全 14 件のコメント

[–]You_are_Retards -1ポイント0ポイント  (13子コメント)

What does this mean?

[–]WTCMolybdenum4753[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (12子コメント)

[–]You_are_Retards 0ポイント1ポイント  (11子コメント)

Im confused. What point or info is being made here?

[–]PhrygianMode 0ポイント1ポイント  (10子コメント)

My assumption is that the post is indicating that the journal is in fact credible despite faithers desperately trying to prove otherwise.

[–]You_are_Retards -2ポイント-1ポイント  (9子コメント)

Ok.

Why does it matter?

(don't know why this downvoted..looks like the shills have arrived already)

[–]PhrygianMode 0ポイント1ポイント  (8子コメント)

Why does it not?

[–]You_are_Retards -1ポイント0ポイント  (7子コメント)

i was under the impression someone thought it did matter.

[–]PhrygianMode -1ポイント0ポイント  (6子コメント)

Are you referring to the faithers?

[–]You_are_Retards -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

the post is indicating that the journal is in fact credible despite faithers

I thought given that comment, maybe OP thought it mattered.
I am only wondering why

[–]PhrygianMode -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

  1. Op linked you to the paper published in this journal.

  2. I explained before and will explain further that faithers attempt to discredit the journal so that they can pretend the peer review is inadequate since they have no peer reviewed rebuttals to the actual paper.

  3. Providing evidence against the official story and the faithers that push it is always relevant.