あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Prester_John_United States -4ポイント-3ポイント  (47子コメント)

And then hundreds of allied soldiers died doing the actual dirty work and removing the enemy from your country for you. GG.

[–]MornicThe Glorious Kingdom of Denmark 33ポイント34ポイント  (45子コメント)

lol

You are an idiot if you think it would have made any difference that a country of 5 million people started fighting against a country that could invade France in the blink of an eye.

Maybe if the US had not waited 4 years to join in the war there would have been less casualties, but I guess we all have our priorities.

[–]ColonelbrickarmsAlabama 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

So, we invade when the first shots are fired and some one gets Anschlussed Annexed, you yell "ILLEGAL INVASION! REMOVE YANKEE!" (which by the way, I aint a yankee!) but if we come in later, you yell "FUCK YOU COME EARLIER!"

EDIT: this is not meant to start a flame war

[–]MornicThe Glorious Kingdom of Denmark 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

You know, there's a difference between invading countries on your own and coming to the aid of allies upon their request against a war machine aiming for global conquest.

The US can do what it wants, but Americans think we are somehow supposed to be wildly impressed by 200,000 US casualties 'to save our assess' when it was clearly to protect the US itself from an escalating conflict. The Russians sacrificed 10 million... 50 times as many. And that is excluding civilians. You don't see any Russians asking for respect in every WW2 reference.

We're not ungrateful. We just don't think you did all the work.

[–]ColonelbrickarmsAlabama 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I know we didn't do it all, but we did have a major part in it, I recognize the other nation's achievements, the battle of britian, stalingrad, leningrad, kursk, el almein, the commando raids, dunkirk. The casualties is not by what the people say "save your asses" its the material support, most of the weapons used in WWII where american designs (not saying we did it all either, spitfire, churchill tank, lags and migs, t-43) the RAF and Soviet air force used some american planes, under the lend-lease program (the boston, P-40, P-39, P-51A, A-20 etc.) and the soviets and british both used US-built/designed tanks with at least 1 division, with tanks like the sherman. Also, please don't turn this into a flame war.

EDIT: Also, most invasion were not just us, the vietnam war was Vietnam, China, and North korea vs USA, australia, South korea, and Thailand) Iraq wars (Iraq vs NATO, Eygpt, Syria, Suadi Arabia, Oman) or Afghanistan (Taliban vs NATO and Afghanistan)

[–]MornicThe Glorious Kingdom of Denmark 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Its not a flame war, the initial response was just to a dumb comment.

It is obvious the allies could not have won without US support. Regarding invasions, we joined most of the recent ones (Iraq, Afghanistan, etc). We lambaste our own government for that too.

[–]tgrfedeuygtrfToronto Best part of Canada -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

Well to be fair The US probably thought they could handle it them selves which is seem they could not funny that US world police is only good when it helps them

[–]MornicThe Glorious Kingdom of Denmark 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

I think there is a slight difference between declining to help allies that ask for it vs. invading other countries on your own, violating international law in the process. But hey, maybe its just me.

[–]tgrfedeuygtrfToronto Best part of Canada -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Last time i check Denmark and US were not allies in 1942

[–]MornicThe Glorious Kingdom of Denmark 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Last time I checked Denmark was not the ones asking the US to assist them.

[–]New_KatipunanPhilippines 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Still better than Sweden, which not only remained neutral while Nazi Germany was conquering the rest of Europe, but continued to supply metal to them while they did so.