全 110 件のコメント

[–]AnarchoEpictetuspariah of the mind 27ポイント28ポイント  (41子コメント)

I often see AnCap, or even libertarian, ideology labeled as "racist." For the life of me I cannot understand why.

The opponents of ancapism see it as an almost completely white movement. Any group that is majority white is racist by default.

[–]AshlirAnti-Theftist 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

The Kafkatrap.

[–]Sir_Schadenfreude 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Great. Another book I have to read.

[–]torontosinan 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is why engineering is blatantly misogynistic.

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's also pretty racist.

[–]E7ernalDecline to State 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

Like democrats?

No. that's not the reason.

[–]AnarchoEpictetuspariah of the mind 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

Like democrats?

Well, obviously a self-hating white is better but still tainted with original skin er I mean sin.

[–]Ordo_SpontaneumErisian Anarcho-Voluntaryist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is it because ancaps stand against the (IMO rather racist) affirmative action, favoring market action instead?

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Democratic party is a minority-focused party, whereas the Republican party is almost exclusively white-focused.

I think that's a good thing, of course.

[–]Brambleshirelibertarian socialist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

/u/SteelTyphoon: here lies the answer to your question. ^

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. -3ポイント-2ポイント  (12子コメント)

The opponents of ancapism see it as an almost completely white movement.

It is, as is libertarianism, and none of this is an accident, but is the result of European history and European genetics.

[–]strayadviceBe free in the realization that there are no states 0ポイント1ポイント  (10子コメント)

Won't you say the same for communism?

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 1ポイント2ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'm glad you asked: Communism has its origins as a Jewish tool of white dispossession; it was used against the Czar and discarded after the escape from Stalin to America, and therewith came American neoconservatism, another Jewish tool, but this time as a method of Irsaeli foreign policy.

All of Jewish sociological theory is not accidentally a critique of Western Europeanism. If you study Jewish history, you'll find a long track record of intellectuals hostile to gentiles, and if you look into anti-white groups, you'll find many Jews on the board.

The take over of academia was a Jewish insurrection. Look into Boas. Now, academia is hostile to European culture.

[–]StarlightSemaphoreA Bomb in the Marketplace 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

This. This is why.

[–]HypnotaodRoads? 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why is he still here again?

[–]SnakesoverEaglesAnti-Voluntaryist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dude, like why are any of us even here. Like totally whoa bro!

[–]Illin_Spree 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's sad to see you uncritically parrot this drivel. But since politics tends to change with age and experience, there's hope you will come full circle and reject 3rd grade tribalist reasoning.

You fail to mention that according to the conspiracist theory of intellectual history you are elaborating, anarcho-capitalism is also a tool of Jewish ideological domination, as many of its leading theorists are Jewish and it is historically and ideologically linked to neo-conservatism and neo-liberalism.

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

there's hope you will come full circle and reject 3rd grade tribalist reasoning

Northern Europeans are the first ethnicity to ever break from significant ethno-centrism.

But, that doesn't mean other ethnics that are much more racist aren't worth worrying about; were they not so tribal, I wouldn't have to encourage Europeans to defend themselves.

anarcho-capitalism is also a tool of Jewish ideological domination, as many of its leading theorists are Jewish

Rothbard and Mises were both alienated from Judaism and fully assimilated into Western European values. They in fact led the vanguard of such Western championship.

I have no problem with these kind of Jews; I would defend them against mindless anti-Semites. What I fear is how Puritanic Anglos are going to commit cultural suicide and take their institutions, which gave me the maximum leeway for free thought and creativity, with it, and the extremely ethno-centric Jews are the euthanasia doctor and multiculturalism the cocktail.

In a morbid way, I want the Jews to destroy the West and let the equally ethno-centric East Asians and muslims begin to flex their muscle against their tiny gene pool. Toward the end, they'll realize whites were their best friend and they shouldn't have injected cultural poison into them.

[–]Illin_Spree 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

But, that doesn't mean other ethnics that are much more racist aren't worth worrying about; were they not so tribal, I wouldn't have to encourage Europeans to defend themselves.

When other ethnic groups start engaging in imperialism and justifying it via racialist ideology, then Europeans can start worrying about defending themselves. At the moment the main enemy of Europeans is the same enemy as everybody else--the dictatorship of capital and the rule of the banksters.

Rothbard and Mises were both alienated from Judaism and fully assimilated into Western European values. They in fact led the vanguard of such Western championship.

If you read the writings of your ideological comrades on Stormfront, they will argue that is precisely the Jews that were alienated from Judaism (and attached to the universalist, enlightenment, liberal values that Mises and Hayek praise) that were the vanguard of anarchism and communism. In any case, according to their logic, anarcho-captialism, being objectively in favor of banker rule and hostile to nation states and/or volksgemeinschaft, and sporting a naive rationalist/utilitarian outlook re. human nature/ethics/interaction, is pretty much a paradigmatic example of what they claim to be against.

I don't endorse this view of course, but this piece by McDonald lays out the case for anarcho-capitalism as essentially an idealist metaphysical point of view.

https://www.toqonline.com/blog/libertarianism-and-white-racial-nationalism/

What you (and McDonald) fail to grasp is that racialist ideology is a way to manipulate and divide/conquer sheeple, and serves the long-term interests of our actual rulers (the banksters).

[–]SnakesoverEaglesAnti-Voluntaryist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have no problem with these kind of Jews

Did you check out this Jew from the other day?

[–]majorpaynei86Voluntaryist 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

'Jew bad...anything I say bad is jew...me hungry...but bagels wont eat"

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Now, you're getting it.

[–]Z3Fimgur.com/I4YGzQ9 27ポイント28ポイント  (6子コメント)

Any group that doesn't toe the SJW party line is going to be labeled as such by them. It's no surprise.

[–]Brambleshirelibertarian socialist 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Duh. Has it occurred to anyone that this is because "SJW" types concern themselves with countering racism and other forms of bigotry?

If your finding yourself frequently in opposition to "SJWs" it could be because your racist, or reinforcing racism. Just a thought.

[–]Ordo_SpontaneumErisian Anarcho-Voluntaryist 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Some of the SJW I have encountered are actually the biggest racists and misogynists I've had the displeasure of trying to reason with.

[–]Brambleshirelibertarian socialist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think this is very relevant. If it was that prelevant then SJW's wouldnt be infamous here for being crusaders. But I'm curious, what did you experience. Since being racist/misogynist is completely contradictory to the concept of SJW, I'm also a bit confused.

[–]ritherzEdmonton Voluntarist 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

SJW also ignore Ayn Rand, and Thomas Sowell as two heroes that "struggled against the patriarchy and racism" they should be congratulating.

Methinks there's ulterior motives for most SJWs.

[–]Brambleshirelibertarian socialist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

SJW also ignore Ayn Rand, and Thomas Sowell as two heroes that "struggled against the patriarchy and racism" they should be congratulating

Explain

[–]GoodPhantomBadDog 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Of course the huge amount of actual racists this subreddit just had a huge discussion about doesn't help either.

[–]cpvazxt 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Ancap consists of a certain set of values that the statists are desperate to keep away from black people. They don't want black people to understand how the min wage locks them out from getting their foot in the door. They don't want black people to understand that the welfare state is fucking them out of their communities and families. They don't want them to understand that the public school system is teaching their kids conformity instead of knowledge and understanding.

[–]anon338Anarcho-capitalist biblical kritarchy 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

They don't want black people to know how they are used as props in political campaigns and government programs, to sustain lavish bureaucracies trying to control their lives and the rest of society.

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

They don't want black people to understand how the min wage locks them

Libertarian ideas have been available for quite some time.

[–]baggytheoAnarcho-Crapitalist 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

The state controls education, and teaches people that the state was forced to fight a war in order to end slavery, and that the end of open racial discrimination was achieved through state legislation rather than shifts in culture and ideology. People are taught to assume that if the civil war had not been waged, slavery would have continued unhindered, and if the civil rights act had not been passed, white business owners would have continued to marginalize black customers at great detriment to the black community. They are also taught that surreptitious racism is still widespread and is of exclusive blame for all disparities between groups.

When you deny the necessity of a state, their view has been molded to perceive you as someone who denies the necessity of having ended slavery or of making sure people aren't mistreated because of their race.

[–]Solus_111Join Me Or Oppose Me 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

A bunch of weak-minded hysterics trying to signal to their fellow worker ants that an enemy of crazed pettiness is in the vicinity.

[–]JesusWasARed 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

It isn't anarcho-capitalism as racist, as much as anarcho-capitalism not being anti-racist. Anarchism condemns racism as an integral part of what it is. Anarcho-capitalism doesn't.

There's nothing about anarcho-capitalism that works directly to eradicate or drive racism into the ground. And while some anarcho-capitalists do argue against racism, or assert that racism would be driven away by market forces, many take the opposite position (Hoppe) and claim that an anarcho-capitalist world would actually manifest in very homogeneous, insular communities.

This sub is an example. It's full of racists, even racists who don't identify as anarcho-capitalist but are openly ethnic nationalists. The sub can do nothing to rid itself of them, because there is no inherent mechanism in anarcho-capitalism to say "that's not anarcho-capitalism" or "you can't be a racist and be an anarcho-capitalist."

[–]EvilManichean 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Leftists will call anything even remotely 'right-wing' racist. Of course, left-right is bad politics but i am using it here to give a simplistic example. Ancaps care about property, and even if anarcho-capitalism could help 'the oppressed' increase their position better than any other system, this is irrelevant to the leftist. The leftist cares about his own moral salvation from the point of view of what he views as good assumed a priori. There are exceptions to this, of course. But, the average leftist will be this type of person in my experience. They want to 'save the world' but end up destroying it.

[–]thunderyakAnarcho-Capitalist 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

no taxes = no welfare = hating the poor = hating marginalized races

[–]anon338Anarcho-capitalist biblical kritarchy 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

That is Bastiat's framing of the socialist argument:

“Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.”Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

[–]GummyTheFirstAnarcho-Minarchist 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

That is frighteningly similar to how they actually think.

[–]SummonerofDoubtPhilosopher 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

If I were to guess, and some of these sentiments have already been said: 1. Most Ancaps are white 2. Ancaps oppose social engineering projects like race quotas and affirmative action. Faulty conclusion: Obviously they oppose these because they're racist.

[–]wrothbardclassy propeller 5ポイント6ポイント  (7子コメント)

Lefties tend to think or at least give the appearance of thinking that a capitalist economy in which you are free to keep the fruits of your own labor is one in which white males will dominate all societies. I'm not sure why they believe that, possibly because they've accepted the idea that white people are capitalist ubermensch, as our resident neo-reactionaries seem to believe.

[–]AnarchoEpictetuspariah of the mind 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

white people are capitalist ubermensch

white males will dominate all societies

--wrothbard

Careful, shitlord.

[–]darchdollanrx | r/anarcho_reaction 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Do you believe otherwise? Do you think the oppressed Congolese in the US will become the elite once the yoke of the state is thrown off?

[–]AnarchoEpictetuspariah of the mind 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

I guess you could think everyone would be better off but whites would be the best off.

[–]darchdollanrx | r/anarcho_reaction 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know that's what you think, but im keen to hear the mighty bane of the reactionaries: wrothbard.

[–]asherp 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Minorities may be the first to adopt cryptocurrency since they have the most to gain from its utility. Immigrants adopt it for remittances. Muslims adopt it because it prevents usury. The poor need it for banking. The last to adopt what's left will pay a much higher premium.

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. -3ポイント-2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Capitalism does inherently favor European whites as they have the highest intelligence standard deviation (more geniuses, more intellectual pioneers) and the highest intelligence-testosterone combination in existence (more intelligent risk-takers, more intelligent entrepreneurs).

[–]live9free1or1die 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

He who claims you're a racist gets the benefit of the doubt that he himself is not racist. Of course you're going to get called a racist.

Speaking of which, shut up you racist libertarian!!

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Racial differences in intelligence is mainstream science, not fringe.

And SJWs are going to always find any element of traditionalism—Patriarchy, Eurocentrism, Capitalism, Heterosexuality, Christianity, etc.—as racist, imperialist, and evil.

[–]aletoledojustice derives freedom 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

subscribe to anarcho capitalism that also harbor fringe racial beliefs

I think there is a big component of this. Since a freedom movement allows for freedom, then it obviously allows for racists to more openly present themselves. I don't think this means that there are more racists here than a statist philosophy, just that they are no longer an oppressed minority opinion.

The odd part is that a statist believes that oppressing a minority opinion is good, at least in the case of racism. They can't seem to bridge the gap in thinking that maybe other minority opinions might be getting oppressed that shouldn't be (e.g. anti-patriotism).

[–]JesusWasARed 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Since a freedom movement allows for freedom, then it obviously allows for racists to more openly present themselves.

This, exactly this. I wrote something similar. If your movement does not openly condemn racists, but allows racists to thrive (e.g. the way certain persons on this sub now dominate every thread with racial themes), then people are going to perceive it as racist. If the ideology is not racist in and of itself, it has nonetheless become a home where racists are allowed to live and seek safe harbor.

And that's not okay to people who are anti-racist.

[–]godshamgod12 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Many ancaps are antagonistic to the "ism infestation" in political discussion and any attempts to administratively toggle privileges to adjust for group-level differences. Those who aren't tend to just ignore these social justice issues. Even the latter is more than enough to count as everythingist in their book.

[–]dissidentrhetoric 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think there are two sets, first one is people who just call anything racist as a way to stop thinking. The second group is people who think that any ideology that does not include free stuff for "poor people" is racist.

[–]fascinating123 1ポイント2ポイント  (6子コメント)

It's a combination of misunderstandings about libertarian/AnCap ideas and the fact that a lot of libertarians tend to be male and white.

There's nothing inherently racist about Anarcho-Capitalism or libertarianism of course. And the vast vast majority of us are in no way racist or bigoted, but some people only go by demographics.

The thing is, we can really do a much better job marketing our ideas in underdeveloped countries. Believe it or not there are a lot of people open to the idea that limited or no government is a much better way to achieve peace and prosperity vs the status quo. We just have to reach out and do the leg work.

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

The thing is, we can really do a much better job marketing our ideas in underdeveloped countries.

Focus on Asia, don't bother with Africa.

[–]fascinating123 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

I disagree. I think the message can and does resonate with a lot of people.

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Capital accumulation to medium to high depth requires low time preferences, and these instincts have to occur before a political system formalizing the process happens.

And time preference is largely the result of intelligence, which native Africans lack; they are a simple people with limited abstract thought, limited conception of time, and high impulsiveness.

East Asians possess the needed low time preferences and the intelligence that gave them it. They are the lowest testosterone race, so they tend to be less prone to rocking the boat, less likely to be a socially disruptive entrepreneur like a European-derived person.

In this way, East Asians will be limited in their ability to create and adopt radical thought, but they at least have a more easily interface-able position with Europeans, and that's exactly what's happened historically.

You and others can invest your efforts in African outliers, but it's largely an inefficient endeavor, without some kind of eugenic pressure applied to their pool, as their progeny will keep gradually regressing back to the mean of their pool.

[–]strayadviceBe free in the realization that there are no states 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

If the only available dimension for a dichotomy is race, sure.

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Race still largely marks breeding patterns.

If somehow Africans stopped breeding with pure Africans, and were inseminated with only Europeans and East Asians, this wouldn't really be a problem, but in a way, it's because you're committing a clean genocide of African genetics.

That's actually why American blacks are more intelligent than Africans, because the average American black carries 20-30% European genetics.

[–]strayadviceBe free in the realization that there are no states 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

As I said...

[–]Caltex88 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's because many leftists are racist deep down. An anarcho-capitalist or libertarian society would result in the most capable persons rising to the top, and the least capable sinking to the bottom. These leftists assume that certain racial and ethnic groups will sink to the bottom, and thus assume those who want a libertarian society want to see this outcome. They then call us racists, despite the fact that their whole reasoning for calling us racist, is in fact rooted in their belief that some races are inferior. Because of their sense of social justice, they believe equality of outcome must be forced on everyone, so those they see as inferior must be given a helping hand in order to achieve equal results.

I personally don't know, nor care who thrives in a free society. As long as we're all free, we all have a fair shot at success, and that success will be dependent on our own capabilities.

[–]lightfiveanarcho-libertarian 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, it basically some people within the movement hold those views and opponents use it to make an argument against the entire ideology. It's the same with every other political movement as well, look at the communists, liberals, conservatives etc.

[–]PG2009 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is this just a defense mechanism where people can write off differing points of view by simply labeling then as something unsavory?

It is a mixture of both the "straw man" and the ad hominem fallacy...its almost beautiful in its all-encompassing ignorance.

[–]terinbuneAnarcho-Capitalist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you don't support handouts from government, it means you don't support handouts at all. If you don't support government enforced equality, it means you don't support equality at all, etc.

[–]elbow_ham 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

if you don't support welfare benefits heavily weighted towards members of special interest groups, you're clearly a biggot

[–]whyohwhydoIbother 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you want to know the actual reason people think ancap is racist, it's because the status quo is racist and they see ancap as just status quo+.

If people are pointing out overwhelming concentration of white people that's (primarily) as symptom.

The other reason is that it provides a haven for the obviously, explicitly, obnoxiously racist and makes at best a token effort to exclude them. It provides a welcoming environment for them. So I think you're wrong when you say that:

I figure there probably is an element of those that subscribe to anarcho capitalism that also harbor fringe racial beliefs but I can't imagine it's any more than any other political ideology.

Also:

If anything I believe capitalism has done a lot to improve the lives of marginalized people, whereas the state has always maintained institutionalized racism. Your thoughts?

I think it's far more accurate to see the state and capitalism as symbiotic and most of their products as the result of joint effort, including racism.

Hope that helps.

[–]ArcherDNM 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is this just a defense mechanism where people can write off differing points of view by simply labeling then as something unsavory?

Often (always), especially in the US, The "rascism" tag is used to shut down legitimate debate by someone unwilling to consider that their viewpoint may be wrong. People are so unwilling to respond to the charge of 'rascist' that the one tossing the term usually wins by default.

If people would simply fight back with a reasoned argument more often, rather than getting butthurt and running away, this could be combated.

[–]JollyAncap88 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ancaps and libertarians generally support free markets. Republicans and conservatives sometimes say good things about free markets too. There are some racist groups who support the Republican party. It follows that anarcho-capitalism is racist, and therefore wrong.

I think that's how the argument goes.

[–]FooQuuxman18Smy5Ks1cX1dMJVhdFgmtuqSiqVytyhLB 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It isn't just libertarians, conservatives get it even more than we do. Many (most?) conservatives have a twitch reaction whenever the subject comes up as a result.

[–]Brambleshirelibertarian socialist 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Because there is a frightening amount of racism amongst ancaps, and others take notice; and you don't see as much in other movements. It's as simple as that.

Apart from the nationalism and militarism, ancaps largely partake in very socially conservative and white viewpoints. Basically other than the opposition to nationalism and miltarism, it's very difficult to tell the difference between republicans and ancaps.

[–]JesusWasARed 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm surprised more people are not able to recognize this. A lot of the responses seem to be along the line of "it's because we're white, thus they assume we're racist" or "because we hate taxes."

[–]p5f8z5233K846kQ7wG9N -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

"Racism" sounds bad to most people and is such a vague term that it can be applied to anyone and everything; perfect for dishonest pseudo-intellectuals like yourself to use.

[–]Brambleshirelibertarian socialist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Case in point.

[–]JobDestroyer36210f2f164929ab31b0a8b803c4de6f -3ポイント-2ポイント  (17子コメント)

I don't know, but these neo-reactionary cunts didn't help much.

[–]AnarchoEpictetuspariah of the mind 8ポイント9ポイント  (16子コメント)

I know. If only the NR cunts would go away the SJW's would accept us.

[–]darchdollanrx | r/anarcho_reaction 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

THEN they would hastily defeat the state and bring Rothbardianism to life, im sure.

[–]AnarchoEpictetuspariah of the mind 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Definitely.

[–]JobDestroyer36210f2f164929ab31b0a8b803c4de6f -3ポイント-2ポイント  (13子コメント)

Same thing, dude.

[–]AnarchoEpictetuspariah of the mind 4ポイント5ポイント  (12子コメント)

I don't know

cunts

dumbass

Observe the polite and super effective debating skills of your typical, NAP observing, ancap.

[–]darchdollanrx | r/anarcho_reaction -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

/u/IsCuck_bot JobDestroyer

[–]iscuck_bot 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

/u/ JobDestroyer post history contains participation in the following crap subreddits:


/r/atheism: 9 comments (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), combined score: -19.

/r/Anarchism: 3 comments (1, 2, 3), combined score: -15.

/r/politics: 3 comments (1, 2, 3), combined score: -29.

/r/SubredditDrama: 3 comments (1, 2, 3), combined score: 2.

/r/cringepics: 2 comments (1, 2), combined score: 6.


Cuckold Denial isn’t about eliminating pleasure or cutting him off, but rather controlling their sexuality to ensure attention is focused on the wife and her bull(s).

[–]Z3Fimgur.com/I4YGzQ9 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Hmm...looks like it was shadowbanned. /u/isreactionary_bot isn't. If you message the admins they'll probably either shadowban /u/isreactionary_bot also or unban iscuck.

[–]of_ice_and_rockIt is thus rightly expressed from the soul of a proud Viking. 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

That is so high-carb delicious.

[–]isreactionary_bot 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Check the username or try again later.


I'm a bot. Only the past 1,000 comments are fetched.

[–]darchdollanrx | r/anarcho_reaction 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes. It wasn't until after I posted I saw it got banned like an hour before

[–]JobDestroyer36210f2f164929ab31b0a8b803c4de6f -4ポイント-3ポイント  (5子コメント)

I'm not debating you, I'm berating you.

[–]AnarchoEpictetuspariah of the mind 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm un-beratable.

[–]darchdollanrx | r/anarcho_reaction 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Is that what you do to people that fluster and outwit you?

[–]JobDestroyer36210f2f164929ab31b0a8b803c4de6f -4ポイント-3ポイント  (2子コメント)

iAmVerySmart.png

[–]darchdollanrx | r/anarcho_reaction 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

You're only embarrassing yourself still. Even I am not this petty, nor do I engage in this cute downvoting I'm witnessing before my eyes.

[–]JobDestroyer36210f2f164929ab31b0a8b803c4de6f -5ポイント-4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hereby declare myself the winner of a flamewar on the internet.

[–]Easy-TargetAnti-fascist -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

People might have a thought process that humans are inherently evil, and that a good strong government can fix that.