全 171 件のコメント

[–]rico_tubbs 42ポイント43ポイント  (54子コメント)

" straps on kevlar "

Buddy: Hey what are YOU up to?

Me: Daygame.

But seriously...the next racially charged shitstorm. Is civil war imminent in America?

[–]Endorsed Contributor - Class of 2015Modified_Hackware 22ポイント23ポイント  (16子コメント)

Standards of living are looking set to decline relative to other countries, blue pill societal dogma is failing to deliver happiness to anyone, the twittersphere is making semi organized mass violence feasible, police depts are becoming increasingly militarised, anti gun articles and featurettes are being astro-turfed and homeland security want 1.6 billion rounds of ammo.

As a UK observer from across the pond I think there will be an "Arab spring" in the US within 10 years. Had the majority of rioters here recently had access to firearms I could have seen that descending into calling the army in...

With a lot of dead bodies and resentment afterwards.

[–]silvertongue35 21ポイント22ポイント  (4子コメント)

I don't see an Arab Spring happening here. People still have jobs, and most people are too beta to risk losing their jobs and security to join a revolution.

It won't happen here for a few more decades. Things have to get much worse than they are now. Right now there is just enough bread and circuses to mollify the masses.

[–]Ovadox 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

The economy is different depending on where you go. In the city I live in, things are pretty good. Drive two hours to my hometown and things are looking pretty bleak. Jobs are bleeding away, the people look like shit, half the kids are on heroin. The flag will fray at the edges first. I expect violence and crime to increase, randomly at first, but then organizing around drug cartels and regional insurgencies. Now is a good time to find like-minded people who are into building themselves and those around them up and forge a strong group that can weather the storms to come.

[–]crimson-hound 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Same situation for my hometown. A whole generation of youths are doped up. Saddest thing is, the family doctor is the drug dealer hooking them up with oxys or whatever the opiate of choice is. Even sadder: half the time those who are prescribed the drug aren't interested AT ALL in heroin, but only are after once they develop an opiate dependency and they can't get a prescription anymore. I think a large part to due with it is the economic desperation and lack of employment around here. A lot of the older generation didn't bother keeping up with tech or the changing tides of the workforce and now they're paying for it.

Then a 30 minute drive away are the best universities in the country, great quality of life, and plenty of jobs to go around (if you're skilled).

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think you are wrong...

Most people are working minimum wage (or nearly so) dead end retail jobs. You don't need to be alpha to join a revolution, you need to be alpha to start one or plan one.

You watch though. The signs are already there. Police are being targeted. Particularly when one of their own does something stupid like shoots some black kid. It used to be that police had a few bad apples but were mostly good people. In teh past 20 years it's seemed to in public perception reverse... now it's mostly bad apples with only a few good people left and those good ones are probably the ones closest to retirement or just entering the force.

[–]perplexedm 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

...If you print money like in Zimbabwe... the purchasing power of money goes down, and the standards of living go down, and eventually, you have a civil war.... - Marc Faber.

I think he have predicted civil disturbances in USA at least 2 or 3 years back.

Though a market crash monger, I used to like his articles for portraying depressive reality the world is in.

[–]CDBaller 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Maybe in the cities, where access to firearms is not widespread, but any thug coming out to Cowpie, Iowa is in for a rude awakening. Rural America will continue.

[–]james-watson 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

I find it fascinating how men on this sub are RP when it comes to women, but magically go full BP when it comes to understanding the vastly different evolutionary environments of various human groups and their resultant genetic differences.

Populations that evolved in radically different natural and social environments will not be the same genetically. This is just common sense.

This should be on the sidebar:

"Race, Behavior, and Evolution"

http://lazypawn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

[–]racist_fart_sniffer 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It boggles the mind. People here are aware of all the brainwashing society inflicts in regards to women; endlessly lying about their motivations, obfuscating their worst aspects, giving them absurd privileges all the while infecting them with a severe sense of entitlement and victim mentality. People are aware of the lies of feminism, the blue pill media, the deluded leftists who endlessly make excuses for women. People here see this rather readily.

But no, on the issue of race, the SJWs happen to be right! Yes, all human groups are completely equal in every way! The fact that they were separated for tens of thousands of years of divergent evolution in profoundly different environments is just IRRELEVANT! The fact that we interbred with different hominids is also IRRELEVANT! All is well in this big peaceful world of racial equality :)

[–]IronMeltsinmyHands 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think a revolution will happen. People are strung high on TV and fast food.

[–]drallcom3 1ポイント2ポイント  (6子コメント)

The only thing that holds China together are very strict firearms laws.

[–]5 Endorsed ContributorStayinghereforreal 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

That plus the gulags for those who still speak out.

[–]Wraithwain 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

I sometimes wonder what would happen if the average Chinese populace manage to organize themselves. Could they overthrow the Party with nothing but their harmonious fists? Sure, they'd die in droves. But they'd overwhelm the army and party eventually.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Regimes are built on the back of the people. When the people refuse to bear the weight of the regime on their back what can those in power do?

All it takes is a movement similar to MGTOW to hit mass appeal and then they're up shit creek because noone is working a maximum efficiency anymore.

[–]3 Endorsed ContributorBurgundyCarpet 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Tru dat. In practical terms tho, the movement would have to be WAY DUMBED DOWN version of MGTOW. That specific philosophy seems to appeal only to highly-verbal guys with good educations.

If someone took MGTOW, removed all the intellectual talk, ramped up the angry emotional appeals to action, and gave it a catchier name, that person would be the next Che Guevara.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Stop Beta providering for the guvmint!!!!1!11!oneoneone!

[–]drallcom3 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

That happened a lot in China's history. I usually means 10-100 million dead and then maybe some part of the country splits off or is joined together. There's a reason why China is controlling ways of communication heavily.

[–]Piroko 8ポイント9ポイント  (30子コメント)

Well, yes.

Been coming for a while now.

[–]rich_ripped_redneck 15ポイント16ポイント  (29子コメント)

It's amazing RP'ers can accept the RedPill on women, but are oblivious to it on race. Check the very last comment on this post.

[–]NidStyles 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Some people can not understand reality. RP wouldn't even be here if that were not true. I think every knows on some level what is going on. It is whether they want to admit or not to themselves that is the barrier. I think the men on the outside are seeing what is happening too, but the ones still riding the bp, they have no idea.

[–]FoolishWiseGuy 2ポイント3ポイント  (27子コメント)

How does one become RP on race?

[–][削除されました]  (26子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]billthane 17ポイント18ポイント  (10子コメント)

    A little heavy on the aggression, but you bring up some good points that at first surprised me and yet I can't find anything against it. So black people do seem to have dramatically lower IQs, something not really publicized much. Let's think about this.

    If they're less intelligent, but more outgoing (as the studies suggest), that means that they're similar to women in some ways. Very social, but not always rational. Hence, they may well be highly machiavellian, like women, but they may not be good at it. When trying to manipulate smarter people and failing, it could lead to frustration and aggression.

    Is this a factor in black relationships? Is this part of why they turn to crime more than white people? (Economic reasons as well, this would just be part of the equation.)

    I would love for any African-American (or any black) person to speak up on this, no matter what your IQ or status. This probably sounds offensive, because it is, but I'm going for a deeper understanding here. Just like I won't hesitate to discuss the negative aspects of our typical beta white male.

    [–]MyReddit4 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

    A great book on this subject I've been reading recently is "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" by Thomas Sowell, as well as "The Victims' Revolution" by Bruce Bower.

    They DESTROY our modern propaganda about race, identity studies, and it's impact on society/the economy.

    An interesting statistic from Sowell's book (I'm ballparking here) is that pre-Civil Rights era, the majority of black families stayed together and accounts of divorce and cuckoldry were less than many white immigrant groups, if not the lowest in the country. He presents a theory that why, with over 600,000 people dying in the Civil War for the freedom of slaves, and with Black Slaveowners fighting for the Confederacy, what would cause the black family to disintegrate? - The Welfare Policies of the Civil Rights movement.

    He illustrates accounts of black fathers spending their entire lives as freedmen searching for their family - why after such a brutal war, emancipation, and decades of freedom, would fathers abandon their families in the span of a decade? They weren't - it was the women. He points the finger at affirmative action and economic incentives for black mothers to be unwed.

    Bower details how Identity Studies was created through racketeering universities, whose beta white presidents came to the idea that when black students "act white and achieve" they "aren't being themselves" and encouraged thug culture which is actually ties nicely to the first few chapters in Sowell's book.

    Through studying linguistics, much of what we hear today as Ebonics and gangsta talk is actually taken from poor Irish and North English immigrants. These immigrants worked as indentured servants in the US, were reviled for their lack of industry, laziness, abuse of women and substances, disrespect for authority, hair-trigger tempers, and use of profanity and slang - and guess who spent the most time with these immigrants? Black fieldhands - who then adopted their mannerisms by assimilation. This where Booker T Washington and WEB Du Bois' idea of Talented Tenth comes in because there was a minority of well-educated blacks that were extremely successful.

    Sowell supports this with statistics related to the amount of murders and their motives, as well as deaths from duels. He also compares overall cotton production of the antebellum South to the North (south had WAY more workers, but only 1/4 the output as the North even with more land, farms, and cows)

    I could go on but this is WAY longer than I intended. Read the books, they will answer your questions. The TLDR would be Blacks were actually doing better and more industrious than many white immigrants at the turn of the 20th Century, so aristocratic blacks and whites created welfare policies with the intention of manipulating the poor into voluntary government slavery. This influenced the belief that it's fashionable to underachieve, hence crappy performance by blacks intellectually.

    [–]NoRegretj 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I just recently found a Thomas Sowell in my related videos link. Pleasantly surprised at his ideaology and philosphy on modern leftist ideals being completely toxic to blacks. The thing I think he misses the mark on is race realism in relation to IQ and cited a rather mediocre Flynn study then blamed black american subculture ie gangsta rap on black america's downfall.

    Aside from this, he is incredibly smart and I would absolutely vote for this man. The welfare state, feminism and other progressive policies and unions have absolutely destroyed black families, which was what held them together after the civil rights movement. Racial tensions were not nearly as bad as they are today.

    [–]2alisonstone 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Also, there is talk about African immigrants being the new model minority like the Asians and Jews were. African immigrants that are not contaminated by African American culture excel at academics and they end up holding very good jobs afterwards.

    The top schools end up filling a lot their black quota with African immigrants or middle upper class blacks because they know the ghetto hood culture is bad. Diversity is not a good thing when you bring low class behavior into the mix.

    [–]racist_fart_sniffer 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

    African American culture excel at academics

    Going to need a source on that one. If by "excel at academics", you mean "are shoehorned into various high ranking positions, completely undeservedly, as a result of affirmative action", then I'd be inclined to agree.

    Also Afro-Caribbean studies doesn't count. It's bunk. Other than the occasional Ben Carson, I've yet to see a large number of blacks make any meaningful contributions to any subject that actually matters.

    [–]NoRegretj 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Those studies do not take into account for the fact that it takes a very above average IQ in those countries to leave in the first place.

    [–]OneRedYear 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Black people are also only 13 percent of the population. A race war would be swiftly over. Which I think that the whites who fear/desire a race war are really looking for an excuse for genocide. 13 percent of a mostly unarmed or lightly armed populace vs. 40% of a heavily armed populace is not much of a war.

    [–]rich_ripped_redneck 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

    From your train of thought, you are still relating this on TRP terms, which is fine. But they are not Machiavellian at all, that requires very high intelligence. Blacks are notorious for being slow, and their brains are about 1/10 smaller than ours, with a more primitive skull shape. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Images/Figure%2027-5.GIF

    For instance: Jews, with a average IQ of 115, would be the most Machiavellian. Blacks are the least, with a IQ of 70-85(max).

    Another thing is that blacks are very dumb and manipulable, they are a herd animal for sure. This video blew my mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxAhwYoZQKU

    Also crime rates are much higher because they have weak impulse control mixed with a lower pre-frontal cortex: https://neurophilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/on-the-peculiarities-of-the-negro-brain/

    I would research it myself as well if I were you, I have noticed all scientific findings to be very true in real life. Homo Erectus walks among us.

    [–]NoRegretj 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

    By large I agree with your realism, you are also being very abbrasive and this forum seems to have an eye for picking out "Racists".

    Though, the max IQ for blacks is NOT 85 even though The Bell Curve has shown the deviation between blacks and whites to be widening. I know a few who are above this.

    Try this, assuming you've heard of it though.

    http://www.moreright.net/the-mainstream-science-on-intelligence/

    [–]trpdownunder -4ポイント-3ポイント  (13子コメント)

    dumbest shit I've read. Your history is completely wrong. I don't know about your IQ claims, but there were several complex and extremely wealthy sub-saharan societies in existence before even the european middle ages. Civilisation started in mesopotamia and spread outwards into modern day egypt and africa as well as east towards india and west towards greece. Large and extremely wealthy african states existed right up until the colonial period. In fact, their wealth was such that when one african king made the ritual pilgrimage to mecca, he distributed so much gold to the poor that the value of gold dropped from cairo to venice. In all honesty, the much vaunted roman accomplishments were merely built on the older breakthroughs of the greeks, who built on what they learnt from the sassanians and the pre-islamic arab world. If you think that by being born white you are somehow gifted with a superior civilisational lineage then you're fucked mate. Human culture exhibits gradual differences from region to region as opposed to clear cut ethnic groups. To think otherwise is to live in aryan-master-race fantasy land.

    [–]brandor77 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Goddamn it, I want to feed this troll so bad.

    [–]rich_ripped_redneck 6ポイント7ポイント  (11子コメント)

    Show me any evidence of anything you just said. All of that supposedly happened thousands of years ago. Why is every african country a third world country today then? Why is there no written african languages? How could they be taken as slaves if they had civilizations? Why have africans not invented any technology? they didn't even invent boats or farming. Why are african incarceration rates absurdly higher than any other race? Why before the 60's, were they the only race to be segregated?

    Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxAhwYoZQKU

    I would gladly be proven wrong, but the RP is that I am correct. You are BP on this subject. Find me any sources on anything you said that prove true.

    [–]MyReddit4 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Africans weren't "taken" as slaves. The slave trades started by the dominant African tribes selling out other Africans they had conquered. When they realized the Spanish and Arabs (who had a MUCH more brutal slave trade than Europe) had interest in some niggerwork, business was a'boomin' for the African traders.

    White man was more likely to catch malaria in Africa than a slave, so any fantasy you have about a Brit or American rolling into the jungle with a musket, manacles, and a net is entirely illusion.

    [–]trpdownunder 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

    In all honesty, I'm open to changing my views if you give me well sourced information that's not aryan nation.org. The common arguments I'd put forth against your issues with modern african societies are:

    Third world country?: colonialism destabilised established political order, looted natural resources (process still going on today). The primary cause for instability in africa and indeed in the arab world is that these societies never evolved democracy or even a "nation-state" ala the west. Instead loyalties were delineated by family, clan and tribal allegiances. a loose coalition of tribes would then form a "nation". When you try and force a democratic system of government on a social structure like this, you're going to have a bad time because everyone votes for their tribal leaders and eventually one guy figures out it's best to just get some machetes and kill everyone. cue bloodbath. It's the fundamental reason democracy efforts failed in arabian countries and afghanistan and the primary factor behind the instability, violence and murder you see in africa today.

    Written script: Are you srs bro, there's over a thousand languages in that continent and most of them have a written script. They're usually pretty obscure and most were replaced by "lingua-franca" type scripts, so arabic in the north, ethiopian in the horn etc. But I can guarantee that written scripts have a long history in africa. While I'm prepared to concede that they may not have reached the prominence as in the west, it's because most african cultures rely (like most tribal cultures) heavily on oral history and story telling. It's highly likely writing was only used for official purposes. I can point you to arabic as an example. The only reason we have a standardised arabic alphabet was because generation after generation of ruling class were taught how to write. Even today, there is a heavy emphasis on oral teaching in arabic cultures (I know because I'm a dirty sand-nigger as you'd probably say).

    slaves: The reason you have so many africans in slavery is because the northern part of africa, so berber groups, turks and to some degree egyptians were the ones who started the slave trade. You think that whitey rocked up to africa and took slaves himself? nah m8, he was sold the captured sub-saharan africans by a fat slave trader sitting in the emirates/sultanates along the modern day libyan and tunisian coast. It makes sense that you have a lot of africans as taking slaves was a normal part of warfare in africa.

    Technology: why have they not invented boats or farming? They're sub-saharan africans bro, they live in the biggest desert in the world and they couldnt farm worth shit even if they tried. Why the fuck you need boats in the desert? If you cast your eyes further north, you will find that the seaside dwelling cousins of these people had indeed developed boats. In fact, they were so good at the whole naval thing that they became termed "barbary corsairs" and kicked crusader ass up and down the Mediterranean.

    I'm not an american so I have no clue about segregation. From what I can see your african american culture is absolutely fucking fucked through the head. It values thuggery and anti-authoritarian behaviour over personal growth and the like. As a corrolarry, the housing projects you have set up seem to be plagued with all manner of social ills. (this may not necessarily be whiteboy's fault, but institutionalised racism HAS to play a role in denying the first generation of "equal" africans their "equal" opportunities in the workplace and so one. Not saying it's a deciding factor, but it is there). Aside from that I have no clue about the states. Feel free to correct me if you can.

    I'm curious to hear what you have to think

    I saw your response below and I'll edit and add some more points. Yeah they exploited precious metals. They actually have built monuments though, I outlined why their current government sucks, science and philosophy. You'd be surprised. Astronomy is the one that I know of, but I'd argue that at points they were probably more advanced that european societies simply because of the abundance of natural resources. In all honesty, I highly highly doubt you would be a multi-millionaire if you moved because you'd get fucked in the ass by all the things I outlined above.

    Yea african's are fucked. But I argue that they are a product of their environment more than their environment a product of their nature.

    [–]brandor77 -4ポイント-3ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Just one... ONE... response for the troll under the bridge here.

    The Mali empire was one of the most powerful civilizations during the middle ages. The amount of gold Mansa Musa brought during his Hajj fucking rekt the economy in the middle east for decades.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mali_Empire

    [–]rich_ripped_redneck 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Okay, great for them. They found precious metals and exploited it. That doesn't change the fact that they did not advance any science, philosophy, build any monuments, no real government, etc. Look at mali today. I would be a multi-millionaire if I moved there. That doesn't really say anything. Modern day africans cannot even create positive value in South Africa, Built by the evil whites.

    [–]brandor77 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Egypt, bruh.

    "But what have you done for me lately?"

    Civilizations rise and fall, bruh. Even ours, one day. My name is Ozymandias, and all that.

    South Africa is about the worst example you could cite. Shaka was defeated by superior weaponry, then Europe squabbled over the scraps. But always made sure that that no matter who was in charge, they didn't have dark skin. Apartheid, bruh, till the 90s. The US had similar policy till the 60s. The situation you are talking about is just like the "Why are you hitting yourself?" game.

    [–]MentORPHEUS -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    An average White's IQ is 103, while an average [redacted] ( sub-Saharan African) IQ is 70.

    See: The chitterling test.

    [–]this_guy2001 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It can't happen because the world doesn't need total chaos, just controlled chaos.

    Keep calm and lift.

    [–]drawingroomgentleman 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Reminds of this WKUK skit: Race War.

    Jesus what a world.

    [–]crimson-hound 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

    I fucking hope not. Now is the most dire time that we need a unified America. Our nation is crumbling and all of this racial turmoil and identity politics is the cataclysm of it. We need to nip it in the bud COMPLETELY. Identity politics is the bread and circus of the intellectuals/bourgeoisie. The rich oligarchs who are raping our country want us divided because if the working and middle class unite that will spell the end for the ruling class.

    Not only this, but we also need a unified nation to combat the growing fascist threat that is "ISIS". So many "progressive thinkers" are tooting their "vote for bernie" horn on my FB feed when the man has no clear outline or stratagem on how to handle this conflict other than "he wants to bring the troops home" or "thinks the middle east nations need to take care of it". Well the troops are all ready there, ISIS hates America, and they're a threat to our allies who we're obligated to protect.

    It's time that Americans take ownership of who we are, what we stand for, and why this country was founded. A unified country that will stand tall and crush these fascist enemies who threaten our freedom. It disgusts me that a single person on this soil would ever think of joining the enemy and shows the dog shit morale and weak will of Americans today. That needs to be changed.

    [–]Echo906 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    ISIS is a cia construct nothing more.

    They don't threaten anyone or anything the cia and nsa don't want threatened.

    [–]MyReddit4 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Not to mention I can't believe the day has come when an out and proud socialist is able to run for President. Talk about going against every American value.

    PS: the majority of Gov spending is on social initiatives, including trillions of $$ over decades to "assist" minorities and single mothers. We're already living in a socialist country...

    [–]trpadawan 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I can't believe so many people upvoted this. Think about what you're saying. What would be the sides? White vs. Black? If it didn't happen during the civil rights movement it certainly won't happen now. The government vs. the people? Most people are employed and are happy enough not to take up arms.

    The "society will collapse any day now" circlejerk has been going on for generations.

    [–]GhostOfAladdin 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The killer was on a mind altering rx.

    [–]Tres_1001 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Fails to explain why he killed twice as many women as men.

    [–]tomysotomayorfuxboys 20ポイント21ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Well, for one thing, church attendance seems to be more popular among black women than black men in the USA.

    [–]rich_ripped_redneck 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Great information in the "children" comment below.

    [–]Tarnsman4Life 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Been carrying every day for over a year now. Just added a custom 2a vest after a discarded plate went off the deep end and decided to stalk me. Stay frosty out there.

    [–]TheJessee 30ポイント31ポイント  (12子コメント)

    Did you see his haircut? No wonder he wasn't getting any.

    On a more serious note, america is gonna be so screwed very soon at this rate, this is just going to keep happening and more frequently, i think it's sad really when you genuinely live in a place where you even have to CONSIDER arming and protecting yourself, this should not be happening

    [–]5 Endorsed ContributorStayinghereforreal 49ポイント50ポイント  (7子コメント)

    i think it's sad really when you genuinely live in a place where you even have to CONSIDER arming and protecting yourself, this should not be happening

    All people everywhere throughout recorded history and before recorded history genuinely lived in places where they had to arm and protect themselves.

    Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding themselves by assuming you can rely on other people to protect you and treat you well. Protip: humans exploit each other, and often only the threat of violence keeps that tendency reasonably in check.

    [–]TRP VanguardCyralea 25ポイント26ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Yep. Bad people are the constant. Unless you can somehow remove them from the equation you always need a means of defending yourself.

    Gun control laws only seem to work in countries that don't already have guns in them.

    [–]Suravira 25ポイント26ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Can I also put this notion forward, gun control isn't for the rich either, it's for the poor people, so that they can't fight back. I have gun control in my country, but because I'm rich, if I wanted to I could easily get a gun. In addition to this criminal elements have their own ways of getting guns.

    Not an American btw, UK here.

    The point of the second amendment is to defend free speech/thought. The grand idea is you have to have the capability to defend your rights, not just hope that someone else will protect them for you in the army, hint: they wont.

    [–]holytrpbatman 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

    No, the second amendment is to keep tyranny, and the people who would love to be tyrants, in check. By deadly violent force if necessary. All other purposes are bonus material.

    [–]Suravira 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Pardon yes I remember this now, it was free state wasn't it.

    Ah so long since I studied politics. Still I would argue that free speech and thought are necessary to a free state.

    [–]holytrpbatman 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Yes, free thought and free speech are necessary, but without arms to ensure those remain free, they rapidly disappear.

    [–]Suravira 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Oh yes, but I meant free thought and speech are necessary to the definition of a free state in relation to the second amendment.

    In the same way militia doesn't mean a private army, but rather all men of a fighting age.

    [–]sardinemanR 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

    This is very true. Either from animal attacks or bandits, for almost all of human history men were armed almost all the time. This was a major reason women sought men out for protection, they were always too weak to defend themselves. Women wouldn't go out on their own because it was too dangerous, the home was the safest place for them. And they also absolutely loved having sons, because said sons were an extra set of eyes and arms to also provide protection.

    I'm looking to homestead in the near future, and I plan on carrying a rifle with me while patrolling my property.

    Also the part you mention of the thread of violence is true. In states with open carry, generally there is less crime and far more civility. In your own personal interactions, when you are fit and people know you have martial arts training, they are also nicer. Truly strong men don't need the threat of violence to behave civilly, but most are not strong, and the weak always need to be kept in line. This is another reason why women are so irrational and entitled, fear is the check on their behavior and they can never gain true power, so it's like taking the reigns off of them. Biologically they were always meant to be checked.

    [–]DaphneDK 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Did you see his haircut? No wonder he wasn't getting any.

    Bet he'll have girls fawning over him now though. Mass murderes will do that to you.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

    The 2nd amendment was intended to protect the individual against foreign occupation as well as domestic corruption (the government)

    What the US has is a very strong 'gun culture' along with popular media highlighting and glorifying firearm related violence you've got the perfect storm for young adults to think shooting people is the way to fix things. That's why shit has been going down hill a long time ever since things like Wako Texas, Columbine, etc...

    Sure they may be fucked in the head to begin with but the media puts the idea in their head that they can fix things by killing a bunch of people doesn't help. I mean that's why murder and violence are totally cool to put on public television or over the air broadcasts but show a nipple and oh my god the world is coming to an end.

    [–]Derbi50 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    To that I would add that the media making an instant celebrity out of any nut who goes off contributes to the next nut. For example when all those people were out at that ranch pointing guns at Feds they got tons of attention.

    A couple of the major tea naggers out there decided they needed some more media attention so they killed a cop and shot up a Walmart.

    They were celebrities even though they were dead.

    [–]jolly--roger 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    don't even bother explaining.

    most people outside US just don't get it, nor they can imagine it and they never will.

    just as the right to keep and bear arms is embedded in the 2nd amendment, so is the notion that guns, rather than people, are the problem is embedded in their minds. rarely will they accept the reality, so thus, don't waste time.

    disclaimer: I'm from outside of US

    [–]brandor77 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Wow, the comments section of this post is like turning over a rock. Gross.

    News loves this shit, and so does our government. Anything to keep us distracted from root cause of the ever-declining quality of life for the bottom 80% in this nation. Gotta keep making people think it the "other's" fault rather than the design of the people in charge. The curtain only gets lifted on those rare occasions people turn on the government for their failure to make something happen. Then you get storm troopers gassing people in Oakland and New York, or gun-happy clowns riding tanks in Ferguson.

    TRP is about awareness, and it goes a lot deeper down the rabbit hole than just women. Question is, what are you personally going to do about it? This sub is all about facing reality and owning it. It's just as easy to say "it's the government's fault" as "it's the black/white/brown man's fault" - it may even be true to some extent. So what? As cathartic as raging against the machine may be, at the end of the day it's not productive.

    As Dr. Sweeney asks in American History X, "Has anything you've done made your life any better?"

    [–]halfbluehalfyellow 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

    This kid was an idiot, the news is terrible, and the government isn't any better...but that doesn't mean white people are just imagining their qualms about race in this country.

    [–]rico_tubbs 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Exactly. Everybody knows something is boiling beneath the surface. Even if the news and government love it, the issue is still real and to ignore it is simply sticking your head in the sand.

    [–]MattyAnon 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    No, he just hates Men that can get Women that he can't. These are side effects of Feminism. ... this case along with Elliot Rodgers you clearly see the link.

    I can see a tentative link, developed below

    There were men who couldn't get women long before feminism became a thing. Before feminism there was no sexual utopia in which every white male had access to a beautiful woman.

    The last 50 years have been a sexual utopia for attractive / alpha males, but betas were beta before that. The omega males who couldn't get anything have always been with us. Always frustrated, and occasionally going on a murdering rampage.

    The link I see feminism of having caused is the ridiculous shaming, put-downs and humiliation that most men are constantly on the receiving end of with women. Beta/provider males are no longer respected, they are just laughed at. Social humiliation is a factor in people becoming outcasts and then going on a murder spree.

    [–]AllWerewolvesAreLike 15ポイント16ポイント  (6子コメント)

    I disagree. The above post has nothing to do with RP. OP is reaching

    [–]TekkomanKingz[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

    His killing was because Black Men are supposedly taking all the Available White Women in this town. How exactly is that not related to RP when RP principles could have helped him and prevented these deaths???

    [–]Derbi50 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

    I agree completely. If this dude had realized it was his fault he wasn't getting laid and not someone else's he could have improved himself instead of blasting some people who had nothing to do with his low SMV.

    [–]3 Endorsed ContributorBurgundyCarpet 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Exactly. Dylann Roof has a feminist mentality. They're all crabs in the bucket seeking to blame others for their own lack of personal agency & accountability

    [–]this_guy2001 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Dude was mad that the Disney, shy guy gets the hottie fantasy didn't pan out for him.

    "Why don't they like my puny muscles and chili bowl haircut? I'm White. I deserve that blonde-haired, blue-eyed woman. Disney said so."

    [–]AllWerewolvesAreLike 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    RP deals with race:

    how can I bang [race]

    I am [race], how can improve my SMW?

    Bud, I'm not white and black men are not taking all the white women. In my town, white alphas are. It makes sense due to primarily white population.

    [–]butnowthis 18ポイント19ポイント  (38子コメント)

    Being a white male myself, it is always a particular type of white male that resorts to being racist, hateful, and joining internet forums where hatred is commonly spouted. You can just see some of the hatred and anger in the eyes of these kinds of men, they think they are being loyal to some nationalist cause but the history of such a guy consists a lack of attention from the opposite sex. Years of browsing internet forums, watching porn, and surrounding their minds with such negativity turns them into the Eliot Rodger of the planet. I think racism is just a side effect of inceldom itself rather than being a side effect of feminism.

    Now on a completely unrelated note, why do people say black men are stealing all the white women when other minorities get with white girls just as, if not more, often?

    I tend to notice that latinos hook up with white women at much higher rates than blacks do (statistics will back me up on this) and these days I even see Asians and other minorities hooking up with white girls just as often as blacks. For some weird reason, it seems like American society just feeds off of the whole thuggish black guy nailing a pretty white girl narrative and I will never get it.

    Maybe it is just a thing in my area but I don't see black men with attractive/hot white girls as often as I see latinos and some of the other minority groups, is it different in South Carolina?

    [–]Tarnsman4Life 13ポイント14ポイント  (9子コメント)

    it seems like American society just feeds off of the whole thuggish black guy nailing a pretty white girl narrative

    Because the media fetishises race, specifically between BM and WW, to a lesser extent between WM and AW too.

    [–]crimson-hound 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    For some weird reason, it seems like American society just feeds off of the whole thuggish black guy nailing a pretty white girl narrative and I will never get it.

    You can thank porno and racism for this. It's like a racist's white knight wet dream to kill a black man for "raping" (even if it's consensual, a racist will trick himself into thinking it's rape I bet) a white woman.

    [–]racist_fart_sniffer 24ポイント25ポイント  (26子コメント)

    He said that black men are raping white women, which is in reference to the huge number of black on white rapes that occur every year, at a rate hundreds of times higher than the inverse.

    This race attack is a drop in the water when you look at black on white crimes, which are almost never called "hate crimes" even if they are obviously racially motivated. The white family who were attacked this week by a gang of blacks shouting "get that white!", somehow isn't a hate crime.

    The narrative of the white oppressor and black victim will be ramped up 100 fold after this attack. It makes no difference is black on white crime occurs at a rate disproportionately higher than the inverse, no, now this attack will be held up as the indicator that America has a "racism problem".

    This attack is tragic but it's nothing compared to the amount of black on white crime that occurs each year. Fucking nothing. Yet out come the SJWs telling us again how racist whites are and how evil they are. The Kike media in full swing promoting this specific crime, all the while virtually ignoring every single black on white crime that occurs, and going out of their way to claim that such attacks are nothing to do with race.

    The self righteousness of the SJWs and blacks in general doesn't change the truth. This attack is nothing compared to black on white crime, it just isn't. It's just the Kike media will promote the fuck out of this while they ignore everything else.

    [–]Glenbert 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Unrelated but this guy couldn't have picked a worse group of targets if he tried. These all look to be accomplished, respectable people. If he had clipped a bunch of thugs, maybe he'd get the outcome he was looking for.

    But this is straight up terrorism.

    [–]TekkomanKingz[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, for some reason racists only kill the good people of another Race. This is what perpetuates the belief of the White supremacy establishment.

    [–]Brewjo 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Also relevant is that no one reported him beforehand.

    With a criminal history his papi bought him a handgun as a gift.

    On top of that he had chomped on SSRI's/pharmas like they were skittles. Welcome to crazytown + violent outbursts.

    [–]crimson-hound 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

    "THE BLACK MEN ARE TAKING ALL THE WHITE WOMEN!"

    Said the guy who saw a bi-racial couple for the first time.

    I seriously don't get this. I live in probably the most liberal part of the US and it's still fairly uncommon to see biracial couples. I get weirded out by people who are bothered by bi-racial dating in the first place.

    Anyway, I digress. This kid is exhibiting the classic symptoms of a mass killer. "WAHHHH I DIDN'T GET MY WAY NOW IM GONNA GO ON A REAL LIFE UNREAL TOURNAMENT KILLING SPREE!"

    You know it and I know it too. Those kids you grew up with in grade school who were just constantly pampered by a single mom or shitty parents. The parents could never punish their sweet little boy and take away his xbox or a Cartman from south park style fit would be the result.

    This is what happens when you teach a generation of men "it's okay, things will work out eventually, just be yourself!" You raise a generation of losers who expect the world to hand them something without putting in any effort; or in layman's terms.. "Spoiling them".

    And what do they do when they don't get it? Act as any other child does with undeveloped coping skills.. Lash out and have a temper tantrum, only now Jr. is older and knows how to get his hands on a gun instead of throwing his toys.

    Fucking bad parents. No one ever points the finger or wants to blame the parents, but it really is their fault at the end of the day. "I raised him right! I was so good to him!" No, you spoiled him and didn't teach him how the world actually fucking works. You failed at parenting because you "didn't want to be mean" like your parents were. Also, you neglected him because you wanted to watch Grey's Anatomy and go to bed after picking him up from the babysitter instead of asking your kid how his fucking day was and helping him out with his homework. But no, you can never expect the parents to actually do their fucking job.. It's out of their control!

    [–]NoRegretj -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

    If we are to go the environmental route - I don't want to blame the parents entirely as much as I want to blame the institutions these kids are raised in. Thomas Sowell refutes the idea of parents being the problem and has spent a lot of time in academia in the past few decades.

    Thomas Sowell on teacher Unions and academia in general: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaFAUeftTKs

    If you want to argue the genetics argument and the genetic quality of people is largely declining ( I believe intellignece to be very much hereditary ) then I will be in agreeance with you.

    [–]lonernot -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I live in probably the most liberal part of the US and it's still fairly uncommon to see biracial couples.

    You must live in the northeast then, biracial couples are very common in some areas of the USA.

    [–]NeoreactionSafe 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    "Terrorism is anarchism: a shattering of order. Is there such a thing as right-wing anarchism? Of course not: the concept is retarded. If the word "right" means anything, its goal is not to shatter order, but impose it."


    http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2011/07/right-wing-terrorism-as-folk-activism.html

    MENCIUS MOLDBUG

    Just thought it would be good to drop this here.

    This kid likely had no political agenda, but if there was some bizarre terror angle he had in mind it does not help the right because the right is about Truth.

    The full article is worth the read. (was linked on Dark Enlightenment today)

    [–]Fagbasher01 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    anarchism is basically antistatism. true anarchism is order i would argue

    [–]IronMeltsinmyHands 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    So is this guy a terrorist? Or just a crazy white boy?

    I wanna know CNN!

    [–]Kaokien 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The amount of racism in this thread is disgusting.

    [–]NeoreactionSafe 0ポイント1ポイント  (16子コメント)

    No, this is just a stupid kid.

    He's like Elliot Rodgers in that he's a total idiot... but that's about it.

    Any white ethnonationalist (like myself) sees this sort of thing as aiding the Racists and Feminists that rule America.

    When America falls apart (which is happening) the Africans will be in the South, the Hispanics will be in the Southwest and the Europeans will hold the North.

    We don't need to kill each other... just move to where you belong with your tribe.

    Africans are migrating back to the South now actually:

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/02/02/census-great-migration-reversal/21818127/

    ...so this is already happening.

    The stupid kid should have just moved North if he had a problem.

    [–]DOCTORxTEETH 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I'm African and Mexican and identify with both races. Where do I go?

    [–]Karma_H8er 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    In the event of societal collapse, it would be smart to go where you are accepted.

    [–]trpdownunder 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

    I've always been curious about ethnonationalism, particularly coming from ethnic anglo/europeans. I'm muslim and very very brown obviously. But I have 3 questions for you. The first being, why do you feel you need a white homeland? and where will this homeland be?, do you claim all countries that were white majority in say the 1950's as your homeland? If so how does everyone else survive? Finally, how do you propose to regulate this place?

    I'm not really for or against nationalism in that regard. I live in a very stable society and even a global economic collapse would probably not result in a societal collapse where I live, so I've never had to worry about things like this. But from the impression I get about the USA everything is so racially charged and your society is so fucked that I understand precautions need to be taken to some degree.

    [–]this_guy2001 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Nah. We all hardly see each other except in traffic and the news.

    [–]NoRegretj -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

    The main thing is, most of us would be ok if we just closed the borders and stopped importing millions of people just for the sake of "diversity", but whites cant have any country or areas to themselves? Japan can, but we can't?

    The leftist slipperly slope argument always appals me, in that the minute we close our borders to and guard them as so that we will elect a new Hitler the day after. How's that any different than any of us saying that this is going to turn into the USSR's international socialism? We mirror them pretty well in recent years.

    [–]trpdownunder 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

    you realise you aren't importing millions for diversity reasons right... Your economies are built entirely on consistent positive growth. And since your birth rate decline means less people spending money, the only solution is to import more people and hope that they spend enough to keep the whole house of cards up for another year. Don't blame anyone but your own masters for your fate.

    [–]3 Endorsed ContributorBurgundyCarpet 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Finally a voice of reason. The guy you're responding to hasn't actually thought this shit through.

    [–]CAPS_4_FUN 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Why can't we instead work at increasing our own native birth rates? It's way better than spending billions subsidizing this third world immigration that will eventually collapse this country. Immigrants are a net negative on every economic metric long term. This line that hey they "work hard and pay taxes" is just a myth. They take way more than they ever put in, so why would we continue this scheme?

    [–]NoRegretj -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Sadly, since this is common sense and would actually work, it won't happen and no overwhelming majority will ever agree upon it. Democracy, gotta love it.

    [–]NeoreactionSafe 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

    When the shit hits the fan people will only survive with people they trust.

    It's like the Balkans:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balkans

    ...people with fundamental cultural and ethnic differences attempting to live in the same physical space do not do well when the multi-ethnic state collapses.

    You want to live where 90% or more of your neighbors are similiar to you.

    If you are white most Red States are like this... so the wisest move it to a Red State.

    I'm 4th Generation Californian and left in 2002 to Red States because I realized there were too few ethnically similiar (to me) people living there.

    [–]3 Endorsed ContributorBurgundyCarpet 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    The Selfish Gene discusses how it makes more sense for the survival of your genes to behave more altruistically with people who share those genes than with those who don't.

    Thats why humans all tend towards a biological in-group bias, which liberals have nominalized as "racism"

    [–]NeoreactionSafe 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's just more logical to trust your family first, then your tribe second.

    By the time you get to dealing with a foreign tribe you should be indifferent.

    [–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

    [deleted]

      [–]osman300 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

      Media is pretty hypocritical: when a 19 yr old russian immigrant who happen to be muslim shot 2 people at boston bombing, he was called a "terrorist" for 2 months, thus putting the blame on 10 million American muslims.

      Since this time it is a 21 year old white man who killed "Blacks", he would be market as someone with "mental instability", thus taking the blame out of the white community. "He is a lone gunman, not all white people are like that." narrative

      [–]trphardmode 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Since this time it is a 21 year old white man who killed "Blacks", he would be market as someone with "mentally instability", thus taking the blame out of the white community.

      Yeah, I'm sure the media won't touch race at all on this one. Obama probably won't even mention it /s

      [–]3 Endorsed ContributorBurgundyCarpet 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      White people own the media.

      ALL people are reluctant to make generalizations about ANY group they belong to. It's easy for the ego to make generalizations about the outgroup but nearly impossible to make generalizations about the ingroup.

      Whites aren't evil, but they are beholden to this tendency as much as anyone else. They also own the media. That's why we get the insanely unbalanced media coverage.

      [–]Derbi50 -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

      A lot of racism is jealousy. African Americans tend to be ripped and hung without any effort in the gym. I Guess it's natures reparations for the whole slavery thing. When a population is bred selectively for its reproductive capability and its physical strength you end up with ripped hung dudes. Plus all the weak Africans died because of the horrible conditions on the boat/plantation.

      [–]AllWerewolvesAreLike 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

      get out of here with that nonsense

      [–]Derbi50 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

      I think it makes sense. Why aren't mexicans or Asians as hated as African Americans (I use that term because the African American is its own race because of the livestock style selective breeding vs just plain black people who were never run through that genetic forge) it's because white dudes don't see them as a threat because white dudes are taller and stronger (on average) than Mexican and Asian dudes.

      I'm not saying black dudes are better. The same selective breeding that prized strength and fertility actively bred against intelligence.

      [–]3 Endorsed ContributorBurgundyCarpet 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

      People ONLY criticize things they feel threatened by.

      ^ I challenge anyone to debate this universal principle, from which we can discern that:

      /u/derbi50 is so obviously correct its insane. White dudes criticize blacks more than Mexicans because they feel more threatened by blacks than Mexicans. Its that simple. It makes perfect sense because black dudes tend to have bigger dicks and higher T than white dudes while Mexicans don't. The end.

      [–]EurasianTiger 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Western civilization is pretty much the history of white knights trying to demean non-white races to keep access to white women down while increasing access to non-white women.

      Any other race does that in their own country too.

      [–]activist116 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Obviously. Although I think you're slightly inaccurate.
      Take the academic definition of racism:

      A system of procedures/patterns in all walks of life, i.e. education, housing, businesses, employment, professional associations, religion, media, etc., whose effect is to perpetuate and maintain the power, influence and well-being of one group over another. It originates in the operation of established and respected forces in the society; and thus receives far less public condemnation than does individual racism. Although more subtle than individual racism, it is more destructive of humanity.

      FEMINISM IS RACISM

      Feminist ideologies maintain the suppression of black men in particular. Who gets arrested for "man-spreading?" the black man. Who will be put in jail for false rape accusations? The black man. Who overwhelmingly goes to jail for not paying child support? The black man

      You really should have labelled your post "FEMINISM=RACISM"

      Sure the guy was an omega loser, but I don't think there are many black men on this forum to appreciate the fact that most of the feminist policies that we on the redpill despise overwhelmingly target Black men. Black men are feeling the onslaught of feminism the worst.

      [–]TekkomanKingz[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Oh we know alright. And the biggest problem we have to face as Black Men are not White Women - But rather BLACK WOMEN. They are the main agents of the ruling class right now. They are easily to manipulate and predict. The oligarchs that control this country oppress anyone who is "not connected". Black Men are merely a scapegoat to detract away from the true mission which is to subdue anyone not in the "inner circle". Black Women are the main agent used to fulfill this goal. White Women are merely supplementary to that cause.

      [–]3 Endorsed ContributorBurgundyCarpet 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

      YES. You're killing it. The elites use economic incentives (welfare) to turn black women against their husbands. By incentivizing single motherhood, they essentially enlisted half the black population into turning against the other half.

      Q: "okay, lets say you're right, Burgundy. But the situation is still fucked, and i need a scapegoat to blame. Who's fault is it? Whites or Blacks?"

      A: NEITHER. This situation was created by the UPPER CLASS, which contains ALL races (not in equal proportion tho). Ultimately there is no one to blame but human nature itself, because people of ANY ethnicity will act to oppress others if they have economic power. (The first slaveowners were black).

      "When you seek revenge, dig two graves." A great quote, which I will extend:

      When you seek a scapegoat, simply sequence the human genome. You will find your scapegoat in our universal DNA-encoded tendency to dominate our environments at the expense of others

      [–]Luke666808g -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

      The saddest thing is it's not even true, white women with jungle fever are only common place in movies.

      [–]Dbrown15 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Do you live in the American south ? Because here, there is a significant black population and there is a decent percentage of white women who prefer black men. A lot! To each their own, but it's clearly not just in the movies.

      [–]TaylorWolf 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Your crazy, they love it. It goes back to Michael Jordan I think. Then Drake kicked it into overdrive. White bitches FiEND Drake

      [–]DRMMR76 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      What's with the random capitalization? Is it code or something?