use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
974 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Click here to get a countryball.
POLANDBALL IS OF REDDIT
Wiggly mouse-drawn comics where balls represent different countries. They poke fun at national stereotypes and the "international drama" of their diplomatic relations. Polandball combines history, geography, Engrish, and an inferiority complex. The comic series first became popular on a well known German image board int ze internetz.
Polandball is unique and it should remain so. It's clearly distinguished from rage comics and memes. Read the Official Polandball Tutorial. To keep the quality of the content high, all comics have to comply to it.
Why can't I submit comics?
How you get submission rights is described here.
WHAT'S GOING ON?
TREASURES
Official Polandball Tutorial - The Book of Börk - Wording Problems Solving Chart
Académie Polandballaise - LatvianJokes the politbüro for jokes - Rules for reposts
Our Comment Policy - Vexillology a subreddit for flags - Game: Polandball Multiplayer Shooter
HONOUR TO WHOM HONOUR IS OF
berndmade this comic was made by someone who most probably goes by the nick bernd somewhere else int ze internetz.
redditormade if you made a comic yourself you can click on flair in the post and apply this label. It looks weird first but that's fixed with a page reload.
Hussar Wings only a select company of Honorary Polish Winged Hussars is allowed to bear this sign of splendour. Visit their Hall Of Fame.
HATERS OF BE HATING
Polandball went mainstream. Polandball can into Reddit, but cannot into space.
JOKE LIFE PRESERVE
Some jokes need of protection season: look here to see which are:
LINKINGS
YOU OF HELP
Animations Animations
redditormadeRelationship Issues (i.imgur.com)
ActamisImperial Sultanate of Japan が 8時間 前 投稿
[–]sirpellinorMagyar best nomad 184ポイント185ポイント186ポイント 7時間 前 (31子コメント)
What about the US forcing Japan to open her ports? Clearly the US is the bad boy, remove pretend-isolationalist imperialism!
[–]RPM123MA's Thirteen 71ポイント72ポイント73ポイント 4時間 前 (25子コメント)
Ugh, Japan just shoulda opened her ports in the first place. And do you remember the last time Japan tried to build an empire?
[–]Halorecon95Greater Netherlands 52ポイント53ポイント54ポイント 4時間 前 (24子コメント)
They opened their ports only after Commodore Perry started to threaten the Japanese with his ironclads. The Japanese had been trading peacefully with the Dutch, and only the Dutch, for years and they didnt see any reason to change this. All the bad things Japan did with modern technology could, again COULD, be atributed to American imperialism. But we will never know.
[–]-ArkennonAustralia 80ポイント81ポイント82ポイント 3時間 前 (8子コメント)
I mean how could you expect a country late to develop its industry not to rape Nanking? The city was practically begging for it!
For what it's worth, Japan was actually looking fairly promising right up until about the First World War, when the country began to slip into the grip of the military. They certainly weren't on that track straight off the bat in the 1850s.
[–]QuofNorth Carolina 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント 56分 前* (2子コメント)
Holy fucking SHIT the Japanese military after WWI pisses of me so much. Hoooly shit. I would like everyone to read this wikipedia page about the Japanese Prime Minister before World War 2, Inukai Tsuyoshi. He was desperately trying to improve relationships with china. He was desperately trying to save his country. And then some fucking 20 year old Navy men came in and shot him. He said 話せばわかる, which means "if we talk we'lll understand each other". They say "there's no point" and shoot him. Holy shit. My blood boils. A peaceful old man trying to make things right getting murdered by imperialistic FUCKWADS. Imperialistic 20 YEAR OLDS. Argh! And then WWII happened and Japan got fucking destroyed. I want to laugh about the karma but the situation just sucks for EVERYONE. God.
[–]That_Hobo_in_The_TubThe land of the coal and the home of the lumber. 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 21分 前 (1子コメント)
So basically if there was any one reason for japan's involvement in ww2, it's those assholes?
[–]QuofNorth Carolina 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 13分 前 (0子コメント)
It's a clusterfuck of such proportions that it's impossible to pin blame on any one person... but yes, the May 15 incident in which Inukai was assassinated pretty much ensured Japan would be involved in the wrong side of WW2, as it marked the end of a civilian government not firmly under the control of the military (As seen by Hideki fuckin' Tojo, the general responsible for Pearl Harbor, being prime minister from 1941-1944). A military which firmly believed in Japanese Imperialism, the conquest of China, etc.
[–]AngryWatchmaker 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
Wow victim blaming? Really? Don't trigger me!
[–]Wizzad 38ポイント39ポイント40ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
REMOVE MEME REMOVE MEME YOU ARE OF WORST LIGHT HUMOR YOU ARE OF HUMOR SMELL
[–]FrancisGallowaySic Semper Tyrannis 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
I mean look at what she was wearing! Come on, Nanking was asking for it.
[–]CptBigglesworthPint of porter and half a pork pie 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 27分 前 (0子コメント)
Maybe we shouldn't have given them those German colonies. It gave them a taste for sweet blood money colonialism.
[–]Red_OktoberfestVatican City 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 1時間 前 (8子コメント)
I blame the tentacle porn. Its always been there.
The next big Japanese war is gonna have giant robots too man.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (6子コメント)
They import Red Alert 3 into the Vatican?!
[–]Red_OktoberfestVatican City 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間 前 (5子コメント)
Dude. We got it first. Straight from heaven to earth.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (4子コメント)
heaven
Eeeeehhhhhhhh
RA2 + YR for life
[–]Red_OktoberfestVatican City 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (3子コメント)
Even our lord makes mistakes.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (2子コメント)
That doesn't sound very zealous of you. Turn in your tiara.
[–]Red_OktoberfestVatican City 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
Do you know how many fucking nerds I smoked to get this silly hat? They'll pry it off my cold dead head.
[–]Archive_of_Madness 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 24分 前 (0子コメント)
Actually the tentacle porn came from the brits, Japan just went nuts with it.
[–]votelikeimhot 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
pretty sure we do.know...
[–]GreatGreen286Ontario 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前* (4子コメント)
Can we really say that, if the Americans didn't do it, its whats to say the British, French of Russians would have done the same.
Edit: I've left the original post to as not confuse people
Can we really say that if it wasn't for the Americans, Japan wouldn't have become an imperialist power. With other empires expanding in Asia during the same time as Admiral Perry's visit to Japan (Such as Russia, Great Britain and France) its entirely possible that Japan could have been forced to open up its ports due by some other Great Power.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 54分 前* (2子コメント)
If I kick a homeless man in the gut and steal his change, can I justify it by saying that some other asshole would have done so? I'll never understand this argument.
If you want to say that they conducted themselves better with their imperialism there are metrics to do so (they have their fair share of atrocities in the Philippines, among other places), but defending the act of doing so by saying "others would've done it anyway" is specious at best.
[–]GreatGreen286Ontario 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 34分 前* (1子コメント)
I by no means was implying that the US were somehow nicer or conducted themselves any better, rather saying that it was inevitable that Japan would open itself up to the rest of the world and while the blame could rest to the United States for Japans start into imperialism. But to say Japans imperialism might not have ever happened if it wasn't for the US seems specious.
Edit: Reading my original post I see how my statement was a bit improperly worded and how that might have been misenterpreted.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 32分 前 (0子コメント)
Oh yes, Japanese militarism and expansionism definitely has its own cultural strains, it was just the idea that America somehow was a better option than those eeevvviilll Yuropeans to which I had objections.
[–]hello-719Ohio 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2分 前 (0子コメント)
Frankly, I think that by being forced to open up it's ports when it did was a good thing for japan. WW2 and other things aside, it's better for them to have modernized, even with all the shit that comes with it, and preserve their culture than to be colonized.
[–]AOMRocks20"Remove Japan" -Harry "Missouri stronk" Truman 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
I mean, did you see what Japan was wearing? She was just begging to have her ports opened.
[–]ofRedditingMaryland 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 5分 前 (0子コメント)
We just wanted to help them modernize. We didn't know how far they'd go. They got a little taste and they realized they liked it, before long they were hooked, there was never enough. It got to the point of raiding entire counties just to get their fix. Not everyone can handle it.
[–]PerNihilAdNihilOne Nation Under Trees! -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
what better way to inaugurate an era of 'free trade' than at literal gunpoint?
lol
"american exceptionalism" indeed
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
They learned well from their dad and his friends.
[–]rindindinUnknown 78ポイント79ポイント80ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
Reading through the comments, people seemed to have forgotten:
don't take polandball so seriously
Besides, we all know Japan's on its period again. Look at that red splot in the middle.
[–]newtothelyteCuba 31ポイント32ポイント33ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
If people get butthurt about this, then they shouldn't visit this sub anymore. This is about as tame as it comes
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 65ポイント66ポイント67ポイント 7時間 前 (17子コメント)
remove sushi REMOVE SUSHI yuo are the worst japanese of the...ah fuck it, I can't be bothered.
[–]LocnilBut why not a ball 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント 4時間 前 (16子コメント)
remove sushi REMOVE SUSHI yuo are the worst japanese
...There's a better Japanese?
[–]MaserPhaserEh? 48ポイント49ポイント50ポイント 4時間 前 (9子コメント)
Mainland Japanese of course! Or "China" as you might call them.
[–]tc1991Tyne And Wear 28ポイント29ポイント30ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
No No Mainland Japan is Korea
[–]TrauermarschJoseon 28ポイント29ポイント30ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
I am of offend! I SHALL SENDINGS MANY FANS TO YOUR HOUSE!
[–]vincentmaiWe Are Rising. 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2時間 前 (4子コメント)
I prefer island Chinese.
[–]Jawado116Palestine 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2時間 前 (3子コメント)
You mean Taiwan?
[–]vincentmaiWe Are Rising. 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2時間 前 (2子コメント)
Apply to all East Asian countries except Mongolia.
[–]AndarnioSwärje 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
even south korea?
[–]That_Hobo_in_The_TubThe land of the coal and the home of the lumber. 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 21分 前 (0子コメント)
North korea is sea of glory.
[–]batmaaangChinatex 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Canada best Canada! I gibe trade deals.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4時間 前 (3子コメント)
Quoth the old saying, the only good ones...
[–]OllieGarkeyDC Can Into State 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間 前 (0子コメント)
*glare *
[–]sabasNLNetherlands best lands! 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
...are those that don't eat raw fish.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
Ehh, close enough. I don't like sashimi.
[–]likesdarkgreenTexas 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
Sashimi for one
[–]CrocPBFreedom's back bitches and Sturgeon is ma waifu! 42ポイント43ポイント44ポイント 7時間 前 (11子コメント)
Ugh, just fuck each other the lot o' ye!
[–]rindindinUnknown 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント 3時間 前 (10子コメント)
American's too big (about 9 million Sq.Km.) for Japan (about 350 Sq.Km). Just won't fit!
[–]rfowlePennsylvania 41ポイント42ポイント43ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
Florida is 170,304 sq km so we should be fine
[–]kami232German Empire 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
Japan couldn't handle Florida's girth.
[–]Nukem_From_OrbitMURICA 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
Lube it with the tears of North Korea.
[–]rindindinUnknown 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
Sorry, Cuba recently took over as the position of fluffer and luber.
[–]CrocPBFreedom's back bitches and Sturgeon is ma waifu! 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
It can try ;)
[–]batmaaangChinatex 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
Eh, I'm sure that's one of Japan's (many) fetishes.
[–]1f90304Maryland 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
350 square kilometers seems a bit small...
[–]MadlockFreakI am become Earth, Destroyer of Death 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
Well there is Cape Cod, (880 km2)
[–]waadkinsUnited Kingdom 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント 3時間 前 (13子コメント)
Seriously though, do Japanese people here feel any sort of grudge with Americans?
I once met an Argentinian on my degree's year out, and she just hated me and I couldn't not conclude as to why. My 'Union Flag' (Union Jack) shirt was probably the giveaway there.
[–]dtwnNeeds a monocle. 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 3時間 前 (6子コメント)
Worked in Japan for a while. For the most part, there's no hate for the States at all. They mostly think it's pretty cool, pretty dangerous, pretty weird, and pretty fat. Not too different from the attitudes towards America on Polandball.
Many of them would like to visit, but not to live there.
[–]tak-in-the-boxNumber one victim of Chile's seafood diet 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント 2時間 前 (4子コメント)
Relevant
[–]KnightModernSmoke Country 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
the comic where poland is a thief instead of a plumber
[–]RainDownMyBluesMURICA 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Woo! I forgot about his comics. Time to catch up. They're awesome! :D
[–]ToTheNintiethChile 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Daw.
[–]WaffleAmongTheFenceMURICA 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 44分 前 (0子コメント)
America and Japan #1 transpacific bros.
[–]CIV_QUICKCASHFlorida 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 36分 前 (0子コメント)
Hit the nail on the head with that description.
[–]Alvargon75Spanish Empire 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
There´s two words to explain that: Islas Malvinas
[–]tc1991Tyne And Wear 52ポイント53ポイント54ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
Gosh you really misspelt FALKLAND ISLANDS
[–]Alvargon75Spanish Empire 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Fuck you pirate!
[–]probable_alcoholicOhio 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
Why were you visiting the south lands? You know only the USA will put up with your bullshit. Ha!
[–]waadkinsUnited Kingdom 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
My mistake, I wasn't in South-USA, I was in Oz (my favourite of the colonies).
[–]HarrisSinclairScotland 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
This is one of the many perks being Scottish exempts you from for some reason
[–]Halorecon95Greater Netherlands 24ポイント25ポイント26ポイント 7時間 前 (2子コメント)
Japan's response to that: Commodore Matthew Calbraith Perry.
[–]coldpipeIndonesia 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 5時間 前 (0子コメント)
"Anime"
[–]cecilterwilliger420Thirteen Colonies 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 9分 前 (0子コメント)
You leave that nice Rhode Island boy out of it. We don't have a lot of important historical figures. He's about it. And I guess Roger williams who has a pretty nice statue in Geneva.
[–]MortalSphereLithuania 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 5時間 前 (2子コメント)
Is 'Murica slowly becoming cyclops now?
[–]BroloniousJoey Vento is my Spirit Animal 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
The fat crowds the eyes together.
[–]TomKiiskEstonia 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Meanwhile Japan has become wide-eyed.
[–]TheScamr[🍰] 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 8時間 前 (2子コメント)
Why you no ennrish?
[–]DalekSpartanSpanish Empire 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
¿wat?
[–]SunnyChowHong Kong 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 3時間 前 (7子コメント)
As far as I know, atomic bomb in that day is just as destructive as formal bombing. The difference is, formal bombing requires 1000 bombers but atomic bomb just need one
[–]HoboBruteMissouri 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
The initial destruction was similar, but the long lasting effects of Nukes were absolutely horrifying
[–]KerbalrocketryYTBritish Empire 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間 前 (5子コメント)
Slight diffrence though, 1000 bombers is overkill. A equivilent toneage of TNT bombing allows civilians to survive the bombing, and allows people to return to the area after the bombing.
But yeah the USA compares flattening several sqaure miles of city to an attack on a naval base. Talks about their priorities really.
[–]tc1991Tyne And Wear 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
we can't really criticize bombing overkill though...
[–]KerbalrocketryYTBritish Empire 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Yeah we can, any kind of strategic bombing is overkill. It likely had little effect on the course of the war and didn't have the intended effect to demoralise civilians.
But yeah, arson was a british speciality during the war...
[–]Seriouslybrochill 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2時間 前 (2子コメント)
keep touting your imaginary super civilized war machine England. Keep on keeping
[–]Seriouslybrochill 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
Incendiaries, You and Dresden all you need to know about creating a vacuum that sucks the air out of the area and deny all life oxygen while slowly roasting to death .
[–]Seriouslybrochill 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
"The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw and half a hundred other places, they put their rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind." Man those bloodthirsty Amer... oh wait
[–]vincentmaiWe Are Rising. 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 6時間 前 (2子コメント)
Remove Japs.
[–]ama_deoPoland can into Ebola 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
Remove Tibet.
~ China 1951-20??
[–]SPARTAN_TOASTERUnited States 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 14分 前 (0子コメント)
~ China 1951-3???
FTFY
[–]ToTheNintiethChile 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
In my experience, Americans bring up Pearl Harbor way more often than Japanese do the nukings.
[–]ZebulonPike13California 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 23分 前 (0子コメント)
When have you heard Americans ever bring up Pearl Harbor?
[–]MrQuiggles 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
THINGS WOULD BE SO MUCH BETTER IF YOU'D STOP WITH THE PORN CENSORING JAPAN
[–]Pitpit7Old Europe 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
Definitively the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust. Shame on you Japan!
[–]protohomBharat 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 7時間 前 (232子コメント)
Yep, Pearl Harbour was the justification for nuking cities and refusing them treatment for 'unconditional' surrender.
[–]CurlyNippleHairs 110ポイント111ポイント112ポイント 5時間 前 (185子コメント)
No I think World War 2 was justification for that. Human rights went out the window a long time before the nukes dropped.
[–]CookieMan0Colorado 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 2時間 前 (5子コメント)
Human rights went out the window a long time before the nukes dropped.
R A P E O F N A N K I N G
[–]PerNihilAdNihilOne Nation Under Trees! 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 1時間 前 (4子コメント)
T R A I L O F T E A R S
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
T H I R D P U N I C W A R
Forgive me for skipping a few steps.
[–]StrangelumpGermany 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間 前 (2子コメント)
Never forget
[–]ElectricZMURICA 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
Never forget what again?
[–]CookieMan0Colorado 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 18分 前 (0子コメント)
nineleven
[+]protohomBharat スコアが基準値未満のコメント-36ポイント-35ポイント-34ポイント 5時間 前* (178子コメント)
Not really.
Edit : Wow, -6 in half an hour in Polandball? Looks like angry Muricans began to downvote historical fact that goes against their nationalistic narrative.
Edit2 : Japan wanted to surrender conditionally, relinquishing their Asian possessions by conquest, by July 1945. For this, they extended diplomatic offers to United States through Soviet Union. Source : 1 and 2. Now, if the reason was to end the war, United States could have accepted the offer, but they wanted unconditional surrender from Japan. For this, nukes were dropped, killing about 200,000 and condemning about the same for a far worse fate as the Hibakusha. If you think such a price in human life and misery was required for 'unconditional' surrender, then move on.
[–]DrdresSweden 49ポイント50ポイント51ポイント 5時間 前 (103子コメント)
What
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 44ポイント45ポイント46ポイント 4時間 前 (10子コメント)
The only people opposed to the idea that America is a sadistic mass murderer and who are willing to downvote the notion must be butthurt Americans, duh.
[–]sabasNLNetherlands best lands! 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント 3時間 前 (9子コメント)
Well no, the thing is that it's true that human rights were not a thing during the war. All sides committed horrible war crimes.
For some reason this guy seems to be implying only the US committed crimes. That's bullshit.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
I'm sorry, I must have layered the sarcasm on my statement too thinly.
[–]protohomBharat -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 3時間 前 (7子コメント)
I'm not implying only the US committed war-crimes. I don't know where you got that notion, and I'm not so naive as to do that.
[–]KnightModernSmoke Country 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 3時間 前 (6子コメント)
No I think World War 2 was justification for that. Human rights went out the window a long time before the nukes dropped. not really (your comment)
not really (your comment)
[–]zeniizJapan 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (2子コメント)
How in the hell does that imply only America committed war crimes?
[–]Unsub_LeftyPennsylvania 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 45分 前 (1子コメント)
It implies that the only violation of human rights was the dropping of the atomic bombs, which was done by the Americans. It disregards the previous violations (Rape of Nanking) in which Japan also committed human rights atrocities
[–]protohomBharat -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
Not really meant what I wrote as the detailed response later.
[–]zeniizJapan 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
I think logic and reading comprehension is beyond the reach of some people here. "OMG he said something bad about MURICA, burn a cross on his lawn!!!"
[–]Sadnot 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
Oooor, you got downvoted for writing a two word dismissive response, maybe.
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
I've edited my response.
[–]Sadnot 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
Thanks, that was informative.
[–]124876720The Athens of the North 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 2時間 前 (18子コメント)
Japan wanted to surrender conditionally
Wrong. Togo had sounded out the Soviets with a conditional peace offer, but the Japanese cabinet could not surrender without unanimous approval, and such approval was not present. The Supreme War Council was divided - the military hawks wanted to offer a surrender that let them keep the Emperor as well as Korea and Taiwan, and deal with demobilization and war criminals themselves, whilst the civilian doves wanted to offer one that just kept the Emperor. In any case there was no possibility of Japan surrendering without the approval of the Supreme War Council - and the Army had an effective veto over SWC policy anyway. So Japan didn't "want to surrender"; some of them wanted to make a delusional offer for a peace they didn't deserve, which wasn't even communicated to the Allies in any significant detail, whilst others wanted a more reasonable peace, which they couldn't get through the SWC in any case.
"Their Asian possessions by conquest" was understood to include only those territories gained since the outbreak of war in Asia in 1936 - so this conditional "surrender" would have let the Japanese keep exploiting their captive populations in Korea and Taiwan, as well as allowed the old militarists to continue to rule.
The atom bomb was a perfectly reasonable response to such a "peace offer".
[–]protohomBharat -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 2時間 前 (17子コメント)
I'd agree with Korea being captive, but not Taiwan. My point was, dropping nukes was not about ending the war. It was about obtaining an unconditional surrender, in favour of the US, guaranteeing American hegemony in Japan.
[–]124876720The Athens of the North 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2時間 前 (10子コメント)
You speak as though those objectives can be separated.
The Americans wanted to avoid having to launch an invasion of the Home Islands that was projected to result in 1 million American casualties. So its true that their concern was primarily the welfare of Americans, not Japanese, but that doesn't change the fact that a continuation of the war would have resulted in greater Japanese casualties too. There's nothing wrong with that either; the Americans were at war, and placing the lives of their own men over those of the enemy was a perfectly legitimate calculation.
America had every right to claim hegemony in postwar Japan. Japan was a totalitarian rogue state, that had, without provocation, attacked the United States, which had done the lion's share of the heavy lifting in defeating it.
[–]ArtfulLoungerTaiwan 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (5子コメント)
Taiwan was seized by the Japanese from the Chinese in 1895 in the first Sino-Japanese war. Taiwan is 98% Han Chinese.
[–]blackninja9939United Kingdom 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 3時間 前 (14子コメント)
In the nicest way... you're an idiot :D
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 3時間 前 (13子コメント)
Care to elaborate?
[–]blackninja9939United Kingdom 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 3時間 前 (12子コメント)
I am pretty sure you can read over all of the comments done by other people to figure that one out
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間 前 (11子コメント)
You're just saying that because you want to assert Western hegemony over all forms of discourse, including internet dick-waving.
[–]blackninja9939United Kingdom 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 3時間 前 (7子コメント)
Nothing wrong with some internet dick-waving or western hegemony jeez
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間 前 (6子コメント)
Mmyes, Meatspin truly is the high point of Western culture, never to be topped except perhaps by waffles of a certain tincture.
[–]blackninja9939United Kingdom 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間 前 (5子コメント)
Or a certain party with a citric nature
[–]protohomBharat 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間 前 (2子コメント)
You don't have to mock me of my purported bias on every comment I make, you know.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
You do enough of that yourself.
Sorry, that's actually a bit harsh.
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
By insisting upon some other historical reading by citing sources? I'm Indian. I was raised on Soviet books and American TV.
[–]ArtfulLoungerTaiwan 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 4時間 前* (20子コメント)
Many terrible things were done during WWII to and by the Japanese. But mostly by. Yes they got nuked. They also had the Batan Death March, Hell (Slave) Ships, Unit 731 performing inhuman experiments on Chinese, the Rape of Nanking, and the overall treatment of Chinese as subhuman. So they can't really claim any sort of moral high ground just by getting nuked. No one forced them to invade half of Asia.
[–]TheG-man98Gib me all your clay 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 5時間 前 (1子コメント)
I don't think there is a big difference between firebombing a city and nuking it.
[–]protohomBharat 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 5時間 前 (0子コメント)
There is. For example, no one knew what can a full scale nuclear blast can do humans. This is why Murican doctors refused treatment to survivors and studied them. Also, heard of the Hibakusha? It's one thing to de, and another to live on a life of unbearable misery.
[–]jPaoloGrey Poland creator 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 47分 前 (2子コメント)
Holy shit!
Oh man, no other nation downvotes here as heavily as fatass burgers.
[–]protohomBharat 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 40分 前 (0子コメント)
You missed out all the fun though, if you were here, this could've been turned into a second hypocrates.
[–]ArtfulLoungerTaiwan 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
Make that -34
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
I'd set a new Polandball record I think. My total negative Karma in this thread is -170.
[–]PerNihilAdNihilOne Nation Under Trees! 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間 前 (2子コメント)
mRRicans understanding of history is quite limited
they imagine the world was created in 1492 and that they are "god's chosen people" - they even created an entire mythology to justify their human rights violations (ie, 'manifest destiny') which they to this day will shrug off as somehow 'irrelevant' (even though they happened only, you know, 200 years ago and are well-documented though 1/3 of them have no problems swallowing whole undocumented (and perhaps even plagiarised) fictional works dating as far back as several thousand years ago
[–]martybadIowa 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
No, history started in 1776, everything before that was a mistake.
But I expected those who come here to have some brains. Seems like I'm wrong.
[–]Takuya813Germany 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2時間 前 (2子コメント)
I love how people are downvoting you and saying things like “ we don’t know the main reason”
I studied this as one of the intelligence failures of the united states. We had intel, we knew the soviets could mediate peace. We had a bad secretary of state who misled fdr and got him to witheld information from the ussr at Yalta which led us to nuke japan and the cold war.
We also had a few translation issues along the way.
So yeah-- could have ended the war without nukes.
[–]polioperativeAMAMURICA 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
No, thats dumb as shit. The Allied powers made the decision to only accept an unconditional surrender from Japan and Germany. The USSR couldn't mediate because they had already agreed to invade Japanese mainland possessions.
The only worst war crime was committed by Japan and Germany, they lost.
[–]martybadIowa 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (2子コメント)
Wow I really thought you were /u/jpaolo there for a second
[–]protohomBharat 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 55分 前 (0子コメント)
jPaolo is amateur compared to me now.
[–]ButtstacheOhio 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 32分 前 (0子コメント)
Just as dumb, but with less to say!
[–]ComradeHavoc 41ポイント42ポイント43ポイント 5時間 前 (27子コメント)
You have no idea how many more people would have died with a land invasion of Japan, and how much longer the war would have been drawn out. Anyway google search "dresden bombing", makes nukes seem a lot more humane.
[–]I_NEED_YOUR_COOKIES1939 worst year of my life 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間 前 (2子コメント)
This is false.
Japan was already in the process of writing up some sort of peace with the yanks, american submarines already had cut off most of the Japanese Empire from the island, and as such, they would have starved to death soon, just like Britan would if the germans had a considerable naval blockade or didn't accidentally give away the secrets of the naval(hint:magnetic) mine, the Island archipelago isn't nearly enough to sustain the population.
[–]CIV_QUICKCASHFlorida 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 31分 前 (1子コメント)
The thing is, even when Japan agreed to an unconditional surrender hundreds of military officers committed suicide because they would rather die than accept defeat, and even when the peace was agreed upon there was an attempted coup to prevent the surrender from happening. Japan wasn't quite defeated when they surrendered, at least by Imperial Japanese standards. Invading would've made a very messy clusterfuck as the armed forces and government fragment, many separate groups moving on to (likely with relative effectiveness) fight their own wars while the civilian population takes an even greater toll from starvation and general damage caused to what was left of the islands. The bombings were an important factor in a very clean and safe ending to the Pacific front, along with demonstrating their destructive power and preventing any governments from dropping the first bombs when they have a lot more.
[–]Traim -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
You have no idea
So do you.
[–]The_GrubgrubMURICA[🍰] 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
No, we have estimates.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Downfall#Estimated_casualties
This doesn't even consider the Japanese casualties. Our plan was to divide and conquer, and many more civilians would have died due to starvation than from the nukes. I read estimates from another website (I'm sorry, can't provide a source here, if someone can find an estimate, please post it) putting civilian casualties to at least millions.
[+]protohomBharat スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 5時間 前* (21子コメント)
I don't have to search about Dresden bombing, and there were far more fire-bombings in Japan where multitudes perished. Japan also agreed to conditionally surrender before the nukes were dropped. The nukes were more of a show of strength.
Edit : Relevant documents 1 and 2
[–]whatIsThisBullCrapMommy's favourite 33ポイント34ポイント35ポイント 5時間 前 (20子コメント)
Japan also agreed to conditionally surrender before the nukes were dropped.
Not true. While some of the Japanese government was somewhat kinda sorta considering surrender, the military was not. They were planning to fight until they either won or literally the last Japanese man was dead
[+]protohomBharat スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12ポイント-11ポイント-10ポイント 5時間 前 (19子コメント)
Did you even read the documents, dude? Or are you still believing in World War 2 propaganda?
[–]Atomic_CommunistStraya 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 4時間 前 (5子コメント)
One could also argue if the US didn't drop them on those cities someone else would have let off a nuke later on a different target. Maybe a few years later when they developed the tech further.
I don't think anyone has the right to judge what the US did too harshly. I'm just glad they learned their lesson and the same mistake was not repeated.
[–]Traim 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間 前 (0子コメント)
could
Thats the important part of your post. You should not trivialise the past with things which could be. If you try to build a argument of hte bases what could be it's empty and a waste of time.
[+]protohomBharat スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 4時間 前 (3子コメント)
No one can judge Murica for their war-crimes. Got it.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 4時間 前 (2子コメント)
Nobody except you.
[–]protohomBharat -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 4時間 前 (1子コメント)
I of 10th Avatar of Vishnu. I'll judge anyone I want.
can't argue with that
[–]shrekter 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 4時間 前 (12子コメント)
Did you read the second one? The phrase 'unconditional surrender' is right in there.
[–]duelistgamerUnited Empires of Scandinavia, Brittania and Italia 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
I don't know if you understood the second document but it reads as "we'll continue to fight if the only other option is unconditional surrender" in the last part. That hints at the possibility that they were willing to consider a negotiated/conditional surrender.
[–]CIV_QUICKCASHFlorida -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 25分 前 (0子コメント)
The Allies had already agreed that they'd accept no surrender from Axis powers other than unconditional surrender. They might has well have said they would only accept surrender to any country not in the Allies.
[–]bestrtsplayerBey caught me jihadin' 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 6時間 前 (1子コメント)
Pearl Harbour .
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 4時間 前 (0子コメント)
It's spelled "Harbor" because 'Murica.
[–]BroloniousJoey Vento is my Spirit Animal 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
America didn't need justification for nuking Japan. It's not like we have to explain ourselves to lesser nations.
[–]DiplomjodlerGermany World Champion 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4時間 前 (13子コメント)
Well no, it was more of a convenient pretext. But it's really funny how it still seems to be some sort of national trauma for many Americans.
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント 4時間 前 (12子コメント)
It was an unprovoked attack on a state in a heavily isolationist stance and it set off the conflict that turned the US into a superpower. I'd say the importance lent to it is very appropriate.
[–]WilliamzasLithuania 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
Wasn't WWI what made the US powerful?
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Arguably, the US became a great power by the turn of the century. WWII is what started the whole period of American hegemony.
[–]DiplomjodlerGermany World Champion 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間 前 (9子コメント)
Wrong. It was just the spark that blew up the powder keg. The conflict between Japan and the US had been brewing for a long time.
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 3時間 前 (8子コメント)
But the Japanese didn't have to attack the US. The US was not actively provoking Japan save for lending aid to enemies of its allies for the purpose of fighting a war on the other side of the planet.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 3時間 前 (7子コメント)
Except for the small matter of the oil embargo which would have destroyed its economy.
If Japan had gotten its head out of its ass and stopped interfering in China it probably wouldn't have needed to do it, but even then they were too far gone with militarism and expansionism.
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 3時間 前 (4子コメント)
The oil embargo that was put in place for attacking the US's ally, China, and for the Rape of Nanking. The US was not obligated to continue selling oil to the Japanese and to continue enabling Japanese militarism and atrocities, but the Japanese wouldn't play ball so the US did have to stop selling them oil.
[–]duelistgamerUnited Empires of Scandinavia, Brittania and Italia 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
Sorry, but that's quite revisionist.
The US and RoC were cordial friends at best, and not allies.
It wasn't because of the invasion of China that the embargo was put. It was because tensions between Japan and the US were already high under Hirohito's rule. The Japanese troops were indisciplined, and during the invasion they accidentally (some argue it was intentional) sunk the USS Panay, and US-Japan relationships only continued to deteriorate (Allison incident, troops looting American settlements etc) thereafter. Their embargo wasn't an altruistic one, it was mostly seen as a good opportunity to hit out at the Japanese and to curb their excessive militant ambitions.
There was a long history of tensions between Japan and the US over foreign policy in China. Most of the western powers only saw China as a trade partner to be exploited, and the Japanese rejection of the Open Door Policy and control of Manchuria only served to hurt US interests in the area. Any further conquest would seriously weaken the West's trade with China, as Japan at that time was very much considered to be a world power (thanks to the Russo-Japanese war).
It wasn't out of sympathy for the Chinese, and please don't portray it as that. That was only a convenient pretext.
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
Ok, you seem to be more knowledgable, I will defer to you.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間 前 (1子コメント)
Accounting for reasons why Japan resorted to the ends it did is not the same thing as justifying them. Given my family history I would be the last person to make a case for Japanese expansionism.
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 3時間 前* (0子コメント)
I wasn't, the second half of your comment made your intentions clear, I was just stating in case. Although the point could be made that if, say, Japan had not attacked Pearl Harbor and simply stuck with invading British and Dutch posessions in Asia, the population of the United States would not have had such a fervor in signing up for war, even if the US decided that it was enough cause for war.
[–]Houdini_Dees_NutsNorth Carolina 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2時間 前 (1子コメント)
Embargoes are not a pretext for war, if that were the case the U.S. Would've bombed the shit out of the OPEC counties during the 70s.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Like I said, I'm not justifying their actions. Furthermore the context of Japan in 1941 =/= that of the USA in the 1970s, especially in terms of aims and resource requirements.
[–]ElectricZMURICA 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前* (0子コメント)
None of this would have happened if Kirk Douglas hadn't recalled the strike force back to the Nimitz.
Thanks, Kirk!
[–]the_brown_stocktonPakistan 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2時間 前 (4子コメント)
pearl harbor was allowed to happen so that we had a pretense for joining the war just like 9/11
[–]polioperativeAMAMURICA 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2時間 前 (0子コメント)
Jet dreams cant met dank memes.
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 2時間 前 (2子コメント)
Roosevelt knew about 12/7! Zero Fighters can't sink aircraft carriers!
[–]S-B312 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間 前 (1子コメント)
Roosevelt did 12/7! 12/7 was a part time job!!!!!
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
REMOVE ROOSEVELT THE LIAR FROM RUSHMORE PREMISES
[–]zeniizJapan 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間 前 (0子コメント)
Reading this thread makes me lose hope in polandball. So many people down voting for disagreeing with someone, this might as well be /r/news.
π Rendered by PID 10807 on app-314 at 2015-05-25 16:53:50.199377+00:00 running 7d6cd40 country code: JP.
[–]sirpellinorMagyar best nomad 184ポイント185ポイント186ポイント (31子コメント)
[–]RPM123MA's Thirteen 71ポイント72ポイント73ポイント (25子コメント)
[–]Halorecon95Greater Netherlands 52ポイント53ポイント54ポイント (24子コメント)
[–]-ArkennonAustralia 80ポイント81ポイント82ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]QuofNorth Carolina 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]That_Hobo_in_The_TubThe land of the coal and the home of the lumber. 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]QuofNorth Carolina 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AngryWatchmaker 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Wizzad 38ポイント39ポイント40ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]FrancisGallowaySic Semper Tyrannis 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CptBigglesworthPint of porter and half a pork pie 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Red_OktoberfestVatican City 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Red_OktoberfestVatican City 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Red_OktoberfestVatican City 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Red_OktoberfestVatican City 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Archive_of_Madness 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]votelikeimhot 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GreatGreen286Ontario 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]GreatGreen286Ontario 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hello-719Ohio 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AOMRocks20"Remove Japan" -Harry "Missouri stronk" Truman 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ofRedditingMaryland 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PerNihilAdNihilOne Nation Under Trees! -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]rindindinUnknown 78ポイント79ポイント80ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]newtothelyteCuba 31ポイント32ポイント33ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 65ポイント66ポイント67ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]LocnilBut why not a ball 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]MaserPhaserEh? 48ポイント49ポイント50ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]tc1991Tyne And Wear 28ポイント29ポイント30ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]TrauermarschJoseon 28ポイント29ポイント30ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]vincentmaiWe Are Rising. 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Jawado116Palestine 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]vincentmaiWe Are Rising. 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]AndarnioSwärje 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]That_Hobo_in_The_TubThe land of the coal and the home of the lumber. 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]batmaaangChinatex 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]OllieGarkeyDC Can Into State 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sabasNLNetherlands best lands! 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]likesdarkgreenTexas 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CrocPBFreedom's back bitches and Sturgeon is ma waifu! 42ポイント43ポイント44ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]rindindinUnknown 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]rfowlePennsylvania 41ポイント42ポイント43ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]kami232German Empire 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Nukem_From_OrbitMURICA 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]rindindinUnknown 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CrocPBFreedom's back bitches and Sturgeon is ma waifu! 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]batmaaangChinatex 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]1f90304Maryland 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MadlockFreakI am become Earth, Destroyer of Death 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]waadkinsUnited Kingdom 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]dtwnNeeds a monocle. 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]tak-in-the-boxNumber one victim of Chile's seafood diet 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]KnightModernSmoke Country 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RainDownMyBluesMURICA 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ToTheNintiethChile 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]WaffleAmongTheFenceMURICA 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CIV_QUICKCASHFlorida 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Alvargon75Spanish Empire 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]tc1991Tyne And Wear 52ポイント53ポイント54ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Alvargon75Spanish Empire 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]probable_alcoholicOhio 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]waadkinsUnited Kingdom 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]HarrisSinclairScotland 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Halorecon95Greater Netherlands 24ポイント25ポイント26ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]coldpipeIndonesia 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]cecilterwilliger420Thirteen Colonies 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MortalSphereLithuania 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]BroloniousJoey Vento is my Spirit Animal 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TomKiiskEstonia 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheScamr[🍰] 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]DalekSpartanSpanish Empire 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SunnyChowHong Kong 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]HoboBruteMissouri 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]KerbalrocketryYTBritish Empire 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]tc1991Tyne And Wear 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]KerbalrocketryYTBritish Empire 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Seriouslybrochill 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Seriouslybrochill 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Seriouslybrochill 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]vincentmaiWe Are Rising. 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]ama_deoPoland can into Ebola 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]SPARTAN_TOASTERUnited States 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ToTheNintiethChile 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ZebulonPike13California 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MrQuiggles 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Pitpit7Old Europe 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (232子コメント)
[–]CurlyNippleHairs 110ポイント111ポイント112ポイント (185子コメント)
[–]CookieMan0Colorado 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]PerNihilAdNihilOne Nation Under Trees! 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]StrangelumpGermany 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]ElectricZMURICA 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]CookieMan0Colorado 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]protohomBharat スコアが基準値未満のコメント-36ポイント-35ポイント-34ポイント (178子コメント)
[–]DrdresSweden 49ポイント50ポイント51ポイント (103子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 44ポイント45ポイント46ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]sabasNLNetherlands best lands! 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]KnightModernSmoke Country 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]zeniizJapan 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Unsub_LeftyPennsylvania 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]zeniizJapan 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Sadnot 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Sadnot 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]124876720The Athens of the North 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]124876720The Athens of the North 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]ArtfulLoungerTaiwan 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]blackninja9939United Kingdom 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]blackninja9939United Kingdom 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]blackninja9939United Kingdom 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]blackninja9939United Kingdom 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ArtfulLoungerTaiwan 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (20子コメント)
[–]TheG-man98Gib me all your clay 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jPaoloGrey Poland creator 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ArtfulLoungerTaiwan 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PerNihilAdNihilOne Nation Under Trees! 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]martybadIowa 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Takuya813Germany 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]polioperativeAMAMURICA 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]martybadIowa 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ButtstacheOhio 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ComradeHavoc 41ポイント42ポイント43ポイント (27子コメント)
[–]I_NEED_YOUR_COOKIES1939 worst year of my life 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]CIV_QUICKCASHFlorida 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Traim -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]The_GrubgrubMURICA[🍰] 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]protohomBharat スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (21子コメント)
[–]whatIsThisBullCrapMommy's favourite 33ポイント34ポイント35ポイント (20子コメント)
[+]protohomBharat スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12ポイント-11ポイント-10ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]Atomic_CommunistStraya 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Traim 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]protohomBharat スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]protohomBharat -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]HarrisSinclairScotland 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]shrekter 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]duelistgamerUnited Empires of Scandinavia, Brittania and Italia 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]CIV_QUICKCASHFlorida -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bestrtsplayerBey caught me jihadin' 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BroloniousJoey Vento is my Spirit Animal 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]DiplomjodlerGermany World Champion 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]WilliamzasLithuania 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DiplomjodlerGermany World Champion 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]duelistgamerUnited Empires of Scandinavia, Brittania and Italia 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]safarispiffHong Kong 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Houdini_Dees_NutsNorth Carolina 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ElectricZMURICA 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]the_brown_stocktonPakistan 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]polioperativeAMAMURICA 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]S-B312 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tungstencomptonUniquely Singapore 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]zeniizJapan 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)