あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]slothbuddy -395 ポイント-394 ポイント  (82子コメント)

How is this sexist shit getting upvoted? In other news, this is the first sub I've seen this posted in that decided to go immediately sexist instead of racist.

Edit: Holy regressivism, Batman! Here are some of my favorite responses:

Awwwww the land whale can't take a joke. Go eat another bag of chips, pig.

I care about sexism, so I must be fat! No sexism here! Move along!

I find it to be reverse sexism on all this cry wolf bullshit.

"Men are the real victims of women being treated as lesser people!"

Insted of getting jokes you should be getting your ass back to the kitchen.

I was clearly barking up the wrong tree thinking there was sexism here. Boy, isn't my face red!

Lol did you see the post about Blizzard being sexist for making the women in their games hot? What a fucking dork.

Holy shit, these people are going through months of my posts. That's a level of infatuation and anger you only see in the most hateful of people. Namely bigots.

Lmao and s/he is defending obesity and being over weight saying that they extend your life expectancy. Is it just a retarded troll? Or is this person just retarded?

Not really a favorite, but for anyone reading, that's completely accurate. The best metadata we have on the subject says being in the "overweight" category significantly reduces the chance of death compared to "normal" weight. It's amazing how often reality is different than what people think is "common sense".

Edit 2:

Someone is going through all my posts and downvoting them. That kind of vindictive, toddler-like behavior is consistent with bigots. Bigots hate being exposed.

[–]Casualties 95 ポイント96 ポイント  (10子コメント)

you should get a sense of humour

[–]BeldarofRemulak 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I know plenty of males that are bitches, it's not gender specific.

[–]life_is_like_a_sewer 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (3子コメント)

most of what you said is fair, but quit that 'overweight people are healthy' bullshit.

[–]Kyoraki 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Back to Tumblr with you.

[–]WinkMe 36 ポイント37 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Sexist? "Bitches" is a slur nowadays that can be used intejectionally for either sex, and most commonly implies that the person is "an over confident asshole".

Get off your witch hunting feminist idealism and understand not everyone who uses American colloquialisms is prejudice or sexist against women.

I find it to be reverse sexism on all this cry wolf bullshit. Call it when you rightfully see it, don't just label everything you dislike that may or may not involve a female as sexist.

/rant

edit: related?

[–]Malamutewhisperer 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

How High.

I feel like if that movie came out tomorrow it would gross $100 million, easy.

[–]33thirtythree 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Exactly this. To me it's just like what "fag" or "queer" are (or at least have become). I think I'd be more startled to hear someone use them in context of sexuality than the fact that I was witnessing someone being insulted. I think I personally would most likely use them to playfully make fun of someone that its being cheesy.

[–]Prowlerbaseball 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Am bi, call people fags. No fucks given

[–]IrishGoatMilker 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm straight, I call all my straight friends faggots. It doesn't mean anything anymore, it's just a word.

(I'm agreeing with you)

[–]33thirtythree -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good point about being straight and calling straight friends faggots. Same here, and I refrain around gay/bi friends out of acknowledgment of the term's previous use. Unless maybe if I'm really close to them.

[–]mehdbc -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Am bi

No, you're a sexual deviant with a wish of living in hell for eternity

[–]PM_PICS_OF_ME_NAKED 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Isn't that a good thing?

[–]Pieloi 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

A STEP TOO FAR MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[–]Euron_CrowsEye 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (12子コメント)

The person in the hoodie is a girl, the person who she rightfully pushed is a girl, for all we know the person to whom you commented is a girl. Where's the sexism?

[–]pericardiyum 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I usually don't see comments that have proportional downvotes to stupidity, so this made me smile.

[–]mtil 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

What I find funny is that after looking at your history you've commented on the same video from three different posts, like you expect different responses or something. No one wants to read your personal agendas about making everything sexist. Dumbass got dealt with because they were a dumbass not a woman.

[–]slothbuddy -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What I find funny is you've combed through my history for some sad reason. Also I don't remember saying anything about the video being sexist in other threads.

[–]blab140 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Hey I'm half with you on some stuff, but the pusher clearly had tits man.

Is this sexist still?

Think twice man.

[–]slothbuddy -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I didn't say the video was sexist though, at least not intentionally. It was the comment about "bitches" needing to check themselves (under threat of violence) that I thought was sexist.

[–]Darkstrategy 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So scrolling through these replies it seems like your main issue is with the word "Bitch" and nothing else about the sentence. Specifically saying "word choice matters".

I'd agree that bitch was a previously gender-based insult. Key word is "previously". While it can be used in a sexist context, so can almost any insult. I'd say it's no more gendered and no more sexist than insults such as "dick". Language is alive and as such it changes over time.

Imbecile, moron, idiot - these are all words that in their original context and with their original meanings could be considered highly offensive. Yet they're totally PC now. Not exactly polite, but not politically incorrect.

Through common use and their context being less to harm specific individuals and more just as a general insult these words changed into what we know today.

If it was a male dancing on desks that got knocked over the sentence would remain contextually appropriate. But you would no longer be able to call it sexist. See how there's a failure in logic there?

As it stands with the video itself the violence was a bit overboard, I'll admit. But having been in situations where very loud very annoying people suddenly invade my personal space in a blatant manner like that, I'm betting that person just reflexively overreacted. This isn't really "violence against women" so much as "violence where a woman happens to be involved". She's not being attacked because she's a woman, and honestly I'd expect the same outcome if it was a dude as that person dancing was most definitely provoking a confrontation. It's akin to saying that a deployed female combatant being under fire is "violence against women". The situation is a violent one, the soldier being female has nothing to do with it.

[–]Demopublican 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Nobody cares.

[–]r0b0c0d 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The girl in the grey hoodie is female, just FYI.

[–]McGrundle 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why would you waste your time and thought on this website and in this sub? I never understand this. You have to look at any forum on the internet like an anonymous cesspool