism. Since it's hard to really burn a book in the digital age.

https://imgur.com/a/a8iC4 For proof.

[–]Senecatwo 138ポイント139ポイント  (13子コメント)

To insinuate that those statements and the others listed in the article are aggressive in any way is an incredible feat of mental gymnastics. This new culture of hypersensitivity is ridiculous. Who has ever been offended by hearing "the most qualified person should get the job," and why would anybody entertain that offense as justified? Get some mental fortitude.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Who has ever been offended by hearing "the most qualified person should get the job,"

The person who will never get the job based on merit.

[–]mcmcn 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

People want to be offended because then they can claim discrimination points which they can cash in for benefits. Work, competence and responsibility are hard so they would rather cut corners by complaining.

[–]big_deal 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

initiated by University of California President Janet Napolitano

Title makes sense now...

[–]Singing_Shibboleth 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ah, I see Janet Napolitano is hard at work, turning the UC system into her private DHS wonderland of control freaks, incompetents, and ever-burgeoning bureaucracy.

Carry on, Janet -- prove to us that just as the DHS is security theater, the four year college has devolved into education theater.

[–]Zarg3927 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

50 years from now they will look back at all of this bullshit and wonder what the fuck we were thinking.

[–]Nevermore60[S] 83ポイント84ポイント  (8子コメント)

Eugene Volokh, writing for the Volokh Conspiracy at the Washington Post, notes that U-Cal. has stated that "microaggressions" can create a hostile learning environment, which can be federally legally actionable.

It seems the implication is the U-Cal. is telling its faculty that it believes that stating "I believe the most qualified person should get the job" may be federally legally actionable.

[–]TurboSalsa 49ポイント50ポイント  (2子コメント)

This country is getting stupider by the minute.

It truly frightens me that people who use the word "microaggression" and are offended by the phrase "I believe the most qualified person should get the job" will someday vote and maybe even hold office.

[–]ChocolateDindu 36ポイント37ポイント  (1子コメント)

Newspeak is a real language.

[–]Dame_Juden_Dench 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

it gives me good bellyfeel

[–]dacian420 37ポイント38ポイント  (2子コメント)

Non-mocking use of the term "microaggression" is my trigger for not taking you seriously, ever again.

[–]oO0-__-0Oo 45ポイント46ポイント  (2子コメント)

Self-Esteem Regulation

Captured under the umbrella of grandiosity, self-esteem dysregulation serves to maintain inflated self-experiences and undo feelings of inadequacy and insufficiency. Studies have also identified narcissism as a defensive form of selfesteem regulation (Kernis & Sun, 1994; Raskin, Novacek & Hogan, 1991). These studies verified that narcissistic self-esteem management, consisting of dominance, hostility, and grandiosity (Raskin et al., 1991), serves to enhance the vulnerable grandiose self and protect it from self-doubt and feelings of inferiority and insufficiency. In addition, it protects against other threatening feelings such as anger, anxiety, fear, shame, and depression. In other words, narcissistic individuals with an inflated self-view and high but unstable self-esteem tend to dominate and control situations and other people, and react with anger and hostility toward perceived threats to their positive self-regard and self-esteem (Bushman & Baumeister 1998; Kernis, Granneman, & Barclay, 1989; Smalley & Stake, 1996). They also react with increased optimism and unrealistic goal setting, leading to impaired judgment and risk of self-regulation failure (Baumeister, Heatheron, & Tice, 1993).

Ronningstam, Elsa. "Identifying Pathological Narcissism." Identifying and Understanding the Narcissistic Personality. New York: Oxford UP, 2005. 77-78. Print.

[–]infinity_QE 15ポイント16ポイント  (1子コメント)

Narcissists also try to psychoanalyze everyone else but themselves, hanging labels on folks, and making conflict everyone else's fault instead of looking at their own role in it.

[–]oO0-__-0Oo 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Elsa Ronningstam lecture on NPD traits and therapies:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaMhHyw46zc

Narcissists also try to psychoanalyze everyone else but themselves, hanging labels on folks

I have never heard that before, but if you can provide a peer reviewed citation for it, I'd be really interested in seeing it. The "hanging labels" part is a bit vague, if you don't mind providing some clarification.

making conflict everyone else's fault instead of looking at their own role in it.

That part of your statement certainly has some validity.

EDIT:

That lecture also discusses the differences between BPD and NPD. You may find that useful as well, if you wondering about whether to watch that lecture.

[–]Luckyluke23 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

no because we can't have the " THE BEST PERSON FOR THE JOB!" the minority needs that,so we can fill a quota.

[–]nickfromnt77 40ポイント41ポイント  (7子コメント)

I thought the most qualified person should get the job. Oh wait... Napolitano thought of it. Nevermind...

[–]negotiationtable 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

Does it benefit us to believe that there is no opportunity, and the most qualified person should not get the job? Does this help any black people, or in fact anyone? Who is it that feels 'safer' when everyone believes that this isn't the land of opportunity?

[–]roadrunnermeepbeep3 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're not getting the purpose of it. The purpose isn't to help people, or create opportunity. It's power. If I control what you can say, then I control you and I can destroy you. You are now my bitch.

If you want to create the Fourth Reich, this is how you go about it.

[–]uncleroger96 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Wait, how is believing that the most qualified person should get the job a microaggression? Like, isn't this true or am I missing something?

[–]goodguy_asshole 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

What about open macro aggressions, like telling people what opinions they cannot share? Is that still allowed?

[–]IstvaanShogaatsu 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a fan of punching people, it's my favorite macro aggression.

[–]SuperComputrix 19ポイント20ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fuck this whole hurt feelings generation SJW bullshit. When will people learn to just use common sense?

[–]killswithspoon 31ポイント32ポイント  (3子コメント)

Can't control the law? Control the language.

[–]fellatious_argument 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

In the California university system they control the laws too.

[–]Velshtein 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

This country gets more pathetic by the day.

[–]BoxworthNCSU 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

This article is dumber than anything from the Florida news. This is so dumb I want to punch myself in the face.

[–]PiratePantsFace 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

You think that's crazy? Take a look at their applications. One look at that and I didn't even bother applying.

[–]Ginnex 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

How...how can anyone be offended by "I believe the most qualified person should get the job."

Like...what's the argument against this? Should we give the job to someone who isn't as qualified for a position. It doesn't even begin to make sense.

[–]Lost2Logic 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

this all stems from the abuse of title IX. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_IX it was suppose to protect from discrimination but is being used to against faculty and administrators at university's and is very clearly an attack on free speech. the truth as I see it is that SJW's have co-oped feminism and are an extremely vocal, radicalized fringe element of what used to a noble cause. We saw the same thing happen with the occupy movement. it started out as a call to hold the bankers that crashed the economy accountable but by winter everyone with "cause" was using occupy gatherings for "mic checks" on unrelated issues. this Lady got the low down. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ewU33EdNnM&list=PLytTJqkSQqtr7BqC1Jf4nv3g2yDfu7Xmd

[–]Egon88 15ポイント16ポイント  (4子コメント)

I think we need to be far less concerned about offending people as a person can literally be offended by anything. I think it makes sense to give people the benefit of the doubt and not automatically interpret everything they say in the most negative way possible. I think the consequence to society of not doing this is that people begin to speak in a way that is deliberately unclear.

This is a great essay about the problems of unclear language.

http://www.orwell.ru/library/essays/politics/english/e_polit/

Edit: is

[–]Sugreev2001 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

Microaggressions = New Age Fascism

[–]tiamdi 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you can't handle people saying benign statements such as those then you're going to have to deal with much more serious personal issues before you can have a meaningful and productive life in this society.

[–]smoothtrip 18ポイント19ポイント  (2子コメント)

Is this okay?

America, you are fucked!

Is that better?

[–]Imapopulistnow 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well based on the path that these "progressives" want to take us down, it is truthful. However if this truth offends anyone, then it is a microaggression, so no?

[–]nebuchadrezzar 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

I feel really bad for these kids when they leave the soft, mediocre womb of the UC system and get a job with folks who don't realize that they are constantly microaggressing, over aggressing, and passive aggressing. Or workplace shooting. Maybe teach the kids to deal.

[–]mysled 11ポイント12ポイント  (21子コメント)

Wait, is U-Cal a phrase people use? I've never heard it called that, only as "the UC system" or "UC"

[–]BoiseNTheHood 2ポイント3ポイント  (10子コメント)

UC can also refer to the University of Cincinnati (in fact, Cincinnati is the first thing that comes up if you google "UC"), so it can get confusing.

[–]bearsnchairs 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

That must depend on your search history. The first link is www.universityofcalifornia.edu for me.

[–]JegnomeSimpson 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

more influenced by where youre searching from, but yes.

[–]destructormuffin 29ポイント30ポイント  (11子コメント)

As a UC employee I just want to point out that literally no one on my campus is talking about this, trying to enforce this, or trying to get employees to abide by these guidelines.

[–]storefront 23ポイント24ポイント  (12子コメント)

how are these even considered microaggressions? these are infinitely pettier than what were previously referred to as microagressions. i can't even fathom as to how anyone can take most of these offensively

[–]oO0-__-0Oo 35ポイント36ポイント  (9子コメント)

It sounds nuts, but many colleges and universities have adopted rules in their "Student Code of Conduct" books that anything which another person perceives as offensive will be considered aggression.

The tacit part they left out is that if it ever comes to an adjudication, the default is that anything that is complained about which aligns with leftist or liberal ideology will be considered a valid complaint, while anything that does not will simply be ignored.

[–]MonkeyPunter 20ポイント21ポイント  (6子コメント)

For state schools, any "Student Code of Conduct" which restricts speech is unconstitutional.

State schools are branches of the government, and the 14th Amendment extends the protections of the 1st Amendment down through all levels of government.

Private schools can get away with it though.

https://www.thefire.org/campus-rights/

[–]MotleyCruise 22ポイント23ポイント  (4子コメント)

America is the land

SIR, HOW DARE YOU STEREOTYPE AMERICA, SIR!! YOU STEREOTYPER! RACIST!! I BET YOU INTENTIONALLY IRONICALLY SERVE CORNBREAD AT CRACKER BARREL!! SIR!!

[–]SniperGX1 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Oh man I miss Cracker Barrels. They need to bring some to CA.

[–]flyingburritoman 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think cracker is considered a reverse micro aggression now.

[–]MotleyCruise 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've had this conversation with a corrections officer (prison guard) going into probations.

Cracker isn't offensive, apparently. It's a Saltine or a Ritz wafer. Cracka, however (you say it crack-ah) is how you say it offensively.

And, yes, I can say cracka and spell cracka as a white guy, and not even feel like I'm offended or being offensive, because, honestly, guys, is that the worst you can do? Cracka?

I can't get past being amused to be offended.

[–]geezergamer 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Neurosis disguised as activism.

[–]fiverrah 19ポイント20ポイント  (3子コメント)

Thought Police are running UCal now? WTF is wrong with these people for not standing up and loudly putting a stop to this bullshit?

[–]theonlynick 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

California + University + Janet Napolitano + SJW + PC = whatever the fuck is happening.

Thought police have been a part of higher education for quite some time. The fact that this training even exists is proof that nobody will do anything other than lie on their backs and thankfully take it.

[–]jrizos 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Here I was thinking they were banning the term microaggression itself. But yeah, "merit" is a microaggression now.

[–]nilok1 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Micro-aggression- so now people are readily admitting they're complaining about little shit.

Josh Lymon said it best on the West Wing,

"How are you not making fun of yourselves?"

[–]projektnitemare13 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

I just...no. See this is why our education system is becoming a laughing stock. We've become obsessed with including everyone to the point of ridiculousness and its to the point its actually haveing an impact on the quality of education being provided. maybe worry more about getting knowledge and critical thinking skills into these kids' heads instead of how to make sure everyone you ever come in contact with isnt even marginally offended.

[–]ampellang 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sorry, this is bothering me...

Nobody calls the UC system "U-Cal."

[–]wrathborne 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

So now that we know that a gender studies degree is the key to being a doctor, a lawyer, a cop, and an engineer what are we going to do with all the real doctors, lawyers, cops and engineers who know what they're doing?

[–]erniecardenas 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

All the feels are belong to us

[–]bearsnchairs 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't know what I hate more, these silly new rules or that everyone is saying UCal.

[–]sidroast 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well this will make the graduating classes of U-Cal much easier to surpass in the workplace since they'll all be a bunch of wusses if that hasn't already happened...

[–]JBlitzen 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Recall that Napolitano was the Secretary of Homeland Security for four years under Obama.

[–]Stuckinaloop 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Referring to this list will be considered a microaggression (which is not a real word).

[–]anothercarguy 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Here I was thinking I was going to go a full 24 hours without finding another reason to hate my state

[–]Xenu3 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

How do you know when political correctness has gone too far . . . ?

[–]From2112 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The intellectuals of this nation have gone collectively insane.

[–]Cairnsian 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The most qualified person should get the job. There's nothing wrong with that at all. In fact it's essential to remain competitive in a business sense otherwise the business with the most qualified people will outwit and stomp your business to the ground. Same applies to nations.

[–]ThatsRightApologize 20ポイント21ポイント  (2子コメント)

Certain minority groups would be harmed by the "I see no color" perception, because this would mean they would be held to the same standard as everyone else. They do not want to be held to the same standard. They want the standards lowered. The doctrine of "equality" it is completely based on the focus of external forces and institutions with absolutely zero focus on internal ones. It is a one way street, its all your fault, the mere implication that there is possibly something 'they' could do to better themselves and make them more successful in our society is racist. These people crave power, this is a testament, making people change their language or stop talking to fit their agenda. It will never stop, speech control will continue exponentially until we as a society finally take a stand.

[–]bellcrank 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

"America is the land of opportunity" isn't offensive, it's just incorrect. There are plenty of places on Earth providing opportunities.

The second one makes no sense at all. It doesn't promote the idea that race or gender play no role in life successes, it promotes the idea that they shouldn't.

[–]JackWackington 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

I like to scroll to the bottom of the comments page on these so I can see the SJW vanguard defend their attempted censorship and their hatred of opposing views. Ain't nothing like a good old "right wing /news at it again" "dickless neckbeards being dickless" "reddit has too much time on its dick" "god hates men" "hnngghhh"

[–]Dr_Morsu 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Do they want a demolition man type society because this is how you get that.

[–]JackWackington 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

It seems like they want to dismantle anything they disagree with.

[–]Lost2Logic 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

which is everything. but I have great news these people views and goals aren't sustainable. their regressive toxicity can't continue forever, the only way they win these little battles now is though censoring dissenting views and the self censorship of people oblige and enable them. these views could survive in a closed society. 1940's Germany comes to mind.

[–]run-a-muck 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

I guess they should 'microaggressions' like 'America sucks, don't even try' or 'I believe whoever is the most PC should get the job'.

Janet is in a leadership position, what a joke.

[–]modsrliars 16ポイント17ポイント  (5子コメント)

The headline should read

"U Cal professors unanimously hand in their resignations stating that they 'won't work for a bunch of oversensitive twats who have no idea what the fuck they're talking about,'".

[–]dacian420 21ポイント22ポイント  (4子コメント)

Being a tenured professor means never having to say you're sorry, so why quit when they can just tell her to choke on a cock and carry on as normal?

[–]jcaseys34 10ポイント11ポイント  (3子コメント)

Isn't this the point of having a tenure system anyway, not having to worry about cunts like this?

[–]dacian420 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's intended to protect the free exchange of ideas, such as those ol' Janet here is trying to suppress.

[–]Wetzilla 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

The document has drawn little scrutiny until now, when a professor in the UC system pointed it out to The College Fix. The professor chose not to attend the seminars

This is literally all of the evidence they have that the school is telling instructors what they can and can't say. A professor who didn't even attend the seminar. Is it not possible that the school just thinks this is interest research, and something that the professors should know about? Not that they aren't allowed to say these things? It seems more likely to me that they just thought, "hey, these are things that you might want to consider when addressing a class." If these were literally phrases that the professors couldn't say then the seminar wouldn't have been voluntary.

[–]SuperAwesomeNinjaGuy 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ah yes the hypersensitive sjws are at it agian. Making everywhere a "safe space" free from those icky truths that are so very problematic and triggering.

Thank god these people exist to protect my poor little feefees from the harsh unforgiving world. I'm so glad that after I've finished my degree in gender studies, these people will always be there to tell me how to act and what to say so I don't unintentionally trigger someone.

/s

[–]flyingburritoman 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh my fucking god this is the most idiotic thing I have read all day. How's that for a fucking micro-aggression you morons.

[–]sidewalkchalked 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think this shit just officially became the new McCarthyism.

[–]S1911 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

this country is a soft smooth pussy just waiting to get fucked

[–]HS_00 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Waiting?!? This country is getting cornholed like Richard Simmons in a hot tub full of baby oil on a float at the gay pride parade.

[–]MedicSF 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

“I believe the most qualified person should get the job”

Why not?

[–]FelixVulgaris 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Since when did it become an imperative to shield everyone from offense? If you didn't get offended by at least one thing that one of your college professors said, then you didn't get much for your tuition payments, IMHO.

[–]pfunkmort 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm sorry, but whenever I hear or read the word "microaggresion", I immediately stop taking the content seriously.

I understand that there IS such a thing as using unreasonable cultural language without realizing its impact...but, I have almost universally found that the people getting pissy about it are well past the line of reasonability.