I told you the reason pros don't use them. 300$ is not a small amount when rounds are decided on an extra smoke, especially for a gun that they are not comfortable with. They know the recoil patterns of the weapons they use like the back of their hands.

How come you decide I know nothing about the subject? I layed out a bunch of reasons why they are statistically better in almost every way(spread, accuracy, recoil, damage, all are statistics) and your counterargument is that I know nothing. You can check out every graph or video on this and realize you are just wrong. Or better yet, you can check it out for yourself on an empty wall. That takes time and work though, you'd rather be spoonfed all the information.

I'm still curious though: You said they both suffer from higher first bullet spread than the AK. It is an absolute fact that the SG has almost immaculate first shot accuracy, while the AK doesn't. What on earth could be your response to that? That I know nothing? Get a grip kid, and realize when you've lost an argument.

edit: They also buy awps you know. They actually cost more money than AKs, but you get something significantly better on the role you expect it to play. But the 300$ is too much of an investment for such a small benefit. I'm not arguing if they are worth it. I'm arguing that they are better, even if slightly so, while you just assume they are worse because pros don't use them.