Oh good, you're here. You must think the Articles of Confederation were a great idea, right? With no central regulation on currency, or services like inter-state mail, America was constantly on the verge of complete economic collapse. Then let's look at the railroads, banks, and private local transit that by the 1900's were creating huge monopolies like you seem to want. These monopolies actually rose prices on the consumer! THEY DIDN'T STAY WITH THE COMMONLY ACCEPTED PRICES! They kept getting more and more money so they could drive out competition so they could make more money and extort the private individual. The "Beef Trust" was a group of the top six beef producers in the U.S. They went on to fix prices of beef at insanely high prices; defrauding and extorting the consumer, who was powerless to do anything about it.

So the United States Government had to gasp regulate the market. The entire point of government regulation is to increase competition! Over time private corporations will solidify power into a small number of hands and start defrauding their consumer base: when only one person is supplying your food you can't just "go to their competitor." (Before you even try to bring that idea up.) Competition is what drives a capitalistic economy; when that competition is no where to be seen the economy will stagnate or crash. When no other private enterprise can actively compete the government has to step in. The reason a pound of beef isn't thirty dollars in the U.S. is because of that government intervention.

The regulation of Net Neutrality isn't to "determine what the consumer wants" it's to prevent another monopoly. It's a pre-emptive measure so the government won't have to intervene like it did in the early 20^th century.