jump to content
my subreddits
more »
want to join? sign in or create an account in seconds|
[-]
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
subreddit:subreddit
find submissions in "subreddit"
author:username
find submissions by "username"
site:example.com
find submissions from "example.com"
url:text
search for "text" in url
selftext:text
search for "text" in self post contents
self:yes (or self:no)
include (or exclude) self posts
nsfw:yes (or nsfw:no)
include (or exclude) results marked as NSFW
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
this post was submitted on
246 points (75% upvoted)
shortlink:
reset password

TwoXChromosomes

unsubscribesubscribe2,935,343 readers
1,043 users here now
Welcome to TwoXChromosomes, a subreddit for both serious and silly content, and intended for women's perspectives.

Thoughtful, Meaningful Content

Posts are moderated for content according to the following guidelines (hit report on violations):

  1. Respect: No hatred, bigotry, assholery, misogyny, misandry, transphobia, homophobia, racism or otherwise disrespectful commentary. Please follow reddiquette.
  2. Equanimity: No drama-inducing crossposting of content found in other subreddits, or vice versa. Likewise, posts found to direct odious influxes here may be removed. [more]
  3. Grace: No tactless posts generalizing gender. We are a welcoming community. Rights of all genders are supported here.
  4. Relevance: Please submit content that is relevant to our experiences as women, for women, or about women. [more]
  5. Images: No direct links to images, except on Image-Fest Friday (IFF). To post an image during the week, do so within a self-post and with some added context. See here for guidelines.
    Post all memes and rage comics to /r/TrollXChromosomes.
  6. Fundraising: No links to fundraising pages, please. As a community, we're not set up for screening each funding request.

Related subreddits

/r/Women /r/TheGirlSurvivalGuide
/r/AskWomen All Womenhood
/r/Fashion /r/femalefashionadvice
/r/ABraThatFits All Fashion
/r/MakeupAddiction /r/RedditLaqueristas
/r/FancyFollicles All Beauty
STEM Ladies All Careers
/r/GirlGamers /r/TrollXChromosomes
/r/EntWives All hobbies & Fun
/r/BodyAcceptance /r/xxfitness
/r/PCOS All Health & Fitness
/r/TwoXSex All Relationships
/r/feminism All Activism
/r/actuallesbians All LGBT
/r/birthcontrol Abortion Support
/r/childfree All Birth Control
/r/BabyBumps /r/TryingForABaby
/r/Mommit All Parenthood
/r/LadyBoners /r/ladyladyboners

All Related subreddits

Assault & DV Resources

#twoxchromosomes on Snoonet

Thanks to /u/jaxspider for the new logo!
created by You are now doing kegelsHiFructoseCornFecesa community for
No problem. We won't show you that ad again. Why didn't you like it?
Oops! I didn't mean to do this.
all 343 comments
Comments should contribute to the conversation. Report any comments that are rule-breaking.
[–]churakaagii [score hidden]  (7 children)
Can anyone provide some context without being ridiculously odious one way or the other?
[–]leddit_xDDD [score hidden]  (6 children)
Copy and pasted from u/kuyamik3
Approximately 4 days ago reporter Lauren Sutherland for Rebel news channel, a YouTube Canadian based channel, posted a video where she attended the "Slutwalk" movement protest. In said video she spoke to several people of contrasting opinions and had adrenaline filled discussions where she stated that Canada doesn't live in a "rape culture".
During the video she spoke to both well spoken and we'll versed protesters and engaged in pseudo debates, I only said that because her videos didn't really cover a lot of the protesters points. Supporting her side she stated that in the west, we as a society demonize rape. Westerners lose jobs as sex offenders, we send people to jail for convicted sex offenses and have a list of offenders. I suppose she feels that we are very proactive about rape in contrast to countries like Africa and those in the Middle East.
Since posting the video, Sutherland has had people close to her sent messages lying about events that occurred in during the protest. Saying that Sutherland was rudely interrupting speeches and yelling over protesters. The protesters were as well lying about her character and how she conducted herself during engaged conversations.
The video that this post is about is Sutherland's reaction post to how the Slutwalk movement acted toward her. Reactions to both the protest and the threats/messages she received.
This video covers how she was politely silent during the speech holding a sign clearly saying "We dont live in a rape culture in the west". Contrary to what the protesters said, she waited until all the speeches were finished before stating her opinion. This is confirmed in the reaction video.
She also stated that she was shocked that these protesters were actively trying to silence her message by all forming a group to cover her sign she held. This too is confirmed in the video. She left the reaction video ending saying that she was really offended that she was having her opinion taken away and that these protesters did not conduct themselves the way, that in her opinion, should have conducted themselves.
It is also a good thing to mention the other arguments against Sutherland to keep things as unbiased as possible.
A lot of her video is very cherry picked. At one point of the original video her camera man was accused of being physical first before being pushed, and all Sutherland said before a convenient cut away was "Oh come on, really?".
As well as the fact that when she was presented with "facts" she didn't really address any points correctly nor did she have well supported facts herself but rather only had the points of western demonization to fall back on almost every time.
[–]sweetsaturnmine [score hidden]  (3 children)
Good post but Africa isn't a country.
[–]impendingwardrobe [score hidden]  (0 children)
No need to be pedantic. Obviously OP misspoke. It's not worth derailing what could be a good discussion on this comment.
[–]thedude388 [score hidden]  (0 children)
Really? But it's so homogenous. Egypt is totally the same as the Congo
[–]vkob [score hidden]  (0 children)
Sarah Palin thought it was. She must be right. Women in power are never wrong and if you think they are that's a little thing called misogyny
[–]dasbin [score hidden]  (0 children)
She also stated that she was shocked that these protesters were actively trying to silence her message by all forming a group to cover her sign she held. This too is confirmed in the video.
No it's not. There is no part of the video where the protesters are actively trying to cover her sign. The protesters stood beside and in front of her with their own signs, presumably to ensure that there wasn't a possible camera angle which made it look like her sign outweighed the others who were there in support of the event. Her sign was never covered as she claims in the video as she was on the steps above them at all times.
[–]nikography [score hidden]  (2 children)
While I don't agree with the lying and awful-behavior backlash, since the video clearly shows that this person just stood, held a sign and then left; I do feel that the women who went up to stand next to her were not being inappropriate (or at least not more inappropriate than OP). I was able to see the 'offensive' sign quite clearly for the duration, and just as this person was hoping to get attention and stand out by dropping in behind the speaker with their message, other people came to stand next to and below her with their own messages.
Personally I think it was kind of a rude (and sneaky) thing to do but it is behavior that is allowed socially and legally in this country and so I can't say much more about that. It seems kind of clear though that no one actually tried to hide her sign? I am not seeing anyone standing below her and holding their sign in an attempt to cover hers...
edit: grammar
[–]dasbin [score hidden]  (0 children)
Yeah, I find it really hard to side with anybody on this one. She accuses the protestors of lying, and then seems to engage in lying about what happened herself. She claims to provide evidence for her claims but then shows a video clip which does not show what she says it does. The cherry-picked editing in the original is obvious as well.
[–]surfnsound [score hidden]  (0 children)
I would agree if it weren't for the one woman directing someone with a camera to "maybe focus on the speakers." If your goal is to win a debate on ideas, then let your ideas win rather than try and silence the other side by directing the audience to focus only on your argument.
[–]condylomamasita 217 points218 points219 points  (53 children)
I really think that TwoX should band together and show her some support. She must be absolutely terrified right now. If we stay silent while she's publically lynched, she'll serve as an example of what happens when you speak up against these types of tumblr feminists.
If we don't have the right to challenge ingrained ideas, constantly in fear of being personally victimised, then how can society have these conversations in order to progress?
We should show our support now as members of the moderate middle before any of the extreme ends of the gender-rights spectrum weighs in on this.
Any thoughts?
I have to agree with the other poster, it is awfully quiet in here.
[–]RedSt_Sonja 113 points114 points115 points  (11 children)
Well, Im in. She's a sister and being harassed, stalked and bullied. She's being threatened with death threats and rape threats. by other women.
[–]Khaaannnnn [score hidden]  (0 children)
Equal opportunity harassers.
They don't care about gender, they care if you disagree with anything they do or say.
[–]HbeePtusF comment score below threshold[score hidden]  (2 children)
Hahaha rape threats and death threats? Wut? Where.
Course you gonna downvote. Just wanna actually see wtf you're talking about.
Lol I mean she's a hero. I mean I heard they were sending her Barbies with their hair torn out and eyes X'd out with a note saying your next. Then, get this, OK, she goes into the bathroom and the femnazis fucking rearranged the bathroom somehow -- they put goddamn bathtub on the other side of the room, the whole layout mirrored, and she's balling at this point. They want to make her feel like she's fucking nuts for making them feel so fucking nuts. Just wants to cry in the tub, but when she turns on the faucet, the blood of pigs comes out. And if you listen to the blood real close, you hear, and this is the real fucked up part, somehow by fucking sorcery, the gurlging and bubbling makes up this spoken word poem if you listen real close, alluding to all sorts of imminent sexual violence. Can't believe they're fucking doing that to her. It's real!
There's no way you guys are moderate.
[–]CandySnow [score hidden]  (1 child)
About two words of that made any sense whatsoever.
[–]HbeePtusF [score hidden]  (0 children)
You probably checked out right when I wondered where you get the death and rape threats.
It's cool, you're stupid. It doesn't matter.
Didn't think that would actually get addressed lol yall just making shit up.
Just downvote and move on and try not to think too much.
[–][deleted]  (4 children)
[deleted]
    [–][deleted]  (1 child)
    [deleted]
      [–]◖◧:彡heatheranne[M] 7 points8 points9 points  (0 children)
      Yeah, the name calling will stop now.
      [–]doubleunplussed 22 points23 points24 points  (0 children)
      That's not what strawmanning means. The term you are looking for is 'false flag'.
      And yeah, because we've never heard of feminists making stuff up to further feminism before. /s
      [–]wumbledjords 75 points76 points77 points  (9 children)
      What I find really interesting is that if you believe even in the slightest of the feminist agenda, that woman are oppressed etc, this is a perfect example from the other side. This woman stood up in front of clear oppression and is reaping the consequences of it. This is what it's like if you believe woman are oppressed. Only in this case, its not sexism from men or pure misogyny or patriarchy or anything. It's people who think they are oppressed committing the oppression. If this continues people who truly want equality will have to abandoned feminism. This is all the ammo anyone needs to vilify feminism. The people who are trying to silence Lauren are doing no favors for equality.
      [–]ProbablyARob0t [score hidden]  (4 children)
      Well as a white man who used to identify as a feminist until my opinions and views were invalidated for my gender and my skin color I have to say this is already happening in droves. New age millennial feminism has undermined and destroyed any credibility the feminist movement has. This ultimately will destroy the push forward because the only major feminists who are getting attention are the social justice warriors who are pure 100% misandrists, these people are no better than extreme Christians screaming religious equality as they strike down homosexual, excuse me, civil rights. Even if these women are a vocal minority, they are still the most represented opinion who act as if rape is exclusively a male action. I was raped by two different female babysitters as a child, but because I'm a white man I can't voice an opinion on that? Because I'm a white man I'm automatically a part of some broken Christian patriarchy? Even if I want to stand against it my support is unwelcome? What the fuck!? Why is the pain I feel as a man invalid because of my gender? Why is it OK for women to tell me it's creepy for me to ask to kiss them for the first time but it's rape if I don't ask!?... Sorry... I got on a tangent there... Feminism is broken, and it needs to change, white men like me, want to be part of the solution, but it's not fair that we can't be because of our skin colors and it undermines the entire concept of equality and social justice by creating a new form of justified animosity, the sort of animosity that started the feminism movement in the first place.
      [–]_beekay comment score below threshold[score hidden]  (3 children)
      white men like me, want to be part of the solution, but it's not fair that we can't be because of our skin colors
      dude. i am a white man, and i am a feminist. i have never been rejected.
      you have some really strange ideas.
      [–]ProbablyARob0t [score hidden]  (0 children)
      So because it's never happened you, it must not happen? Flawless logic there man. I live in a feminist heavy college town and I'm an heavily active part of my activist community. I was even once told I wasn't welcome at a gay rights rally when I was protesting for gay rights by a straight white woman. I have had several male friends experience much the same. I know without a doubt I'm not alone on this one.
      [–]proudwhitebread [score hidden]  (0 children)
      You must be fine with being constantly alluded to as a privileged oppressor. White men with any self-respect will not stand by such racist generalizations.
      [–]Darealyusuf [score hidden]  (0 children)
      I have been told that because I am a guy I can't have any sort of pain, I have never been excluded. I have been told that everything is for me. It isn't. Some men may be on top but most are on the bottom.
      [–]OrbitalThrownaway comment score below threshold-31 points-30 points-29 points  (3 children)
      If this continues people who truly want equality will have to abandoned feminism.
      This is already happening. If Feminism was actually about equality I'd be one of the most ardent feminists on the planet.
      [–]small_havoc [score hidden]  (0 children)
      This is already happening. If Feminism was actually about equality I'd be one of the most ardent feminists on the planet.
      Fuck, I mean you post in the RedPill. You are in no way interested in equality whatsoever if you post in a subreddit dedicated to treating women like children. You post in another subreddit that explicitly says it doesn't allow feminists. You're so full of hypocrisy and shit.
      [–]dildope [score hidden]  (0 children)
      I'm so confused. Am I really reading this conversation in TwoX????
      [–]FWWclub [score hidden]  (6 children)
      This is how a lot of people get treated when they disagree with some parts of the feminist movement. The way she has been treated is why some people don't like the label.
      Edit: why the downvotes? Is it because you don't agree with me? This video is about self-identifying feminists attacking and slandering a woman because they don't like her message. The downvote button is for comments and links that don't contribute to the conversation. This is a conversation that we should be having. Remember that people on the internet are people, not just abstractions to be argued with. We ought to not exclude differing opinions just because they differ.
      Edit#2: The downvotes have gone. Have a lovely day.
      [–]Khaaannnnn [score hidden]  (3 children)
      This is how men are often treated by these parts of the feminist movement.
      Why they find this harassment outrageous sometimes, then do it themselves, eludes me.
      [–]GreyMX [score hidden]  (2 children)
      Tools of the master?
      [–]Khaaannnnn [score hidden]  (1 child)
      I don't understand.
      [–]GreyMX [score hidden]  (0 children)
      The idea is that it's natural for someone who is oppressed to see the methods of an oppressor as being effective, and then try to emulate those methods themselves. But in reality, this is never an effective strategy for achieving justice.
      [–][deleted]  (1 child)
      [deleted]
        [–]FWWclub [score hidden]  (0 children)
        I usually feel the same way until it's my turn to be the one asking. Duality of man I guess. I upvoted you btw
        Edit: I hate when people delete their comments, so here goes... /u/DoxxingShillDownvote said the they downvoted me because of my initial edit asking about downvotes.
        [–]Mostly_Lucid [score hidden]  (0 children)
        Why did she feel the need to go out of her way to invalidate the concerns of these other women? I can't help but think that she provoked exactly the response she expected, and maybe she doesn't want or need help.
        What she did was fundamentally no different than someone attending a gay pride parade and holding a sign that says "Homosexuality is not real". It's not vulgar or obscene, and it's just an opinion, but it IS a tremendous dick move.
        And then after, she walked around trying to "engage in debate" aka "pick fights" with attendees.
        Good for her - she has an opinion. But in order to express it, she chose a platform diametrically opposed. Like when the Westborough Church shows up at a veterans funeral.
        If you have a message, but the only way to express it is to make others feel bad or foolish, you have made a poor choice.
        She reaped what she sowed. It's just extra shitty that now EVERYONE looks like an asshole.
        [–][deleted]  (5 children)
        [deleted]
          [–]NyaaFlame 18 points19 points20 points  (4 children)
          Yeah, because women could not possibly have their reputation and career prospects destroyed by an overly sensitive group such as this.
          Look mate, I'm all for looking at the terrible things that happen to both genders, but it's just fucking stupid to say women are immune.
          [–]Khaaannnnn [score hidden]  (0 children)
          When anyone can have their reputation and career prospects destroyed by these people, something is seriously wrong.
          [–]proudwhitebread comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points  (1 child)
          The label of "rape apologist" doesn't stick to women quite as well as it does to men.
          [–]NyaaFlame 13 points14 points15 points  (0 children)
          It doesn't, but "Yelled at rape victims" is still a pretty nasty tagline.
          [–]DoxxingShillDownvote comment score below threshold-32 points-31 points-30 points  (6 children)
          it is awfully quiet in here.
          154 posts at current count.. but its "awfully quiet"... whatever
          [–]aywwts4 10 points11 points12 points  (1 child)
          That was written five hours before your observation.
          [–]DoxxingShillDownvote comment score below threshold-12 points-11 points-10 points  (0 children)
          Which is what makes it hyperbole.
          [–]Ravanas 4 points5 points6 points  (3 children)
          You're posting 5 hours after they did. You suppose its possible people responded afterwards? Maybe it was quiet and now it isn't.
          [–]DoxxingShillDownvote -2 points-1 points0 points  (2 children)
          It's hyperbole to say "its quiet" right after an article was posted particularly when the continent it took place on is still asleep.
          [–]Ravanas 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
          They gave it 3 hours and nobody was posting. You gave it a further 5 before you decided to tell them they were wrong. I understand what you're saying, it would be a more meaningful statement to say it's awfully quiet if they were making it say, now (if there was still nobody posting). But to say it's not quiet when at the time of the post it was and over time that changed is just as, if not more, incorrect than the initial statement.
          [–]pearplate comment score below threshold-77 points-76 points-75 points  (7 children)
          She would have nothing to fear of she hadn't done what she did. She wasn't victimized, the survivors she tried to mock were.
          [–]Corpus_Fisti 41 points42 points43 points  (6 children)
          oh ffs
          [–]wumbledjords 17 points18 points19 points  (4 children)
          You know how sometimes people say they are one thing even though they are really the counterpoint to that thing and then proceed to spout stuff off that makes the one looks bad? Like subterfuge and stuff? I'm not entirely convinced that pearplate isn't doing that.
          [–]Corpus_Fisti 15 points16 points17 points  (3 children)
          ...in other words you think pearplate is a troll...
          [–]wumbledjords 7 points8 points9 points  (1 child)
          Kinda. To me a troll is someone who acts out for personal amusement. This seemed much more politically motivated.
          [–]SavageScagBaron [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Kinda like an agent provocateur sorta thing
          [–]tholgrr [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Are you from CC Tx? Nice username.
          [–]Khaaannnnn [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Perhaps pearplate forgot /s
          [–]whitebelg 136 points137 points138 points  (10 children)
          Awfully quiet in here...
          [–]NyaaFlame 101 points102 points103 points  (1 child)
          Not much to say about it. The people who made these claims were lying to try to destroy her character and support their opinions. Lauren was in no way in the wrong, and what she was doing was perfectly acceptable. It doesn't matter if you agree or not, the people who made these claims were way out of line.
          The fact they tried to start a petition to remove her as a candidate for the Libertarian party is laughable, to say the least. Especially seeing as it is based off of false claims, and seeing as the Libertarian party is known for prizing freedom of speech and expression.
          [–]Dee_Jay_Eye 52 points53 points54 points  (1 child)
          Not really surprising after the way these "feminist" behaved.
          Laughable and sad at best. People have opinions, no reason to get salty.
          [–]shadowbanningsucks 4 points5 points6 points  (0 children)
          Everyone is probably over at Voat.
          [–]DoxxingShillDownvote comment score below threshold-23 points-22 points-21 points  (3 children)
          it is awfully quiet in here.
          154 posts at current count.. but its "awfully quiet"... whatever
          [–]whitebelg 13 points14 points15 points  (2 children)
          Mine was the only comment when I made it.
          [–]DoxxingShillDownvote comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points  (1 child)
          that will happen when you arrive first to a post that was made while North America was still asleep.
          [–]faulparker [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Let's hope they sleep in over the weekend.
          [–]Basically Liz Lemonfurnelladeville 36 points37 points38 points  (11 children)
          I don't 100% agree with her, but I certainly understand her point. I definitely don't think that she was treated fairly, or the situation was handled respectfully by the participants of the SlutWalk. Nobody deserves the kind of backlash that she got for voicing a peaceful opinion.
          [–]lIIlIIlllIlIll [score hidden]  (3 children)
          can I ask what it is you don't agree with?
          [–]untogethered [score hidden]  (1 child)
          To try to be /r/neutralpolitics about it... "We dont live in a rape culture in the west" is a difficult statement to parse, given that different people have different perspectives on what "rape culture" is.
          She's correct that we live in a society where rape is a crime, where people are sent to prison for it and shamed for being rapists. But there are elements of our culture that are troubling in terms of consent, slut shaming, masculinity, etc. etc. - and rape happens. But by contrast, in other countries, rape is rarely if ever prosecuted (even if it is illegal) and is far more accepted by society, and happens a lot more.
          Are those both "rape cultures"? Are they comparable? Are there degrees of rape culture? If her point is "rape is far worse in other places", she's right. If her point is that no-one lives in fear of rape in the West, she's wrong. The likelihood is that it belongs in a grey area somewhere in the middle, which means it angers basically everyone.
          [–]mabolle[🍰] [score hidden]  (0 children)
          This is an excellent summary.
          "Rape culture" and "patriarchy" are troublesome terms in that a) they're both rather nebulously defined, and b) feminists and non-feminists often don't agree on what they actually mean, so it's hard to have meaningful discussion about them as such (unless you explicitly break them down and define them). It's actually rather similar to how socialists and libertarians mean rather different things when they say "capitalism".
          [–]ewewmjuilyh [score hidden]  (5 children)
          Can you help me understand what opinion she was voicing with her sign? What does it mean to say that there's no rape culture in the west?
          Honest question
          [–]switch6lade [score hidden]  (0 children)
          From what I understand, 'rape culture' is the idea that a society, by default, blames female victims of sexual assault for what happened to them because of what they were wearing, etc, offers them no support, and is essentially run by men to protect men. The Slut Walk is specifically built around this ideal, and Lauren was saying that such a thing does not in exist western nations like Canada and the US, etc.
          Edit: Forgot a word.
          [–]Khaaannnnn [score hidden]  (1 child)
          She explained in earlier videos, including:
          [–]Basically Liz Lemonfurnelladeville [score hidden]  (0 children)
          I have to admit, I hate the fact that victims of false accusations have a terrible, inexcusable time. It astounds me that it's legal for the media to post faces/details etc. before a verdict, as it can absolutely destroy someone's life, which is disgustingly unfair.
          [–]YourSnowflake [score hidden]  (0 children)
          What she is saying is that there is no rape culture in the west because rapists go to jail, they are looked down upon, lose their jobs, etc. However, in various African countries women don't have the ability to do anything about their rapes like women in the west. Men can much more easily get away with it in Africa. She is saying we need to focus our efforts on the women in need there instead of here because we've progressed much farther than sometimes it might seem or feel.
          [–]dasbin [score hidden]  (0 children)
          She voiced the opinions that because we don't literally stone to death women who are raped, or imprison them while congratulating the perpetrators, as does unfortunately happen in other parts of the world, this means there is no rape culture here.
          I disagree mostly with this interpretation of the phrase "rape culture." I think it's pretty widely understand to mean any degree of victim-blaming, or societal pressures which instill any degree of a sense of entitlement towards women's bodies. It can grow from there, for example on reddit itself, where actual rape stories are suppressed while cherry-picked cases of women faking rape claims etc are up-voted and extraordinarily popular because they appear to confirm whatever pre-existing notions of women that people have. That's rape culture and she's certainly wrong that it doesn't exist.
          Here's the kicker. The SlutWalk movement itself (the event she was at) was started in response to a statement made by a Toronto police officer that was undeniably an example of rape culture: "I've been told I'm not supposed to say this – however, women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized." (Constable Michael Sanguinetti).
          It's pretty obvious this sort of attitude still surfaces too often and the entire purpose of the event she was counter-protesting was to quash this erroneous attitude. She was there arguing a straw-man.
          [–]turkeyinthecorn [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Gamergate told me that online harassment isn't a problem
          [–]LadyoftheDam [score hidden]  (0 children)
          These kind of events always seem to attract certain kind of person. Loud, defensive, inarticulate, but still very motivated and empowered. I've been to a few events, but stopped going because it just makes me feel embarrassed. The poorly thought out speeches, the bad poetry. Her "I wrote this on the train over here" seems so typical. The last one I went to, a girl gave the worst speech I've ever witnessed. When we marched, some of the girls were chanting, which is cool, but the things they were chanting were fucking stupid. Like, just nonsense. Just embarrassing all around. When these people speak for a movement, the movement suffers. It's just frustrating.
          [–]arathans 16 points17 points18 points  (3 children)
          reading the comments section here gives me hope for the future of feminism. thank you 2x.
          [–]goingtowinthis [score hidden]  (2 children)
          really, i'm quite depressed.
          [–]Runningman419 [score hidden]  (0 children)
          There's medication for that.
          [–]UsernameIWontRegret [score hidden]  (0 children)
          You're a radfem then?
          [–]Sendmeyourfantasy 18 points19 points20 points  (11 children)
          Hilarious thing is, rad fems did similar and arguably worse ( as in this case Lauren didn't do anything) in Toronto.
          [–]_beekay comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points  (10 children)
          Yup, that's default sub TwoX, alright. "What's that? A feminist somewhere did something bad? Better start bitching about how MRAs are oppressed!"
          posts video of feminist interrupting MRA meeting
          30 upvotes
          [–]isthatafruit 10 points11 points12 points  (1 child)
          There are shitty feminists who do shitty things under their interpretation of what feminism as an ideology is. You can't pretend they don't exist and don't represent the same movement as you just because you don't like them or agree with them. That's what happens when large groups of people interpret some ideologies.
          I also think it's amusing that your automatic reaction to hearing anyone say anything bad about radical feminists is essentially "shut up you MRA!!" which does nothing but strengthen their point about how shitty feminists do in fact exist
          [–]_beekay comment score below threshold-16 points-15 points-14 points  (0 children)
          Er, I specifically said they were a feminist in my reply (and since I didn't watch past the first few seconds, I don't even know that it's true - I'm just giving them the benefit of the doubt). So I'm not pretending they don't exist, am I.
          And no, my automatic reaction to someone saying "radical feminists are bad" is "true." This dude's post was completely irrelevant to the thread. Seriously, read the frigging posts before you attempt to call me out on my OBVIOUS bias. -_-
          [–]LUClEN [score hidden]  (7 children)
          They said nothing of the sort.
          [–]_beekay [score hidden]  (6 children)
          If that's your reaction, then ask yourself: how exactly is a video of a feminist interrupting some MRAs relevant to the thread?
          And if it's not relevant, why exactly would somebody post it here?
          [–]LUClEN [score hidden]  (5 children)
          If you read what was said and understand the context of this thread you would know that censorship and shouting over dissident voices is what those two incidents share in common. The fact that they are MRA's is irrelevant, it is the fact that feminist groups are stifling opposing views in unprogressive ways that relates them.
          If these groups really do have the more accurate and truthful position proving opposition wrong should be a cake walk. Instead they avoid this and try to work around it, so their view never gets challenged nor needs to be defended against legitimate criticisms.
          [–]_beekay [score hidden]  (4 children)
          If you read what was said and understand the context of this thread you would know that censorship and shouting over dissident voices is what those two incidents share in common.
          ...but the woman in the OP was not censored, her opinions were not suppressed, her sign wasn't hidden during the demonstration. So I'm not seeing it.
          Yes, after the fact, a bunch of shitty internet people sent her threats. This happens to everyone who expresses a controversial opinion on the internet. It's not good, but she's not being treated unusually badly.
          If these groups really do have the more accurate and truthful position proving opposition wrong should be a cake walk.
          Oh, please. As though there aren't a thousand incidents every day where feminists defend their position reasonably and respectfully. They're not getting into the news, though.
          [–]LUClEN [score hidden]  (3 children)
          ...but the woman in the OP was not censored, her opinions were not suppressed, her sign wasn't hidden during the demonstration. So I'm not seeing it.
          By trying to leverage her via her political ties they tried to silence her for a conflicting view. One that seems to be at least partially shared by RAINN.
          [–]_beekay [score hidden]  (2 children)
          I'm not sure what exactly you're referring to here. Were there people during the event who... said they'd get her expelled from her party? And if so, is that even a problem? That's a politician's bread and butter. There's a reason that the phrase is political correctness.
          [–]LUClEN [score hidden]  (1 child)
          If that's the go to response for dealing with opposition that seems problematic. Particularly when the political incorrectness of stating that rape culture is nonexistent in the West is dubious at best.
          [–]_beekay [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Wait, is that seriously what you were referring to? Don't be ridiculous. A politician can't go around stirring up public opposition or they'll be voted out/kicked out of the party/be otherwise incapable of doing their job. If a politician is complaining that their controversial counterprotest and selectively-edited videos didn't go down well, they're a fucking idiot. That will happen no matter the topic.
          I have no sympathy for her for that. This is literally her job.
          [–]thechelator 26 points27 points28 points  (192 children)
          What were her motivations for being there? What does she want to change? That's all I want to know.
          [–]lejaylejay[S] 83 points84 points85 points  (141 children)
          She wants to end the notion that we're living in a "rape culture".
          [–]waffleironone 24 points25 points26 points  (78 children)
          To add to this, just remember that rape culture isn't just strangers on the street picking out women for the types of clothes they're wearing its college party culture and the way some rapists who already know their victims expect sex no matter her opinion and roofies and taking advantage of someone when they're high or intoxicated and victim blaming.
          [–]John_Wilkes 58 points59 points60 points  (77 children)
          But thats a small minority of sick individuals. Its not the culture. Some individuals think its ok to murder people apparently but we don't have a murder culture either.
          [–]feminudist 25 points26 points27 points  (6 children)
          Could be wrong, but I suspect the odds of finding untested rape kits and neglected rape case files are a bit higher than the odds of finding untested forensic evidence from scene of murder/homicide or neglected murder/homicide case files.
          [–]Deceviously 1 point2 points3 points  (2 children)
          Why assume there is any process deficiency, or bias? A deficiency in department metrics would be scrutinized and improved, else the department would be closed. And a bias is unlikely when analysts are comprised of both genders.
          [–]feminudist 24 points25 points26 points  (1 child)
          The high number of untested rape kits is very well documented http://endthebacklog.org/ In some places rape victims have to pay to get the kit examined, which is one reason so many go untested. I have never heard of a grieving family being billed by the police department for the cost of investigating the crime.
          [–]Deceviously 9 points10 points11 points  (0 children)
          That just blew my mind. Thank you for the information. I have to see if it is the same in my country.
          [–]ConciselyVerbose [score hidden]  (2 children)
          I am not trying to trivialize rape, because it is absolutely unacceptable and a serious offense, but I'm not sure comparing it to homicide is a valid comparison. Even considering them equal in severity, the volume of rape cases is substantially higher than the volume of homicides.
          [–]feminudist [score hidden]  (1 child)
          But thats a small minority of sick individuals. Its not the culture. Some individuals think its ok to murder people apparently but we don't have a murder culture either.
          This is what I was replying to, my comment got buried under other comments.
          [–]ConciselyVerbose [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Fair enough. I missed the context, and with it that makes much more sense.
          [–]esoteric_coyote 20 points21 points22 points  (2 children)
          Not that I agree or disagree, but I just want to point out I have gotten a ridiculous amount of unwanted attention on the internet. I no longer share my physical appearance on the internet, even to other women because they will share it with other men. I avoid voice chat as I have one of those voices some people find attractive. I am tired of getting pictures of dicks, or crude messages. I just want to log on my game, beat things up, and enjoy a game. And it's sad I have to go out of my way to avoid this shit. On the plus side, no one has flashed me their dick in real life yet. People in real life are far more polite and it's easy to smile and continue on my marry way. I've only had a few times where guy's seemed to follow me, and I was able to go to the populated place to lose them. So I see why women say we are in a rape culture. It's very easy to feel unsafe around men. And it's generally never strangers that really scare me, it's the people I get to know. In the work place, friends, other's partners or spouses...
          [–]MachineMagic2 comment score below threshold[score hidden]  (0 children)
          [–]suicidal_smrtcar 54 points55 points56 points  (45 children)
          I think rape culture is a lot more than just people who think rape is ok, it's about the normalisation of rape and the circumstance that lead to its prevalence.
          For instance slut shaming is a undeniably real thing and is an overall part of rape culture as it influences the way people will start viewing rape or other such sexual violence.
          Eg: the attempted cover up of Stuebenville is part of this not just the rape and the boys themselves.
          [–]Steel50 17 points18 points19 points  (44 children)
          Rape is not normalized... where are you living
          [–]suicidal_smrtcar 35 points36 points37 points  (21 children)
          Normalized doesn't mean accepted, but expected definitely. How often are women told not to walk through a park at night or by themselves in an area that isn't well lit. On top of that how often do we here the terms "I can't believe she walked through that park by herself, what did she expect," as if it's somehow ok to place any sort of blame on the victim.
          Of course women should take care, I tell my girlfriend to, and I will tell my daughter when she reaches a certain age, but this doesn't mean we should expect or accept to have this as standard.
          [–]HungNavySEAL300Kills [score hidden]  (2 children)
          My family strictly enforced a "do not go into Detroit at night" rule. Is that proof of normalized Anti-Detroit culture? Just because I go into Detroit do I deserve to be robbed and murdered? Just because I go there at night? Am I going to fight this Anti-Detroit culture by going into Detroit and driving around all night in a fresh car just to push the envelope? If I'm robbed at gunpoint and carjacked, am I going to blame Anti-Detroit culture or am I going to blame the criminals who did it to me? What if my story gets heard and people who I thought were friends post things like "haha well you were in Detroit man!" "What car were you driving?"
          [–]FWWclub [score hidden]  (1 child)
          We definitely live in an anti-detroit culture lol
          [–]proudwhitebread [score hidden]  (0 children)
          There are quite a few cities like Detroit and they all share a curious little similarity...
          [–]elemenopyquearees [score hidden]  (6 children)
          Thank you! If a guy gets mugged on the street at 2 a.m., he's obviously the victim. If a girl gets raped in the same scenario? "Why the hell were you walking alone at 2 a.m.? You know that's dangerous."
          [–]MachineMagic2 [score hidden]  (0 children)
          If a guy gets mugged on the street at 2 a.m., he's obviously the victim. If a girl gets raped in the same scenario? "Why the hell were you walking alone at 2 a.m.? You know that's dangerous."
          Where do you people get these ridiculous notions from? This has no basis in reality. I've actually been mugged at 2 am while walking alone, and you know what response I got?
          "Why the hell were you walking alone at 2 a.m.? You know that's dangerous."
          [–]PureShnazz [score hidden]  (0 children)
          I'm not entirely sure that comparison is accurate, there was a story in my national papers a couple of months ago about one of our police officers (male) who was mugged and shot on vacation in a U.S. city, after the initial shock everyone I know was asking the same question, what was he doing in that neighborhood at that time of night...
          [–]herpafilter [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Not really. If a guy gets mugged, first of all, why didn't you fight him off? You must have looked like an easy mark. Why were you in that part of town? I heard all three of those lines after I was mugged, all three delivered entirely seriously.
          There is nothing unique to rape about victim blaming. People blame victims of crime all the time for all sorts of crimes. Someone broke into your house? Did you lock the door? Someone stole your car? Well why did you park it there?
          A lot of the 'victim blaming' discussion has revolved around this narrative that rape and only rape victims are blamed for being a victim. It's simply not true no matter how many times its repeated.
          [–]LadyoftheDam [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Any article I've ever read about a man who has been victimized like that had a comment section riddled with "wtf was he doing there?" Or other such commentary. Victim blaming is not reserved for women, or rape victims.
          [–]proudwhitebread [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Both guys and girls get "victim blamed" often. And 90% of the time this "blame" comes not from a place of malice but out of a desire to see the person safe and alive. When people tell a woman to cover herself up in a dangerous part of town, they aren't doing it just to be sexist to her, they simply want her to have as much protection as possible. You need to realize that when people assign certain responsibility to you, they don't want to denigrate you but rather help you survive. It's absurd to suggest, for example, that a family living in a dangerous neighborhood "victim blames" their daughter by telling her that she needs to wear a hoodie and oversized pants. But the people who invented this feminist nonsense live in safe gated neighborhoods, so what do they know about the plight of lower class women?
          [–]Deathspiral222 [score hidden]  (0 children)
          I agree strongly with the spirit of what you are saying but this isn't a very good argument. If a man who doean't live there goes wondering around certain parts of Compton at 2am he'll likely be mugged and people will question what he was doing there as if it was his fault.
          This isn't a "what about men?" post - women have it much, much worse, but your example seems to support the idea that we have a culture of violence in general rather than specifically a rape culture and I wasn't sure if that is what you intended.
          [–]ParanthropusBoisei [score hidden]  (0 children)
          How often are women told not to walk through a park at night or by themselves in an area that isn't well lit. On top of that how often do we here the terms "I can't believe she walked through that park by herself, what did she expect," as if this somehow ok to place any sort of blame on the victim.
          You have a logical confusion between advice/prudence on the one hand and moral responsibilty/blame on the other hand. Giving people advice is not the same thing as telling them that they are morally obligated to do that thing.
          Of course women should take care, I tell my girlfriend to, and I will tell my daughter to, but this doesn't mean we should expect to have this as standard.
          We expect people to lock their doors, protect their identity, etc. but not because they are morally obligated do so, and yet they are standard expectations. Avoiding victimization is not specifically different just because sexuality is involved. The suggestion that it should be is actually condescending to women because it suggests that women cannot be expected to take care of themselves, as if it's too much to ask of them. "I will tell my girlfriend to, and I will tell my daugheter to" suggests that you respect your girlfriend and daughter, but "we shouldn't expect to have this as a standard" suggests that you don't respect women in general enough to hold them to this same standard.
          [–]Runningman419 [score hidden]  (0 children)
          A standard? It's a predictable probability like any other event. Instances of theft does not equate culturally accepted thievery.
          [–]my_honesty_throwaway [score hidden]  (7 children)
          If I walk through a park in a bad area at night I'm careful not to flash my expensive phone. If I walked around texting on it I'd get robbed. Does that mean we live in a robbery culture?!
          [–]suicidal_smrtcar [score hidden]  (6 children)
          Does that mean we live in a robbery culture?!
          That's a red herring. Don't try to devalue the concept with something ridiculous like that.
          And yes you may be careful about not flashing expensive stuff when all alone in a park or a rough neighborhood, but that doesn't make it ok. Both of these situations are bad, end of. As a society we should be aiming to get beyond a point where people should have to worry, even if it's a pipe dream.
          [–]my_honesty_throwaway [score hidden]  (2 children)
          Why is it a red herring? Genuinely don't see it.
          It doesn't make it OK but that doesn't mean I'm propagating rape by telling people to be careful when walking alone in bad areas. It's just common sense and not normalizing rape
          [–]proudwhitebread [score hidden]  (0 children)
          You will never be able to stop worrying as long as certain problem populations exist in your country. And even without them, the likelihood of bad people being around exists in every country. In Sweden a girl was recently murdered and dismembered by a group of immigrants. She probably thought that her pipe dream has become a reality, until the geniune reality sunk its claws into her.
          [–]MachineMagic2 [score hidden]  (0 children)
          As a society we should be aiming to get beyond a point where people should have to worry, even if it's a pipe dream.
          A society without potential anxiety is a society without any freedom.
          [–]Steel50 [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Your idealism is just not realistic at all. You are railing against a non existent problem. There are battles to be fought for women, like the prison pad issue that IMO is pretty terrible. That would be an actual thing you could lobby for and effect change. protesting against "Rape culture" isn't going to do a fucking thing.
          Be more practical, stop relying on feelings to choose your agendas.
          [–]Trailmix1919 [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Well, women should take care at night. I don't know how that saying means we have a rape culture. How many women get raped who walking the streets at night? It doesn't happen in developed countries. Men and women are more likely to get robbed during the day than raped by a random at night - so men and women should take care
          [–]cakebatter 3 points4 points5 points  (21 children)
          The fact that so many people have been raped or assaulted mean that in some ways, it is.
          [–]sixtyshilling 14 points15 points16 points  (16 children)
          Lauren Southern's point (she's the one holding the sign) is that rapists are not protected by modern Western culture. Rapists are vilified, they are punished, and their lives are destroyed. Compare this to third world countries where men actually do get away with rape. That is a rape culture.
          [–]suicidal_smrtcar [score hidden]  (0 children)
          The idea of rape culture isn't about the protection of rapists or the encouragement of rape but about the social interactions that morph the concept of rape into something that becomes more normalised.
          This doesn't take away from the horrors inflicted in other places. Accepting that things aren't perfect doesn't devalue what happens elsewhere. Not every murderer is Ted Bundy but we can still accept that murder is terrible.
          [–]gnoani [score hidden]  (4 children)
          Rapists are vilified, they are punished, and their lives are destroyed.
          Unless you play sports, in which case your entire town will engage in a Hot Fuzz-style coverup to make sure you continue to win fucking football games.
          And when it comes out, people will lament the loss of your career, which is the true victim.
          [–]sixtyshilling [score hidden]  (0 children)
          I'm not saying that's a good thing, but how much of that is because people have normalized rape, and how much of that is because the person is a celebrity?
          For example, how many fans defended Justin Bieber when he was vandalizing property, driving under the influence, and getting into fights every other week? That's not really because those people think those things are good, it's because they are fanatics obsessed with a famous person.
          [–]Auriela [score hidden]  (0 children)
          That's sports and athletic culture then.
          It's no secret that the athlete world is filled with corruption and cover ups, if it's not steroids it's deflated footballs or violent murdering athletes when they aren't in the field.
          The media seems to exemplify rape culture in sports. Not even the entire media though, perhaps just a decent number of journalists or reporters who say "those football rapists had a bright future ahead of them!" Even though there is outrage across the map.
          [–]CodeEmporer [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Of both sexes. Hope Solo starting for the US in the women's world cup, after being convicted for domestic violence. Crickets in TwoX...
          [–]thejokersrs [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Unless you play sports
          unless you play lacrosse, because we fucking hate lacrosse.
          [–]cakebatter [score hidden]  (7 children)
          I actually don't know anything about this woman or this situation in particular so I'm not really weighing in on that. Obviously death threats and harassments are never, ever okay and she had every right to free speech at that rally without retaliation.
          But your sort of comment is really counterproductive. In the US, rapists do get away with it. Of course, there are places in the world where the violence is much more brutal, public, and accepted...but that doesn't mean we don't have ways to improve here.
          You could use the same logic to say that there is still active slavery in the world, but since it's been abolished in the US for 150+ years, we have no cause to complain or work toward ending racism.
          If you hold up the absolute extremes then, sure, our situation doesn't seem so bad. But that doesn't mean we don't have the right to keep pushing for something better.
          *Edited to clarify I meant your comment, not what she was saying
          [–]sixtyshilling [score hidden]  (5 children)
          In the US, rapists do get away with it.
          Correction: SOME rapists get away with it. Just like how some percentage of all crimes go unpunished.
          That's very different from saying there is a "culture" of rape, or that rape is "normalized", though.
          [–]Chocolate_Slug [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Luckily we live in a society where we uphold the belief that some guilty will go free to minimize the risk of someone innocent being convicted.
          [–]ConciselyVerbose [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Unless they have money.
          It definitely pales in comparison to third world countries, where it's not even "getting away with rape". It's expected and accepted there that you do what you please.
          [–]RellenD [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Except we know it's not true. Every rape victim who wants to see her attacker punished has to sit through defense attorneys slandering her and bringing up her sexual history and manner of dress as if it's somehow relevant.
          Then there's cases like with Love Bryant and Ben Roethlessberger and the Steubenville thing.
          [–]Viddion [score hidden]  (3 children)
          Rape and sexual assaults are way down and have been going down for years.
          [–]cakebatter [score hidden]  (2 children)
          I don't know those numbers, but I hope, hope, hope that's true because that's crazy awesome! Let's keep it up :)
          Stuff like the fact that my aunt said what her boyfriend did to her in high school wasn't really considered rape then, since she'd been with him before and the term date-rape wasn't widely used yet, but the fact that my goddaughter knew exactly what happened to her was rape is great progress, but it's not enough. I'd like to keep reforming our culture so that my kids and grandkids not only have the language and support to deal with violence, but aren't as statistically likely to experience it.
          [–]Viddion [score hidden]  (1 child)
          I'm on mobile but http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm shows rape at its lowest level in 40 years and honestly before that I'd imagine the reporting percentage would be much lower. It's not your fault for not knowing this. The media thrives on us living in a dangerous world so they do everything they can to make it seem as terrible as possible. Obviously rape needs to continue to be reduced and I'm all for consent education but regardless of anyone's belief system it would seem that we're at least moving in the right direction.
          [–]MarlenaWatches [score hidden]  (0 children)
          "Boys will be Boys".......said no one ever after somebody was murdered.
          Frat boys, coaches, college athletes, bosses, bus drivers, public transportation users, yadda yadda yadda....allegations of sexual assault and/or harassment roll through the news every day, and I personally have experienced it from the last three examples I listed above. There is a historic trend of men thinking they get access to a woman's sex, or have a right to comment, unsolicited, regardless of that woman's interest or consent.
          [–]TheMysteriousDrZ 8 points9 points10 points  (0 children)
          It depends on who is doing the murdering. The police seem to get away with questionable behaviour on a regular basis, on camera sometimes.
          [–]Zifnab25 [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Some people? Did you miss the shit-show that was the Zimmerman murder or the folks cheering on cops to kill all the darkies during the Baltimore riots? How about folks that supported the Iraq War because it involved killing lots of rag-heads or people that advocate the casual use of nuclear weapons.
          There are, admittedly a slim minority willing to actually pull the trigger. But I'd say we DO have a murder culture in the US, where killing people is considered an acceptable method for settling disputes, so long as the "right" people get killed.
          [–]plummbob 10 points11 points12 points  (17 children)
          Its not the culture
          If you hear a story about a woman who wore skimpy clothing and 'had it coming'.......and that makes some sense to you, then you're living in a 'rape culture.'
          [–]syngeon -1 points0 points1 point  (6 children)
          Isn't that just an example of someone misinformed, uneducated or just wicked. Why does that generalize to the level of culture?
          [–]stripeygreenhat [score hidden]  (5 children)
          Because it's a very common sentiment that's expressed. When something is accepted widely in a community, then that something qualifies as part of that community's culture.
          [–]syngeon [score hidden]  (4 children)
          Justifications for rape are not common or widely espoused in the developed world, and probably not as much in the less developed world too.
          Yes, there are some idiots and scumbags who try to justify rape or sexual assault in some way, but they are very much a minority, if a very vocal minority.
          [–]stripeygreenhat [score hidden]  (3 children)
          You probably surround yourself with educated, thoughtful people. Or maybe I'm surrounded by fucking idiots, because I've heard that sentiment expressed fairly often.
          Then again, I live in Tennessee so there's a good chance it's the latter.
          [–]syngeon [score hidden]  (2 children)
          Ha, I wish. I actually work in mining and heavy industry. And the only time I have had any encounters with a possible rapist (who was found not guilty), was at university.
          I think the term Rape Culture is an interesting idea, but people forget that it is a very politicized terms that grew out of feminist critical theory, not empirical research. So, it's validity is very much in doubt, even though it's heavily referenced and used as an example of a society that is hostile and threatening to women.
          [–]Steel50 -2 points-1 points0 points  (7 children)
          If you think people can't make poor choices that increase their risks of being victimized you are just wrong. That does not mean that a person is responsible for the terrible acts done to them, but if I walk down a street in Gary Indiana at night and get robbed/murdered, i did something pretty unwise.
          [–]cakebatter 3 points4 points5 points  (6 children)
          This is where crime/sexual assault and class intersect and are worth examining. In your example you're failing to consider that some women live in Gary Indiana, and have to walk home at night. So no, those women didn't do anything wrong.
          Sure sometimes you do things that make you more vulnerable to attack, but that kind of helps shape what we mean by rape culture. The thought there are a list of things you should do to keep your safe means that someone out there will likely attack you if don't do these things. Which means there is a culture of rape.
          [–]Steel50 [score hidden]  (5 children)
          So by your logic, we live in a murder culture because I wouldn't walk down the street in Gary at night? hell even during the day its dangerous.
          [–]_beekay [score hidden]  (3 children)
          The difference is, if a woman was raped there, there'd be loads of people saying "she shouldn't have walked home! she should have had a weapon! she should have done x!"
          Whereas if you were murdered, nobody would be saying "oh gosh, he should have taken a taxi! this is why you should always wear a tough leather jacket!"
          [–]untogethered [score hidden]  (0 children)
          Whereas if you were murdered, nobody would be saying "oh gosh, he should have taken a taxi! this is why you should always wear a tough leather jacket!"
          In this example I honestly think they would, though. There is a Reddit thread called What is your most terrifying story about Gary, Indiana?
          [–][deleted]  (1 child)
          [deleted]
            [–]cakebatter [score hidden]  (0 children)
            Nope, not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying you can come up with reasons to think that the victim of any crime is in some way responsible, but there are always factors involved that make it extremely difficult for some people to take the steps you recommend to protect themselves.
            [–][deleted]  (1 child)
            [deleted]
              [–]saynotovoodoo comment score below threshold-12 points-11 points-10 points  (24 children)
              [–]lejaylejay[S] 11 points12 points13 points  (23 children)
              Just because you can find a very tiny minority of people being assholes, doesn't mean it's a general culture. If you can't separate random messages you get on the internet from society in general you'll have very serious misconceptions about the society you live in.
              The idea of rape culture is that rape is accepted or trivialized throughout society. Do a national poll on whether or not people think rape is okay. That's how you figure out if you live in a "rape culture". Not by pointing to messages from 14 year old trolls on the internet.
              [–]_beekay -2 points-1 points0 points  (22 children)
              Do a national poll on whether or not people think rape is okay.
              would it kill you to look up "rape culture" on, like, wikipedia or something before you start crusading about rape culture hysteria?
              here, I'll even give you the link for ultra-easy learning:
              so, not just people going "woo rape! rape is the best, hooray for rape!" it's a teensy bit subtler than that.
              [–]Qapiojg 11 points12 points13 points  (2 children)
              I'm not sure if you were trying to agree with the other poster, I sure hope so because what you linked does indeed back them up. Pervasive directly relates to their proposed national poll (spread widely throughout a group of people). Normalized means that people find it normal, it's the regular state of things.
              In other words: "rape culture is a concept in which rape is widespread and seen as normal due to..." well a national survey would most likely show our culture is neither of these. Rape happens to very few people and when it does happen the accused rapist is met with nearly complete ostracism and vitriol.
              [–][deleted]  (1 child)
              [deleted]
                [–]Qapiojg 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
                I think the response to your post covered it quite well. On top of that you've misrepresented what the OP said. The survey would be about whether the population finds rape to be okay, it wouldn't say "do you think rape is okay." Otherwise they would have used quotes like I did and they would have actually worded it in that manner. Their proposition could easily be calling for scenarios to be presented in the survey to be marked as instances of "rape" or "not rape"
                [–]lejaylejay[S] 4 points5 points6 points  (17 children)
                How is that in conflict with my comment? My comment points out that society as a whole does not condone physical violence against women.
                [–]RockFourFour 14 points15 points16 points  (0 children)
                In fact, for as long as I can remember, rape has pretty universally been considered the worst crime a person can commit, second only to murder.
                [–]_beekay 1 point2 points3 points  (11 children)
                Okay, I'll elaborate. Performing a poll which asks "should women be raped?" is not going to give you any idea about rape culture because:
                1. People aren't going to give accurate answers. If you did this poll about racism, the hardcore racists would deny it, and the people who are racist without realising it will answer "not racist."
                2. Rape culture is specifically about that second group - people who contribute to rape being accepted/encouraged in society, without necessarily realising they're doing it. Plenty of people will proclaim their hate of rapists while failing to notice/act on actual instances of rape. That's what rape culture is about.
                [–]underthebanyan 12 points13 points14 points  (1 child)
                Thing is, in societies such as the ones that exist currently in India, your comment would carry weight. I have observed the societal norms in conservative places such as India and more liberal places such as the USA. I was not looking to observe how females were treated in either location as I was simply a child growing up at the time aka a passive observer.
                Looking back, however, it's quite clear to me how society over there could heavily contribute to a 'culture' of rape and its acceptance. To accuse western society of such a thing seems utterly ridiculous to me. Now of course, I'm not saying it's non-existent, but then we're just arguing the degree to which "rape culture" is present in the west. I think it's absolutely small and your experience may lead you to believe otherwise.
                Also, just on a pedantic note: no respectable poll would ask such a useless question for the exact reasons you mentioned. Questionnaire design is an incredibly important factor in the presentation of data.
                [–]_beekay -5 points-4 points-3 points  (0 children)
                Now of course, I'm not saying it's non-existent, but then we're just arguing the degree to which "rape culture" is present in the west. I think it's absolutely small and your experience may lead you to believe otherwise.
                I have no idea how severe it is, and I'm not about to guess - that's really not my field. I'm only arguing that it DOES exist, since this thread is full of people incredulous that anyone could possibly think it was real.
                Certainly, it would be less severe than in India. It's probably less severe in the West than anywhere else.
                Also, just on a pedantic note: no respectable poll would ask such a useless question for the exact reasons you mentioned. Questionnaire design is an incredibly important factor in the presentation of data.
                Indeed. :p It was the OP who suggested such a poll would be useful, I just added a specific question to highlight how silly that would be.
                [–]proudwhitebread 5 points6 points7 points  (7 children)
                People who know what rape is aren't gonna "fail to notice" an instance of rape. This may only happen when the definition of rape is expanded by feminists to include something that is considered consensual according to more reasonable, non-feminist norms, for example drunk sex.
                [–][deleted]  (6 children)
                [deleted]
                  [–]proudwhitebread 7 points8 points9 points  (5 children)
                  That /r/legaladvice post doesn't have enough detail to determine if it was really rape or not.
                  How am I vilifying feminists when I simply describe a common position of theirs? You need to look no further than Sweden to see what a feminist justice system can do with the definition of rape.
                  [–]louis6279 0 points1 point2 points  (3 children)
                  Why are you posting MRA propoganda to twox? I checked your post history, and you seem obsessed with mens issues. There is a life outside of reddit, l'il buddy
                  [–]Mr___F comment score below threshold-18 points-17 points-16 points  (34 children)
                  Why? What harm is it going to do if people believe there is a rape culture?
                  [–]bZuZu 31 points32 points33 points  (21 children)
                  I don't talk to strangers at all.
                  Too scared.
                  I drove down the highway and saw someone on the off-ramp who was clearly broken and down and struggling. I didn't help her. My boyfriend asked why.
                  "BEcause I dont know whos in the car, she could be working for another dude and could abduct me"
                  Too much fear isn't a good thing.
                  [–]vvomit 11 points12 points13 points  (8 children)
                  Are you a person who is naturally anxious? It's normal to be cautious of those types of situations, and please don't take it the wrong way, but you seem to be more paranoid than cautious. To counter the point regarding the acknowledgement of a "rape culture" being harmful - as someone who has been raped, it's been more reassuring than anything. Knowing that I'm not alone in this, knowing that it's not my fault, and hearing the rhetoric behind why "rape culture" exists and why it's harmful has helped me to realize that it's not my fault, but it's the result of something larger that isn't within my immediate control; that it's not something I could have stopped or changed by changing my clothes or the way I carry myself.
                  [–]bZuZu 7 points8 points9 points  (7 children)
                  I personally have experience in that department; I've been stalked home three times, and while traveling abroad I've almost been abducted, twice. I've had my apartment broken into, seen my personal objects (dildos, pads, tampons) thrown about my apartment, and felt violated.
                  While I cannot ever say I know what it's like to be raped, I can relate on a similar tangent. I didn't lock my window and for weeks I couldn't sleep alone, I'd blamed myself and my boyfriend blamed himself too (as he'd been in the apartment last). I'd say I was in the kiddie-pool of shame compared to what a rape victim would feel, but there's something harrowing about the echo of "If I had only..." or "I should have..." And that sentiment extends to whenever I recount how I was stalked. "Why didn't you have mace?" "Why didnt you scream?" "You could have just called the cops?"
                  I think "rape culture" doesn't have to do with what you wear, but rather who you are. Rapists do it (mainly) because they seek control and power. I think rape culture exists in the sense that when a man is raped, he is congratulated. Rape culture exists in a way that doesn't treat both sexes equally (Lena Dunham, anyone?)
                  I think there's ways to discuss rape and help counsel victims to realize its not their fault without having to parade in undergarments and blame the patriarchy. I feel like doing that is sort of putting a mask on it, almost making it into a joke for those who cannot empathize.
                  There's a place for "rape culture" and way about doing it, but I dont think this is the way about doing it. I mean, the term "rape culture" now is like "feminism," almost. SOME (NOT ALL) arguments have made it hard to jump on board with the approach. I know I get tired of "I wanted sex, but then the next day I didnt so I called it rape" strawman-- but some people actually use that as a point.
                  At the end of the day, it's a huge monster to discuss because there's so many variables. The fucked up rapist, the girl who was raped, the world's views on taking care of mental healthcare (ie; how easy it is to get counseling/therapy in certain areas) and your culture's views on men/women/sex.
                  [–]vvomit 11 points12 points13 points  (2 children)
                  There isn't anything or me to disagree with here. Unfortunately, much of what we (reddit especially) view of western feminism is more focused on self promotion than actually helping other women. It's about speaking, and talking, and opening up, but not doing much otherwise. It's boisterous but doesn't act on things because it often comes out of personal entitlement, and wanting to fit in with a group. The intent is good, they want to inform people that the way society reacts to rape is incorrect and that it needs to be reevaluated and rectified so that it helps the victim, it's a good message. Unfortunately, a lot of it turns into theatrics, because there's that sentiment of entitlement again - we don't want to include the outsider, "educate yourself". It's cliquey. They don't want to realize that outsiders won't take the long way, they'll just go home. To me, this isn't "feminism", but a certain outsider group that has adopted feminist theories and oppression politics to further a voice, but the voice is confused, and because of the confusion it isn't even a movement. This type of thing honestly just lacks proper direction, lol.
                  [–]bZuZu 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
                  Very much so!
                  My stepfather has sexist tendencies and when he got drunk during the holidays it came out. Having to explain why a girl can't just call the cops, or why they may not have mace that one day they got approached was incredibly hard. Trying to teach him about how girls are raised to be polite and kind, and then immediately told "no you don't talk to strangers they'll hurt you." causes a huge dissonance.
                  Even getting my boyfriend to sympathize sometimes is hard. It'll start with "WOW THOSE FEMINISISTS" and I have to translate it from "raging-mysandry!" into reasonable discussion about why some people dont feel safe, or how something can be seen as rape.
                  I think the proper direction stops with "teach people not to rape" and begins with "why do people rape?" because from there we can assess ourselves as possible victims, asses peers as possible victims OR perpetrators and look into guidance and counseling.
                  For example, lets say I know that most rapists tend to be in the family, and I know I'm very forgiving and kind. Normal people wouldn't take advantage of me, because theyre kind too! But a corrupted person who seeks power? They'd find a way to guilt me into helping them clean the living room. Guilt me into staying at the party late. Tell me "its normal" and prey on me. It's not my fault that I'm forgiving and didn't see this; but with counseling or proper education I'd see the red-flags before I became a victim.
                  And likewise, the rapist realizes he has control issues early on, and checks himself in with a counselor (in a perfect world where mental health isnt a taboo) he could learn coping tools in order to channel his control issues and learn when to step away, or how to stop "conning" others.
                  Nothings a permanent solution, but I think giving people tools to see issues is a big solution to a lot of problems in life.
                  [–]feminudist 0 points1 point2 points  (3 children)
                  So much awesome in this, want to hilight a couple points. (Trigger warning)
                  I think "rape culture" doesn't have to do with what you wear, but rather who you are. Rapists do it (mainly) because they seek control and power. I think rape culture exists in the sense that when a man is raped, he is congratulated. Rape culture exists in a way that doesn't treat both sexes equally (Lena Dunham, anyone?
                  This right here is spot on, imo. It is a sick double-standard, Dunham should get just as much flak as Duggar but instead both get defended by tribe loyalists at the expense of tribe values (the patriarchal cult values aren't being compromised in Duggar's case, but the dad's previously stated belief that molesters should be stoned to death got majorly backpedeled).
                  I know I get tired of "I wanted sex, but then the next day I didnt so I called it rape" strawman-- but some people actually use that as a point.
                  Morning after changing mind is very much a strawman. Consent should not be seen as carte blanche. It is important to respect a partner's boundaries and communicate active consent. Consenting to make out with and use hands does not imply consent to intercourse, and consent to the latter on one occasion does not imply it every time. To the dudes who mock the idea of consent being retracted, I would ask them to imagine if after a man gives a woman consent to suck his dick, she proceeds to stick something big up his ass w/o permission. Lack of respect for his boundaries would make her a rapist, especially if he tells her to stop and she doesn't.
                  The definition of rape has changed a lot. Centuries ago nearly all premarital sex could be considered rape, as it was a property crime against the chastity of a female under her father's ownership, which made her less valuable merchandise for the business transaction known as marriage. Hell, marital rape has only been illegal for a few decades. It's a shame the definition of rape still focuses on being penetrated, as it discounts male victims coerced into penetrating/licking, but the good kind of feminists are campaigning to change this, as it should be all about consent.
                  [–]cloudstryfe -1 points0 points1 point  (1 child)
                  Your retracted consent argument is flawed. If a girl consents to have sex with me,and we fuck with her being enthusiastic the whole time and then the next day she says i raped her how is that fair? That's entirely not the same thing as a girl trying to stick something up my ass when she's sucking my dick. I wouldn't go along with that, i would stop her right away.
                  [–]feminudist [score hidden]  (0 children)
                  Your retracted consent argument is flawed. If a girl consents to have sex with me,and we fuck with her being enthusiastic the whole time and then the next day she says i raped her how is that fair?
                  It's not fair, it is very wrong. I was demonstrating nuance to the situation. A sexual experience should be shared between partners who care about each others pleasure as well as their own. Rape is an exercise of power and control and cruelty. The bj/pegging example was to indicate to guys who lack empathy how it would feel to have the terms of a sexual encounter be changed mid-encounter without warning or consideration.
                  [–]Mr___F 2 points3 points4 points  (11 children)
                  I guess that's a good point. I was just thinking that if we recognize it as a problem we would want to do more to prevent it, which would be a good thing.
                  [–]bZuZu 10 points11 points12 points  (10 children)
                  The problem here is you cannot directly stop rape.
                  You can teach people how to protect themselves (which is what leads to "shes asking for it" mentalities)
                  But you cannot teach people to not rape-- because rapists in the first place aren't normal people. They're missing a part of their humanity in a sense that makes them not normal.
                  There will always be defective people, and the best thing we can do is look into mental health care to treat the symptoms, but never cure.
                  [–]Durbee 14 points15 points16 points  (5 children)
                  Is it possible you're a little wrong about this? Before you downvote me, hear me out.
                  I honestly believe that you CAN teach SOME people how not to rape, but we fail miserably on all fronts in doing so. I also believe that there are some rapists who deliberately seek to rape, and cannot be prevented, deterred or deflected.
                  This might not be a popular position to take, but when I took sex ed, there was zero mention of no means no. There was no talk about avoiding date rape. There was no specific training for the guys on the importance of consent and how to recognize the signs of withdrawn consent - it was the parents' job to educate their boys. Worse was the vacuum teaching young women not to rape or sexually assault - the very reason that a majority of people think women can't be rapists.
                  The truth of the matter is that we CAN teach some people not to rape through quality sex ed, we just don't.
                  [–]janearcade 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
                  There was no specific training for the guys on the importance of consent and how to recognize the signs of withdrawn consent - it was the parents' job to educate their boys.
                  It would be ever better if those topics were taught to both genders, not just boys.
                  [–]bZuZu 2 points3 points4 points  (3 children)
                  I don't downvote, by the way, for disagreeing. Just shitposting.
                  We've tried to teach people not to kill, not to murder, not to steal, not to bully but it still happens.
                  Some people like breaking the rules, no matter how much consequence is behind it. Some people like toeing boundaries just to prove they can (which is another control issue). You could teach someone that "No means no, and by forcing yourself upon the other party you are violating their personal rights." and someone who's truly fucked up will find pleasure in stealing that person's right to make the choice.
                  We can teach people that rape is wrong. We can try to teach people how to emp/sympathize with fellow humans, but some people are literally missing that wiring. They'll take the sex, they'll force themselves knowing its wrong, but justifying it because "it makes me feel good," or "well, that'll show him/her whos in control!"
                  You can teach a normal person not to rape, very much so. You can teach a normal person rules and they'll follow them because its right or because they dont want to be punished. I dont think you need to teach people not to rape-- without a lesson you should know its wrong. ANd if you needed the lesson, then yes we could teach normal people not to rape, but those people weren't likely to be the problem in the first place.
                  But someone who's abnormal? They're a wildcard.
                  Abnormal im reffering to like sociopaths, or psychopaths. People who literally lack empathy.
                  [–]Durbee 2 points3 points4 points  (2 children)
                  You can teach a normal person not to rape, very much so. You can teach a normal person rules and they'll follow them because its right or because they dont want to be punished. I dont think you need to teach people not to rape-- without a lesson you should know its wrong.
                  You're missing the point of education and experience. Absent a lesson, all thoughts and actions are arbitrary. If nobody ever tells you something is right or wrong, you cannot possibly have any frame of reference. To insist we are birthed with inherent morality, that an incubator baby can grow up with values and an intrinsic sense of worth without outside influence (raising, growing up) is patently ridiculous.
                  Stop. Practically every date rape, ever was perpetrated by people who "weren't likely to be a problem in the first place." I find your logic appalling - it's almost always the devil you know that flies under the radar. And yet, here you are.
                  [–]bZuZu 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
                  I don't think you're understanding me at all.
                  When I say someone who's unlikely to commit a crime, I'm talking of the people who truly have empathy. The person who does date rape isn't one of those people simply because he or she commit the crime in the first place.
                  You don't need to teach people not to rape, you'd need to teach them morals.
                  When you make a choice for someone, you are taking away their ability to make that choice.
                  When you don't tell someone the whole story, you take away their agency and ability to adjust or make a decision about that truth.
                  These are simple ideas right? They're not saying "do not rape" yet they can be related to rape. They're also related to food, liars, and other things. They're basic morals which DO get taught.
                  Kids get taught to treat each other with respect, but it doesn't always stick.
                  So when I say there's kinds of people who rape and those who don't, I'm saying exactly that. The date rapist is the kind of person who rapes. He or she missed that chunk of empathy and didn't need to be taught not to rape, but rather to learn empathy and needed tools to learn respect.
                  Not everyone is moral when born, but you'll find a majority of people, when given a chance, will be moral rather than not.
                  [–]Mr___F 3 points4 points5 points  (2 children)
                  the best thing we can do is look into mental health care to treat the symptoms
                  I definitely agree with everything you said, and this line especially. I'm not sure how that contradicts what I said, it sounds like we're in agreement to me! I definitely think that mental health care is an important part of preventing rape.
                  [–]bZuZu -2 points-1 points0 points  (1 child)
                  I discussed this with my mom the other day, and I approached it cautiously like abuse.
                  "It's not the abuse victim's fault they were abused, but at the end of the day, they still need to look back on it and patch up anything left over."
                  And nah, I agree we can agree! It's just hard to tell until someone vocalizes their 100% opinion before you can agree, agreed?
                  [–]Mr___F 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
                  Agreed! Thanks for the good, honest discussion :)
                  [–]aport 21 points22 points23 points  (0 children)
                  Ask RAINN.
                  Rape Culture hysteria is scare mongering that diverts attention away from effective risk reduction measures. All it does is spread useless gender politics so blowhards like the women in this video can act righteously indignant.
                  [–]clock_watcher 17 points18 points19 points  (5 children)
                  Because it's a patently untrue notion that gets banded about by people to re-enforce their ideology of prejudice, by spreading fear about an entire demographic.
                  It does the same harm to society as the people who make the untrue claim all Muslims in your country are trying to enforce sharia law, or that immigrants are taking your benefits and jobs, or that gay marriage will end hetrosexual marriage etc.
                  There is rarely if ever any truth to the politics of fear. It just plays on the emotions and allows people to reaffirm existing views and prejudices.
                  [–]Mr___F -1 points0 points1 point  (4 children)
                  I don't think "rape culture" implies that all men are rapists. I'm a man and not a rapist, and I don't even think that more than a small fraction of men are rapists, but I have known enough women that have been sexually assaulted or raped in college to believe you can be justified in calling this a "rape culture." It's obviously not as bad as many 3rd world countries, as Lauren Southern (?) points out in the original video, but as far as I know "rape culture" can mean a lot of different things.
                  I also didn't realize it was causing such a panic...I hope and think that the intention of the phrase was not to create fear, but awareness.
                  [–]Fullofstrange 5 points6 points7 points  (3 children)
                  I always get nervous throwing this opinion out there, but I feel rape culture is exactly that. It's an alarmist call to arms-especially in the first world countries. There is a strong patriarchy here, and mysogynism, but I don't feel that is on par with Rape Culture. Rape Culture is what it means to be a soldier in some culture in Africa, where raping a woman nonconcentually brings you good luck. Where in some middle eastern countries, raping a woman claims her as unvaluable or yours permanantly. Or in India, where women cannot use the bathroom in redlight areas for fear of being taken advantage of. Rape is celebrated there! I don't know when the last time Rape was actively celebrated on a wide-scale level instead of treated as a scandle or taboo.
                  By applying the phrase Rape Cultue to the sexual harassment common in the West we are damaging the stength that phrase has to those who really need it's power. That is what I'm afraid of.
                  [–]_beekay 3 points4 points5 points  (2 children)
                  I don't know when the last time Rape was actively celebrated on a wide-scale level instead of treated as a scandle or taboo.
                  Rape culture doesn't refer to people going "hooray, rape!" It refers to people ignoring or minimising instances of rape on a cultural level - "that wasn't really rape, she didn't say no!" or "maybe she should have been carrying a weapon if she didn't want it to happen."
                  [–]Fullofstrange 4 points5 points6 points  (1 child)
                  I know that its the case here but there are places in the world where rape is considered a celebrated part of their culture. What do we call that? That was more of my point.
                  [–]_beekay 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
                  There are places where it's extremely commonplace, or socially acceptable, but I haven't heard of places where people throw you a party for your first rape. (Though it could exist, who knows.)
                  Still, you're completely entitled to think that "rape culture" is being used in an annoyingly non-literal way. I just question how much you'd use it in the literal form. If there was a place where it's genuinely celebrated, I wouldn't say it had a "rape culture," I'd say it was an irredeemable hellhole.
                  [–]proudwhitebread 7 points8 points9 points  (0 children)
                  Well the most harmful outcome of such belief is that any man accused of rape is gonna be automatically vilified by these people, seeing as they think women can never lie about it and society is always gonna be on the side of the male. When you believe that rapes are massively underreported and the justice system is biased against women, you're gonna view every rape accusation as a chance to punish the elusive male beast who is obviously guilty. People like that aren't interested in moderation and the pursuit of proof, they often want the word of the woman in itself to be considered evidence.
                  A belief that rape culture exists in the upper-middle class Canadian society, especially in the big liberal cities, is clearly a delusional one, and delusional people have the potential to terribly hurt others in the name of what they consider to be right. I think people need to be forced to snap out of their delusions, not left to marinate within their confines and build up a skewed view of society and its male population.
                  [–][deleted]  (1 child)
                  [deleted]
                    [–]vvomit -2 points-1 points0 points  (0 children)
                    How so?
                    [–]Corpus_Fisti -2 points-1 points0 points  (0 children)
                    Seriously?
                    [–]2blanket comment score below threshold-15 points-14 points-13 points  (1 child)
                    You're telling me that's she's dumb enough to think that her being there that single day, holding up a crude cardboard sign and standing behind the slut walk protestors is going to entirely change the way society thinks about rape culture?
                    I seriously think/hope that isn't the case. Admittedly I've only heard about the slut walk today after this thread but nobody who really intends to influence public opinion about anything would simply hold up a cardboard sign on the street with less that 10 words on it. I'd say she only wanted to make sure the people on the street know that at least one woman does not agree with the slut walk protestors, that they do not speak for her and other women, that they do not represent their entire demographic. That's it.
                    e: I'd really like to know what people disagree with in my post.
                    [–]Alan_Carolla[🍰] 7 points8 points9 points  (0 children)
                    Well that can said about anyone at just about any protest.
                    [–]aport 38 points39 points40 points  (29 children)
                    What is the motivation for a slut walk? What do they want to change? That's all I want to know.
                    [–]thechelator 29 points30 points31 points  (28 children)
                    I think they want to make a statement on the cause of rape. Mainly that a woman shouldn't have to dress a certain way to avoid being assaulted. They want to send a message.
                    [–]aport 62 points63 points64 points  (3 children)
                    Mainly that a woman shouldn't have to dress a certain way to avoid being assaulted
                    You can't avoid assault by changing your outfit. The message should be that the majority of sexual assaults and rapes happen in a safe place, perpetrated by people you know. It has nothing to do with what you were wearing.
                    [–]redkey42 23 points24 points25 points  (0 children)
                    That is exactly the point.
                    [–]ginningmosquitoes [score hidden]  (0 children)
                    I think it stems from the number of people who have used "what was she wearing"?? as a question to follow up rape. There's a strong idea that the less revealing an outfit is, that it somehow means a woman is "asking for it" - slutwalk is making a statement against that.
                    [–]Hill_Reps_For_Jesus comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points  (3 children)
                    i hate this idea. Obviously it is never your fault if get raped, but if dressing a certain way makes you statistically safer then that's just the fact of it. If I'm legally crossing the road and i get hit by a drunk driver it's not my fault, but i still look both ways, even if there's a green light!
                    a woman shouldn't have to dress a certain way to avoid being assaulted
                    No she shouldn't, of course she shouldn't. But the problem here is that rapists exist, which they do, and how the hell is marching going to change that?
                    [–]taimpeng 31 points32 points33 points  (1 child)
                    This is one of the most pervasive misunderstandings regarding rape.
                    Statistically, there's actually an inverse correlation between wearing "slutty" / sexually suggestive clothing and sexual victimization. Sexually suggestive clothing is a display of power, and perpetrators tend to select victims displaying vulnerability, not power. (page 144 / 145: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=djglp)
                    So, for one, the marching can change people's attitude about wearing slutty clothing.
                    [–]RaineyJ [score hidden]  (0 children)
                    I can't recall where I found this info, but apparently opportunistic rapists target victims based on clothing that is easily removed or can be used against the wearer. So looser skirts are easier and quicker to remove than pants, and hair in braids can be used to pull the victim back. So clothing can play into how vulnerable a person seems.
                    That study is quite interesting though, I'll have to save it.
                    [–]Ormild comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points  (0 children)
                    This is the biggest problem I have with the argument about dressing a certain way. Yes, a woman should be able to wear whatever she wants, feel and be safe, but if there's even a slight chance that someone is more inclined to rape her because of what she's wearing, there's no law in the world that is going to stop that guy. Be smart, be safe.
                    A woman shouldn't be blamed if she is raped, but she should always take precautions. Don't get black out drunk unless you're with a really close/trusting friend, don't go through rough neighborhoods, avoid taxis by yourself, etc. We don't live in a perfect world. I don't want to be mugged, so I avoid sketchy areas.
                    [–]NyaaFlame comment score below threshold-21 points-20 points-19 points  (19 children)
                    I think the sentiment is a good one. No one should have to be worried about whether what they're wearing might induce a rape or not. However, it's also one that just isn't feasible. No one should be forced to lock their doors or hide their valuables, because no one should live in fear of theft. That doesn't change the fact that you have to lock your doors.
                    In the same way, you have to be conscientious that what you do and wear might make someone want to rape you. That isn't a rape culture, that's just the difference between a house with a lock and bolt, and a house that doesn't.
                    [–]aport 26 points27 points28 points  (18 children)
                    you have to be conscientious that what you do and wear might make someone want to rape you.
                    This is the dumbest thing I've read all day. Congratulations.
                    [–]skylortrexler comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points  (16 children)
                    So if I walk down the street at night with a two piece suit on and my 24k gold headphones I should expect that not a single person will think I have money and try to rob me? Like it or not, what you wear makes other people think things about you.
                    [–]smashes2ashes 21 points22 points23 points  (9 children)
                    You do realize women in Saudi Arabia are still raped in full burkas right? What I'm wearing has nothing to do with your inability to control your actions as a normal human being in this society.
                    [–][deleted]  (8 children)
                    [deleted]
                      [–]vvomit 14 points15 points16 points  (7 children)
                      Hey, girl who lived in a shitty neighborhood year with an equally fucked up past here (as if it makes my opinion any more right or wrong lol) The motivaton behind raping a woman is raping a woman, plain and simple. If you want to steal money, you look for someone who looks well off, like they have money. If you want to rape a woman, you're going to look for someone who is a woman. It has nothing to do with what they have on, it doesn't lead to lesser or greater provocation for the rapist, it's just that she's a woman and he's a man who wants to rape a woman. It's like saying you're a robber who only robs men in chinos. It doesn't make any fucking sense.
                      [–]BadeStone 0 points1 point2 points  (6 children)
                      Actually what a woman wears does suggest whether she is a good target for rape or not. Just not in the way people think https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200812/marked-mayhem
                      This link is something everyone should read to get an idea of what criminals look for in potential victims.
                      [–]aport 5 points6 points7 points  (5 children)
                      Rape and robbery are not similar crimes and do not share similar motives.
                      [–]BadeStone 2 points3 points4 points  (4 children)
                      I will have to disagree with that. As someone who has worked with victims of crime I can tell you that victims of rape and victims of burglary have the same feelings of being violated a lot of the time. Obviously with rape it is the body being violated but for burglary people usually feel that the one place they could be safe has been tainted.
                      Lots of people have a hard time dealing with this and a simple security upgrade isn't enough to help them get over it. For some the only way to move past it is to move home. So yes the feelings of violation in rape and burglary are often times very similar.
                      [–]aport 7 points8 points9 points  (3 children)
                      I understand what you're saying about the victim's feelings, but I'm talking about the motive of the crime.
                      [–]BadeStone 4 points5 points6 points  (2 children)
                      Aren't both the burglar and the rapist just taking something they want? A lot of the time something they think they are entitled to. A lot of burglars talk about the things they take from their victims as something they didn't deserve. Something they were flaunting. The same way a lot of rapists feel that they have a right their victims body. I think both crimes are similarly motivated just different rewards, if reward is the right word to use.
                      [–]PoopJuiceExtract 35 points36 points37 points  (11 children)
                      Probably the same motivation as counter protesters who show up to Westboro Baptist Protests. On one side of the street there is bigotry and vitriol, and on the other there is reason and acceptance. Or if there's a big rally full of climate change deniers, some counter protests will show up to that too in hopes of being the voice of reason.
                      I would disagree with her though. There is a rape culture in the west. People think men getting raped is funny, that a man who didn't like getting raped must have been gay, female teachers rarely get in trouble for raping boys, and people act like men getting raped in prison is a feature. The media is more likely to say "relationship" than "rape" when the victim is male. The government and its legal definitions don't count males as rape victims either unless it's from another male or a female shoved something in him. A woman could smack a man in the head with a baseball bat, tie him up, and force feed him a handful of viagra, the ride him until she gets bored of his crying, and it won't count as rape. In contrast, nobody is in favor of women getting raped. When a woman rapes, people make excuses, from "you can't rape a boy/man" to "she has mental health issues and needs care not prison". Nobody does that for men who rape.
                      So yeah, there is a culture of endorsing rape and protecting rapists in the west, when the victim is male and the perpetrator is female.
                      [–]Maldron_The_Assasin 9 points10 points11 points  (10 children)
                      Depends on your definition of rape culture and such. Our society does not encourage or abet rape. However, rape does sitll happen. And honestly, what makes rape immune from humor? There's a lot of jokes about murder/killing and much more horrible crimes out there. Anyway it's not really black and white, it has a lot to do with western culture as a whole and societal values.
                      [–]smashes2ashes 11 points12 points13 points  (9 children)
                      Sure our society doesn't encourage rape, but we don't really educate our society on what all rape entails or who is actually the most likely to commit it.
                      Most people who commit rape would never in a million years consider what they do is rape.
                      [–]RedSt_Sonja 6 points7 points8 points  (7 children)
                      Everyone knows the legal definition: Every state in the US has the same legal definition of rape. Penetration through force, threat of force, coercion or incapacitation.
                      Everyone in the US knows this is a crime, and you go to jail for doing this. EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT RAPE ENTAILS. And what it is NOT.
                      There is no other definition of rape that matters. Our police, our courts, our lawyers and prosecutors, our judges and juries all use the legal definition. Our families and our friends, our victims advocates, and our medical professionals all use the legal definition.
                      Never in a million years, can you change the definition of rape to something like 'well I didn't really want to, but I did anyway.'
                      [–]_beekay 15 points16 points17 points  (3 children)
                      EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT RAPE ENTAILS. And what it is NOT.
                      Well, I'd disagree. Case in point, this dude who raped a woman while being totally oblivious to the fact that he was doing it.
                      [–]BabiesTasteLikeBacon 7 points8 points9 points  (1 child)
                      EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT RAPE ENTAILS. And what it is NOT.
                      No, everyone does NOT know what rape entails...
                      [–]Auriela [score hidden]  (0 children)
                      It's called denial, or blatantly lying. They're covering their asses, of course having sex with someone who can't say yes is rape. They just make up excuses and blame the victim even though deep down they can't come to terms that the perpetrators are the only ones at fault.
                      [–]bZuZu 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
                      I'm not saying "Well I didn't really want to, but I did anyway" is a valid argument.
                      THe logic behind that is "penetration through coercion." That becomes "I didn't feel like having sex, but then he convinced me I wanted it by doing x, y, z" for some people.
                      *not all people, just some people
                      [–]TheHatedMilkMachine 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
                      no, most people who commit rape are rapists, and know it.
                      A TINY MINORITY of people who have rationalized what they're doing as consensual sex are actually committing rape.
                      I'm not sure there is a Rape Culture, but there is definitely a Rape Culture Culture.
                      [–]Dee_Jay_Eye 15 points16 points17 points  (7 children)
                      How does women dressing down into their near nude stop rape?
                      How is there a "rape culture?"
                      What was the motivations for them being there? What do they want to change?
                      [–]3radishungry 30 points31 points32 points  (1 child)
                      It's an event trying to spread the message that women aren't "asking for being raped", and that clothes and the way they look, etc. are not something that should promote rape.
                      [–]Auriela [score hidden]  (0 children)
                      I can't help but feel that it is redundant to do this. Only someone who is deranged could honestly think that women "ask" to be raped.
                      [–]lockedge 20 points21 points22 points  (4 children)
                      There's still a perception that what women wear can place fault upon them if they're raped/sexually assaulted. That was literally what the event was created to address, after a high ranking official stated that women were asking for it, dressing a certain way.
                      The fact is, clothing has no real part in the matter, and in the minor bits of evidence it has neared significance, it's not skimpy clothing that rapists look for, it's clothing that's easy to grab hold of (like hoodies), and fast to bypass (like elastic waists on sweats/yoga pants). But even that's just an incredibly minor element of 'stranger rape', which is a minor portion of rapes and sexual assaults. Really, clothes just...don't make a significant difference.
                      Yet, a perception exists, and because of that perception, fault can get passed onto victims, which can affect how such cases are handled by law enforcement officers, the justice system, juries, and society at large. They're targeting a specific form of what much of feminism describes as rape culture, and visibly addressing it (whether it's effective or not, I can't say, but I can say that in the two that I've participated in, I've gained a number of friends, and grown my support network, and I'm sure others have done the same, so it's not really something I'd deem net-neutral or worse. It at least helps build solidarity and community for those who might feel they need it.
                      [–][deleted]  (1 child)
                      [deleted]
                        [–]plummbob 4 points5 points6 points  (0 children)
                        The fact that some idiots think clothing causes rape doesn't, in itself, cause rape.
                        They're responding to those 'some people.' Those 'some people' are an influential part of our culture....... You may be all enlightened to the point where you're some kind of super-aware-meta-meta-meta-feminist, but many are not.
                        [–]proudwhitebread -5 points-4 points-3 points  (0 children)
                        Building solidarity and community around delusions and falsehoods is how cults form.
                        [–]Deceviously -3 points-2 points-1 points  (0 children)
                        So the process has become the need, and the purpose redundant
                        [–]dogflap 22 points23 points24 points  (3 children)
                        I do not expect this post to get much traction here.
                        [–]SmokedMeatsAndFishes [score hidden]  (1 child)
                        Haven't been here long?
                        [–]dogflap [score hidden]  (0 children)
                        Pleasantly surprised.
                        [–]redditthrowaway1995 comment score below threshold-24 points-23 points-22 points  (0 children)
                        Lol.
                        [–]incontempt [score hidden]  (0 children)
                        I find Southern's whole act disingenuous. She didn't just stand there holding a sign. She attended this event as a "journalist" and rolled up on women to ask them how dressing sexy helped their cause. This was a rhetorical question meant only to shame the slutwalk protestors for what they were wearing. If Southern were a man, he'd have probably been arrested for these antics. If Southern were really a journalist, she would be genuinely interested in hearing why women participated in the event instead of trying to embarrass them. She's not a journalist, though. She's just a counterprotestor, a troll.
                        [–]nikography [score hidden]  (0 children)
                        But it kind of was an irrelevant thing to say. It's the most classic go-to troll question re: consent. Obviously people talk about giving and withdrawing consent during the sexual act(s) and not after, so I do not blame this woman for giving a rude answer.
                        [–]xP01TERGIESTx 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
                        Can some one explain what happened why was the sign she was holding up bad
                        [–]SmokeMethInhalesatan [score hidden]  (4 children)
                        You know what i don't understand is the whole "MRA" and "Feminist" Things. We are human beings. Gay, Straight, Man, Woman and everything inbetween. We should be "Humanists", Equal as humans. I'm going to get downvoted for saying this. But I don't like Feminist's, nor do i like "MRA's" because they still aren't equal to everyone.
                        We are Human fucking beings, We should not rape, hurt, discriminated, whatever to eachother. I don't care if your black, or asian, gay or pansexual. I will treat you like a person in the return you treat me the same. We all have opinions but does not mean that you should make fun of me for mine.
                        I'm a Guy, and i get alot of hate for thinking this way from women. Not here to start things but to say I support you all. We are all humans!
                        /rant
                        [–]torpidcerulean [score hidden]  (3 children)
                        You get a lot of hate because you refuse to accept that differing races and sexes create barriers that need to be crossed. The first step in understanding someone else is to acknowledge your differences.
                        [–]Auriela [score hidden]  (0 children)
                        Why do differences matter though? We're really not that different at all from a scientific standpoint. We're all on this relatively small planet, we are all of the same species. We are all able to interbreed and procreate for the most part. We all have DNA, cells and organs.
                        The only differences seems to be where we are born, and our heritage, which is fickle when looking at the grand scheme of the universe and life on Earth. We could all die unexpectedly from a asteroid impact, or some other global catastrophe.
                        Can't we just focus on survival, and being able to thrive? Rather than focusing on our differences, because our differences are only there because we make them to set ourselves apart artificially?
                        All we do is fight among ourselves, when it's completely unnecessary. We create fake conflicts and assume the right to be offended and spread hate because of this.
                        It seems so hard for people to understand how fragile our existence, everyone's existence really is. How any one of us could die at any moment, and how pointless arguing over things that really don't matter.
                        [–]SmokeMethInhalesatan [score hidden]  (0 children)
                        I don't refuse the fact that differing races and sexes create barriers. I totally understand that, but black people doing great things should be recognized for good things they do, Same with any gender or ethnicity. Because your one race doesn't mean what you do is any less. If you do something bad, you deserve the appropriate punishment no freebies either because of your race, gender, etc. Maybe I worded things really bad, I mean we should treat everyone equal i mean, You have a equal shot as anyone else does for a job, etc. if your a woman and more qualified you deserve the job and to be paid accordingly. I don't mean equal as in "communism". I mean equal as in the right to practice your religions openly, and experience your culture without prejudiced. Have the sexual preference as you desire without being judged.
                        If your going to be mean to me, put me down, infringe my rights then yes i wont treat you equal. But were humans, People. we should treat each other as so.
                        I do appreciate your input though. Different perspectives are always welcome
                        [–]eirtep 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
                        3:00 in this video - how is what that woman brings up rape culture? what has that got to do with rape?
                        [–]Sorrowsprite comment score below threshold-15 points-14 points-13 points  (11 children)
                        So can someone explain what she did, cus most feminism stuff boils my blood (Yes I'm a girl, down vote me, I used to live in a country thousands times worse then anything in the west towards feminism and I dare them to protest there) Is this the same girl that said the world belongs to her vagina? was it satire or real? I believe in feminism when it matters, not this anti patriarch bullshit thats shoved in my face like gay rights (I'm gay, sorry i'm not pretentious enough to have to "come out") and another thing that bothers me is the claim that without feminism I would not matter, when in fact i did EVERYTHING ON MY OWN /end rant.
                        Fuck equality, Equity is what we need.
                        [–][deleted]  (9 children)
                        [deleted]
                          [–][deleted]  (8 children)
                          [deleted]
                            [–]GentlyCorrectsIdiots -1 points0 points1 point  (7 children)
                            This is exactly the mix of imperious/hysterical I would expect from a teenage boy who doesn't like being challenged.
                            [–]fegginjagoff [score hidden]  (0 children)
                            Well I checked out the user history and she posts to the subreddit r/actuallesbians so she seems yo be telling the truth.
                            [–][deleted]  (5 children)
                            [deleted]
                              [–]GentlyCorrectsIdiots -3 points-2 points-1 points  (4 children)
                              If you weren't so wrapped up in your own fury at being challenged (in a manner suspiciously similar to that of a teenage boy), a quick peek at my comment history would've showed you that I'm a dude.
                              [–]Sorrowsprite -2 points-1 points0 points  (0 children)
                              Okay? that gives zero validity to anything you say about me being a boy lol. nor do I care about your comment history.
                              [–]_beekay -3 points-2 points-1 points  (1 child)
                              despite the fact that you are totally on the money here, i would note that sorrowsprite has posts in a trans sub, so continuing to call them a boy is probably not as funny as it first seemed
                              [–]GentlyCorrectsIdiots [score hidden]  (0 children)
                              It was more a comment about how her original comment is worded exactly like a clumsy attempt at trolling from a teenage boy. Her actual gender identification is mostly irrelevant; but it's not the kind of nuance that I would expect to get through, so you're right, it's slightly distasteful given the circumstances. Oh well.
                              [–]Mr___F comment score below threshold-29 points-28 points-27 points  (18 children)
                              I guess I should preface by saying I do disagree with her message that there is no rape culture, but it is her right to voice that opinion. So here's my thoughts on the video:
                              She counter-protested an anti-rape protest and she's surprised that there was a backlash? I mean it's not ok that people are saying really hurtful or threatening things to her or lying about what happened, but is she honestly surprised? I thought the whole point was to create a controversy to get her message out.
                              She nails it at the end. "I know it seems like I'm playing to emotions..." Yeah it does really seem like that because now you're acting like you're extremely concerned with Slut Walk's message, when you were just counter-protesting that message!
                              It is a shame that the cameras chose to focus on her rather than the women speaking, but that's not her fault; they could have just ignored her.
                              [–]dogflap 33 points34 points35 points  (3 children)
                              You're saying she shouldn't be surprised that a gang of women terrorised her, dox'd her, slandered her and lied about her because she counter protested....? Does that seem reasonable?
                              [–]RedSt_Sonja 28 points29 points30 points  (2 children)
                              IN other words, she's responsible for being victimized, she asked for it, she shouldn't be surprised.
                              [–]aport 18 points19 points20 points  (0 children)
                              Yeah, did you see what sign she was holding?
                              [–]Mr_Stenhouse 25 points26 points27 points  (0 children)
                              She shouldn't be wearing that message in public!
                              [–]RedSt_Sonja 64 points65 points66 points  (13 children)
                              So....in your words, you think she deserved being victimized? You think she was asking for it?
                              [–]ASneakyFox 36 points37 points38 points  (3 children)
                              i read that post the same way lol.
                              it seems the "asking for it" argument is only off limits when it comes to rape.
                              [–]Mr___F comment score below threshold-19 points-18 points-17 points  (2 children)
                              Ok well apparently it came across way differently than I intended. I meant to make it clear that I don't think she "deserved" it. I did say that "it's not ok that people are saying really hurtful or threatening things to her or lying about what happened." I just meant that I'm surprised that she's "shocked" about people's reactions. Actually now that I re-watch it, the entire video is only talking about people lying about how exactly the events transpired, which...people shouldn't do, but it isn't exactly shocking.
                              [–]condylomamasita 20 points21 points22 points  (0 children)
                              So what you're saying is: you're shouldn't question them. If you question them or challenge them in any kind of way, then you have no right to complain because you should have expect them to bully, harass, assault, threaten, stalk you, etc.
                              This is exactly why moderate men and women alike are afraid to challenge people like this. It's their method of stifling dissent. And what's crazy about it is that it's becoming more and more socially acceptable to become radicalised like this.
                              [–]Ravanas 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
                              "She showed up to the bar wearing a short skirt and a halter top and she's surprised the guys went nuts for it? I mean it's not ok that those dudes were saying really hurtful or threatening things to her or lying about what happened, but is she honestly surprised? I thought the whole point was to get attention."
                              This is what you sounded like.
                              [–]Mr___F comment score below threshold-21 points-20 points-19 points  (7 children)
                              haha ohh clever. No, I said in the 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence:
                              I mean it's not ok that people are saying really hurtful or threatening things to her or lying about what happened,
                              and right at the beginning:
                              but it is her right to voice that opinion
                              I'm just commenting on how she seems surprised about the situation. It's a topic that's obviously going to piss people off, and what do you think people who are pissed off do online? I just thought she'd be prepared for a backlash.
                              [–]HowBoutCondor 21 points22 points23 points  (2 children)
                              I disagree that she seems surprised. Nervous, yes, but not surprised. There is a reason she brought her own cameraman. In many ways I believe she got exactly what she wanted, and then some.
                              [–]Mr___F comment score below threshold-13 points-12 points-11 points  (1 child)
                              Well she did say she was "shocked" (at the beginning) and "astonished" (right after the video of the event).
                              I agree, she probably did want controversy in order to bring attention to her cause. Obviously she didn't want or deserve being lied about or any other harsh thing that people might have said about her or to her.
                              [–]Qapiojg 10 points11 points12 points  (0 children)
                              She was saying she was shocked and astonished in response to them lying about her actions and starting a petition against her. Not about them disagreeing with or becoming heated against her.
                              [–][deleted]  (3 children)
                              [deleted]
                                [–]Mr___F comment score below threshold-13 points-12 points-11 points  (2 children)
                                What? No, I didn't say that at all. I said that she is counter-protesting at a very emotionally-charged event and that is clearly going to make people upset. I'm sure she knew that this would create controversy which would bring attention to her cause. That's the point (or one of the points) of a counter-protest, isn't it?
                                I'm saying that it sucks that people were assholes to her, but it's not surprising at all.
                                [–]lejaylejay[S] 8 points9 points10 points  (1 child)
                                That's the point (or one of the points) of a counter-protest, isn't it?
                                Sure. But it seems she misjudged how low they'd go in their response. I think anyone would find it shocking to have people go after your person like that. Sitting behind your computer screen with 20/20 hindsight, is not really a great way to judge how you'd react in that situation.
                                [–]Mr___F comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points  (0 children)
                                Well I feel like it's common for people to lie about what happened to make themselves sound like the good guys or the other person look like the bad guy. That's what happened here, unless I'm missing something. Again, it sucks that people are lying and trying to destroy her character and they shouldn't be doing that, but it seems to me like this is unfortunately a common occurrence in controversies like this.
                                [–][deleted]  (3 children)
                                [deleted]
                                  [–]mctuking3 [score hidden]  (0 children)
                                  Try not to demonize people just because they disagree with you.
                                  [–]leddit_xDDD [score hidden]  (0 children)
                                  Anything critical of women
                                  IT MUST BE LE MRA'S >:(((((((((((
                                  [–]freebass comment score below threshold-40 points-39 points-38 points  (3 children)
                                  Dude, grow some balls and get over it. Who cares what people say? If it's not true, why let it bother you? Why even bother responding to bullshit claims?
                                  Also...that was some horrid "poetry."
                                  [–]wumbledjords 16 points17 points18 points  (1 child)
                                  Reputation is important.
                                  [–]NyaaFlame 5 points6 points7 points  (0 children)
                                  Especially for a political candidate. A bad reputation can ruin you.
                                  [–]condylomamasita 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
                                  The internet can be a cruel place, and if you don't use the media to let people know that you're being wrongfully attacked, people will believe what the other side (the radical people in the video) says as gospel.
                                  Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy {Genitive}. © 2015 reddit inc. All rights reserved.
                                  REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
                                  π Rendered by PID 18127 on app-186 at 2015-06-13 16:00:41.834761+00:00 running 8856c9b country code: DE.
                                  0%
                                  10%
                                  20%
                                  30%
                                  40%
                                  50%
                                  60%
                                  70%
                                  80%
                                  90%
                                  100%