66
67

META[Meta]Mods addressing community concerns seriously (self.KotakuInAction)

Nonsensei が 投稿

I don't post very often, but here are some thoughts on the new moderation policy and its response by the mods/community.

Not going to name names, but I've seen a lot of mods in KiA write off community concerns with a patronizing tone. This does two things. First, it makes people resent you, even if you have legitimate concerns. By being patronizing instead of addressing the points straight on, people won't listen to you, even if what you're saying is completely valid. Second, it actually limits your ability to self-reflect. By adopting a patronizing tone, you're telling yourself the person you're talking to isn't worth hearing. This means if you ARE in the wrong, you won't be able to see it yourself.

What we need is a kind of AMA where the mods field the questions posed by the community asking why SJW stuff is getting curtailed. In this, mods should be expected to give complete answers instead of the patronizing comments they've been putting in the sticky. We should also debate the merits of such a policy and maybe even put it to a vote (to supplant the three other votes we've had on this topic).

If the mods refuse to engage the community, then the community should think about how this reflects on the mods' character.

上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 241
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]videogameboss 37ポイント38ポイント  (3子コメント)

a major cause of dissatisfaction towards the gaming press before gamergate was polygon's review of gone home, which received a positive score purely for ideological reasons. although at its core, gamergate is more a struggle for ethics instead of against SJWs, gamergate has to understand who is opposing them if they want to achieve their goals. to censor such integral information is to throw sand in the eyes of gamergate. "It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle."

[–]RevRound 25ポイント26ポイント  (1子コメント)

Along with Polygons reviews of Witcher 3, Bayonetta 2, Tropico 5, and Dragons Crown all got points docked and paragraphs spent on SJW non-issues. Yet a broken and underwhelming Sim City 2013 got a 9.5 while staff were vehemently defending EA talking points. Good thing the game must have had enough PoC pixels to make them perfectly happy.

The people who think that ethics and obsessive identity politics dogma have nothing to do with each other is either naive, in denial, or are trying to sabotage what has been fueling GG for the last 9 months.

[–]non_consensual 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

It also limits us from branching out and picking up supporters and allies in other areas.

We've only grown to where we are by not limiting ourselves.

[–]sexy_mofo 30ポイント31ポイント  (5子コメント)

"Social Justice" folk need to be discussed. We already know what happens when they run rampant on the internet, completely unchecked. It would be one thing if "SJW" types were no longer an ongoing threat and we were all just beating a dead horse, but this simply isn't the case. Apparently the mods of KiA still think there is some positive merit to be found in these people in particular? Why? When have they ever shown that:

  • anything that they do is constructive/productive?

  • they wouldn't simply take the inch given to them and turn it into miles and miles of bullshit "criticisms" and thinly veiled calls for censorship?

  • that they'd be willing to give the same level of leeway to people they disagree with?

This is one of the few places on the internet where enough eyes are looking at these folk and scrutinizing their behavior... and the mods want to shut that down/phase it out because...why exactly? What ever came out of the SJW movement that was ever truly positive and lasting? Besides cirlcejerk outrage and professional victimhood?

And, it is not as if you can just say "well we have TiA for that." The front line of this fight has been video games, not Tumblr. Most of us don't want to try and post video game related stuff on TiA, only to be told "well lol no because this isn't the sub for that."

[–]flybypost 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

We already know what happens when they run rampant on the internet, completely unchecked.

What exactly happens? I have no affinity for GG and an explanation would be interesting.

[–]sexy_mofo 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you have Twitter, take a gander at the #killallmen hashtag for one fine example.

I should also clarify: When I say "social justice" folk, I am referring to the myriads of people who use "social justice" as means to their own selfish ends, kind of like how people tooled out "religious righteousness" throughout history.

[–]BoltbeamStarmie 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

What ever came out of the SJW movement that was ever truly positive and lasting? Besides cirlcejerk outrage and professional victimhood?

Are you implying that those are positive?

[–]sexy_mofo 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're right, that was poorly worded.

[–]themanclawNoMcIntosh [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Apparently the mods of KiA still think there is some positive merit to be found in these people in particular?

I don't get that impression. I get the impression that they want KiA to be about GG rather than a podium for people to push their personal political agendas.

[–]HatredsBlazingGun 40ポイント41ポイント  (39子コメント)

I won't cry if Twitter dramas, showerthoughts, and the severely off-topic SJW shit disappears. I worry about the "slippery slope" though, and one or two mods making this sub to be all about what they want.

Hint mods, if your comments are getting downvoted off the page, people probably don't like what you're saying.

[–]laughsatsjws 36ポイント37ポイント  (0子コメント)

Being told our conversations were "off topic" and having them deleted is what created KiA.

If it happens here, it's what will kill KiA.

[–]Rokakku 47ポイント48ポイント  (9子コメント)

I don't think the mods care what we think at this point.

[–]XenoKriss 19ポイント20ポイント  (1子コメント)

So basically, Hat values the opinion of John Flynt more than that of the KiA community: https://archive.is/6xF45

[–]TheTaoOfOne [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You mean he had a decent conversation about a bunch of people throwing a tantrum over a proposed rule change.

[–]BasediCloud 26ポイント27ポイント  (4子コメント)

Sometimes I wonder if KiA is even worth saving. ~Hat2

For the greater good I will sacrifice myself and become the savior KiA needs but doesn't want right now.

[–]javiercorre 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

Save from what?

[–]FSMhelpusall 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hat, please get out. You're a curse on GamerGate at this point.

[–]dismalinterest 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Here's an unpopular opinion even the most off topic posts are more valuable to GG than the never ending slew of "lol I drawed Vivian James" threads.

If we're so concerned about image how about the image that having a cartoon character as a mascot gives us?

Whatever though the public loves it's bread and circuses.

Edit: ?

[–]lordthat100188 32ポイント33ポイント  (8子コメント)

The only vote we need is a vote as to whether KiA has any more trust or confidence in its mod team. They seem to have forgotten they arw janitors and nothing more. Its time we showed them that they are.

[–]GG_MeowIt's about meowthics 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm going to say that I think the SJW stuff should stay, but I agree stuff that is really entirely unrelated is just clogging up the sub, when it could be posted elsewhere. Everyone (not just the mods) must decide where that line is drawn.

Also; I'd be very careful about calls to axe the mods; this happens on Reddit by people who want to take over the sub. Not saying mods are infallible, but be wary of campaigns to kick them, and be wary about who steps up to offer to take the job.

I've seen this on /r/conspiracy where people from outside the sub are constantly attacking the mods, and constantly making accounts stirring up shit against them. It's also how SRS gain control of subs, after a request is made to take over the sub, after the mods leave.

[–]throwawaypuay 16ポイント17ポイント  (3子コメント)

The cabal has infiltrated KIA. Pure and simple.

Now is the time for us to find a new home.

[–]CaesarCzech 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Dark Eldar cabal ? i will need two bolters.

[–]Error774 -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

For the Emperor!

[–]EliteFourScott [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Really don't see why the community can't police itself with downvotes. The mods are trying to dictate discourse and that's not what their role should be, in my opinion. Let us decide for ourselves what's relevant to Gamergate.

[–]feroslav -2ポイント-1ポイント  (12子コメント)

why SJW stuff is getting curtailed

Here is the problem, nothing is getting curtailed. You can post everything as always, only OT stuff must be self-posts. That's it, that's literaly it. You won't get karma. How can you have serious discussion with people who scream censorship just because they won't get karma?

[–]BasediCloud 17ポイント18ポイント  (7子コメント)

How can you have a serious discussion with people who scream just because other people get karma?

[–]Splutch 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

The karma-whoring excuse is so fucking bunk I haven't heard that expression in years. But to pretend like it's a problem here is just ludicrous. It's one of those nebulous ideas that can be used to criticize anything at all.

[–]maxman14 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is that seriously the problem? People are crying because they don't get imaginary number points?

Jesus fucking christ just make everything worth no points. Fuck the karma system on this site. People should be posting shit because they want to share stuff, not for points.

[–]RavenscroftRaven 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

This site has a karma system?

[–]BansheeBomb [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Hat2 going full on TheBlade mode up in here. Same shit happening to HQ where the fuck did all these authoritarians come from anyway?

[–]BoltbeamStarmie [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

GamerGate grows. GamerGate needs a bit of control because bad comes with good. GamerGate sub asks for a bit of authority. Authoritative people respond. Authoritative people be authoritative, and make authority. I know from experience: I am authoritative.

[–]Skragzilla [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The only problem KIA has are these fucking asshole mods who are too self-important to just sit there quietly and play janitor like they should.

[–]WittyNonsequitur -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not a fan of over-moderation, but I think that the shrieking and rending of garments over the clarification of the moderation policy is a bit of an over-reaction.

Instead of wasting all the time complaining and working yourselves up into a frenzy about moderation, I suggest the following: just keep doing what you were doing, and posting what you were posting. If you post something and it gets removed, then either the moderation is overzealous or the topic wasn't really crucial enough to be discussed.. by the same token, if it turns out that a subject blows up and KiA misses the bus because mods thought something was unnecessary that shouldn't have been, that will be far more damning of their moderation.. it's not like this community as a whole isn't skeptical, and something being moderated that should not have been WILL surface.

As an aside, there's some, uh, ironies present in the arguments being made both in this thread and the sticky; people claiming that offsite coordination to control conversations and/or sockpuppeting are literal arguments that were made against Gamergate early on. Why are we making these now? Conversely, if people here aren't willing to extend the mods the smallest benefit of the doubt in terms of them trying something and reverting it / taking a mea culpa if they fuck up, you're refusing to extend the same good faith that was denied to Gamergate in its infancy.

When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares into you, guys.

[–]shinbreaker -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd love to see some examples because frankly, I think the moderating should be upped a bit. I keep seeing people post content from years ago of people already known for various unethical practices or bringing up tweets from people in an attempt to have this board do their dirty work. The circlejerking over certain topics and the attempts to weaponize this board is annoying.

You want to make fun of the SJWs, then by all means to to r/TumblrinAction or r/SRSsucks. That's what they focus on. Stop bringing it hear and abusing the off-topic tag just to get your rocks off.

[–]GammaKingThe Sealion King[M] -32ポイント-31ポイント  (44子コメント)

What we need is a kind of AMA where the mods field the questions posed by the community asking why SJW stuff is getting curtailed. In this, mods should be expected to give complete answers instead of the patronizing comments they've been putting in the sticky. We should also debate the merits of such a policy and maybe even put it to a vote (to supplant the three other votes we've had on this topic).

No.

We've gone over and over our reasoning with people. The one thing that's clear is that the minority of people complaining will resist any change regardless of what we say. It's obvious too given that it tends to be the same users making numerous comments and threads all over the place with identical rhetoric.

Some comments may seem patronizing and that's not something I'm fond of, yet part of the issue here is a subset of users who've spent the best part of a day posting the same thing over and over and over. I'll apologise in advance but I hope you'll understand some of the team's frustration.

We're now sick of that discussion. Coupled with the vote brigading which is rampant and actively being organised offsite (yes, we know), spending even more time having the same discussion is a waste of our energy and counterproductive for the sub.

The rules are staying. Hell, we've not even changed much. We're a day in and there's not been a single removed thread that impacts what you see on the front page. We've engaged the community. We've heard people's opinions and this is what we're doing. We've no interest in spending countless hours explaining this repeatedly to users who actively want to see this as a conspiracy.

EDIT: oh look, downvotes. Point proven.

[–]javiercorre 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

Coupled with the vote brigading which is rampant and actively being organised offsite

Can you provide source?

[–]derram_2 34ポイント35ポイント  (13子コメント)

So far there have been claims of karma whoring with no proof, claims of a minority of users complaining with no proof, claims of offsite brigading with no proof.

You haven't discussed anything, you just keep saying it's final.

[–]Interlapse 28ポイント29ポイント  (8子コメント)

This same thing could be applied to you, mods. You're a minority of people deciding the rules, and not listening to the people who have valid concerns, you're assuming you're being brigaded negatively, while it could be that the people brigading are actually attenuating the negative response of the community, you say there's a vocal minority against the changes, I say the vocal minority is the one asking for those changes. You deciding to not engage and just do whatever you want to do, no matter what other people think, shines a very bad light on the mod team.

[–]Rokakku 19ポイント20ポイント  (0子コメント)

Down vote an opinion you disagree with makes you a vote brigadier. Don't agree with the mods or common opinion you are a shill.

[–]literallyaprogrammer 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

EDIT: oh look, downvotes. Point proven.

I didn't come here from off-site. I found this on KiA's front page, then I read this absurdly stupid comment, then I downvoted it.

You've adopted a "I'm right and all the people in this sub are wrong, I know better than everyone" mentality. That's why people don't like you. It's an authoritarian position.

[–]DelAvaria 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

This attitude is horrible.

"THE RULES ARE STAYING"

If you are not going to listen to people at least somewhat you could at least try to appear to engage the community instead of appearing authoritarian and not caring what anyone thinks.

I am extremely anti authoritarian and the attitude of this post REEKS of it.

[–]lordthat100188 9ポイント10ポイント  (8子コメント)

This right here is exactly why none of you should continue to be mods here. "No guys we havent abused this new rule today\yet. So its okay that its open to abuse." thats what they said about the patriot act.

[–]BoltbeamStarmie 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

That was a semi-okay post... until that last line.

[–]Warskull -4ポイント-3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Would it perhaps be more efficient to simply ban the select group of bad actors who are constantly shitposting?

As for the vote brigading, you have to understand why people are wary to take a mod's word for it. The mods on pretty much every other subreddit cry vote brigade and use it as an excuse to censor any discussion they do not like.

[–]mracidglee16k get -5ポイント-4ポイント  (0子コメント)

ITT: People who like posts having nothing to do with GG.