663
664

....... Inside Job. (i.imgur.com)

Sword_monk が 投稿

全 85 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]hack_jealousy 62ポイント63ポイント  (37子コメント)

Fucking awesome.

[–]FutzBucket 21ポイント22ポイント  (5子コメント)

Hell yeah.

[–]smokinbluebear 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

someone please send him a link to the side bar

(message needs to SPREAD)

[–]funknut 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm confused. Is this a link from the sidebar or to the sidebar?

[–]gigabored 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Did you click it? It's obviously an imgur link.

[–]funknut [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I clicked it. I like it. It wasn't the link that confused me, it was the "sidebar" remark, since I don't have any sidebar on this mobile app. I assumed they meant it was the link from the sidebar, rather than to the sidebar, as they had worded it, which turned out to be the case after they replied and explained so. Taking the comment literally, I expected the link to display the sidebar, not the image from the sidebar.

[–]smokinbluebear [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

it's the original link to the image--which is on the sidebar.

WISH THESE WERE STICKERS!!!

[–]George_Tenet 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

theres archetitichts n engineers for 9/11truth... any fireman?

[–]George_Tenet 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

theres archetitichts n engineers for 9/11truth... any fireman?

[–]bernstien -1ポイント0ポイント  (28子コメント)

Can someone please explain why so many people are convinced it was an inside job?

[–]superchibisan2 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

The big tip off is that our entire defensive air force was unable to respond. Also, missile defense systems were not employed as a back up.

[–]lMayback 9ポイント10ポイント  (17子コメント)

Without writing a novel- too many things didn't add up, and too many things that added up shouldn't have.

[–]bernstien -3ポイント-2ポイント  (16子コメント)

Yeah, I get gist of it. But is there any solid evidence to the whole thing?

[–]sayswhat [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

http://youtu.be/Zv7BImVvEyk

WTC 7 was without a doubt a controlled demolition. Believe your eyes, don't let them fool you with their ridiculous theory that an office fire did it.

[–]jonnyredshorts [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

The presence in the debris of nano-thermite.

[–]Portinski [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How about the fact that at the WTC complex, the planes were able to fully penetrate the outer steel structure of both towers, from wingtip to wingtip, also somehow destroying reinforced concrete flooring, but somehow at the pentagon, on the sides of the hole, windows were still intact where the wings should have hit.

Also, the angle of the hole at the pentagon states through trajectory analysis, that the wing should have hit the side of the building first, causing all sorts of mayhem. That's of course IF it was actually a plane that hit.

[–]imjongilling [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

'jet fuel can't melt steel beams': Basically this references a conclusion reached by architects, engineers, etc that the tower that was impacted by the plane shouldn't have been affected structurally to the point of total collapse, as jet fuel does not burn at a high enough temperature to melt steel beams.

Highly recommend you watch the documentary "Loose Change 9/11". Then read the snopes.com article regarding the aforementioned documentary and decide for yourself.

[–]bernstien [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Thanks. I'll look it up.

[–]Alcorr [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Don't watch loose change, it's a terrible documentary full of holes. The above poster "imjonillling" is obviously sending you the wrong direction telling you to read snopes (a known disinfo site) to "decide for yourself".

A much better documentary to watch would be "9/11 a new pearl harbor".

[–]ashenblade [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

You should also be warned that Loose Change is a huge steaming pile of shit

[–]IanPhlegming [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

No no no on "Loose Change." There's some good stuff there, but a lot of bad or deliberately wrong info, I don't know.

The two best films I know of are "9/11: A New Pearl Harbor," which is amazing but also over 5 hours long.

A good intro that nails a bunch of low-hanging fruit about why 9/11 was an inside job is "Anatomy of a Great Deception." I like this film because it's made by a reasonably minded Christian guy who never ever imagined that he'd get where he is. He made the movie almost to keep himself sane, and to convince his wife. It's only 90 minutes and it's much more of a personal journey intertwined with the facts.

But really, once you start digging into 9/11 it becomes pretty obvious that this was a false flag involving several nations to plot, pull off and then cover up.

More and more people are realizing it, too. That's why you're seeing the ramping up of the police state and surveillance. The sheeple are turning.

[–]bernstien [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Two people have suggested "new pearl harbor" but I have no idea when I'll get the time to watch it. Probably going to steer clear of loose change.

[–]IanPhlegming [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Here's "Anatomy of a Great Deception" on YouTube, then. Interesting to note it's been sitting on that 345K hits for quite some time now. I'm not buying it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3q8zYRypoY

[–]Alcorr [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

'jet fuel can't melt steel beams': Basically this references a conclusion reached by architects, engineers, etc that the tower that was impacted by the plane shouldn't have been affected structurally to the point of total collapse, as jet fuel does not burn at a high enough temperature to melt steel beams.

Terrible point. The argument made by those that support the government story is that it doesn't have to burn hot enough to melt, just weaken the structure. The actual solid evidence for it being an inside job is more around building 7, NIST refusing to release their scientific models of the collapse, evidence of thermitic material, problems with the planes (pilots for 9/11 truth is a good resource), government running drills on the same day, cheney giving a stand down order, confiscation of pentagon tapes 75+, refusal to release documents etc. etc. etc.

[–]PtTmAnalrapist [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I'll wait with ya while the evidence is compiled...

[–]sircatherine [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'll save you some time. Go to youtube. Look up controlled demolitions of buildings, then rewatch the towers fall. Simply the elegant completion of the disaster was too tidy. Controlled amount of casualties with minimal dmg to the city around it. Also The reported temperatures on sight after are just ridiculous.

[–]Somewhiteguy13 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

Jet fuel can't melt steel beans

[–]Don117 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

And buildings dont fall because of sympathy! (WTC7)

[–]Somewhiteguy13 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Honestly, I come to these conspiracy pages when I think life is going well, just to scare the shit out of myself

[–]Alcorr [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is a poor argument as the government sympathizers argue it doesn't have to, it just needs to weaken the beams.

[–]BigTinz [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Delicious

[–]catsmeowwrx [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

For the same reason Sandy Hook didn't happen. No fucking evidence or anything that added up.

[–]thinksoftchildren [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The jet fuel thing has been explained by steel losing most of its structural strength at high temperatures (at 1500 F, steel loses 50% of its strength iirc)

Why I'm still out with the jury on this topic: WTC7 collapse (check out controlled demolition on YouTube and compare)
the Pennsylvania crash. See how there's absolutely NO debris from an airliner?
Pentagon: again, not nearly enough debris when you compare it to the countless other airline disasters we've seen the last 40 years

Other interesting tidbits on this is that UBL only admitted to planning and executing the attacks 3 years after (2004 UBL video, Al Jazeera has transcripts), and shortly after the war in Afghanistan started the Taliban agreed to hand him over to a third party(or have him tried in Afghanistan), if the US publicised evidence of UBLs guilt. They didn't and never have... Most of the crucial/damning evidence in the 9/11 report is redacted

E: some other fun stuff

"is this real world or exercise?"
The July bombings in London had a civil exercise happening at that exact time when the bombing happened, covering the exact thing.
Same thing with NORAD on 9/11, they were in the middle of an exercise simulating airliners being high jacked at the time of the attacks.

"We're gonna need a new pearl harbour".. PNAC.

[–]A_Fabulous_Gay_Deer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This video sums up most of the major arguments in layman's terms.

[–]punchpunchkick 27ポイント28ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sanguinem Nostrum Est In Manibus Tuis Is Latin. It means our blood is on your hands.

[–]AllThingsWillEnd 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well.. Now I kind of want an Ama

[–]zeropoint357 25ポイント26ポイント  (0子コメント)

"We know". Perfect.

[–]truthwilgetushiled 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

I've been a fireman since 1993 and class one construction(the twin towers) has never before or since melted structural steel and collapsed a building at free fall speed(for you non-physics types). I'd where the same fucking patch if I rode with them.

[–]HarryMaxNz [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The aluminium in the planes melted, steel just lost a fraction of it's tensile strength from the heat

[–]cjackc [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well it is a good thing the WTC didn't fall at free fall speed then.

[–]pimpythrowaray 19ポイント20ポイント  (2子コメント)

wow

[–]spawnmower 22ポイント23ポイント  (1子コメント)

How's the jacket fit... With those Balls

[–]ETNxMARU 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Looks pretty snug to me.

[–]gorthiv 16ポイント17ポイント  (2子コメント)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BktnqkVCEAA0e1k.jpg

[–]lt_andy 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, but wasn't this because since the original trade center bombing it became necessary for all buildings in New York to purchase 'terrorist' insurance, just in case?

[–]Willusions 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Considering there was a terrorist attack on the WTC just years before...there was definitely reason to take out a policy which "fortuitously" covered terrorism.

[–]Noir_Seraphim 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice cut! We the people will never forget!

[–]infinity_QE 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

343, the number of firefighters that died on 9/11.

[–]Somewhiteguy13 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

Also the number of the guilty spark from halo.

[–]amnioticentity [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

343 dead fire fighters

Halo, guilty spark, 343 industries.

Just...wow. I wonder what else bungie tried to tell us.

[–]Crackerjakx [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Space aliens are evil and like the color purple

[–]sixteentweleveseven 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

A link to an irrelevant Wikipedia page?

[–]Fart_McFart_Fart 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is the bee's fucking knees. I wanna hear some stories from these dudes.

[–]OswaldWasAFag 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Holy shit.

[–]mymerrysacs 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Inside job mob?

[–]Sal_77 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Saw one of those in Canada, then it hit me.

[–]HaltNWO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Someone should cross post this to r/cringe.

[–]canihaveahint -2ポイント-1ポイント  (6子コメント)

Looks kinda funny... shopped?

edit: either that or it's brand new... i think it looks funny...

Edit 2: sooooo.... If it's a motorcycle gang for 911 responders they'll be really really good at spotting undercover cops hopefully...

[–]nopooq 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

Seems like they are a motorcycle group

https://twitter.com/ghostsof911

[–]Bazookabro141 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If anybody finds out more lmk. I want to contact to set up a charter! Twitter blows

[–]StoicSophist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the contrast has been adjusted, making some of the white areas look off.

[–]shadeobrady 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't see any evidence of it being shopped - that looks pretty real. Freaking awesome.

[–]ChrisPwaffle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Let's all not forget that the Rockefeller's helped fund the creation of the WTC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_family CTRL-F "World Trade Center"

I'm sure losing three buildings worth a few billion dollars doesn't hurt them that much.