あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]TheFlyingBastard 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Why's it hurt to not fight on our own?

Because those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.

Of course we need our allies. I am not saying we should exclude non-gamers, on the contrary! What I'm saying is that we've been doing so much for gaming already. We've been calling bullshit for a year now, mostly on SJWs. Why narrow the narrative from "against corruption in (gaming) journalism" to "against SJWs"?

Both can be true at the same time - after all, one is part of the other.

[–]LowbackReckoned for his wisdom and lore[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

That's broadening it. Gaming is a small corner of the world, and very first world. If we had to pick one, fighting SJW unethical behavior would not only allow us to protect gaming, but tabletop games, comics, music, movies, universities, lawmaking, policing, enforcement, etc.

I just really fail to see how that narrows our scope. Edit: and at least we believe in disclaimers =D

[–]TheFlyingBastard 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

I say that because not all unethical shit in gaming is pulled by SJWs. EA is a notorious rulebreaker, for example. Should we just let them off the hook? When we battle both publishers and SJWs, we also fight for others (as you mention).

It's like this Venn diagram which has games, literature, etc. all overlapping. In the middle are the very virulent SJWs. In the rest of our circle are game publishers. In the rest of the literature circle is... idk... Apple and its consorts trying to artificially drive up prices of books. (I don't know if that's what they're fighting against, but it caused a stir a while ago, so let's roll with that for the sake of argument.)

By the way, I find this to be a very pleasant discussion. I'm mildly surprised with all the anger and chaos reigning here at the moment. :)

[–]LowbackReckoned for his wisdom and lore[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think we could afford to do ethics, Sjwing, and maybe even hail-corporate type issues. That would include EA then. We've got plenty of room for issues to tackle, I don't think it's too large for us.