SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.



home faq donate facebook twitter instagram
|
politics lgbt_news racism religion music celebrities hot_guys my_life funny_things kids


I live in a constant state of early 90s.
When college rock was good, and black people were still on TV.








Donate / Subscribe.

Help keep So Let's Talk About running. Read more here.





Fun features.

Flashback Fridays
Male Model Mondays
VH1 Jump Start
Weekly Top Stories


Follow
Follow
You are following So Let's Talk About.Sign Up to see who your friends are following.









Ask me anything

Archive
SLTA___
     Trangender vs. Transracial: Caitlyn Jenner & Rachel Dolezal
So many of my notifications on all forms of social media this morning are talking about this woman:
image
Rachel Dolezal, head of an NAACP chapter in Spokane, Washington, has been posing as a Black woman for years and her whitewhitewhite parents put her on Front Street yesterday.  
The first thing I did when I saw the notifications was open up some links to read about what happened and on every single article, this showed up:
image
Over and over and over again
image
image
image
image
Those comments are from Buzzfeed, but they’re everywhere, and largely being made by cisgender white people.  The opinion I really want is from a Black trans person, not Becky from North Platte, Nebraska who has no frame of reference for either of those groups.
Until Janet Mock or Laverne Cox gives me something to work with, I want to attempt to explain that while race and gender are both social constructs, they don’t occupy the same space with regard to perception or flexibility.
Rachel Dolzeal is white and she’s been white since the day she was born.
image
Her parents say she is a mixture of Czech, German, and Swedish, which is to say Rachel is White, Whiter, and Whitest.  At some point in her life she decided to just BECOME Black.
image
image
image
image
For people saying Rachel never actually lied about being white or never stated she was Black, don’t be simple.  She knew exactly what she was doing, talmbout her “natural” hair which is obviously a perm, taking her dreadlocks out, leading the public to believe her adopted younger brother is her son, posting pics with this random Black man and commenting about her father, etc.  Rachel wanted to be Black because she felt an overwhelming need for attention, because she felt an affinity for Black culture, or because she supports Black politics but was dismissed as a white woman, or possibly a combination of all three.  Rachel didn’t want to be Black because she *felt* Black, because Black is not a feeling.  Black is an existence that was created for us by racists as a tool to justify ill-treatment and codify oppression into law.  
The concept of race as we understand it today developed as an extension of colonialism in tandem with the scientific revolution, where science was used to definitively classify people, rank them along variables such as beauty and intelligence, and solidify whiteness as the ideal in each category.  The scientific community “objectively” placing white people at the top was a way to justify the maltreatment of non-white people further down the list, because white is the pinnacle of humanity and the further you differentiate away from that, the closer you are to beasts.  That is where race comes from.  Race isn’t even 400 years old and it’s a flexible standard by which to judge people.  
White people are white.  Period.  Any tainting of that whiteness means you are no longer white, and if the physical expression of that tainting is clearly evident, you are perceived as non-white by a societal structure created by white people to keep themselves at the top.  Rachel was able to fool people into thinking she was Black because she made enough cosmetic changes to make herself appear non-white.  Her act only works because white is 100% white.  Anything less and you can claim minority status because you are not pure and you have been tainted.  Obama is 50% white and could never be perceived as a white man, while Wentworth miller is (at most) 25% Black and used his race as an explanation of a racially charged cartoon he drew while at Princeton.  Race and the perception of race is based on the need to keep white people at the top.
Gender is a performance wrongfully based on what your body does and how you should behave accordingly.  For most of human history, sex and gender have been interchangeable.  Gender roles developed because male bodies look like this and female bodies look like that.  The male body is stronger, so he should hunt.  The female body gives birth, so she should stay close to home to care for the children.  This was the basis of gender for tens of thousands of years, however, humanity develops.  We are not the same kind of people we were 10,000 years ago.  Sex is something assigned to you by a  doctor at birth based on what’s between your legs.  It’s an imperfect classification not only because gender develops later but also because doctors frequently get it “wrong” when  infant genitals do not meet expectations and they are altered incorrectly.  Gender is an expression of an inner self’s need to perform, present, and be perceived as male or female.
Like race, gender expression is highly variable.  Society says Men Look/Behave This Way and Women Are The Opposite, though a lot of us blur those lines and perform gender in a way that fits us personally.  The difference between perception of race and perception of gender is, Random White Man can perform his gender as 25% female and still identify as male.  He cannot be 25% Black and still identify as white.  (You can’t be 25% female, I’m just drawing a comparison.)  For example, my physical self-expression naturally tends toward blurring gender lines.  I have long hair and I’ll throw on a dress if the mood suits me.  Those behaviors are typically associated with women, but I am still a man and I still perform my gender as a man because that is who I am inside and who I want to be perceived as by society.  
One last strike against anyone claiming to be transracial:  It only works one way.  Only white people can claim to be another race on the inside and then “perform” that race because race operates with white as the default.  Racial classifications are based on deviations FROM whiteness.  Rachel could pay a Black woman to do her hair and then pick up some NARS bronzer and say “Look!  I’m not white!”  I can’t straighten my hair and put chalk on my face while saying “Look!  I’m not Black!”  Transracial as a concept is another extension of white privilege, with those people – firmly situated at the top of society – experiencing an overwhelming need to identify with some other culture to validate their misplaced feelings of oppression because of their affinity for said culture.
I don’t know Rachel but this is what it feels like to me:  she’s a liberal white woman who is actually down for the cause.  She’s here for Black folk and she understands the struggle (as much as any white woman can anyway).  We all know white people like that, and I’ll just put it out there that you should really strive to make sure those are the ONLY kinds of white people you know.  Rachel Dolezal is a white woman who will have your back.  She went to Howard.  She teaches African Studies.  She’s the head of the NAACP.  But she’s weak.  She’s a weak white woman who got tired of being shushed.  
It’s not always easy to be a white ally, and a large part of that is the repeated assertion that white people don’t and can’t get it.  A lot of (most) white people truly do not, and that’s where the sentiment comes from, but for the white people who do TRULY get it, they understand that sentiment.  They also realize most white people don’t get it and they’re not offended at being scooted over to the viewing section, because the overall conversation taking place is more important than sidelining it to focus on how they feel about not being heard on a topic that does not concern them directly.  They’re not interested in taking over the conversation anyway – they just want to offer another voice.  Rachel seems like the kind of person who couldn’t stand being pushed out of the conversation so she created her own way in.  She went a step too far in sending herself hate mail to further solidify her “Blackness” and give credibility to her voice, and the ensuing investigation resulted in this whole fiasco.
Rachel is not transracial, mostly because that doesn’t exist, but also because she herself probably wouldn’t claim it.  She doesn’t “feel” like a Black person on the inside.  She’s using Blackness as an easy way to promote her own (largely well-intentioned) agenda.  Those of us who are upset with her aren’t mad because she’s white.  White allies are great.  White people have always been involved with the NAACP.  They were there when the organization was founded.  We’re upset because she put on a caricature of the people she supposedly supports because it was easier to do that than to be a much-needed white voice in support of our community.  It was too hard for her to be white and have white people shun her because of her affinity for Blackness, so she pretended to be Black instead.  Because of how race operates and because we all still follow the one-drop rule, the Black community accepted her with open arms since she appeared to have some Black ancestry somewhere.  White people do not accept you as a fellow white person for appearing to have white ancestry.   We HAVE to be Black, all day everyday and it makes us stronger people because of it.  The fact that she couldn’t handle being a white ally, couldn’t handle being white with an association to Blackness, and used persecution of Blackness as an attention-seeking “look how oppressed I am” mechanism by exaggerating and trivializing very real threats against our people is disgusting.
Plus.  Her perm is ugly and none of us want to be associated with that fried and crispy mess anyway.
Adobe Flash Player or an HTML5 supported browser is required for video playback.
Get the latest Flash Player
Learn more about upgrading to an HTML5 browser
submit to reddit
Like
Like
Share
30k30k
Add a comment

 

.
 
.
.
.
  • Georgia Hawg · Atlanta, Georgia
    I have been reading these posts and what I am loving is the hypocrisy I see. People are for Trans gender and will argue strongly why it is correct and then put down trans race people. And the other side does the same. people want to be accepted as they are and want everyone to accept their decision for their body and then turn around and jump another person for doing what they want to with their body.

    One of the best comments I saw said (I am paraphrasing) people have their cultures and are proud of their heritage. When someone from an outside culture/heritage tries to embrace another, they are shunned. How is your embrace hurt when another finds comfort in it? Just a new form of prejudice.
       
      .
      .
      .
      .
    • Robert d'Anconia · Top Commenter · Washington, District of Columbia
      "White people are white. Period."

      Sounds an awful lot like "Women are women. Period." Look, I know it's crazy, but it's pretty hypocritical of our society to be open and embracing of people's identity when it comes to gender and sex and then be completely opposed to the idea of it when it comes to race.

      It's stupid, but its the can of worms we opened up when we decided as a society to accept gender fluidity. Pandora's box has been opened.
         
        .
        .
        .
        .
      • Georgia Hawg · Atlanta, Georgia
        I agree with the author. If skin color no longer mattered and we all got along, what would she/he write about.
         
        .
        .
        .
        .
      • Bert Oleander
        "The opinion I really want is from a Black trans person, not Becky from North Platte, Nebraska who has no frame of reference for either of those groups."

        Well, that's mighty tolerant of you. What's your frame of reference? Why is your confused and confusing piece important for me to read?
           
          .
          .
          .
          .
        • Laughs WithCrows · Top Commenter
          In my opinion, this really did nothing to dispel the notion of transracial identity, much less it being highly discrete from transgender. I am not necessarily subscribing to that as an idea, please understand. But if I am to try the idea on and see how it feels – arguably what Rachel did! – then I have to really sit in it and wonder how it might be true, how it might fit, how it might reflect something true. Because, from my understanding, what is True and what is fact are not necessarily congruent.

          The biggest problem with the critique is that is ascribes motive to Rachel. There is an assumption not only WHY she did it, but what her experience was while in it. Neither of these are actually known, and it is problematic to assume that they are known, much less to assert our assumptions as foregone fact. I am particularly confus...ed by the assumption that she presented as Black because she couldn't handle White reaction to her affinity - maybe it was because she didn't like having her affinity dismissed by Black people. Or maybe neither of those points is true at all.

          Being transgendered, as I understand it, is the internal experience of being someone for whom the physical does not sync. In that sense, the concept of transracial is wholly on point. The argument that she can shed her racial identity at any time is perhaps factually true, but not actually true – to shed her racial identity, even if adopted, would require her to shed her entire life….which is probably going to be ripped from her now, anyway. In this way, it is also like being transgender. Because, after all, Bruce Jenner also had the option to continue as a White man, to not express his internal experience. So this notion that it’s a false state because of the ability to be one thing or another, preferentially, is factual, but not does represent the experience of being.

          I was also a little perplexed by the comparison of Black people passing for White in another article. It would seem to me that - if we choose to think of race as a polarity - choosing to pass for White is in many ways equivalent. To say one had to pass to survive is in many cases hyperbole – one passed to escape brutal racism, but not to survive, per se. If Rachel was presenting as mixed-race or light skinned and therefore experienced life as Black in her transactional life, then we cannot say she knows nothing of the experience, just as we cannot say that passing for White led to a dual consciousness no one else can really grok. At most, we can say that her lifetime of formative experiences have been substantially different than most Black people in the US.

          I also think that, as usual, the discussion around race gets bogged down in cultural centrism. A Black African does not have the same experience of race as an American Black person. Race has arguably some physical hallmarks, but it is mostly culturally constructed and relative. “Black” means nothing if there is not also “White.” In the absence of White, Black gets broken down into other ways, like tribal affiliations, class strata, skin tone. Being Black is not a homogenous experience, not even in the US….though I fully understand that being Black in the US trumps pretty much every other attribute.

          As someone coming from the other side – someone passing as White – I understand this story in a different way. I understand what it means, perhaps like transgendered people, to live in a world of not belonging anywhere, of being continuously misidentified in one’s deepest assumptions and perceptions. While I can pass and take with that whatever privilege accompanies it - given that I am also a woman and come from extremely poor class origins - I am not stamped with the shared assumptions which come with being natively White. Worse, I am often excluded to some degree from the community with which I most identify. I think that for people who literally embody their racial identity, this internal sense of alienation and isolation are impossible to fully understand. Perhaps that is why I am open to trying to understand what may have led Rachel down this path.
          See More
             
            .
            .
            .
            .
          • Martin Smith · Top Commenter · London, United Kingdom
            Sorry but it IS the same as the transgender situation.... she wanted to be black, so she started pretending to be black.... just like some men want to be women, and start pretending to be women.... you don't "feel" black, you don't "feel" like a woman, or a man for that matter... the whole "born in the wrong body" is a made up narrative.... a mental health issue.
            • Hannah Brooks · Florida A&M University
              As a mental health issue this has been extensively written about. Gender Dysphoria has been documented as a mind acknowledging itself as a different gender - an identifier that begins in utero. So it is both a mental concern and an actual lived experience. That same identification does not exist for race. One of many differentiators.
              Reply · Like
              · 7 · 3 hours ago
              .
            • Martin Smith · Top Commenter · London, United Kingdom
              Hannah Brooks I'm not buying the bs. this is the same thing.... people need to cut the crap and get consistent. either there are no meaningful categories and what I decide in my mind is what is real, or what is outside the mind is what is real.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ekim9a74dA
              Reply · Like
              · 3 · 3 hours ago
              .
            • Tracy Morris · Waipahu High School
              Martin Smith where's the BS? and you, as a seemingly cis white dude, are NOT an authority on this subject. So guess what? Nobody here has to buy your blatant BS, either XDDDD.
              Reply · Like
              · 4 · 3 hours ago
              .
             
            .
            .
            .
            .
          • Joshua Sperber · Adjunct Professor at Marymount Manhattan College
            Whose back does she have?

            http://s89.photobucket.com/user/Starsdowntoearth/media/Screen%20shot%202015-06-12%20at%2011.03.56%20PM_zpsacuyyvso.png.html
               
              .
              .
              .
              .
            • Carla Wallin Golba · Top Commenter · RN at Community Reach Center
              As a mental health professional, I have to wonder if she has not been suffering from a severe and persistent schizophrenic delusion in which she has created a completely separate persona for herself. This persona happens to be a different race than from which she was born. It's not just that she wants to be someone else, she believes she IS someone else. It happens.
                 
                .
                .
                .
                .
              • Suzy Kendall Osborne · Top Commenter
                Actually I don't hate the perm. But I agree that you don't see a lot of trans people trying to head women's feminist organizations.
                   
                  .
                  .
                  .
                  .
                • Kathy Hirst
                  Isn't the bottom line with this woman that she lied? If she wants to identify as black then maybe some people will take issue with that and others won't but she is the same as the person who falsely claims to have qualifications for a job. Or marries someone claiming to be single when they're still married.
                     
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                  • Anthony Miller · Top Commenter
                    So how many of you trans-racial-phobes were celebrating Caitlyn Jenner?
                     
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                  • Jessy Manuel · Buffalo, New York
                    If all you have to contribute to this discussion are your opinions on the validity of someone who identifies as transracial, then I have to ask: How are you furthering the debate?
                    I could not care less whether anyone believes in the existence of a transracial identity or whether it occupies the same landscape as a transgender identity.
                    If you believe that race is an immaterial concept, instead of blathering on about it with your own big words and" world-shocking ideas", how about you provide scientific evidence supporting your claim from someone who isn't playing a keyboard activist.
                     
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                  • Terry Torres · Top Commenter · Emerson College
                    Y'know the REAL question that needs to be asked? Not to sound too conspiratorial, but...

                    Why did her parents choose NOW to divulge this information?

                    Is she a star witness in a case that will send them both to prison, and they had to put her testimony in a different light by marking her a proven liar?

                    Alternatively - what the hell did her parents do to her? Or vice-versa?

                    Food for thought.
                    • Allene Osborn
                      They had never been point blank asked before. Then they were, they chose to tell the truth. No big conspiracy. :)
                      Reply · Like
                      · about an hour ago
                      .
                     
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                  • Scott Fello · Top Commenter · Owner at The Lucky 7 Smoke Shop and Lounge
                    My question is this: If Race is a construct that was created by white people in order to keep their supremacy over others, why does the Black community embrace it so much?
                    • Xsavier Daniels · Top Commenter
                      RACE only exists conceptually. But racISM is an institution and institutions are physical.
                      The concept of race is immaterial. There is no such thing as race from a strictly scientific basis. However, you must realize that racISM is very real. Just because an idea is immaterial, doesn't mean humans aren't capable of creating MATERIAL systems that protect those who act upon those ideas.
                      A perfect example would be the principles of the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution is composed of ideas, all of which, are immaterial (existing only in the mind). However, government buildings (courts, etc...), the military, and the police force are all physical manifestations of those ideas.
                      The notion that racISM only exists in the mind is utterly fallacious.
                      Reply · Like
                      · 23 · Edited · 9 hours ago
                      .
                    • Scott Fello · Top Commenter · Owner at The Lucky 7 Smoke Shop and Lounge
                      Thanks for the reply. I was thinking more along the lines of identity politics. For instance, to demand to be labeled 'African American', when everyone else is satisfied with just being labeled 'American'. I would think that intentionally setting yourself apart would prompt people to see you as "other". Once people see a group intentionally setting itself apart, it's not that far of a leap to treat them differently..
                      Reply · Like
                      · 4 · 8 hours ago
                      .
                    • Matthew George McKenna · East Glenville, New York
                      Just like Santa Claus exists conceptually and Chirstmas exists as an institution, or at least a product of a(n Christmas religious) institution (overlapping with various commercial institutions)?

                      Santa Claus is composed of ideas, mythos, and of course, lots of red and green jingle-wear, indeed - BUT, we still celebrate and embrace Christmas, no matter how immaterial it is, from a strictly scientific basis.

                      Materiality, physicality, and even "scientific fact" are not the nuclei around which our "reality" is crystallized. The intangible, abstractions, the illogical - that's sort of what makes us human and separates us from other animals, the ability to construct our own reality. Pretty much all of of society is a bunch of subjective bullshit, your argument makes 0 dollars and 0 cents [sp. sense].
                      Reply · Like
                      · 2 · 8 hours ago
                      .
                     
                    .
                    .
                    .
                    .
                  • Robbie Carlysle · Top Commenter · Webs and Designs at Web Designer
                    ... My main question is after the dust is settled, and everyone agrees that she's black. Does that mean she gets to use the 'N' Word?
                       
                      .
                      .
                      .
                      .
                    • Lisa Amor Petrov · Top Commenter · River Forest, Illinois
                      "Black is not a feeling." --says it all to me (I also see great irony in the ending "hair joke").
                         
                        .
                        .
                        .
                        .
                      • Freddy Stubbs · Warrior at Rand Paul Revolution
                        So... Let me get this straight.

                        "The concept of race as we understand it today developed as an extension of colonialism in tandem with the scientific revolution, where science was used to definitively classify people".

                        Hmm.... like SEX was?

                        Then you make a lame attempt to say SEX is what's between your legs and GENDER is "how you feel".

                        Well, then COLOR is your shade of skin and RACE is "how you feel".

                        If you "feel like woman" and have a penis so you put on a dress and magically become a woman than it should apply to race as well.

                        Also, why don't you mention Michael Jackson? I seem to remember many black people outcasting him, mocking him, and calling him white!
                        • Terry Torres · Top Commenter · Emerson College
                          The thing is, the major component that ties black Americans together isn't how they do their hair, or how they feel. It's their actual shared experience as an oppressed people trying to gain respect and autonomy for centuries. It's that fact that so many alive today remember, or are related to someone who remembers, a time when they COULDN'T VOTE. That's not about "feeling" - it's fact. You can't suddenly put on bronzer and be like, "Yeah, I get institutional racism, too, it goes waaay back in my family."

                          As for how "transracialism" is different from transgenderism, gosh, man, that's a lot to unpack, and I guess that's why this discussion is even happening. I guess I'd say that, in this particular situation, I'm insulted by Dolezal's insistence that she was never white, since I don't think Caitlyn Jenner would ever deny the existence of Bruce Jenner. I'll say, too, that Dolezal's revelation seems to be draped in a lot of manipulation and equivocation, while Jenner's was very much open and public, even if it didn't have to be.
                          Reply · Like
                          · 14 · Edited · 9 hours ago
                          .
                        • Sina Koobideh · Top Commenter · Works at ‎YNG Koobideh کوبیده
                          Terry Torres You could take that and extend it to Women as well. Either you failed to see this fact or you omitted it on purpose: The "shared experience as an oppressed people" also extends to women. You can say the exact same thing about Bruce Jenner, he's been a man for 65 years, 99% of his life, and now all of a sudden he's a woman and his celebrated for his actions, yet he has experienced NONE of what women have as a group. Your reasoning is flawed.
                          Reply · Like
                          · 7 · 5 hours ago
                          .
                        • Georgia Hawg · Atlanta, Georgia
                          Terry Torres Blacks got the right to vote in 1869. No one alive today remembers that time. I doubt few if any grandparents knew anyone who remembered that time. Woman on the other hand got the right to vote in 1919. There are people alive today in the US who were around for that injustice. So your wrong there. and the rest of your argument falls flat.
                          Reply · Like
                          · 29 minutes ago
                          .
                         
                        .
                        .
                        .
                        .
                      • David Owens · Top Commenter · Birmingham, Alabama · 106 followers
                        This is the same issue I have with trans-sexuals. You don't become some other gender just by wishing it and popping a few pills, being a woman or man is much deeper than that. It's insulting to women to say, I could become a woman just by wishing it, and I'm surprised that women support them when its literally a slap in the face of the uniqueness and essence of women themselves.

                        I think however that race is a bit different, because you can be mixed & relaxing to races you are mixed with is complicated. Not sure if she is though.
                        • Gary W Beagle · Top Commenter
                          Considering you are neither a woman nor a transgender person, do you really have the knowledge to speak on the subject? Do you even know any transgender people to help you understand? Or are you just blabbering on about something you have no context for?
                          Reply · Like
                          · 12 · 11 hours ago
                          .
                        • Sue Crabtree · Top Commenter · President at Crabtree Consulting Services, LLC
                          Popping hormone pills and having surgery does not make a man into a woman any more than wearing makeup and getting a perm makes a white into a black.
                          Reply · Like
                          · 5 · 11 hours ago
                          .
                        • Vernon Firefly Hampton Jr. · Top Commenter
                          Gary W Beagle, so a transgender woman understands EVERY intricacy of being a gender they were not born to be? How about menopause? Can a transgender woman speak to a genetic woman on the subject outside of textbook fact? Or can a transgender woman speak to a genetic woman on the issues that deal with pregnancy or childbirth or labor or Braxton-Hicks contractions? Or Chlamydia? Or gestational diabetes?

                          The answer is 'NO'. Someone transgender takes on the physical appearance of a woman. They take on the tactile traits of a woman. They may even take the emotional demeanor of a woman. But unless you can change a man into a woman and they can biologically do what a woman can do or unless you are the geneticist with the knowledge of how to change an 'X' chromosome into a 'Y' one in a fully developed human male (or vice versa), it is STILL genetically male. Find me a biology book that proves otherwise and I'll apologize to the entire internet post haste...
                          Reply · Like
                          · 9 · 10 hours ago
                          .
                         
                        .
                        .
                        .
                        .
                      • Laura Brown · Works at Chief Financial Officer
                        My daughter is 25% black but identifies as white. So you're saying she's a liar and not allowed to identify as white?
                        Gender is biology. No man can actually understand what being a woman means, he only can imagine. And Jenner's imagining of womanhood is sexist and insulting.
                        • Gary W Beagle · Top Commenter
                          And your lack of knowledge about what it means to be transgender is ignorance at its best. Do you even know any trans people to give you a context of what it actually means. They don't just wake up one morning and say "Oh I think I will become the opposite gender today." Do you really think someone would put themselves through the shit TG people go thru on a whim?
                          Reply · Like
                          · 4 · 11 hours ago
                          .
                        • Zak Sitter · Top Commenter
                          Sex is biology (sort of); gender definitely is not.
                          Reply · Like
                          · 3 · 10 hours ago
                          .
                        • Vernon Firefly Hampton Jr. · Top Commenter
                          Gary W Beagle - I say again, can a transgender woman ever truly understand what it means to be female? And in accepting them as such, how so do you diminish the value of a biological female when you can just switch up and become one at any given time. Transgender individuals change because they "feel" they were meant to be the opposite gender. But you notice there was nothing wrong with their physical form other than the belief that it was an anomalous natural error? Answer that....
                          Reply · Like
                          · 1 · 10 hours ago
                          .
                         
                        .
                        .
                        .
                        .
                      • Katy Meyrick · Norwalk, Connecticut
                        The only qualm I have about this post is that TERFs are going to run with it. They will claim that if Rachel is just a privileged white woman then transwomen are just privileged men who now demand the right to explain what womanhood is. I would have added that while transgender is a fairly proven scientific phenomenon, transracial identity is not. Sure, you may have grown up in a particular culture that is not your genetic ancestry. International adoptees know all about this. She may have an overwhelmingly black-sympathetic viewpoint. But there is nothing neurological the way there is with transgender.
                        • Laughs WithCrows · Top Commenter
                          Is there scientific evidence of either a trans gene or a trans neurology? If so, I haven't heard about it and would love a research link, @Katy.
                          Reply · Like
                          · 3 hours ago
                          .
                        • Tracy Morris · Waipahu High School
                          http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20032-transsexual-differences-caught-on-brain-scan.html#.VXyx40a_4_g

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_transsexualism - go to biological based theories.
                          Reply · Like
                          · 2 hours ago
                          .
                         
                        .
                        .
                        .
                        .



                      Back   •   Next
                      0%
                      10%
                      20%
                      30%
                      40%
                      50%
                      60%
                      70%
                      80%
                      90%
                      100%