I agree with the spirit of your message. An excessive focus on the character of other people, on how they live their lives... is typically unjustified --- unproductive, in the sense that spinning a reactionary narrative about these evil, evil people and all the evil things they do, typically makes you less capable of seeing the truth with any degree of accuracy.

However. At its core, judgement is really just making calculations regarding alternative actions and their consequences. It can be perfectly reasonable to say that someone is living their life wrong. People aren't even close to being perfectly competent. One could make the claim that someone is failing to maximize their expected value (according to the values they likely possess), that their actions are selecting for less satisfactory consequences or actively resulting in the loss of value. Selections that would not occur if they were smarter. One could also claim that, since one's inherent values can be prioritized, de-prioritized, can be changed, if not fully, then to an extent --- that the values someone is focusing on are the wrong values to focus on.

So, who, with all certainty, can say one ought not be a slut?

I will say it: in an era where you have a shot at actual immortality (not just passing on your genes or being remembered), in an era where digital media holds such focused, concentrated value, lacking the wasteful and at times risky nature of physical interaction --- it is wrong to build your life around physical interaction with other people. The only possible reason you would do so, to make it your prime focus, is because your mind still values community, tribal existence, above everything else --- because of your savage instincts. It is a prioritization that is unjustified, i.e. results in a worse life, a life of lower value, than if you were to de-prioritize that focus.

The chains of your biology that would make you miserable for discarding that focus... those chains can be made rid of as well, broken bit by bit, especially if you expect to see them crumble before you. I suspect much of our slavery to our instincts is a matter of perception: a default assumption that it cannot be overcome, that you cannot actually modify your mind to such an extent, so you do not make a true effort to do so. In the end, getting rid of my thirst for women was not particularly hard, once I actually resolved to do so, once I became aware that it was an option. It might well be harder for women to overcome such programming, but... they could do it --- I am sure some few already have. Those are the women who are living their life the right way. At the very least, close enough that it could not, should not be called wrong.

The only justifiable focus in your life is this: maximizing value. There are two foci that are subsets of this focus: maximizing your lifespan, and striving for a better mind. Tribal interaction --- sex, socializing, typically does not follow from these foci. Communication might. The greatest value of the internet is that it allows us to communicate without the physical waste of eye contact, body language, and other tribal paradigms which are primarily focused on hierarchy: signaling what you think of another, and which role you are playing.

One might value having sex --- but, your mind doesn't work on such hard, magical abstractions. It's not a matter of if(Sex) = Value, if(noSex) = noValue, it just means that you value some of the specific things happening in your mind as you have sex, things that can be better ticked off by watching porn. Sex is typically not justified if you make an actual calculation involving financial risk, health risk, time and effort, expected total value, and so on. So while there is value in sex --- having sex is typically a net negative calculation. It is wrong to focus on sex: it leads to a worse future than if you didn't, if you had more sensible foci. Your unjustified bias towards having sex is so strong that you would be better off committing to a life of celibacy. It would lead to a better life, a better you, if you knew how to proceed from there, instead of crumbling under your expectations that a lonely life must be miserable. If you knew how to maximize for value without relying upon your biological instincts. Doing it yourself is harder since, well, it requires thinking --- but it leads to better results. Evolution is a very sub-optimal process, you can do far better work in optimizing your life through actual thought than you can through reliance upon instinct.

Don't go against nature. Embrace the phenomena of truth.

The closer you are to your nature, the more you are a savage. Here's a very simple graph:

|--A--B--------------------------------------C|

A represents the sentience of say... dogs. B represents the sentience of humans. C represents optimal sentient existence, a hypothetical ultra-rational, ultra-sentient existent. Everything between B and C is something that requires us to deny our nature, to overcome our biology, to be less human. Being more human, more accepting of our nature... basically means being further away from C than if we specifically rebelled against our nature.

Let's say you were transported back in time by a million years. Would you be able to shape the earth into a machine body, and then transfer your mind into it as data, so that you could continue existing until the present day? This is not impossible, it does not violate the laws of physics --- it is something that a hyper-intelligent actor should be capable of doing. Even in a primitive environment, I doubt it would take such an actor more than a few decades to achieve it.

That's the point we need to reach, the level of mental strength that is required for survival, let alone something harder such as "embracing the truth", to know with full 100% accuracy what the world is. Part of that path is passing judgement, denying everything that is wrong --- in part, in order to not be chained by it, to not have your mind permanently bound by a false narrative. But! But also, because the very action of understanding why something is wrong, is conductive to figuring out what the right way of living your life might look like --- a necessary step for shaping a better mind. Intelligence is the ultimate method of actually exerting control over reality --- anything that increases your understanding of anything at all, is typically beneficial, even when it is not immediately obvious how it would benefit you. There is value in understanding why the life of a slut is wrong --- or its equivalent, why the life of an alpha male is not the kind of life you should want to live. That, however, is where it's supposed to end. Any focus on the lives of these people, beyond understanding why they live their lives in such a way --- is unjustified. A waste of time and attention.