90
91

Ultraturbomoderator /u/agentlame: "Voat's primary objective is to be a platform for the trade of child pornography." (self.subredditcancer)

yungwavyj が 投稿

Today, I was talking with /u/agentlame a little bit about the potential for a moderation log or some other system to hold mods accountable on reddit.

Apparently, the only example of this exists at voat.co, and this is kind of a problem because well:

Voat's primary objective is to be a platform for the trade of child pornography.

link

When I refuse to take this seriously, he ultimately follows up with this type of thing:

Why are you deflecting and laughing? Do you rape kids?

Bonus: he reveals the sole basis for this accusation is that . . . it's hard to get content deleted from voat.

Aside from being illustrative of this old half-assed tactic of throwing around kiddie diddling accusations when you don't like someone or something, I didn't want this to fall through the cracks because it's just too damn funny.

These are the people we permit to achieve prominence on this website.

全 53 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]FranktheShank1 70ポイント71ポイント  (31子コメント)

TIL /u/agentlame loves child porn and knows where to go to get it.

[–]LifeizAmazing 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love it when cowards like him try to spread bullshit to continue on your power trips.

[–]morzinbo 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Maybe /u/agentlame is /u/foldablehuman in disguise???

[–]FranktheShank1 18ポイント19ポイント  (2子コメント)

Oh god, i shouldn't have posted that. Now he's going to ban me from earth porn and today i fucked up LOL.

Powerless fags gonna fag.

[–]Dumblerawr 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

Now he's going to ban me from 512 subreddits

Ftfy.

[–]DR_ANUS_MDDrunk Mod 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

When I think about websites I'm going to go to, I pretty much never take CP into consideration. I also very, very rarely see any of it, especially after /b/ cleaned up several years ago.

Why is the cancer always complaining about this shit when it's so rare? It's almost like they can't stop thinking about it......

[–]FranktheShank1 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's the same reason people scream rape and anti semite...because no one questions it, they just take it on board and then repeat it the next time the name in question comes up. "Oh VOAT? I heard that place was nothing but child porn"

[–]DR_ANUS_MDDrunk Mod 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

The mentality is "If you don't spend part of your day speaking out against it, you must be for it."

Then they're free to slander anything and anyone who throws less of a fit than them.

[–]dat-ass-uka 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

They [SJWs] have tried the exact same thing with us here on 8chan [/u/infinitechan] and it really hasn't worked in the slightest.

It's pretty much the cyber version of fake rape / sexual assault claims for them, or screaming that a user is a 'racist', 'jew hater', etc; it's taken at face value and believed by users who are often naive or gullible- with said users who are naive / gullible making up a majority base on Reddit.

What they do is claim there is CP on a website- thus encouraging actual pedophiles to join the website only to shit it up- and then when said pedophiles join the website and start up unwanted pedophile related conversations- use it as a smoking gun and say 'SEE, WE TOLD YOU SO! THERE'S PEDOPHILES ON THERE SO THERE MUST BE CP!'

If this does not work; what they end up doing is contacting pedophile SJWs / pedophile networks / pedophiles they know- to post CP on the website- only for them to cap it and report it- or use it as a true smoking gun, stating that beyond a doubt there is CP on the website and that because of one instance, it must hold true for all future instances.

We had the second thing happen here on 8chan when it appeared that somebody had contracted Laurlie Bailey to post actual CP and to make a honeypot board called /hebe/- only for said contractor to screencap and make a storify of all the CP as a smoking gun that 'gamergate', and '8chan' supported CP.

Proof of this is found here: [click!]

Said CP is removed here on 8chan within as little as 10 minutes to 6h on 8chan and even with this in mind- it's impossible for a website to openly host CP and stay online in the year 2015. It's absolutely impossible. The various secret service or cyber crime units would take the websites down within a day- hence why pedophile networks hang on .onion websites and or on the DW.

But yeah, /u/agentlame is the stereotypical SJW crying 'CP lover!', 'rapist!', 'racist!', 'misogynist!' when he can't formulate an argument or when he simply wishes to character assassinate / libel / slander. It's Scientology tier crazy. 'WHAT ARE YOUR CRIMES??!'

What's ironic is that it's usually the SJWs who are pedophiles, racists, rapists, misogynists, misandrists, classists, bigots, etc. Prominent anti-GGer /u/srhbutts was revealed to be a transgender beast loving [wanting to have sex with dogs, particularly her own], pedophile and she completely becomes asshurt the moment you make note of this and supply evidence as such.

[–]yungwavyj[S] 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ah man, oh well. Guess reddit shouldn't have a moderation log, due to the risk of it causing child porn, obviously.

[–]iSamurai 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've heard this argument before. RE : 8chan

[–]derram_2 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Why are you dodging the evidence I haven't presented?"

[–]EugeneNix 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

SRS [28%, 32] | SRSSucks [72%, 84] - Mod of TheBluePill

That's all you need to know.

[–]frankenmine 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's just one of their go-to retorts.

  • It's racist.
  • It's sexist.
  • It puts cunts in danger.
  • It puts faggots in danger.
  • It puts trannies in danger.
  • It puts coloreds in danger.
  • It makes me feel unsafe.
  • It involves rape.
  • In involves child porn.
  • You're a rapist.
  • You're a pedo.
  • You enable one or more of the above.
  • You internalize one or more of the above.

This is about all they've got.

[–]dan4daniel 5ポイント6ポイント  (12子コメント)

And this is why you should only be allowed to mod a small amount of subs, say five to ten. Just so this kind of cancer can't control tons of real estate.

[–]muskegthemoose 2ポイント3ポイント  (11子コメント)

Multiple accounts gets around a limit.

[–]Hypothetico-deductiv 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

It wouldn't be hard to make that limit based on IP address.

[–]muskegthemoose 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's expenses involved with that, plus the chance you will affect innocent people.

[–]dan4daniel 1ポイント2ポイント  (8子コメント)

And it's also a pain in the ass to have to switch between them just to be a dick. There's always going to be a loophole, but at least it will be an inconvenient loophole.

[–]muskegthemoose 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

Naw, just have 2 browsers open. And never underestimate the lengths people will go to just to be a dick. Especially since some people don't think they're being dicks, but doing important things.

[–]dan4daniel 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

That's fine, I want to make them go to those lengths.

[–]muskegthemoose 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

It just encourages them, because reddit gives them attention in a roundabout way by reacting to their behaviour. Most of these people have no lives to speak of outside of reddit, judging by their karma scores, and lots of time on their hands.

[–]dan4daniel 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

So you're saying that making it less convenient to be a huge dick by not allowing one account to have hundreds of subs modded will cause even more dickery?

[–]muskegthemoose 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

No. I am saying it won't help more than hurt, which is the standard by which laws should be judged.

[–]dan4daniel 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Hurt who? Who is modding 11 subs and isn't cancer?

[–]Amazing_Degradator 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The butthurt of /u/agentlame is strong.

Started to humiliating him yesterday because of that. So far it works great.