Upvoted because the downvote button is not a disagree button.

I disagree with you for a very simple reason. I assume we can agree that this picture is a joke. So what is the content of the joke?

We see a man and a genie. First the genie grows large breasts, then becomes a full bodied woman in a sexual looking outfit, and then we see the man and the genie sitting on a couch with 2 children that are clearly meant to be the offspring of the man and genie. And the genie seems quite upset while the man seems quite content.

If I understand correctly, your concern is that this comic tells men "this is what you should want, what you should wish for given ultimate power" and that is to supposedly marry an attractive women and have kids with her. And I agree, this isn't something that should be forced on people. However, you've missed something.

This is supposed to be comedy, which often consists of subverting expectations. Here we would expect a man with 3 wishes for anything to wish for obviously unattainable things. Super powers, a trillion dollars, whatever. But our expectations are subverted when he wishes for essentially, a hot wife for life. That's something that people actually achieve in life, I'd even say semi-often. The comic is actually highlighting how ridiculous it seems to make this your wildest dreams.

The second aspect of comedy is the genie's obvious discontent. The genie is pissed he (she?) has to put up with this shit. The key point I wanna make here is that a genie is by definition a slave to the wish maker. Therefore, this comic is actually comparing your average discontented trophy wife to a slave.

Now in conjunction with my previous point: the comic is actually commenting on how ridiculous it is to try and make a slave out of someone else who doesn't actually want that life, as well as how unfair it is when you can instead find someone who does want that future. It also suggests how future trophy wives everywhere should stand up and carve out their own futures! And be their own individual!

Now, I don't know if this is really the author's intention. But see how I interpreted this to send the exact opposite message? And it wasn't even that much of a stretch? Art is funny like that.

And before you go all "blah blah blah intentions blah blah" like most do, if an art piece inspires millions to fight for what's right, and cause great social changes that benefit humanity, but was misinterpreted and the author intended the opposite message, is it still a great piece of art?

TL;DR: food for thought, interpretation is tricky and based on a number of your preconceptions. Not everyone sees that same message as you, so don't assume those who like the art also like the message you see.