, gfrbe@unhcr.org, jpntopi@unhcr.org
Cc: central@iso.org, info@karelvanwolferen.com, info@wolferen.jp
Dear Deutsche Bundesamt and UNHCR Berlin & Japan office,
Cc: Prof.Wolferen, ISO central office
I am Hidenobu Onishi, the first refugee of Deutschland from Japan.
My ID number of Deutschland is 5556608-442.
I had requested to Bundesamt and local officer many times to send me copies of my documents, but nothing had done.
Let me show you;
http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/AsylVfG.htm
Section 21 Retention and transfer of documents
(4) Copies of the documents taken into custody shall be provided to the foreigner on request.
Deutsche Bundesamt has to send me copies on my request, as written.
Please do so.
I will read the law and indicate what Deutsche Bundesamt has to do, on next week.
I can also read the Japanese version of AsylVfG and explanation of that from the file below.
http://www.ndl.go.jp/jp/data/publication/legis/216/21602.pdf
Hidenobu Onishi
kotochan0725@gmail.com
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I ask for the return of these materials.
Question to BAMF 02.
You might think my evidences you lost were insignificant, but they were most important materials for the asylum application. So I think it is a big problem without reviewing the asylum application.
The fact that the letter has not been carefully studied, is apparent, because I had reported in a letter that report to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is rejected in September
The evidence is:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/9/2012 P57
1. Yesterday, I called to Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry to hear my whistleblowing sent 19/4/2012. The person said research finished one month before and nothing against the law.
I told why, I want to discuss why nothing against the law, but he said he can say nothing and if I have a question I have to go to the court.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and, the report does not reflect the fact, I had rejected.
Also, the request to send a copy of the evidence materials, meeting requirements of such additional, are not accepted wholly.
Of course, documents submitted to the meeting held at 16/7/2012 had lost, and it is not been studied at all. That is also apparent.
From the fact that not only from my memory, but also the fact I explained about the Personal Information Protection Act violation in detail in the meeting, you can imagine easily I had handed to Bundesamt not only passport, airline tickets, business cards, but also many evidence documents.
The materials Bundesamt seems to have lost, I come up now, are as follows.
﹞ Whistleblower writing to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (In it, attached criminal mail documents IT Strategy Headquarters created, which violates Personal Information Protection Act)
﹞ Complaint to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, and the reason document for the rejection about that (reason for the rejection is the lack of configuration requirements, in that document it was described that I should talk with a lawyer, etc., so I don't think that is not the reason for claims Onishi made is not a crime).
﹞ Mail a total of 100 hip, sent to 11 people director of Hitachi, Ltd.(and 4IDs, total 15IDs), to sue the personal information protection law violations. (Why Onishi sent so much? You may think, but I explained the reason in 16/7/2012 meeting.)
﹞ Information manual from the industrial physician Minoru Arai, and the response from Daisuke Mori. I think doctors should consider only treatment of the disease, and had an order to make suspension from "a light manic state", is believed to be ultra vires.
(I think if I were a severe manic state, it'll be allowed. But there is a fact, another doctor Takuro Endo said I had nothing bad.)
Also, since there are some missing pages, and nested pages, the possibility that investigators have lost article is inferred easily.
Let I tell:
P63 is, despite being described as "1/6", there is only one page. Investigators had lost five.
P64, P65 was described in 29/11, from the fact that there is a statement that "November 29th" in the fourth row of the P64. However, the P66, there is a receiving push of "28.Nov.2012". The order is reversed.
The P66, it is with "I send a letter 3 days before", and is also on the P68 "I used Japan Airlines (JAL) and, my customer information leaked. 3days before I told one, but, occurs another." And further, since the term "26/11/2012" in the signature line of P69, there should be a letter written in "23/11/2012". And you can imagine, the mail contents written in 23/11/2012 is a disclosure of personal information about JAL.
Materials P122-123, P124-125 are a pair, but P126 is only one. One page had been lost.
Other problems are, I was beaten by Bundesamt calling the police 12/07/2012(say later), and, I called once to Neumunster in October around, to make a counseling. And I had heard the phone number twice, and in addition, I repeated to say, but that was a FAX number. I called there twice.
Neumunster person cheated me.
The following request in letters sent to Bundesamt has not been fulfilled at all.
--------------------------------------------
4/9/2012 P62
I want to tell many peoples the truth of Japan.
After November 29th (correct date not written) P64-65
And now, I a sincerely hope, I want a interview by a person.
Since I am a refugee of politics, I want to tell my problems all over the world.
I already sent so many massages to Bundesamt,
(Abbreviation)
I convince, if I meet a person such as a UNHCR, an expert of world peace, an university professor, they can think it's a big problem and they may introduce me to some correct person, such as mass-communication.
Please think about these matters.
26/11/2012 P69
Anyway, Japanese Government and Japanese companies leaks so many privacy informations of me. That is accurately persecution.
Please take account of these facts.
22.12.2012 P76
Please investigate about this.
If I have to, I will go anywhere and I will tell about my opinions.
If you say, I will correct my doings.
11/1/2013 P80-81
In these mails, Chisa Yamamoto did hacking with account of Naoya Muraoka.(* P84)
She may also hacked Manabu Takahashi.
This is exactly a crime.
Muraoka says, he will tell Japanese police about this. I want to tell this to Deutsche police. Please investigate about this.
Chisa Yamamoto demands me commit a suicide two times. (* P83”自ら命を絶つという選択肢もあるかと思います。 I think you have a choice to commit a cuicide”, P88”日本に早く帰るか，自ら命を絶ってください。 You shall go back to Japan soon, or shall commit a suicide.”) This is apparently illegal in Deutsche, I think.
These are strictly persecution by Japanese people. Please investigate.
8/1/2013 P96-97
They told me so many lies and they tried me insult and threat.
(Abbreviation)
And, for Chisa Yamamoto's case, She is my home country's person.
I am refugee. I have got serious crime from my home country, Japan.
She has no right to insult and threat me.
That is persecution from Japan.
2/4/2013 P120-121
I wrote many opinions below site for almost 10 months, and Hitachi's person, I convince, attacked me so much.
http://awabi.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/company/1363341628/l50
(Abbreviation)
I have caught so many attacks every day.
Many people say me, Commit a suicide!
I want your reply as soon as possible.
--------------------------------------------
Question to BAMF 03.
Hitachi has continued to attack against Onishi thereafter.
I think those attacks are against the Personal Information Protection Act, Privacy Mark, and those base, OECD privacy principles.
However, even if I appealed to Bundesamt, Peter Martensen, and Zink Ailne, they ignored or did nothing because it was a matter of Japan.
If Hitachi, in an organized manner is violating the Personal Information Protection Act, Privacy Mark, and those base, OECD privacy principles now and attacks me on the Internet, I think Privacy Mark buro and Bundesamt can never say the answer "no problem concerning about the privacy mark and personal information protection law" by Hitachi is correct.
It is not possible to state definitively without having to study to have doubts about the story of Hitachi, because it is lack of thinking the case of Hitachi violates those Acts and cheats you.
Hitachi, Ltd. had wrote the reason for the disciplinary dismissal of me as "slander on the Internet". And I had seen Hitachi person read the writing to 2ch (Internet site) in the meeting at the time. Therefore it is clear that Hitachi organisation is monitoring 2ch.
However, Onishi has been under attack from the man looked like Hitachi's employee who write my personal information at Hitachi, again and again.
You may say that is a problem of Japan, but I want to confirm you that it is not in accordance with the OECD privacy principles that Japan also comply.
----------------------------------
OECD Privacy Principles
http://oecdprivacy.org/
1. Collection Limitation Principle
There should be limits to the collection of personal data and any such data should be obtained by lawful and fair means and, where appropriate, with the knowledge or consent of the data subject.
2. Data Quality Principle
Personal data should be relevant to the purposes for which they are to be used, and, to the extent necessary for those purposes, should be accurate, complete and kept up-to-date.
3. Purpose Specification Principle
The purposes for which personal data are collected should be specified not later than at the time of data collection and the subsequent use limited to the fulfilment of those purposes or such others as are not incompatible with those purposes and as are specified on each occasion of change of purpose.
4. Use Limitation Principle
Personal data should not be disclosed, made available or otherwise used for purposes other than those specified in accordance with Paragraph 9 except:
a) with the consent of the data subject; or
b) by the authority of law.
5. Security Safeguards Principle
Personal data should be protected by reasonable security safeguards against such risks as loss or unauthorised access, destruction, use, modification or disclosure of data.
6. Openness Principle
There should be a general policy of openness about developments, practices and policies with respect to personal data. Means should be readily available of establishing the existence and nature of personal data, and the main purposes of their use, as well as the identity and usual residence of the data controller.
7. Individual Participation Principle
An individual should have the right:
a) to obtain from a data controller, or otherwise, confirmation of whether or not the data controller has data relating to him;
b) to have communicated to him, data relating to him
i) within a reasonable time;
ii) at a charge, if any, that is not excessive;
iii) in a reasonable manner; and
iv) in a form that is readily intelligible to him;
c) to be given reasons if a request made under subparagraphs (a) and (b) is denied, and to be able to challenge such denial; and
d) to challenge data relating to him and, if the challenge is successful to have the data erased, rectified, completed or amended.
8. Accountability Principle
A data controller should be accountable for complying with measures which give effect to the principles stated above.
----------------------------------
The main thing of violation is the following. (I take some.)
﹞ A detailed medical history, medication history information of Onishi only be known by Hitachi industrial physician Minoru Arai and the attending physician Daisuke Mori, who is also hired by other division of Hitachi as a industrial physician
【onishi】日立製作所の裏事情70.7【ﾋﾞｻﾞ期限切れ】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1348658012/
958 ：M[]投稿日：2012/10/07(日) 14:53:26.01 ID:XKmVrW9e0[1/1回(PC)]
>>952
大西さんについて補足しておきます。
彼は休職中の2011年7月から少なくとも2012年2月まで
リタリンを服用していました。
そのため9月の復職後は副作用による様々な
悪影響があり、社内SNSへのAKBに関する投稿を
他人の迷惑も顧みずに行い、やがて歌詞を転載する
という行動に出て現在に至ります。
Note about Onishi.
He was taking Ritalin until February 2012 at least from July 2011.
There is a variety of negative impact, after returning to work in September, so he did posts about AKB to the corporate SNS without regard to the nuisance of others, and then did the behavior to reprint the lyrics and it now leads out.
Why the person can write about my medical history in detail?
I must say this is by Minoru Arai or Daisuke Mori.
This is also an abuse of confidentiality as a doctor.
Defamation of Onishi, too.
【懲戒】日立製作所元社員大西の事情70.12【解雇】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1353478945/
632 ：A[]投稿日：2012/11/25(日) 23:46:33.34 ID:NeoaUjpC0[1/1回(PC)]
大西さんは休職中の昨年7月から復帰後の今年2月まではリタリンの
(Abbreviation)
復帰時点で彼が服用していた薬は
ソラナックス、デパケン、アタラックス、リーマス、レンドルミン、
ベンザリン、デパス・・思いつくままに挙げると・・
誰が見ても異常な薬漬けの状況でした。
Drugs he was taking at the return point,
Let I show as it occurs to me...
Solanax, Depakene, Atarax, Limas, Lendormin, Benzalin, Depas...
It was a situation of abnormal drugged, as anyone can see.
Why the person can write about my medicine history in detail?
I must say this is by Minoru Arai.
This is also an abuse of confidentiality as a doctor.
Defamation of Onishi, too.
【老婆】元日立製作所の大西の事情70.14【襲う】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1355552582/
657 ：A[]投稿日：2012/12/21(金) 22:56:50.70 ID:3ARlTmDk0[1/1回(PC)]
あなたは昨日嘘をつきましたね。
リタリンについては大西さんには全く効用がなく副作用の影響とみられる
異常な行動が散見されたので、リタリンの処方を止めてもらいました。
You told a lie yesterday.
I saw some abnormal behaviors seemed to be caused as side effects, and there are no effect at all for Onishi for Ritalin. I had to stop the prescription of Ritalin.
Why the person can write about my medical history in detail?
I must say this is by Minoru Arai.
This is also an abuse of confidentiality as a doctor.
Defamation of Onishi, too.
﹞ A detailed worker's information of Onishi only be known by Hitachi person
【onishi】日立製作所の裏事情70.7【ﾋﾞｻﾞ期限切れ】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1348658012/
34 ：O[]投稿日：2012/09/27(木) 01:01:23.15 ID:FP0MbQ0A0[1/3回(PC)]
大西君はさあ相手に確認せずに決めつけるよね？
休職についても2ヶ月前の診断結果を頑なに主張してたけど、
荒井さんの診断を受けた後で確認してなかったよね？何事においても根拠が弱いよね？
Onishi declares not to confirm the other.
Onishi had claimed results of the diagnosis about the leave of absence made two months ago stubbornly, but you didn't confirm after a diagnosis of Arai's? You are weak in basis, everything ?
Why the person can write "you didn't confirm after a diagnosis of Arai's"?
I must say this maybe Ofuji, but anyway he says person's name "Arai", so he is a worker of Hitachi.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
【新チームA】日立製作所の裏事情70.9【伊達娘命】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1350564419/
142 ：K[]投稿日：2012/10/20(土) 09:07:55.01 ID:+VsAdvbJ0[1/1回(PC)]
こもれびへの書き込みも9月頃からはじまって
内容が同じような投稿ばかりで皆さん辟易してましたよ。
大西君は相手の事を考えられるようにならないと。
Write to "Komorebi" also began around September, and those posts were just similar, so everyone had been fed up with.
Onishi has to be thinking about the other party.
Why the person can write about "Komorebi"'s writing?
I can't say who is this, but anyway he can say "Komorebi" doing of me, so he is a worker of Hitachi.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
472 ：O[]投稿日：2012/10/23(火) 08:12:39.15 ID:Nkq4UlkI0[2/2回(PC)]
大西君さあ、大西君ができないというのはカンパニーにおいて公然の事実じゃなかったっけ？
大みかから異動したのは出世じゃないというのはいいよね？
Now you Onishi, the fact Onishi could do nothing at work was well known to the public company?
The change from Omika works was not a promotion, you understand?
Why the person can say my change "from Omika works was not a promotion"?
Omika works is a Hitachi's real works.
I must say this maybe Ofuji, but anyway he knows inside affairs of Hitachi well.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
【ドイツ】元日立製作所の大西の事情70.13【永住】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1354208277/
799 ：N[]投稿日：2012/12/13(木) 04:41:28.38 ID:ynDrarbF0[3/3回(PC)]
最後にもうひとつ
お前は人のことを情報を抱え込んで保身しているとかなんとか
言ってるけどさ、
自分のパソコンにでしか出来ないことがあるのにパスワードの共有もせず、
夜に作業している人間を困らせて電話せざるを得なくする状況って
それじゃないのかい？
One last thing.
You are saying that is self-protection racking the information to a person.
You annoyed a person who was working at night and forced to phone because you did not share the password of your own PC with him.
The situation you said is just that?
I remember, that was happened about 10 years ago. The time my boss was Satoru Nagai, and he ignored me and he gave me no work to me, I convince he had persecuted me, so I got angry, and just once, I didn't tell the password and went home. But he called me and I told my password. Nothing bad.
So I must say this must be Satoru Nagai.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
And, he has written so many times in internet about the password problem, but I think I did only one time a pinprick, so he couldn't say other problems to me.
【老婆】元日立製作所の大西の事情70.14【襲う】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1355552582/
21 ：I[]投稿日：2012/12/15(土) 18:26:00.91 ID:Rv0xMoyt0[1/1回(PC)]
大西って思い込みが強くてやってられないんだよね～
何年か前にSNSで知り合った同僚が彼氏持ちだと
言ってるのにも関わらず妄想していないか倦怠期かのどちらかや！
だって・・・・・
なんか個人の趣味で美術館とか博物館とかに一人でいくのは相方がいない証拠
なんだって。
I feel Onishi is troublesome, because he is strong in belief.
Some years ago, regardless of colleagues who met Onishi at SNS were speaking about she had a boyfriend, Onishi had a delusional mode, and he said she had really not a boyfriend, or either bored with a boyfriend!
A woman going alone to museums or Museum of Art as a hobby of individuals, is the evidence who must not has a boyfriend, he said.
This is about Mizuho Saijo, who is working in Hitachi Ultra LSI company, as I said that anywhere.
You may think that is true or not, but anyway that is my privacy.
And, the SNS is strictly Komorebi. Komorebi is used by Hitachi group company.
It may written by Mizuho Saijo, but I think this is written by Waka Igarashi, who had hate me so much. In Komorebi, she blocked my access.
And even worse, many of my friend had become blocking my access, when they had befriend to Waka Igarashi.
I convince she had done negative campain in Komorebi to me.
Anyway, this is also a defamation of Onishi.
86 ：O[]投稿日：2012/12/16(日) 00:12:00.83 ID:NB8SAP0e0[1/2回(PC)]
大西君さあ、大西君がAKBに関しての投稿及びコメントについて、
業務が成立しない頻度だったというのは証明できる事実だよ。
それから面談で大西君自身が成果をあげられていないと認めているよね？
大西君の問題行動って、こもれび運営事務局が上長にメールを出す前から問題視されていたんだよ。
You Onishi, Onishi you made so many posts and comments about AKB, and you could not work. I can prove that as a fact.
Then, Onishi, you admitted you could not have been paying off at the meeting?
Behavior problems about Onishi was, before executive secretariat of Komorebi sent an email to his boss, that was seen as a problem.
Hitachi's people have no rights to write my working attitude.
And, I had a progress report meeting with Yokosuka, who was my boss, once at a time.
Yokosuka said me nothing.
I said I couldn't make an outcome, but the most big reason was Yokosuka gave me a little work since December. Yokosuka removed me from all of projects.
Anyway, this is also a defamation of Onishi.
328 ：Y[]投稿日：2012/12/17(月) 22:42:01.97 ID:KCYkg1Rx0[1/1回(PC)]
大西君は4月の時点で精神に異常をきたしており、異常行動を連発し
会社側としても手をこまねいていた状況でした。
従って法に触れるような事についても躊躇なく行うんでしょうね。
4月～懲戒解雇までにおける大西君の問題行動の【一部】を以下に記述します。
これを見て公平な目で審判する裁判官はどうお思いになるのでしょうか？
１．3月25日よりアメリカ旅行に行った際に職場上長に身内の不幸のため
実家に帰ると虚偽の理由で休暇申請を取る。
2．4月8日東京ビッグサイトで行われたAKBの握手会において
AKBメンバーを恫喝して泣かせた上、スタッフに暴言を吐くなどやりたい放題。
物々しい厳戒態勢で握手を行う。
3．4月16日社長及び取締役に100通のメールを送付して問題となる。
4．4月18日異常な行動により産業医が軽そうと診断を受ける。
5．4月19日経済産業省に公益通報書提出
6．4月21日実家にて休職を説得した際に休職不要との診断を受けたのが
2ヶ月前で有効ではない事が判明
7．5月8日懲戒一日の処分（自席のPCからLANケーブルに接続できなくされる）
8．5月23日勤労面談でヤフーファイナンスへの書き込みを本人と認める。
就業時間中に自己判断による休憩で24Fの休憩スペースで書き込み。
就業規則違反だと認める。
9．5月23日経済産業省に公益通報を出す。
10．5月30日出勤停止15日の懲戒処分となる。
11．5月31日懲戒処分を受けたにもかかわらず出社。
12．6月10日懲戒処分中にも関わらず北海道旅行
13．6月21日懲戒明けの面談においても改悛の情は見られず。
14．6月22日懲戒解雇
Onishi had mentally ill at the time of April, and did the string of abnormal behavior, so the company was at a loss what to do with him.
Therefore, I guess he could make things like touching the law without hesitation.
Let me show Onishi's problem behaviors from April to disciplinary dismissal[part].
How judge who has a fair eyes think, when he get to see this?
From the 25th march, when he went to America travel, he said he would go home owing to a bereavement as a false request, and he took a vacation.
(abbreviation)
Truly I said wrong reason to my boss to go to America, but not "bereavement", because I took rights may be one week or so before.
Why could I say bereavement one week before?
And, I went New York Times at the travel. If I said truth things to go to America, my boss may reject, so I said I will go home.
But anyway, my boss Yokosuka gave me no work, anyway he didn't talk to me, if I said something to him. I thought he was ignoring me.
I must say this must be Yasushi Yokosuka, was my final boss in Hitachi.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
Onishi had mentally ill is so defamation.
These are just a few examples. So many insults to me is written in 2ch, in internet.
And, persons who can know the personal information of Onishi in Hitachi are so limited. so I can imagine some people who is writing them.
I suspect initials of the last name of the writing people, is written in the name field.
For example, as follows.
Y may Yasushi Yokosuka
N may Satoru Nagai
O may Ofuji (I don't know his name)
I may Waka Igarashi
Sk may Seki (I don't know his name)
F may Kazunori Fujiwara
S may Masataka Shiba
K may Toshiya Kurakake
Why they do those things? I don't know. But anyway that is happening.
If you think that is unbelievable, please click those URL and see the writings and translate to your own language.
Never think "Everything Onishi tells unbelievable", and never decide without investigation, as many people include BAMF did.
Claim information about Onishi in Japan Airlines, that only be known by the workers of Japan Airlines,
【懲戒】日立製作所元社員大西の事情70.12【解雇】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1353478945/
221 ：名無し[]投稿日：2012/11/23(金) 10:28:28.84 ID:1qllQfb70[1/1回(PC)]
この人、さかもと未明さんを批判してるけど人のこと言えない。
5年以上前の話ですけどこの方の手荷物のパソコン等の収納スペースが
なかったみたいで合図されたらしいんですが気づかずにそのままに
なってしまいました。
これに立腹したのかチーフパーサーにとんでもない剣幕で起こり
担当者が直接お詫びをしなければなりませんでした。
This person has criticized Mimei Sakamoto, but he can not say other person.
It is a story of more than five years ago, there was no storage space, for his bags, personal computer, he seem to have been signaled, but he had remained alone by CA without noticing (CA said "start preparation" and all of them sat their own seats).
He may got very angry, personnel have to apologize directly to him, in the threatening attitude to chief parser.
I remembered, that occurred about 6 or 7 years before using JAL.
I had got angry, because Cabin Attendants are "Safe security guard", for planes may get serious accident.
All of Cabin Attendants forgot to check the cabin and sit, so I thought I couldn't trust my life to those people if there is an accident.
Anyway, why my privacy in JAL's is leaking?
Can't that be said as persecution from Japan?
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
222 ：名無し[]投稿日：2012/11/23(金) 15:07:11.07 ID:ZTG/7LJI0[1/2回(PC)]
JALではクレーマーとして名が通ってた。
自分は上客というのを振りかざして特権を要求してた。
対人関係全てにおいてこれなんだと思う。
His name was well known as claimer in JAL.
He had requested the privilege by brandishing a good customer.
I think he does such in all interpersonal relationships.
I said sometimes difficult demand as a good customer, but that was as negotiation, anyway just I tried to. I didn't demand so severe.
I think I was thought truly good customer, Cabin Attendant of All Nippon Airways said to me I was so humble, in a plane a year ago.
Anyway, why my privacy in JAL's is leaking?
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
510 ：名無し[]投稿日：2012/11/25(日) 04:07:20.12 ID:UgtRM/FX0[1/1回(PC)]
＞優先搭乗したことはあるけど、優先搭乗を強要したことはないぞ？
マニュアル通りの対応してどないする？って言うたことはあるかもやけど、
優先搭乗強要はしたことない。知らん。ホンマに知らん。
いつどこで言った？
忘れたとは言わせない！
あなたが上の方でしつこく出してる水とゆずを間違えたときに
言った。
その場で怒った後、ご丁寧に他の客室乗務員に再度
クレームを上げ、その時にいろいろおっしゃってました。
それともうひとつ言うと、普通の言い方だったら絶対に水と言われてゆずジュースは
出しません。
薬をちらつかせたと言うけど見えたという確信はありますか？
上の方で子供をその場で叱るのが普通と書いておられますが
後から別の人間を捕まえてクレームする必要はありますか？
どうしても我慢できないんだったらコメントカードに書けばいいのでは
ないんですか？
> I had used priority boarding, but I had never been forced a priority boarding.
I might say, you shouldn't treat us in accordance with the manual only.
Say again, I had never forced a priority boarding. Truly I don't remember.
When and where did I say?
You must not say forgot!
When you indicated a mistake, "citron" and "water", you are persistently saying towards the top of this page.
After angry on the spot, you said the claim again to the other cabin crew. At that time you had said in various things.
And I say one more thing, if you pronounced correctly Cabin Attendant must not bring citrus juice, said water.
You said you showed medicine to the Cabin Attendant, but are you certain that looked by her?
Above you write when someone scold children, usually do on the spot, but if so why you had to claim to catch another person later?
If you couldn't endure, do you think you could write in the comment card?
I showed a medicine with looking the Cabin Attendant.
But she mistook "mizu" to "yuzu", so I scolded to her.
And, she seemed to feel no remorse over, so I said to another.
That's all.
Anyway, why my privacy in JAL's is leaking?
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
Question to BAMF 04.
In the 2ch website, there was a post looked like the BKA.
In the report of the Bundesamt, nothing is described about research to 2ch.
BKA wrote themselves? Or human pretending to BKA wrote?
It is not clear to Onishi.
【老婆】元日立製作所の大西の事情70.14【襲う】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1355552582/
451 ：Instruktion[]投稿日：2012/12/19(水) 08:00:00.27 ID:UEZF0Jtn0[1/1回(PC)]
BKA 80 168 176 88 177 200 184 104 86 17 228 113 111 236 124 108 52 90 72 133 239 70i 85 181 155 182 228 141 90h 156 8 229 9 223
A0 215 223 68 148 33s 122 240 248 205 74 204 127 74 8 11i 249 B0 192 122 78 60n 102 244 144 226 58 96 56o 6 105 150 115 3
C0 67 1 30u 52 226 188 193 174 135 188 246 106 182 43b 188 231 D0 165 254 135 183 134 134 157 118 177 100 130 165 204 49o 10 110
E0 101 205 83n 56 163 147 188 39 131 227 31 94 193 89e 215 37 F0 103 137 238 205 32 30d 106 238 71i 191 143 88 86 135 41h 86 BKA
Umsichtig handeln
Question to BAMF 05.
To appeal for violations the personal information protection law by Hitachi to Onishi, there was no clear answer from Hitachi, privacy Mark Office, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, etc.
First, Onishi, a Hitachi IT Strategy Headquarters of IT Division, which created the problem mail, is an organization separated with Hitachi Transport System, Inc. (one of In-house Companies of Hitachi) I was belonging to. There is no hierarchical relationship between each Division.
http://www.hitachi.co.jp/about/corporate/organization/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/03/15/130401_j.pdfhttp://www.hitachi.co.jp/about/corporate/organization/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/03/15/130401_j.pdf
I explained that IT Strategy Headquarters made a material from my personal informations, which was collected from personal mail of "Komorebi", directory from me to "Komorebi" Administration Bureau in IT Strategy Headquarters, without consent of Onishi.
(Contrary to, such as Article 15 (1) Article 16 (1))
個人情報の保護に関する法律
Act on the Protection of Personal Information
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=130 &
Article 15 (1) When handling personal information, a business operator handling personal information shall specify the purpose of utilization of personal information (hereinafter referred to as "Purpose of Utilization") as much as possible.
Article 16 (1) A business operator handling personal information shall not handle personal information about a person, without obtaining the prior consent of the person, beyond the scope necessary for the achievement of the Purpose of Utilization specified pursuant to the provision of the preceding article .
In the material made by "Komorebi" Administration Bureau, twitter writing seemed written by Onishi (The user didn't write the name in twitter account) was used as Onishi's writings.
These are contrary to Article 15 (1) Article 16 (1) as well.
Although Onishi sued to Hitachi compliance division about the case above-mentioned, Hitachi compliance division did wrote on Parrot words of Onishi, and wrote there is no problem.
－－－－－－
２０１２年４月２５日 コンプライアンス本部
交通システム社 経営企画部 研究開発企画室 大西秀宜様
コンプライアンス通報回答の件
首記の件，貴殿から２０１２年４月１１日付でいただいた通報に関し，下記の通り回答します。
記
１．通報内容
（１）（I戦）にて個人情報の無断収集および開示が行われている。
（２）上司や総務/勤労/産業医の指示のもと，そう病により休職を指示する診断書を作成されそうになり，危うく休職に追い込まれるところだった。
２．回答
（１）（I戦）が貴殿の上司に対して，貴殿のこもれびの書き込みなどを送付したことを確認しましたが，当該行為に，コンプライアンス上の問題はないことを確認しました。
（２）貴殿と関係者の間で話し合いが行われたことを確認いたしましたが，当該話合いの過程においてコンプライアンス上問題となることは確認されませんでした。
以上
－－－－－－
------
Compliance Division April 25 2012
Research and Development Planning Department / Corporate Planning Department / Transportation Systems Inc.
Mr. Hidenobu Onishi
Review of compliance report answers
Regard to report that we received in the April 11, 2012 review from you, of the neck mentioned, let's answer as follows.
Chronicle
1. Report content
(1) Disclosure and unauthorized collection of personal information by (IT strategy) has been carried out.
(2) From instructions made by my boss, and general affairs / labor division / industrial physicians, I was likely to be created a medical certificate document which indicates the leave of absence by mania, I was almost forced to leave.
2. Answer
(1) It was confirmed that for the boss of you, (IT strategy) was sent your writings in "Komorebi", and so on, but it was confirmed that, in the act, there is no problem of compliance.
(2) It has come to our attention that the discussion has been made between you and the parties concerned, but in the course of the discussion there was seen no problem of compliance.
Or more
------
Because "the reason" s not listed at all, Onishi asked to Hitachi people, "Why you say there is no problem, please say the reason.", but the relationship of the Hitachi did not answer at all.
To Onishi's appeal, Privacy Mark Office said "There is no problem, because Hitachi says that as labor management information".
Onishi appealed that, "you say leakage of information is legal, but previously that, it is illegal to collect personal information by the unauthorized department, and further, the collection of twitter is also illegal.", but they did not hear me.
---
Time:2012/05/09 14:20:22 (GMT+09:00)
From:プライバシーマーク事務局 消費者相談窓口
To:onicchan@docomo.ne.jp
大西秀宜 様
(株)日立製作所のＳＮＳサイト運営事務局が、大西様と同事務局とのやり取りの内容等を大西様の上司に連絡したことに関しては、「当該連絡は従業員の社内における行動を所属部署の上司に伝え、職場指導を依頼するための社内連絡であることから、雇用管理の問題である」と(株)日立製作所より報告がありました。
以上の事業者報告より、当事務局では、「当件は個人情報の漏えいに該当しない」と判断致しましたことをご連絡させて頂きます。
（このメールは発信専用アドレスにより送信しております）
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
一般財団法人日本情報経済社会推進協会
プライバシーマーク事務局
消費者相談窓口
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
---
---
Time: 2012/05/09 14:20:22 (GMT +09:00)
From: Privacy Mark Office Consumers consultation window
To: onicchan@docomo.ne.jp
Mr. Hidenobu Onishi
Hitachi, Ltd., reported, for the SNS site Management Office of Hitachi, Ltd., contacted the boss of Onishi about the exchange of them, "the contact his or her divisions boss is, since reports the actions of in-house employees and requesting a in-house guidance, that is a matter of employment management."
From above reports, in our office, we tell we have determined that the "this matter does not fall under the disclosure of personal information".
(I have been transmitted This e-mail by the send-only-address)
******************
General information the Japan Association for Promotion of economic and social
Privacy Mark Office
Consumers consultation window
******************
---
Because "Privacy Mark Office" is a third party position, which should direct Hitachi, must answer by an independent survey, instead of trust the answer of Hitachi, Ltd.,
Onishi complained that, but, Privacy Mark Office did not listen at all.
As for the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Onishi claimed over again and again to have the opportunity of detailed description from Onishi, which shall be heard, as guidelines of treating a claim from Whistleblower indicates.
------
国の行政機関の通報処理ガイドライン （外部の労働者からの通報）
http://www.caa.go.jp/seikatsu/koueki/gyosei/files/gaibu.pdf
Report processing guidelines of the Administrative Organs of the country (Reports from workers outside)
http://www.caa.go.jp/seikatsu/koueki/gyosei/files/gaibu.pdf
(2) Implementation of Survey
① Once you have accepted the report, you make the necessary investigation.
② As for the implementation of investigation, it is done, to protect the confidentiality of whistleblowers, while consideration enough to whistleblowers is not specified, without delay, or using any other method that is found to be reasonable and necessary.
③ Concerning about such as ensuring appropriate law enforcement, when under investigation, trade secrets of an interested person, trust, and honor and privacy, should be protected, and, on the progress of the investigation, tell to the informants appropriately times, and, the results should be issued so promptly, and should tell without delay.
(5) Notification of measures to whom report
① When an administrative organ has taken measures, for whistleblowers, should be informed its contents without delay in consideration of privacy, such as ensuring the appropriate law enforcement, trade secrets of an interested person, trust, and honor.
② Each administrative agencies, should set the standard processing period to the end of the process from receipt of notification, or for whistleblowers, should inform without delay a period, that is expected to required.
------
Contrary to, above guideline, My demand was all rejected.
In addition, without having to answer to Onishi, Japanese Government finished the survey in August (four months was passed) in silence as no problem.
Onishi, requested the contents many times, but they don't tell me at all, and only said "If you have any question, go to the lawyer" (I thought it must be "go to the court").
Even though guidelines write "should" instead "shall", so the Government doesn't have to treat whitsleblowing, but once the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry received the whistleblowing, I think it shall not do the behavior that deviates guidelines significantly.
I described a report at that time on Internet (2ch). Let me show.
------------------------------
【onishi】日立製作所の裏事情70.5【隔離病棟】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1346340321/
265 ：hidenobu onishi ip-80-226-24-13.vodafone-net.de 忍法帖【Lv=32,xxxPT】(1/5:0) []投稿日：2012/09/03(月) 15:10:23.75 ID:XWqQLpIy0[3/16回(PC)]
(* I write English translation only. Japanese is seen by above site)
New Facts About Personal Information Protection Act violation
As a result of contact, Industrial Machinery Division of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, one time will not lead even wait 3 minutes, placed on hold in the inside of a section.
Because a trick by Industrial Machinery Division was suspected, secondly I had called to Information Economy Division, and from there transferred to Industrial Machinery Division, and the person answered.
It has been answered as follows.
Fact of the Personal Information Protection Act violation by Hitachi was not observed, and the necessary research had been aborted in more than a month ago.
Can not be explained any specific content of the survey.
I requested the number of day and month accepted the Whistleblower manual, and the number of day and month broke off the investigation, but the person said no explanation.
Because Onishi was not saying a need to contact, so didn't make contact to Onishi's home, etc. I answered because this inquiry comes.
Views of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is as such, we recommend that you consult the lawyer if there are doubts.
I made sure that I will ask not a lawyer, but a way to exile to the BAMF.
------------------------------
Originally, the person who accused should be waiting for an answer, so the answer must be transmitted to him? Is that a work? If no telling, what bureaucrats think is the goal of the work?
Even if it has not been made compulsory by law, the applicant requested and had a contact many times, so can bureaucrats say under no obligation to tell?
Guidelines for Whistleblower is one in which the Japanese government is to proactively protect, to enlightenment in each local government. I heard this from a person in a Consumer Agency, which is a regulatory agency of the Whistleblower Protection Act.
If Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, a Japanese government is not protected in the case of a complaint of Onishi, and defending in the case of appeal, and if other Whistleblowers are done as written in the guidelines, then in accordance with the principle of equality, why the case of Onishi is not protected, I think should be an explanation of the reason at least.
6. In this way, Onishi, is keenly aware that people usually say "because Hitachi said,". People and organizations don't think by themselves, they ought to swallow the claim of large organizations. I am also acutely aware that large organizations often hide criminal things get together.
Onishi strongly say, that it is necessary to think "what is real thing with reference to evidence, rather than who and what organisation is saying".
But, no one and no organisation can say the reason referenced to the evidence, so about the exile of Onishi, no one thought as reference to the evidence.
Onishi had became refugee because of those thinking ways of Japanese people, but at present even in the asylum, from prejudiced impression of the BAMF has, Onishi is subject to persecution from the BAMF.
Even, BAMF is bullying me. That is strictly an abuse of Onishi's human rights.
Suppose, if any one organization that explains the reason, I was to be explained with reference to the evidence, there was no need to exile Onishi, for I could talk to the organisaiton.
From the report by BAMF, it has written that there is no reason at all of complaints by Onishi. However, when Onishi was in Japan, not all were necessarily rejected the declaration of me. One Doctor, and two lawyers, admitted some part of the story by me.
One doctor was Takuro Endo.
http://www.sleepmedicine-tokyo.com/doctor/
Endo, who is Alienist told me, Onishi is not the disease, nothing is bad.
Further, why Onishi receive the misdiagnosis was, he pointed point out the problems of the health care system of Japan.
And, the law relating to industrial physician system was also a problem, he said.
But he could not assist Onishi legally.
Two lawyers told me, both of them said Onishi's case is really a problem.
1 person was Hiroyuki Adachi.
http://www.bengo4.com/search/130699/
When Onishi first met, he told me projects of Onishi will be a major event that comes to broadcast by evening news of NHK.
However, even if I called so many times and reminded him, he did no act at all to me then, I decided not ask to him.
Second person was an Shinichi Shima.
http://www.surugadai.ac.jp/gakubu_in/houka/curriculum/staff/professor/s_shima.html
When he first met to Onishi, he also said that is a crime.
However, Onishi insisted that this a criminal case, not a civil action, I want to create a good complaint to prosecutors office in Tokyo, but he reminds persistently as a civil action, because he said prosecutors don't receive.
Onishi felt, this matter become pointless to be in civil cases, despite this case is apparently a criminal case.
Onishi decided not to ask for this lawyer.
In this way, I want you to understand that for the review of Onishi, not all said no problem at all.
Rather, please consider the fact that, experts with each field talked to me much and said "this is a problem", but large organizations had neither talk chance nor gave no reports with some reason.
Onishi contacted other lawyers, but it was rejected without look, the reason was: "criminal cases become not much money."
Mr.Shima, too, argued strongly to the civil action rather than a criminal case. I think in fact Shima wanted a lot of money.
So, Onishi, was not able to find a lawyer before I caught disciplinary dismissal from Hitachi, willing to write a complaint of criminal cases.
Question to BAMF 06.
And, recently, some comments are written in internet which indicates Deutschland's Government and Japanese Government talk much, without hearing my saying.
---------- 転送メッセージ ----------
From: hidenobu onishi
日付: 2013年4月13日 16:29
件名: Threat to me came, in which written, "Deutsche Government will refuse Onishi's application in June".
To: gfrbe@unhcr.org, "ivs-anfragen@bamf.bund.de"
Dear Bundesamt and UNHCR Berlin office,
I am Hidenobu Onishi, the first refugee of Deutschland from Japan.
My number is 5556608-442.
Today, I got a commnent below:
－－－
http://anago.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/tubo/1355273129/560
(* now the url is hidenobu onishi 忍法帖【Lv=40,xxxPT】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/tubo/1355273129/560)
560 ：dinq：2013/04/13(土) 06:51:47.61 ID:rbzh6nRs0
先週、デュッセルドルフとハンブルクに出張した。
ハンブルクの取引先と会食をした時に、大西なる人物を知っているかと尋ねられた。
日本では有名人だと本人は主張しているそうだが、ぜんぜん知らなかったので、帰国後に検索してここを知った。
2チャンネルの一部では名を知られているようだが、それは「有名人」とは言わないので、ちょっと？な人物と印象を持った。
投稿を飛ばし読みしてみたが、ほとんど意味不明な主張の繰り返しで、彼の不合理な行動と置かれた状況を理解しかねた。
取引先相手が話していたことを紹介するが、とてもそのまま書ける内容では無かったので、婉曲な表現にしている。
大西氏はハンブルグの在留邦人にはよく知られた名前で要注意人物であり、ハンブルク北方120km程度の村に住居を与えら監視されている。
彼は、亡命申請を出したが、調査の結果それは事実に基づかない虚偽の申請と判断され、直ぐには申請却下の結論を出さないで、
そのペナルティとして事実上の軟禁状態にされている。しかし、6月になれば正式却下の結論を伝えるようだ。
在留邦人の人々は大西氏の行為に対して大変に怒っていて、厳しい表現で説明をしてくれた。
大西氏の経歴、年齢から考えたらとても不合理な行動をしている。その原因は、彼の誤った戦略・戦術によるものだが、
失敗の原因全てを他人の責任に転嫁するという特異な思考により、ますます孤独化して行くだろう。
私は、正直、このような人物とは関わりたくないので、この投稿が最初で最後にしておく。
－－－
In which written:
Onishi is well-known on the blacklist among Japanese people in Hamburg, and he is supervised now, given a house in a village 120km north from Hamburg.
He applied for asylum, but the Bundesamt investigated and that was considered as false, because that was not based the facts.
Bundesamt decided not to display the conclusion soon, and as a penalty to his false application, he is kept in his own custody now.
Bundesamt is planning to tell Onishi to reject in June.
I think that is not based on the fact.
But that is only my analogy.
Deutsche Bundesamt person might leak information of the fact to Japanese person, and the person might tell me.
The probability, that Bundesamt person does wrong is not zero, so you nor me can't declare.
If that is true, that is a problem not only of Japanese Government, but also of Deutsche one.
So Deutsche Bundesamt and UNHCR have to investigate about that.
I am very uneasy now, so Deutsche Bundesamt and UNHCR have to explain me even if that is not the fact.
I think that is Deutsche Bundesamt's role.
I want a investigation in good faith.
Hidenobu Onishi
kotochan0725@gmail.com
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/
----------------------------------------------
http://anago.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/tubo/1368755317/
(* now the url is 日立製作所を公益通報→懲戒解雇された大西秀宜スレ
http://www.logsoku.com/r/tubo/1368755317/)
364 ：工作員：2013/05/23(木) 22:04:09.30 ID:yYJUba1A0
>>342
> 不当解雇を訴えるのは労働基準監督署とかやけど，労働基準監督署は既に
> 日立製作所が手を回しとったから，意味ないと思ったからスルーしたの。
ドイツへの亡命申請も意味ないよ。
既に外務省と日立がドイツ政府に手を回してるから。
日立には外交官出身のゴマソール取締役がついているから、それくらいのことは朝飯前。
----------------------------------------------
In that, one wrote;
Becoming a political refugee (that is me) to Deutschland is meaningless.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan and Hitachi company already lobbied to Deutsche Government.
In Hitachi company, Sir Stephen Gomersall works as a director, who is ex-diplomat of the United Kingdom.
Hitachi makes nothing of it.
Stephen Gomersall
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Gomersall
http://www.hitachiforum.eu/cvs/StephenGomersall.htm
If it is true, does Deutsche Government hide my problem?
Please investigate if it is true or not.
Best regards,
Hidenobu Onishi
kotochan0725@gmail.com
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/
Question to BAMF 07.
I want to say if you don't think there are no difficulty, hear the person's saying.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: hidenobu onishi
Date: 2013/4/23
Subject: Who have responsibility?
To: asia@rsf.org, europe@rsf.org, kontakt@reporter-ohne-grenzen.de, "ivs-anfragen@bamf.bund.de"
, gfrbe@unhcr.org, central@iso.org, jpntopi@unhcr.org, info@wolferen.jp, info@karelvanwolferen.com
Dear Reporters without borders, Deutsche Bundesamt and UNHCR Berlin & Japan office, Prof.Wolferen, ISO central office
I have got the mail below yesterday via facebook:
---
Reporter Ohne Grenzen e.V.
Dear Hidenobu Onishi,
Thank you for your message. Unfortunately we are not able to help you regarding your matter. This is because Reporters without Borders is an international human rights organization supporting journalists in need and fighting for press freedom. However, our staff members don’t pursue investigative journalism themselves.
We document on violations of freedom of expression and information all over the world and we also alarm the public if there are any media representatives in danger. Our global network for fast communication and intervention is possible through the support of more than 150 correspondents worldwide as well as our sections in many countries for example the US, Austria, Tunisia, Libya and Spain.
We thank you for your understanding and still wish you success with your cause!
Best wishes
**** ****
---
I want to say strongly, who have responsibility?
This is not only a problem of journalism themselves.
I brought a whistleblowing to Japanese Government.
But they did nothing, because they didn't want to solve the problem which would punish Hitachi, which company has cozy relationship to Japanese Government.
I brought a whistleblowing to Japanese journalism.
But Japanese journalism didn't accept that, because they didn't want to broadcast the problem, because they had cozy relationship to Japanese Government. For example, "kisha clubs(*)".
I made a refugee application to Deutsche Bundesamt.
Deutsche Bundesamt is holding my problem for 10 months, I don't know why they take so long time.
And I have sent many mails to Deutsche Bundesamt, mentioning about Deutsche's law, in which written, they have to send me a copy of my evidences when I say I want a copy. But they did nothing.
I have sent so many mails to UNHCR, but they did nothing.
I have sent so many mails to Deutsche journalism, but they did nothing, because they said "that isn't our problem".
Then, who can solve that?
Do I only have to wait without a time period?
But, I want you to think, if my saying is true, who can decide that?
I strongly state, you have to remember the poem;
-----
Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Kommunist.
Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.
Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,
habe ich nicht protestiert;
ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.
//////////////////////////////////
Als sie die Juden holten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Jude.
//////////////////////////////////
Als sie mich holten,
gab es keinen mehr, der protestieren konnte.
-----
If you say I have to solve the problem myself, can you introduce a journalist who is interested in Japan?
That is what you can.
You should not be a bystander.
Anyway, please answer me.
(*) Reporters Without Borders wrote reports below;
---
http://fr.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/classement_2013_gb-bd.pdf
Japan resorts to press restrictions
Japan, demoted from 22nd to 53rd place, recorded the biggest drop of any Asian country.
The reason was the ban imposed by the authorities on independent coverage of any topic related directly or indirectly to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Several freelance journalists who complained that public debate was being stifled were subjected to censorship, police intimidation and judicial harassment.
The continued existence of the discriminatory system of “kisha clubs”, exclusive press clubs which restrict access to information to their own members, is a key element that could prevent the country from moving up the index significantly in the near future.
---
Hidenobu Onishi
kotochan0725@gmail.com
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/
最近のコメント