“If one wishes to actually obtain veridical understanding into the most crucial fields of sapient knowledge, then I have made it as easy as possible for one to do so via my own writings.”

Says you.

If you had actually proven God, don’t you think someone would have noticed by now? I have never seen such a blatant display of arrogance. You claim not only that you are smarter than most but that you have knowledge that is exclusive to you. You say it’s only a matter of someone reading your book and they’ll have the knowledge you do, but that demonstrates that you don’t understand how knowledge works. If what you have in your head can’t be externally verified, it has no more value than a passing thought or a dream.

James Redford,
is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) demonstrating that sapient life (in the form of, e.g., immortal superintelligent human-mind computer-uploads and artificial intelligences) is required by the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) to take control over all matter in the universe, for said life to eventually force the collapse of the universe, and for the computational resources of the universe (in terms of both processor speed and memory space) to diverge to infinity as the universe collapses into a final singularity, termed the Omega Point.

In the above quote you equate the term “sapient” with human intelligence. IMO, this is a narrow and exclusive interpretation.

David Bohm also used the term “insight intelligence” but he did not mean any sentient, let alone sapient awareness.

The laws of nature are not intelligent, they are mathematically logical and constant, but that does not make them “wise”.

Fractals are expressions of a Trinity. It is clearly spelled out in CDT, (causal dynamical triangulation).
Three points are the fundamental minimum requirement for 2D representation (a plane). Add one more point and you have 3D (volume). Nothing mystical or intelligent, It’s BEAUTIFUL!

It is a triangular dynamical causality.

If only we had the wisdom to appreciate and respect its awesome mathematical powers, as well as the spiritual beauty which we all observe within our (confined space) mind as a subjective holographic mental (spiritual) image. Our minds create our present from old information, but in our imagination exists as our very present. We live in the future of what we believe to be our present, but we are always looking backward in time.

Lausten - 19 June 2015 01:20 PM

“If one wishes to actually obtain veridical understanding into the most crucial fields of sapient knowledge, then I have made it as easy as possible for one to do so via my own writings.”

Says you.

If you had actually proven God, don’t you think someone would have noticed by now? I have never seen such a blatant display of arrogance. You claim not only that you are smarter than most but that you have knowledge that is exclusive to you. You say it’s only a matter of someone reading your book and they’ll have the knowledge you do, but that demonstrates that you don’t understand how knowledge works. If what you have in your head can’t be externally verified, it has no more value than a passing thought or a dream.

Hi, Lausten. Bear in mind that physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler’s Omega Point cosmology has been published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals. Further, the Omega Point cosmology is a mathematical theorem per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics). These aforesaid known laws of physics have been confirmed by every experiment to date. Thus, the only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject empirical science. As Prof. Stephen Hawking wrote, “one cannot really argue with a mathematical theorem.” (From p. 67 of Stephen Hawking, The Illustrated A Brief History of Time [New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1996; 1st ed., 1988].)

For much more on Prof. Tipler’s Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:

* James Redford, “The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything”, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf .

Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.

* James Redford, “Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss’s Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?”, alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk[at sign]4ax[period]com , July 30, 2013, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo , http://archive.is/a04w9 .