あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]PhiGam1990 1541ポイント1542ポイント  (143子コメント)

The sad thing is he has to have some physical evidence because Americans are so sexist towards men if he even tried to stop her without filming he would be the one going to jail, it's sad but those kids have to suffer for the law to step in and do what is necessary. Congratulations radical feminists you win.

[–]_Kannon 219ポイント220ポイント  (7子コメント)

Exactly, it's too risky even to touch her and restrain her from beating the kids even with video evidence, it's better to let this ride out and use it as evidence in court to get sole custody of the kids and bar her from seeing them ever again. It's a long shot but hopefully he tries.

[–]thekittenisaninja 65ポイント66ポイント  (2子コメント)

She says she's not their biological parent, and even if she is their stepmother, by law she has no rights to them whatsoever. There is a third kid that she does say is hers though.

[–]2koo4skoo 24ポイント25ポイント  (0子コメント)

She's like the evil stepmother who reigns as Queen over the household. Telling the kids to off themselves by getting hit with a car rather than giving them poison apples.

[–]knatxxx 22ポイント23ポイント  (0子コメント)

law she has no rights to them whatsoever

Not true. If she gained legal custody or guardianship she does.

[–]-Bingo- 38ポイント39ポイント  (0子コメント)

Exactly. But what's sad is that I could see him using this film as evidence but then being charged for child abuse for failing to stop the abuse as it occurred. But had he stepped in...

The privilege of having a penis in America today.

[–]n1nj4_v5_p1r4t3 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

meh feed her to the dogs no one will notice or care shes missing.

[–]LordOfThePooniverse[🍰] -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

No, with video evidence he should have intervened, he was only right for the first part, but to not intervene he is as at fault as the woman.

[–]PlatypusThatMeows 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

I often don't talk about my parents divorce. And pretext, I don't hold this over my mother, because there was a lot more going on.

But basically my mother claimed my father hit her. Everyone believed her, and it was a shitstorm. He was in tears because he would never hit a women.

It's all fixed now, my mom is on medication for issues, but still. You are 100% right. Women claim anything and the man is crucified.

[–]yakityyakblah 74ポイント75ポイント  (10子コメント)

Radfems assume women aren't abusive, MRAs assume men aren't. I'm stuck here just wishing someone would care about fixing problems instead of boosting their "team" or saying they're egalitarian and then not actually fucking doing anything.

[–]TheOneWithNoName 42ポイント43ポイント  (4子コメント)

The whole radfem vs men's rights thing is so fucking stupid and holds everyone back. People are so determined to prove their side is right they don't look at it objectively and see that everyone has problems related to their gender. Some more than others but no one's completely free of it. But people will continue to blame the other side for everything and nothing will ever get solved because each assume the other is evil and crazy

[–]Justmetalking 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Think it's just "stupid"? Scroll down and take a look at the "punishment" she received and tell me again how stupid this fight is.

[–]captainfantastyk 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

i've never seen an MRA who thinks men can't be abusive.

[–]damendred -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not many people are dumb enough to give a flat no if you asked them a question like that, the usual answer would be 'Well if it was a women..."

[–]afadedgiant 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

And that's the whole point. When people are wrapped up arguing over petty bullshit the shit that matters is being carried out en masse without much opposition. This FPH debacle is a perfect example of diversion and divide and conquer. It's all bullshit to further agendas.

[–]UnknownXV 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not really an MRA, though I lean there more than feminist. But I've never thought that men don't abuse their partners. It happens all the time. It's an issue on both sides. What pisses me off is how men are essentially laughed at if they claim to be abused or even raped by a girl. That's so wrong.

[–]Fishinev 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're the hero Reddit needs!

[–]OmicronNine 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

...MRAs assume men aren't.

I've never, ever seen that assumption.

[–]Dert_ 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not true, MRA's usually put a sidenote like "(yes, obviously men are abusive too)" or something like that.

[–]Doakungfu 100ポイント101ポイント  (8子コメント)

upvote for visibility

[–]Aetrion 28ポイント29ポイント  (11子コメント)

That's exactly what I was thinking. If he had raised his hand against her he'd be in jail and the mother would keep abusing those children.

[–]InsaneGenis 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know reddit loves to hate on cops, but most don't realize cops are witnesses to the complete ridiculousness of domestic violence towards men perpetuated by women. They will never admit this as it doesn't fit their agenda. Cops know this to well and don't immediately arrest a man just because, but continue on. This is the type of shit that has 7 individuals watching two women fight in a Walmart and do nothing.

[–]febreeze1 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

You seriously think a jury would convict that guy even with video evidence of how bat shit crazy she is? I dont get why reddit thinks just because he's a guy he'll be convicted. He had video evidence aat the beginning when she initially started beating the children and yelling at them. Put the fucking camera down and protect your children

[–]Aetrion 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Without video evidence "My wife was beating my children so I knocked her out" wouldn't be believed by anyone is what people are saying.

[–]febreeze1 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I understand that, what I'm saying is he caught the initial beating on camera and the verbal abuse. Why not put down the camera and defend your children at that point? You have the evidence, now do your job as a parent and defend your helpless children

[–]Jimmni 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd say the sad thing is that these are far, far, far from the worst parents ever.

[–]Ramona223 18ポイント19ポイント  (6子コメント)

Great point, but this isn't due to feminism! This is from sexist views that have been around for nearly a century. Women are meek and feeble; men are strong and violent. It has only been in recently years, IN LARGE PART DUE TO FEMINISM, that the fact that females can be the abuser has started to gain light.

[–]captainfantastyk 31ポイント32ポイント  (4子コメント)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model

yeah, it is pretty much due to feminism.

[–]patsybob 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feminism has deliberately pushed for the gendered dimension of domestic violence, that women are always the victim and men the aggressor. Erin Prizzy opened the first women's shelter for domestic violence in Britain. Her book "Prone to Violence" suggested domestic violence could also be perpetuated by women against their partners and that some of these women in her shelter were violent towards their own children as a result. The conclusion that some victims of domestic violence could fit into a pattern of violence, that is they engaged in domestic violence (i.e not as a result of defending themselves or another individual but as aggressors) was completely rejected by mainstream feminism. Erin Prizzey views were so anti-feminist and controversial, that as a result of a series of threats made to herself and her family she decided to leave the country.

Erin's views are very insightful considering her interaction with the early development of the industry involving women's shelters, which she has claimed that feminists co-opted the idea to be completely about patriarchy and domestic violence against women which is now a multi-million dollar industry throughout the West through state funding and maintaining a feminist institution (along with its ideology as the dominant paradigm of domestic violence theory). Whereas male shelters of domestic violence throughout the West are very small in comparison. Along with mainstream feminist thought focusing on the Duluth model, some domestic violence helplines refer to men seeking help as exclusively being the aggressors who need counselling to control their violent ways. Feminism has fed into this notion of stereotypes about violence and gender. In fact I recall a feminist book claiming that to argue that men can also be domestic violence victims is along the radical "MRA" thinking. In essence it stated that male victims are claiming victimhood on the basis that they have beat up their partner so badly that they ended up bruising their own knuckles, and as a result have claimed to be a victim also. In fact this line of feminist thought of gender imbalance and domestic violence has become so dominant that we forget that same-sex relationships are also troubled by domestic violence that does not fit into the feminist model. Some studies have suggested same-sex relationships have higher incidences of domestic violence than heterosexuals. The mainstream feminist paradigm of domestic violence through gender and patriarchy has prevented further discussions on the complex reasons of why domestic violence occurs and it's preventing the development of how best to help the victims and their families, and how to deal with violent partners legally or through counselling without the stereotypes of women always as victim, men always the aggressor.

[–]SinisterPaige 11ポイント12ポイント  (4子コメント)

Most of Western Society is sexist against men, not just the United States.

[–]Goldentongue 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

You have to be joking. The power systems of nearly every single country show bias towards men over women in most facets of life.

[–]DkimCM -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Power system =/= sexist. Show me the females that run for any office in the national government, and compare them to other politicians.

Politicians still exist to serve the people and their rights in order to get relected, which is why feminists can push for BS bills, especially in CA.

[–]iced327 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I REMEMBER BEING 15

LOLOLOLLLLOOOOOOLLLOLOLOLLLL

[–]spanky12493 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

society is sexist towards everyone, but certainly women in general face more challenges from sexism.

[–]GeneraLeeStoned 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm very anti violence, can't even kill bugs without feeling terrible, but if this was my kid in the video, I would have filmed the first 5 seconds of her for court evidence, and then I would have done this to her,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2NmmLV8aq8

then call 911 "yeah bring an ambulance, she's gonna need it"

[–]SosolidFox 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The worst part is that he's probably going to get charged with abuse because he didn't do anything and instead "stopped the film the activity."

[–]UnknownXV 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Same thing in all first world countries.

It seems there's no country that has it right.

Either the legal system is massively skewed in favor of women, or massively skewed against them.

[–]mikoboo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're fucking stupid. This has nothing to do with feminism.. it simply isn't right. If anything you sound like a mascunazi... you're so against the idea of women feeling victimized that you've victimized males. Feminism is about equality.. so if anything her ass would be going to jail same as any man would, you don't know what you're saying.

[–]dorkmax 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's a way to handle it assertively without the camera: make her have fear for you more than arrogance. If she wants to use violence against his kids, he should respond in kind. I was infuriated with his passive, doormat attitude. She should've been unconscious the moment she tried to lay a finger on his kids.

I came from a dysfunctional family, I remember the pain of thinking my mother left because she didn't want me: It turned out to be partially true, and to this day its a bad scar. She wants to bring up painful memories, she wants to use physical violence, he should've put her on the ground.

[–]mackinoncougars -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Found a way to blame this all on feminists. Classic Reddit.

[–]bossmcsauce 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

radical feminists are just angry people who want to feel powerful because they were never allowed to have the power that comes from real respect, probably because of exhibiting absurd character traits that made them into a radical feminist in the first place.

[–]Shogun82 -5ポイント-4ポイント  (3子コメント)

dude fuck this guy too he's barely defending his kids i would have thrown this bitch through a wall if I had kids and some cunt was telling my kid she wishes he was dead

[–]offguard 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

i would have thrown this bitch through a wall

Enjoy being arrested and carted off to jail, leaving her alone with the kids while you get destroyed in court.

[–]ThexAntipop 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

but you don't have kids, and you aren't in this situation, so you don't fucking know, quit pretending that you do.

[–]maiorano84 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, you wouldn't have done anything either, keyboard warrior.

[–]Yelnik 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

this animal will claim some disorder than only women can get and still get partial custody or some other horrendous outcome.

[–]coolasafool462 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

and was she pregnant too? she kept saying 'if you cause me to lose another kid.'

[–]jefuchs 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lose a kid, as in lose custody, I'm thinking. She's the kind of parent who would have had kids taken from her already.

[–]candypuppet -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree that female on male abuse is an important issue, but the reason why men, who are beat by women, aren't taken seriously is that of Western gender roles and not cause of radical feminism.

In our society men are seen as strong and women as weak, and thus when female on male violence occurs, the guy is seen as a pussy, lying or is ridiculed and thus is afraid to report to the police or tell friends etc.

The problem here is that police will assume he made up his claims of abuse, since they view the woman as unthreatening, so if he defended himself, they'd assume he hit her for no reason.

This is a product of sexist views and not radical feminism. Some radical feminists might share the view, but if they were the source of the problem, your typical fratboy or manly man macho dude would totally help and support a guy, who gets beat by a girl, instead of ridiculing him like you can see in most cases.

[–]iced327 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

You clearly know literally nothing about society or our legal system, but so long as these people say what you need to hear to support your narrative, you keep believing it.

This ranks among some of the dumbest shit I've ever read on this site, and there are some amazingly daft men's rights assholes around here.