//
Quickread
×
Like what you're reading?
Never miss a thing with the HuffPost Parents newsletter!
  Sign me up for the Lifestyle newsletter, too.
Newsletter may include personalized content. Learn more.
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
Huffpost Parents
  • Like
    Like
    774k774k
  • Newsletters
    Get ParentsNewsletters
  • Huffington Post Search
    Search The Huffington Post

Mom Fights Back Against Sexist Sixth-Grade Pool Party Dress Code

The Huffington Post  |  By Alexandra Svokos
Posted: Updated:
When Jennifer Smith's son brought home a permission slip for a sixth-grade pool party, she was surprised to read a stipulation: "All girls must wear a non-white t-shirt over their swimsuit."
slip
"Being a feminist and seeing things through that filter, I was just kind of enraged by that," Smith told The Huffington Post. "They're saying little girls need to be ashamed of their bodies and cover themselves up."
The pool party was being held for sixth-graders at Rhoades Elementary in Indianapolis who have displayed good citizenship. Although Smith does not have a daughter, she did not want to encourage the gendered rule. The slip also said Speedos would not be allowed.
"I have a little boy, I'm teaching him to think correctly, and this is contrary to what I'm teaching him," she said.
Smith contacted the school to understand why the rule was put into place. She said the school explained that there had been inappropriate swimwear at past parties and that they wanted to help students who may be uncomfortable not covering themselves. The T-shirt rule was also an economic consideration.
"We know that for many of our families, buying an extra [one-piece] swimsuit for their children would be a luxury they cannot afford," a district spokesperson told HuffPost. "To address the issue of appropriate dress for the swim party, we believed asking the girls to wear T-shirts over their swimsuits was the solution that addressed the issue most sensitively."
Smith countered that idea in an email to the school's principal. "Setting one standard for half of the student body only promotes the idea that girls bodies are naturally shameful," she wrote.
Ultimately, after Smith went to the superintendent, the pool party rule was changed to say that T-shirts were optional. Smith was pleased with this progress and said she believes it will help the girls in the class know that their bodies are not shameful and that they are not responsible for how others see them.
"If we can change little things to make it better, and examine the reasons why we do things, that would be great," Smith said. It's these small decisions that can alter how young people view themselves and help or hurt them in the long run, she added.
The pool part was held on Monday. According to Smith's son, no girls wore a T-shirt.
(h/t Babble)
 
Click here to view Conversations

Conversations

Add a comment

 

.
 
.
.
Your comment may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
.
  • Craig Schultz · Top Commenter · Middleton, Wisconsin
    "I'm teaching him to think correctly"

    A subjective statement if there ever was one.

    Translated into actual English, "I'm teaching him to think the way I think."
    • Darla Cook · Top Commenter
      No she is teaching him not to be a sexist and see girls bodies as something solely for his delight. I applaud her.
      Reply · Like
      · 342 · 9 hours ago
      .
    • Fe Ciega · Top Commenter
      You can say the same thing for making them go to church, or bigotry, or liking the New England Patriots.
      Reply · Like
      · 54 · 8 hours ago
      .
    • Larry Kanter · Top Commenter
      No, she's teaching them correctly.
      Reply · Like
      · 61 · 8 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Tiesha Bumpers Watson · Works at Personal Assistant
    Our society is hyper sexual, and girls should not be putting their bodies on public display. These are children. Modesty is a necessity to combat our hyper sexual culture.
    • Maxwell J. Puthoff · Top Commenter
      Do you not see how insanely circular and illogical that argument is?
      Reply · Like
      · 146 · 9 hours ago
      .
    • Nicole Mi · Top Commenter
      Then you must just LOVE burqas.
      Reply · Like
      · 74 · 9 hours ago
      .
    • Darla Cook · Top Commenter
      Define modest. But I promise you, however you define it someone else will say it is not modest enough.
      Reply · Like
      · 36 · 9 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Lily Ng · Top Commenter · Los Angeles, California
    Way to go, Mom. We need more moms like her.
    • Daniel Cox · Top Commenter · Podunk
      More complainers and victims?
      Reply · Like
      · 49 · 10 hours ago
      .
    • Ryoma Meeiz · Top Commenter · Works at Wendy's
      This isn't being a victim, it's standing up against this rising idea that girls have to cover themselves up all the way because boys can't control themselves/are distracted. Which, by the way, doesn't work; my dad stared in school, and the girls were fully covered.
      Reply · Like
      · 45 · 10 hours ago
      .
    • Aaron Litteken · Top Commenter
      Ryoma Meeiz "it's standing up against this rising idea that girls have to cover themselves up all the way because boys can't control themselves/are distracted."

      So should we let them all go co-ed skinny dipping? If someone cannot control themselves then they are the problem, not what you are wearing (or not wearing).
      Reply · Like
      · 10 · 9 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Jimmy Tillman · Top Commenter · Inspector at Chrysler LLC
    The party was given so the 6th graders could have fun not show off their bodies! Girls should have been modest and boys should not have been allowed to wear speedos! There is no problem with the rules. Be grateful somebody wants to try and counter all the SEX ( It is everywhere because it sells everything) that is thrown in the face of kids by having them covered! Rules had nothing to do with making ANYONE feel bad about their bodies but to keep order and to ensure parents know the party was on the up n up.
    • Ma Ratl · Top Commenter · Spring Branch High School, Houston, TX
      They are kids! Why do YOU look at them as sexual objects? Does their show of skin turn you on? When you were in 6th grade did you want to have sex with every girl you saw in a bathing suit? Have you always been obsessed with sex?
      what makes you think they wouldn't have fun in the swimwear they preferred?
      Reply · Like
      · 92 · 9 hours ago
      .
    • Maxwell J. Puthoff · Top Commenter
      So if you see a sixth grader in a swimsuit, you have sexual thoughts? If you don't, then your comment makes no sense, so obviously you do. The point here is that YOU are the problem, not the little girls and their Dora bikinis.
      Reply · Like
      · 57 · 9 hours ago
      .
    • Darla Cook · Top Commenter
      Hence the problem. What you call modest, someone else will call indecent. Leave it up to the parents, they paid for the swim suit. As long as they aren't naked it is fine.
      Reply · Like
      · 13 · 9 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Matthew Barguirdjian · Top Commenter · Quiet University
    1st world problems...
    • Brian Howard · Top Commenter · Kansas State University
      Matthew Barguirdjian, unfortunately the issues related to young girls being sexualized is much more universal than you seem to think. Underage females are in serious danger of being sexual victims in many parts of the world. Not everything is solely about the United States.
      Reply · Like
      · 23 · 8 hours ago
      .
    • Nicole Wilson · Top Commenter · Minion at Misha Collins
      Matthew - And? We live in a first world and these are our problems. We could be living in a not first world land where a girl not wearing a heavy piece of cloth over her entire body could get her killed.
      Reply · Like
      · 19 · 8 hours ago
      .
    • Lars Taylor · Top Commenter · UC Berkeley
      If you think this is a first world problem you have not spent much time outside the first world or payed much attention when you did.
      Reply · Like
      · 6 · 7 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Jessica Allen · Owner at Farmhouse Dressing
    I agree! As a seventh grader still in lower school (school was split into k-7/8-12, I was told by the now-Principal of my former high school that I was too "well-endowed" to wear bodysuits (they were popular then). I didn't realize there was a difference in my chest and the other girls' chests and was all of a sudden embarrassed and ashamed of myself. I didn't tell my mother then because I was afraid I would get into trouble and that I had done something wrong. I don't think telling children who aren't aware of sexuality/sensuality to cover themselves is an age-appropriate message to send.
    • Rachel Holley Sciortino
      Do you really think a 6th grader is unaware of sexuality? Have you raised one? I have had two and many of the girls in our 6th grade are very into boys...and very aware of how their appearance affects them. These are kids who are a good 10-12 years away from full brain maturity -- in bodies that are in some cases fully mature (I know mine was at age 12-- too young but that's what it was). I think encouraging modesty is fine and I'm a very staunch feminist -- modesty is not in opposition to feminism (or it shouldn't be).
      Reply · Like
      · 23 · 9 hours ago
      .
    • Larry Kanter · Top Commenter
      Rachel Holley Sciortino Then everybody should have been told to wear T shirts, boys & girls alike!
      Reply · Like
      · 41 · 8 hours ago
      .
    • Brea O'Keeffe · Top Commenter
      So you think the teacher telling her that she was too well-endowed to wear the clothing was appropriate....? And, what exactly is "modesty"? Who decides? You're a feminist and yet you believe boys have the right to dress any way they want, but girls should follow established rules in what they wear...? What happened to equal rights for all which is what true feminists believe in?
      Reply · Like
      · 7 · 7 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Rob Harris · Top Commenter
    So why were the boys not allowed to wear speedos? Are they also to be ashamed of their bodies.
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Rick Johnson · Top Commenter
    Sorry this is not about "being ashamed of themselves". Being in a relationship with a lady who has a daughter in that grade and age and seeing how other parents would let her friends dress when they would come over for bbq's/pool parties or other activities we would have at the house... yea, I see nothing wrong with this.
    • Valerie Strawmier · Top Commenter · ETT at ACN
      I agree Rick and it's not about body shaming. It's about teaching them modesty. Both girls and boys should understand modesty. It's not a bad thing to cover up and that doesn't mean you can't be stylish and sassy. There's something to be said about teaching our girls and boys as they grow up about the attraction of a little mystery. Rather than showing off everything they have, save it for the person they love. It's about creating a better quality of life as they grow up-not about shaming them and making them feel like their bodies are bad. People need to grow up and think like adults, not like everyone and everything is attacking them. Or have we completely thrown out the book of morals for life?
      Reply · Like
      · 31 · 9 hours ago
      .
    • Jen Wagner · Top Commenter
      Valerie Strawmier this isn't about modesty. This is about having different rules for boys and girls. Girls are expected to cover themselves, boys are not.
      Reply · Like
      · 56 · 8 hours ago
      .
    • Larry Kanter · Top Commenter
      Valerie Strawmier Then boys and girls both should have been told to wear T shirts. No different values
      Reply · Like
      · 60 · 8 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Juli Caldwell · Top Commenter
    Oh good grief. This isn't sexist. This is some mom getting her panties in a twist because she's bought into the ideology that her double X chromosome makes her a default victim of the patriarchy. Some kids' parents can't afford a new swimsuit. Some kids may not even have a swimsuit, and letting them show up in a tee shirt and shorts gives them an out and levels the playing field. Isn't that what feminism is supposed to be about? Leveling that field? Or has it evolved into something where you put sexism where it does not exist and make sure to take a pic and post it online so you can shame "the man?"

    Take it from a mom with two intelligent, confident daughters: no body shaming will come from others if you teach them to find their value in who they are, not how they look. That is YOUR job as a mom, not society's, so if your daughter gets invited to a pool party and the invitation tells her to wear a tee shirt, she won't see body shaming. She'll just be excited to hang out with her friends. Even the friends whose parents can't afford a swim suit.
    • Darla Fuller · Top Commenter
      It had nothing to do with leveling the field . It had to do with the fact they did not think the parents could choose an appropriate swimsuit.
      Reply · Like
      · 6 · 57 minutes ago
      .
    • Juli Caldwell · Top Commenter
      You can't be serious. What normal person functions on the assumption that everyone else is incapable of making an intelligent decision? Growing up, I was the kid who wouldn't have had a swim suit and would have been embarrassed about going in shorts and a tee so I just wouldn't have gone. I don't know the demographics of the school in question, but the fact is that some people live below the poverty level. Not everyone can afford the swim suit. To think that this is sexism and misogyny is ignorant and ill-informed. Stop looking for the bad in this.
      Reply · Like
      · Edited · 27 minutes ago
      .
    • Diana B White
      Maybe those parents didn't want to see half naked girls at their pool party...
      Reply · Like
      · 13 minutes ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
  • Dan Anderson
    Sigh. Another example of the 'culture of offense.'
    • Daniel Cox · Top Commenter · Podunk
      in the Nation of Victims and Entitlees
      Reply · Like
      · 19 · 10 hours ago
      .
    • Lily Ng · Top Commenter · Los Angeles, California
      You're not really getting the big picture.
      Reply · Like
      · 24 · 10 hours ago
      .
    • Devrie Paradowski · Top Commenter · Bunnell, Florida
      It's a valid point, and speaking up isn't such a bad idea. We're either right or wrong, and it's getting to be rather common for folks to try to squash progress or communication by whining about those who aren't afraid of speaking up for what they believe.
      Reply · Like
      · 10 · 8 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    Your reply may also appear on The Huffington Post's Facebook page.
    .
    .
Advertisement

Nameberry

Or search with the options below

Suggested For You

These stories are recommended for you by Gravity.
The recommendations may include stories from our other publisher partners, some of whom pay to include their content here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

Use this form to alert a HuffPost editor about a factual or typographical error in this story.

Notify message
* Required
* * .
.
* What kind of error is this?
.
* What is the correction? 0 count
.
* Type the words below so we know you are not a cyborg


.
Thanks for your report!
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%