あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]TheIdesOfLurchu/TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK alt 0ポイント1ポイント  (46子コメント)

Man, that /u/Elkmont guy moves the goalpost so many times they're in a different county.

[–]anisaerahone-armed Belgian circus acrobat -13ポイント-12ポイント  (45子コメント)

"Drunk men who have sex are rape victims, but its unfair that men who have sex with drunk women can be prosecuted for sexual assault" seems to sum up his argument in that thread.

[–]atsteak 14ポイント15ポイント  (14子コメント)

"Drunk women who have sex are rape victims, but its unfair that women who have sex with drunk men can be prosecuted for sexual assault" seems to sum up u/Throbbing-Clitoris counter-argument.

[–]anisaerahone-armed Belgian circus acrobat -5ポイント-4ポイント  (13子コメント)

Not really.

The fact that a person who is past a certain point of intoxication cannot consent doesn't mean that they also can't be a rapist.

He picked a poor example for his argument. I don't think many people would describe a drunk woman who performed oral sex on a man without his consent would be described as a rape victim by most people, either.

[–]atsteak 15ポイント16ポイント  (12子コメント)

Are we talking hypotheticals or Amy Schumer? Because by her own account Amy wanted sex, while the guy she was with was too drunk to consent (although she mainly focuses on how he was too drunk to perform, because apparently that's what really matters to her, not her being a rapist).

[–]Elkmont 8ポイント9ポイント  (29子コメント)

Seeing as I was linked and am being talked about Ill bring some drama to this otherwise boring thread.

The point I, albiet poorly, was attempting to make was it is hypocritical to, in a thread discussing feminists victim blamming, for feminists to victim blame. Scandalous, I know.