Sure, here you go.

Start by familiarizing yourself with a basic version of the Flat Earth model, it should answer many of the questions you'll no doubt have due to your government programming. If you're a reader, literature from over a century ago is still very relevant as independently reproducible proof of non-curvature. If you prefer to watch something, you can start with a feature-length documentary that will prime you on the subject, and there are many more that you can discover. If you're the hands-on type, all amateur attempts to reach as high an altitude as possible show a flat horizon at heights NASA material shows curvature. In short, Flat Earth is flat.

Need more evidence? Lighthouses can be seen at distances that should be occluded by curvature, if it existed. Railroads span hundreds and even thousands of miles without taking into account any curvature. Sailors navigate by plane sailing, mathematically assuming a Flat Earth to compute their heading. Again, the truth of Flat Earth is easily reproducible by anyone who has the courage to take it seriously.

I'd love to explore Antarctica and what's beyond, but the combined militaries of the world will stop you. In a century of constant warfare, it's the only thing they can agree on. That's as far as our current observations and explorations have taken us. NASA was created to continue the spherical Lie and everything they put out is a hoax, starting with Operation Paperclip's Dr. Werner Von Braun's phallus rocket fetish. The higher in altitude you climb, the lower the density of the air and the less effective rocket propulsion becomes. NASA has not gone to low-earth orbit or any higher because rocketry does not work in a vacuum.

Here you can view many useful datasets on different map projections, comparing them on a spherical (orthographical projection) and flat (azimuthal equidistant projection) model. Here is someone showing you some examples of how the data fits a flat model more cleanly.