Are you seriously stripping a historical event of all context to push an agenda?

Get the fuck out of here. As has been explained by multiple people below: Revere was an active and prominent member of the Revolutionary Movement and his community. He had his name out there. This girl - while brave and dedicated - was not. She was relatively unknown.

Like it or not, social connections play a larger role in how your achievements are received than any physical identity of your person. It was true 300 years ago and it's still true.

If you'd wanted to make the argument that he was more easily recognized because he was a man so he'd had the opportunities to establish himself in ways that she hadn't, I would agree - except it would be age that defined their different capacities for social engagement. Not their gender. There's no great conspiracy, but given your username I'm pretty sure I'm already talking to a tinfoil hat wearing pleb. So good day. Stick with gender studies, because you're absolute shit at understanding simple history and sociology.