/
    Skip to main content
    Advertisement

    What do the politically correct brain police have against straight white dudes like Jerry Seinfeld?

    Lindy West
    The vintage observational jokester says killjoys are ruining comedy. But where he sees a threat, I see marginalised voices finally being allowed into the club
    Jerry Seinfeld
    Seinfeld ... ‘They just want to use these words. That’s racist. That’s sexist.’ Photograph: Craig Barritt/Getty Images North America
    Beloved funnyman of yesteryear Jerry Seinfeld (ask your parents!) took to the airwaves this week to offer his hoary wisdom on the state of modern comedy. A plague is upon us, he warns. Harmless jokesters and joy-bringers are literally being figuratively strangled by the long, thin goblin-fingers of “political correctness” (which is a fancy term for “not treating people who are already treated like garbage like garbage”), even though all they were trying to do was just say anything they want to, the way they always have, without ever being questioned or criticised by known killjoys such as “people of colour” and “women”, and with zero regard for the institutionally oppressed groups upon whose backs their industry has been stepping for generations in the service of shallow, straight white dude “catharsis”. Is that so wrong? Jerry Seinfeld, hero, is here to say “yes”; yes, that is so wrong.
    “They just want to use these words,” he explained, weeping probably, but in a brave way. “‘That’s racist. That’s sexist. That’s prejudiced.’ They don’t even know what they’re talking about ... I don’t play colleges, but I hear a lot people tell me: ‘Don’t go near colleges.’ They’re so PC.” Yeah! Take that, words! No PC college phony is going to convince me that words have meanings.
    Why, back in Seinfeld’s time, you could run a sitcom set in New York City for nine entire seasons and only feature 19 black people ever (18 of whom were one-off background characters such as “the waiter” and “the guy who parks cars”) – and if anyone tried to do words at you, you could just pretend they didn’t exist.
    Nowadays, because of Twitter and electric mail, you get the brain gestapo completely up your underpants if you so much as publicly fantasise about making a black media personality your erotic slave. Or if you produce an innocent web series with an almost-entirely white, male cast, only 20 years after you were criticised for doing the exact same thing with your sitcom. The PC police might not know what “racism” is, but Seinfeld does, and it certainly isn’t either of those things. And yet the PC death-grip on comedy is so fierce that Seinfeld has only managed to accrue $820m so far. The horror.
    Advertisement
    This unfairness, as you can see, is bad for fairness; it is bad for the constitution in some way, I’m sure; and it is bad for college students who are probably really clamouring for the vintage observational stylings of Jerry.
    OK, look: our divergent political priorities aside, I actually don’t mind Jerry Seinfeld. I liked Seinfeld the programme. If I was a person who got stoned, I would enjoy watching Bee Movie while stoned (a bee is a lawyer and has implied sex with a human woman!!!). But his past work does not entitle Seinfeld to our eternal adoration or unconditional support. In fact, he isn’t even entitled to be a defining, authoritative voice in 21st-century comedy – particularly when his response to the broadening scope of his art form is one of mistrust, defensiveness and gloomy prognostication. Even the old guard forfeit their clout once they start to reject innovation and challenge. (I’d much rather hear Cameron Esposito’s perspective on the state of comedy in 2015 than, say, the ghost of Buster Keaton’s – the prospect of a talking comedy-ghost notwithstanding – not because he’s irrelevant, but because she is of this moment.)
    What Seinfeld is reacting to is not the shrinking, ossifying death of comedy, as he seems to believe; it is the vibrant, expansive unfurling of comedy, and the multitude of growing pains that come along with it.
    It’s absolutely true that some individuals use political correctness to disguise what is, in reality, a regressive devotion to propriety. There are people who simply have no sense of humour. It’s possible that a small few just relish the takedown but don’t care about the politics. But none of that has anything to do with whether or not it is correct to treat people with dignity and care; to call them by the names they’ve taught you; and to remain open, elastic and humble enough to catch up when you’re behind and apologise when you’re in error. No one is required to do any of these things, but that doesn’t mean they’re not good things to do.
    I used to think it was a given that, at any comedy gig I attended, I’d have to grin through a number of brutal jokes about my gender: about beating us, about raping us, about ranking us, about reducing our already dehumanised existence to a handful of insulting stereotypes. And I went ahead and grinned – because, I thought, that’s just how we joke.
    We must have agreed. Someone must have signed a contract. This is the price if I want to be in the club. (And that’s not even touching on the way female comics are treated offstage.)
    But, of course, there is no contract, and I’ll never fully be allowed in the club no matter how obedient I am. As long as sexism goes unchallenged, I’ll always be “just a girl”. But because I’m a girl, my complaints about sexism are dismissed. It’s a loop. And that devaluation is vastly compounded for people of colour, trans people, gay people, disabled people – anyone who has spent the past few decades as a stock “edgy” punchline.
    It’s so-called political correctness that gave me the courage and the vocabulary to demand better than that from the community I love. Yes, this cultural evolution is bumpy, but what Seinfeld and some other comedians see as a threat, I see as doors being thrown open to more and more voices.
    Video-game critic Leigh Alexander, who is perpetually besieged by male gamers for daring to critique a pastime that is hers as much as theirs, wrote a beautiful meditation on her weariness: “My partner is in games, and his friends, and my guy friends, and they run like founts of tireless enthusiasm and dry humour. I know sometimes my ready temper and my cynicism and the stupid social media rants I can’t always manage to stuff down are tiring for them. I want to tell them: It will never be for me like it is for you. This will only ever be joy, for you.”
    Joy isn’t finite. Share. Just share.

    comments (124)

    Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
    This discussion is closed for comments.
    We’re doing some maintenance right now. You can still read comments, but please come back later to add your own.
    Commenting has been disabled for this account (why?)
    1 2 3 4
    Loading comments… Trouble loading?
    • 0 1
      You're so much better than Seinfeld. He sickens me.
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      Every marginalised group you mentioned has had comics from their demographic for a significant period of time now, and they, as much as the straight white male comic, make jokes about anything and everything, with anything and everything as the punchline.
      Because that's what they are, jokes, whether or not they are meant maliciously you or I don't know, and probably never will.
      Look at someone like Frankie Boyle, if somebody actually found the subjects he jokes about funny; disability, paedophilia, terminal diseases, without the structure and turn of phrase he uses, they would be an awful person clearly. But a cursory glance at a Boyle interview or article on this very website shows him not to be that person, because he is a comedian, and comedians, regardless of their sex, gender, race or sexuality, adopt a persona on stage and make jokes about stuff. Just because they make a joke about a subject that is sore to you and it hurts your feelings doesn't mean they meant it that way, if you laugh along at the rest of their set mocking things but then get hurt by the subject close to you, you're an ignorant hypocrite desperate to whine about anything.
      Cancer has plagued my family. My best friend committed suicide. Neither of those facts on their own are funny. But I love a good cancer or suicide joke, come to think of it, I love a good joke about anything.
      If you really think a professional male comedian hates women because he has a joke about women, or a female comedian hates black people because she makes a joke about them, or an asian comedian hates gay people because they have a joke about them, maybe you should not watch or attend stand up shows, because the best stand up is often taboo, completely inappropriate and takes some actual nuanced thought to realise that it is actually caring and inclusive to everything that it mocks.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      In comedy, there is a line that shouldn't be crossed and that line is between "funny" and "not funny".
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      “They just want to use these words,” he explained, weeping probably, but in a brave way. “‘That’s racist. That’s sexist. That’s prejudiced.’ They don’t even know what they’re talking about ... I don’t play colleges, but I hear a lot people tell me: ‘Don’t go near colleges.’ They’re so PC.” Yeah! Take that, words! No PC college phony is going to convince me that words have meanings.
      You are deliberately misquoting the guy!
      1) the 'That's racist. That's sexist. That's prejudiced.' They don't even know what they're talking about' was a reference to his daughter (and kids her age, 14,) looking to be offended, or act as if they are (not the PC brigade) . 2) the ellipsis you have there is clearly indicating that what the men said is following from one thought to the other whilst in fact the latter part of the quote occurs not only prior to the former, they aren't logically connected.
      You link the article right there!!! There is even an audio if you don't want to read it + what Seinfeld says is a bit of nonsense, sure, but it isn't at all fairly represented in your article.
      I don't even enjoy the guy, and agree with the point about comedy needing to be inclusive....
      Facts are .... ? a) inconvenient. b) optional. c) irrelevant to Guardian US. d) [insert whatever you wish]
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      What an absolute pig's ear of an article
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      I like to separate out these things into two categories, political correctness and not being a dick. I make no bones about tasteless jokes, if they're funny. Sometimes you'll be the butt of them, sometimes I will be. You have no right to not be offended, you know.
      And so there's the matter of not being a dick. It isn't difficult, I would've thought, to accept a basic level of human decency is a good thing for society. Seeing someone shout abuse across the street to someone, whether because of race, sex or creed, is surely something none of us want for our country?
      I think it's safe to say British people by and large don't want to see others hounded and lynched. Unfortunately, extremists on both "sides" are now leading witch hunts against each other.
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      This is so Guardian. In a rubbish way.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      So you never saw the episodes that directly alluded to their separate bubble? You are unaware of the co creator further mining that vein in Curb? Possibly far more significant are his comments about colleges. Search out the many academics who are living in fear from causing offence against the 'feelings' of students. Finally, when certain cultures demand segregation of genders at college meetings, is it politically correct to enable them, or politically incorrect to be sexist?
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      Anyone see that thing with Gervais, Rock, Seinfeld and a couple of others in it? Would have been funnier and more honest if they had just had an orgy right there.
      Oh, and you can't fight bigotry with super serious self-righteousness, they;re two sides of the same coin, or weird passive-aggressiveness , this article, you have to fight it with irreverence, humour, comedy.
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      I refuse to be told what is funny, and what isn't.
      This makes me an individual.
      If that makes me a target for these PC bellends, so be it.
      I believe I'm moderate and conscientious enough to know where I stand, and the idea of these idiots increasingly policing the world is ridiculous.
      Comedy will always have victims, laughing at myself, as I frequently do and others have, is one of the greatest gifts I have.
      All this columnist has done is make me laugh at their ridiculous worldview, and subsequently feel sad for her, even pity. If that was her intention, well done.
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      Seinfeld was a comedy about a group of mainly Jewish people. Why would it feature a plethora of black people. The Cosby show and fresh prince of be air was about black families.
      I have no black or Jewish friends so a comedy I would write would be most certainly all about white people .
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      I'm mixed race, and the phrase "people of colour" is cringeworthy. Please give it up.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      Seinfeld was offensive to people living in bubbles, which aptly describes all the PC warriors.
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      Why would a comedian play to a room of people who spend every minute of their waking lives looking for ways to be offended? These people are completely antithetical to everything comedy is and should be about.
      Reply |
    • 10 11
      I've read some whiny crap articles in my time but this one was right up there. It's very rare I actually give up halfway through a book or article but this was one such time. The standard of writing was also woeful.
      Reply |
    • 3 4
      Jerry Seinfeld is funny, at times very funny. This piece is not. Maybe in the future we should laugh when we see people who are not funny? I suppose that is comedy in its own right.
      Reply |
    • 7 8
      The worst article ive read in the guardian for a long time.
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      I'm very much in favour of political correctness. It has done far more good than bad. However articles like this do political correctness a disservice.
      Within the article is the grain of a good point. It's a shame that it was lost amidst the angry diatribe.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      Jackie Chiles is the greatest black character in TV history.
      Reply |
    • This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.
    • This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.
    • 1 2
      Seinfeld was pretty white but The Wire was pretty black.
      It all balances out in the end.
      Reply |
    • 9 10
      author is playing a misleading game here - speech quotation marks for not only direct quotes but also, and in the same paragraph, "people of colour" and "women", words Seinfeld didn't use. Seems the author might be imagining words and trying to give the impression that he said things he simply didn't say.
      Reply |
    • 16 17
      This sneering article just goes to prove jerry's point 100%
      Reply |
    1 2 3 4
    SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
    SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
    desktop
    0%
    10%
    20%
    30%
    40%
    50%
    60%
    70%
    80%
    90%
    100%